Jump to content
Toggle sidebar
Logos
Search
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Editing
Personas/The Truth Seekers
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
More
Read
Edit
View history
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
= The Global Intelligence Enthusiast Community Persona = <span id="summary-14"></span> == Summary == The /r/intelligencenews community is characterized by individuals with a keen interest in intelligence, geopolitical, and security-related news. This community is diverse, consisting of both professionals in the field and enthusiasts who seek to understand the complexities of global intelligence operations. Members are often motivated by a desire to stay informed about international affairs, covert operations, and the role of intelligence agencies in shaping global events. They value factual, well-researched information and engage in discussions that explore the implications of intelligence activities on world politics and security. This community is detail-oriented and values critical thinking, often analyzing news with a discerning eye to separate fact from propaganda. <span id="what-are-the-related-subreddits-to-this-community-14"></span> == What are the related subreddits to this community? == * r/IntelligenceFiles * r/IntelligenceBooks * r/IntelligenceHistory * r/IntelligenceMedia * r/IntelligencePorn * r/Intelligence <span id="what-are-the-dominant-personality-types-in-the-community-14"></span> == What are the dominant personality types in the community? == Members of the /r/intelligencenews community often exhibit high Openness, as they are eager to explore new ideas and delve into complex topics related to intelligence and geopolitics. They display Conscientiousness by adhering to the subreddit’s rules and engaging in well-structured discussions. The community includes both Introverts, who enjoy reading and analyzing content independently, and Extroverts, who actively participate in discussions. There is a mixed level of Agreeableness, as debates can be intense and opinions vary significantly. Emotional stability varies, with some members displaying high Neuroticism, often expressing anxiety over global events, while others remain calm and analytical. <span id="subgroup-personalities-14"></span> == Subgroup Personalities == * '''Belongers''': Approximately 20% of the community. They value being part of a group that shares their interests in intelligence and geopolitics. * '''Emulators''': Around 10%. They admire intelligence professionals and may mimic their behavior or viewpoints. * '''Doomsdayers''': Roughly 15%. They are often pessimistic about global security and express concern about intelligence failures or threats. * '''Survivalists''': About 10%. They focus on practical aspects of security and intelligence to protect themselves and their interests. * '''Achievers''': Approximately 15%. They are ambitious in their pursuit of knowledge about intelligence and geopolitics. * '''Saviors''': Around 10%. They aim to raise awareness about ethical issues in intelligence operations. * '''Integrators''': About 20%. They seek to understand and integrate diverse perspectives on intelligence and geopolitics. <span id="what-are-the-goals-and-aspirations-of-the-community-14"></span> == What are the goals and aspirations of the community? == The long-term aspirations of the /r/intelligencenews community include becoming a leading platform for intelligence-related discussions and information sharing. Members desire a comprehensive understanding of global intelligence operations and their impact on world affairs. They aim to foster a community that values critical analysis and respectful debate. Additionally, they aspire to influence public opinion and policy by raising awareness about intelligence issues. <span id="what-are-the-values-held-by-the-community-14"></span> == What are the values held by the community? == The community values factual accuracy, transparency, and accountability in intelligence operations. They hold a strong belief in the importance of ethical considerations in intelligence work and advocate for the protection of civil liberties. Members value diverse perspectives and encourage open dialogue to explore complex geopolitical issues. They hold these values to ensure that intelligence activities contribute positively to global security and do not infringe on individual rights. <span id="what-are-the-motivations-of-the-community-14"></span> == What are the motivations of the community? == The primary motivation for the community is the pursuit of knowledge and understanding of intelligence and geopolitical affairs. Members are driven by a curiosity about covert operations and their implications for global security. They are motivated by the desire to critically analyze news and separate fact from misinformation. Additionally, some members are motivated by a sense of civic duty to hold intelligence agencies accountable and advocate for ethical practices. <span id="what-are-the-pain-points-of-the-community-14"></span> == What are the pain points of the community? == The community faces challenges such as misinformation, biased reporting, and the complexity of verifying intelligence-related news. Members often struggle with the lack of transparency in intelligence operations and the difficulty of accessing reliable information. There is also frustration over the portrayal of intelligence activities in mainstream media, which can sometimes be sensationalized or inaccurate. <span id="what-are-the-anticipated-solutions-to-the-pain-points-of-the-community-14"></span> == What are the anticipated solutions to the pain points of the community? == The community seeks to address these challenges by fostering a culture of critical thinking and fact-checking. They encourage members to share credible sources and engage in constructive debates. Some propose collaborating with experts to provide insights and analyses that enhance the community’s understanding of intelligence issues. Additionally, they advocate