Jump to content
Toggle sidebar
Logos
Search
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Editing
Personas/The Cybersecurity Altruists
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
More
Read
Edit
View history
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
= OPSEC Community Persona = <span id="summary-11"></span> == Summary == The /r/opsec community is a diverse and highly specialized group focused on Operations Security (OPSEC), with members ranging from cybersecurity professionals, privacy advocates, to individuals seeking protection from oppressive regimes. The community is dedicated to minimizing attack surfaces and protecting sensitive information through proper habits, risk assessment, and countermeasures. Discussions often revolve around threat modeling, privacy tools, and secure communication practices. Members are diligent, detail-oriented, and proactive about their security posture, often employing advanced technologies and methodologies to protect their personal and professional lives. <span id="what-are-the-related-subreddits-to-this-community-11"></span> == What are the related subreddits to this community? == * /r/netsec * /r/privacy * /r/rbi * /r/vfio * /r/lemmy <span id="what-are-the-dominant-personality-types-in-the-community-11"></span> == What are the dominant personality types in the community? == In terms of the Big Five personality traits, members of the /r/opsec community tend to exhibit: - High Openness: They are imaginative, curious, and open to new ideas, especially in technology and cybersecurity. - High Conscientiousness: They are detail-oriented, disciplined, and vigilant in their security practices. - Introversion: Many members are introspective and prefer solitary activities like coding and research. - Moderate Agreeableness: While cooperative within the community, they might be skeptical and cautious in external interactions. - Low Neuroticism: They tend to be calm and emotionally stable, handling stress and security threats with a level-headed approach. <span id="subgroup-personalities-11"></span> == Subgroup Personalities == * '''Belongers''': 15% - Value community and shared practices in security protocols. * '''Emulators''': 10% - Aspire to emulate the security practices of industry leaders and experts. * '''Doomsdayers''': 20% - Highly cautious and prepare for worst-case scenarios, valuing self-sufficiency. * '''Survivalists''': 25% - Pragmatic and resourceful, focus on cost-effective security solutions. * '''Achievers''': 15% - Ambitious in advancing their security knowledge and tools. * '''Saviors''': 5% - Advocate for privacy rights and help others improve their security posture. * '''Integrators''': 10% - Balance personal security needs with broader societal contributions. <span id="what-are-the-goals-and-aspirations-of-the-community-11"></span> == What are the goals and aspirations of the community? == The community aims to enhance personal and collective cybersecurity awareness and practices. Long-term aspirations include fostering a culture of security consciousness, developing robust tools and protocols to mitigate risks, and advocating for privacy rights. Members desire to stay ahead of emerging threats and continuously improve their security posture to protect against sophisticated adversaries. <span id="what-are-the-values-held-by-the-community-11"></span> == What are the values held by the community? == The community values privacy, security, and freedom of information. They hold a strong belief in the right to personal privacy and the protection of sensitive data from unauthorized access. Trust, transparency, and ethical behavior are also highly regarded, as members often rely on open-source tools and collaborative knowledge sharing. <span id="what-are-the-motivations-of-the-community-11"></span> == What are the motivations of the community? == Members are motivated by the need to protect personal and organizational information from security breaches and surveillance. The desire to maintain anonymity and control over personal data drives their engagement in security practices. Additionally, a commitment to helping others understand and implement effective security measures motivates their participation in discussions and resource sharing. <span id="what-are-the-pain-points-of-the-community-11"></span> == What are the pain points of the community? == Challenges include staying updated with rapidly evolving threats, managing complex security tools, and balancing privacy with usability. Members also face difficulties in educating others about the importance of OPSEC and encountering skepticism or resistance from those unfamiliar with security practices. <span id="what-are-the-anticipated-solutions-to-the-pain-points-of-the-community-11"></span> == What are the anticipated solutions to the pain points of the community? == Solutions involve continuous education and training, development of user-friendly security tools, and fostering a supportive community for knowledge sharing. Advocacy for privacy rights and collaboration with industry experts to address emerging threats are also anticipated measures. <span id="who-are-the-key-villains-11"></span> == Who are the key villains? == * Government surveillance agencies (e.g., NSA, GCHQ) * Corporations with invasive data collection practices (e.g., Google, Facebook) * Cybercriminals and hackers targeting personal data <span id="who-are-the-key-heroes-11"></span> == Who