Design/Stakeholder Requirements (StRS)

Stakeholder Requirements Specification (StRS)

for Logos: A Sovereign Decentralized Technology Stack

Version 1.0, Prepared by Jarrad Hope. 05-01-2025

This document is work in progress

1. Introduction

1.1 Purpose

This Stakeholder Requirements Specification (StRS) document captures and communicates the needs and requirements of stakeholders for the Logos decentralized technology stack. It serves as a foundation for system requirements and architecture decisions, ensuring alignment with stakeholder needs and the project’s vision of enabling sovereign digital infrastructure.

1.2 Scope

This specification covers:

• Requirements from main identified stakeholder groups
• TODO Full system lifecycle from development through operation
• Privacy, security, and sovereignty considerations

Exclusions:

• Specific implementation details (covered in SRS)

1.3 Document Conventions

Requirements are formatted as follows:

• MUST: Mandatory requirement
• SHOULD: Recommended but not mandatory
• MAY: Optional
• WILL: Statement of fact or declaration of purpose

Needs are identified using the format: [Category]-NEED-[Number] Example: PRIV-NEED-1, SEC-NEED-1, SOV-NEED-1

Requirements are identified using the format: [Category]-[Number] Example: CAP-1, SEC-1, PRV-1

Priority levels:

• Critical: Essential for system viability
• High: Important for system effectiveness
• Medium: Desirable for system completeness
• Low: Optional enhancements

1.4 Stakeholder Overview

Primary Stakeholders:

• Privacy Personas
• Focus on personal privacy and data sovereignty
• Value strong encryption and anonymity
• Concerned about surveillance and data collection

• Government/Institutional Skeptics Personas
  • Distrust traditional institutions
  • Seek alternatives to centralized systems
  • Value transparency and accountability
  • Advocate for individual sovereignty and freedom
  • Oppose centralized control and coercion
  • Value voluntary association and market solutions
• Financial Personas
  • Interest in economic sovereignty
  • Value financial privacy and independence
  • Seek alternatives to the traditional financial system

Secondary Stakeholders:

• (FOSS) Developers
• Build applications on the platform
• Contribute to core development
• Value technical excellence and innovation

• Node Operators
  • Maintain network infrastructure
  • Ensure system reliability and performance
  • Value operational stability and sustainability
• Service Providers
  • Offer services through the platform
  • Value platform reliability, user base and network effects
  • Seek sustainable business models

1.5 References

• Vision and Scope Document
• Personas Analysis
• IEEE 15288:2015 Systems Engineering Standard
• Related Project System Requreiemnts (Waku, Codex, Nomos, Microkernel, Modman, etc)

2. Mission Context

A broader more comprehensive understanding of the Mission can be found in the Vision & Scope Document

2.1 Mission Objectives

Primary Objectives: 1. Create a maximally privacy-preserving decentralized technology stack 2. Enable censorship-resistant applications and services 3. Foster an open-source development community 4. Establish a global network of users and operators 5. Demonstrate viable alternatives to centralized services

Success Criteria:

• Network-level anonymity for all participants
• Demonstrated censorship resistance
• Growing ecosystem of applications
• Active community of developers and users
• Real-world value delivery to stakeholders

2.2 Problem or Opportunity Statement

The digital age has given rise to unprecedented challenges to individual liberty and sovereignty. The convergence of state power and corporate infrastructure has created a system of mass surveillance and control that extends beyond traditional national boundaries. Through initiatives like National Security Letters and global data center compliance requirements, state actors have effectively undermined individual privacy and autonomy in cyberspace. This infrastructure of control has evolved alongside surveillance capitalism, creating a system where censorship and control can be enacted without explicit orders through informal relationships between private enterprise and government.

The problem is compounded by the centralization of digital infrastructure through cloud services, which act as informational container terminals enabling standardization and control. This centralization has created a “super-jurisdiction” where US law can be extended globally through various forms of cooperation implied by server locations and network connections. The trend continues with developments like Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) that threaten to complete the state’s capture of economic transactions by bringing all financial activity under centralized surveillance and control.

However, these challenges present a unique opportunity to create a new kind of sovereign digital infrastructure. There is growing demand for systems that preserve privacy, resist censorship, and enable genuine user sovereignty. Advancements in cryptographic technologies and privacy-preserving protocols make it possible to build decentralized networks that operate effectively against state-level adversaries. The increasing awareness of surveillance risks and the desire for digital sovereignty has created a receptive environment for alternative systems based on voluntary participation rather than coercion.

The opportunity exists to establish a comprehensive technology stack that enables parallel trans-national society

• one that secures civil liberties through technical means rather than legal frameworks. This includes creating privacy-preserving networks for communication and storage, developing censorship-resistant applications and services, and fostering autonomous digital institutions with low exit costs. By combining minimal information disclosure with Byzantine fault tolerance and self-organizing networks, we can create parallel socio-economic systems that extend civil liberties to anyone with internet access while remaining resistant to capture and corruption.