for greater transparency and accountability in intelligence operations to build trust with the public. <span id="who-are-the-key-villains-14"></span> == Who are the key villains? == * Intelligence agencies perceived as operating without oversight. * Media outlets known for spreading misinformation or biased narratives. * Governments that use intelligence operations to suppress dissent. <span id="who-are-the-key-heroes-14"></span> == Who are the key heroes? == * Whistleblowers like Edward Snowden and Julian Assange, who have revealed intelligence abuses. * Investigative journalists exposing unethical intelligence practices. * Organizations advocating for transparency and civil liberties in intelligence operations. <span id="shared-experiences-14"></span> == Shared Experiences? == The community shares experiences of engaging with complex intelligence topics, participating in debates about ethical considerations, and analyzing the impact of intelligence operations on global politics. They often discuss high-profile intelligence leaks and their implications for national security. <span id="barriers-to-entry-14"></span> == Barriers to Entry == New members may find it challenging to join discussions without a foundational understanding of intelligence topics. The community values well-informed contributions, so newcomers may need to invest time in learning about the field before actively participating. This can affect community dynamics by creating a knowledge gap between seasoned members and newcomers. <span id="aio-activities-interests-and-opinions-14"></span> == AIO (activities, interests and opinions) == Community activities include reading and sharing intelligence-related news, participating in discussions about geopolitical events, and analyzing intelligence operations. Members are interested in the ethical implications of intelligence work and often express opinions on accountability and transparency in intelligence agencies. They hold a belief in the importance of critical thinking and factual accuracy in reporting. <span id="community-rituals-14"></span> == Community Rituals == Regular discussions on high-profile intelligence leaks and geopolitical events. Members often analyze and critique news articles, sharing insights and perspectives. The community also engages in fact-checking and debunking misinformation related to intelligence topics. <span id="in-group-jokes-common-phrases-and-memes-14"></span> == In-Group Jokes, Common Phrases and Memes == * “Sources say” – often used sarcastically to question the credibility of a news article. * “Gaslighting” – referencing attempts to manipulate or deceive the public about intelligence activities. * “Shilling” – accusing someone of promoting a biased viewpoint for personal gain. <span id="glossary-of-community-specific-jargon-14"></span> == Glossary of Community-specific Jargon == * “OPSEC” – Operational Security; measures taken to protect sensitive information. * “HUMINT” – Human Intelligence; intelligence gathered from human sources. * “SIGINT” – Signals Intelligence; intelligence gathered from electronic signals. <span id="cultural-influences-14"></span> == Cultural Influences == The culture of the subreddit influences members to prioritize factual accuracy, engage in critical thinking, and value diverse perspectives. This culture fosters an environment where members feel encouraged to question mainstream narratives and seek deeper understanding of intelligence topics. <span id="communication-style-14"></span> == Communication style == The preferred communication style is analytical and fact-based, with members often citing sources and providing evidence to support their arguments. Direct quotes from articles are frequently used to illustrate points. For example, “From the article: ‘The problem is one that every employer faces…’” <span id="conflict-and-resolution-14"></span> == Conflict and Resolution == Conflicts are typically resolved through evidence-based discussions and fact-checking. Members are encouraged to critique articles with factual arguments rather than personal attacks. The moderation team plays a role in ensuring that discussions remain respectful and constructive. <span id="how-to-communicate-with-them-on-an-emotional-level-14"></span> == How to communicate with them on an emotional level? == To communicate effectively with the community on an emotional level, it is important to acknowledge their concerns about misinformation and ethical issues in intelligence. Highlight shared values such as transparency and accountability. Emotional triggers include revelations of intelligence abuses and threats to civil liberties. <span id="how-to-communicate-with-them-on-a-material-level-14"></span> == How to communicate with them on a material level? == To communicate on a material level, focus on providing credible and well-researched information. Use data and evidence to support claims and address the community’s desire for factual accuracy. Material needs include access to reliable sources and expert insights. <span id="external-perception-14"></span> == External Perception: == Outsiders may perceive the community as niche or overly focused on intelligence topics. This perception can lead to misunderstandings about the community’s motivations and values. However, members often take pride in their critical thinking skills and view themselves as informed global citizens. <span id="additional-notes-insights-14"></span> == Additional Notes & Insights == The community values collaboration with experts and appreciates contributions from individuals with professional experience in intelligence or related fields. They are open to diverse perspectives and aim to create a space where complex geopolitical issues can be explored in depth. ----- <span id="rmissing411"></span> === r/missing411 === <span id="the-curious-case-of-the-missing-411-community"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Logos may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Logos:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)