are the key heroes? == * Privacy advocates and organizations (e.g., EFF, Privacy International) * Developers of open-source security tools (e.g., Tails, Qubes OS) * Influential security researchers and educators <span id="shared-experiences-11"></span> == Shared Experiences? == Common experiences include encounters with privacy violations, learning from security breaches, and the ongoing effort to educate others about OPSEC principles. Members often share stories of successfully implementing security measures and collaborating on projects to enhance community knowledge. <span id="barriers-to-entry-11"></span> == Barriers to Entry == New members may face barriers such as the technical complexity of security tools and the overwhelming amount of information available. These barriers can affect community dynamics by creating a knowledge gap between experienced and novice members, potentially leading to misunderstandings or misinformation. <span id="aio-activities-interests-and-opinions-11"></span> == AIO (activities, interests and opinions) == Activities include participating in security discussions, testing and reviewing privacy tools, and contributing to open-source projects. Interests often revolve around technology, cybersecurity, and privacy advocacy. Opinions are generally aligned with the belief in strong personal privacy rights and skepticism toward invasive surveillance practices. <span id="community-rituals-11"></span> == Community Rituals == Rituals include regular discussions on threat modeling, sharing security tool recommendations, and conducting scenario-based exercises to practice OPSEC. Members often celebrate successful security implementations and support each other in overcoming security challenges. <span id="in-group-jokes-common-phrases-and-memes-11"></span> == In-Group Jokes, Common Phrases and Memes == * “Security theater” - Mocking superficial security measures. * “Threat model first” - Emphasizing the importance of understanding threats before choosing tools. * “Tor is not a silver bullet” - Highlighting the limitations of relying solely on Tor for anonymity. <span id="glossary-of-community-specific-jargon-11"></span> == Glossary of Community-specific Jargon == * “Threat model”: A framework for assessing potential threats and vulnerabilities. * “OPSEC”: Operations Security, a process to protect critical information. * “FDE”: Full Disk Encryption, a method to encrypt all data on a disk. * “Burner”: A temporary, disposable phone or device used for anonymity. <span id="cultural-influences-11"></span> == Cultural Influences == The culture of the subreddit emphasizes a strong sense of vigilance, continuous learning, and collaboration. Members are influenced by principles of open-source development, privacy advocacy, and a shared commitment to enhancing security practices. <span id="communication-style-11"></span> == Communication style == The preferred communication style is direct and technical, often using industry jargon and specific terminology. Members value clarity and precision in discussions, frequently referencing technical resources and best practices. <span id="conflict-and-resolution-11"></span> == Conflict and Resolution == Conflicts are typically resolved through constructive discussions, with members encouraged to provide evidence-based arguments and share resources. The community values respectful discourse and often relies on moderators to maintain a positive environment. <span id="how-to-communicate-with-them-on-an-emotional-level-11"></span> == How to communicate with them on an emotional level? == To communicate effectively, emphasize the importance of privacy and security in protecting personal freedoms and autonomy. Appeal to their sense of community and shared purpose in advancing security knowledge. Emotional triggers include stories of privacy violations and the impact of security breaches on individuals and organizations. <span id="how-to-communicate-with-them-on-a-material-level-11"></span> == How to communicate with them on a material level? == Provide practical tools and resources that align with their security needs and threat models. Highlight the effectiveness and reliability of security solutions, offering clear instructions and support for implementation. Address material needs by demonstrating how solutions can enhance their overall security posture. <span id="external-perception-11"></span> == External Perception == Outsiders may perceive the community as overly cautious or paranoid, which can lead to misunderstandings about the importance of OPSEC. This perception can affect the community by creating barriers to engagement with those unfamiliar with security practices. <span id="additional-notes-insights-11"></span> == Additional Notes & Insights == The community is highly resourceful and self-reliant, often developing innovative solutions to address security challenges. Members are committed to continuous improvement and actively seek out opportunities for collaboration and learning. The community’s focus on education and advocacy plays a crucial role in promoting broader awareness and adoption of OPSEC principles. ----- <span id="rpwned"></span> === r/pwned === <span id="the-data-breach-vigilantes-the-rpwned-community-persona"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Logos may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Logos:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)