Problems Addressed:

• Increasing surveillance and data collection
• Centralized control of digital infrastructure
• Censorship and content control
• Economic capture through financial systems
• Lack of genuine user sovereignty

Opportunities:

• Growing demand for privacy-preserving alternatives against surveillance risks
• Advancement in cryptographic technologies
• Increasing awareness of poor governing services
• Need for censorship-resistant platforms
• Desire for personal sovereignty

2.3 System Overview

2.3.1 System Context

The Logos stack operates as a sovereign digital infrastructure layer initially providing:

• Privacy-preserving Mixnet (libp2p-mix)
• Privacy-preserving Pubsub (Waku)
• Decentralized storage (Codex)
• Consensus and governance (Nomos)
• Application runtime environment (Microkernel)
• General Purpose Query Engine for Content Discovery (PDMS)
• Module Package Management (Modman)
• User interface

2.3.2 System Functions

Core Functions:

• Anonymous network communication (libp2p-mix)
• Privacy-preserving messaging and pubsub (Waku)
• Private data storage and retrieval (Codex)
• Decentralized consensus and governance (Nomos)
• Dynamic module loading and execution (Microkernel)
  

- Content discovery and decentralized search (PDMS)

• Package management and distribution (Modman)
• User interface and account management (Status)

2.3.3 User Roles and Characteristics

Table 2-1: User Roles and Characteristics

Role	Characteristics	Requirements	Values
Privacy Advocates	Deep expertise in privacy tech - Strong cryptography knowledge - Experience with Tor/I2P/Monero - Zero-trust mindset - Active in privacy education	Zero metadata collection - End-to-end encryption - Anonymous routing - Zero-knowledge proofs - Secure key management	Privacy as human right - Personal sovereignty - Data minimization - Resistance to surveillance - Community education
Digital Rights Activists	Decentralization expertise - Anti-censorship experience - Open source advocacy - Focus on digital freedoms - Community organizing skills	Censorship resistance - Network neutrality - Community governance - Transparent operations - Whistleblower protection	Information freedom - Network sovereignty - Open protocols - User autonomy - Collective action
Cybersecurity Experts	Security research background - Malware analysis skills - Penetration testing experience - Protocol design expertise - Threat modeling focus	Security testing tools - Isolated environments - Audit capabilities - Incident response - Defense in depth	Security by design - Responsible disclosure - Continuous learning - Technical excellence - Knowledge sharing
Financial Sovereignists	Cryptocurrency expertise - Privacy coin experience - Trading background - Economic theory knowledge - Market analysis skills	Private transactions - Fungible exchange - Market tools - Economic sovereignty - Trading privacy	Financial privacy - Economic freedom - Market autonomy - Value preservation - Voluntary exchange
Technical Developers	Protocol development skills - Privacy-focused design - Cryptography expertise - Formal verification exp - Security architecture skills	Private APIs - Development tools - Testing frameworks - Security libraries - Documentation	Code quality - Security first - Privacy by design - Open source - Collaboration
Infrastructure Operators	Network operations exp - Security hardening skills - Performance optimization - Resource management - Threat mitigation	Monitoring tools - Security metrics - Resource controls - Update management - Incident response	Network resilience - Operational security - Resource efficiency - Service reliability - Sustainable ops
Community Leaders	Strong communication skills - Governance experience - Consensus building ability - Privacy advocacy - Educational focus	Governance tools - Privacy-preserving voting - Secure communications - Educational platforms - Decision frameworks	Community autonomy - Transparent governance - Knowledge sharing - Collective decisions - Privacy preservation

2.3.4 Operational Environment

Technical Environment:

• Diverse network conditions
• Various hardware platforms
• Multiple operating systems
• Mobile and desktop environments

Threat Environment:

• State-level / Global adversaries
• Network surveillance
• Censorship attacks
• Economic attacks

2.4 Critical Success Factors

1. Privacy and Security

• Zero metadata collection and retention
• Strong anonymity guarantees with unlinkability
• Resistance to surveillance and correlation attacks
• Secure key management and storage

2. Decentralization and Sovereignty

• No central points of control or failure
• User sovereignty over data and identity
• Low exit costs and voluntary participation
• Distributed governance and decision making
• Resistance to capture and coercion

3. Technical Excellence

• Formal verification of critical components
• Reproducible builds and auditable code
• Strong crypto-economic foundations
• Resource-efficient and sustainable
• Comprehensive security testing

4. Community and Governance

• Active community participation
• Transparent operations and oversight
• Knowledge sharing and education
• Fair incentive mechanisms
• Collective decision-making processes

5. Economic Freedom

• Private and untraceable transactions
• Market analysis and trading capabilities
• Sustainable business models
• Fair compensation for operators
• Integration with existing systems

6. Resilience and Reliability

• Operation in hostile environments
• Recovery from network disruptions
• Protection against targeted attacks
• Graceful degradation under stress
• Sustainable long-term operations

7. Persona Adoption

• Active user base
• Active community
• Developer engagement
• Geographically distributed Node Operators
• Service provider participation

3. Stakeholder Requirements

3.1 Metapersona Requirements

3.1.1 The Blockchain Innovators and Decentralization Advocates

3.1.1.1 Overview

The Blockchain Innovators and Decentralization Advocates meta-persona represents communities deeply invested in blockchain technology, particularly focused on interoperability, formal verification, and sustainable blockchain solutions. They value technical excellence, research-driven approaches, and robust developer tooling.

3.1.1.2 Characteristics

• Strong focus on blockchain technology and decentralization
• Value technical excellence and research-driven approaches
• Emphasis on formal verification and security
• Commitment to sustainable blockchain solutions
• Deep understanding of distributed systems

3.1.1.3 Requirements

3.1.1.3.1 Interoperability & Integration

• MUST support cross-chain communication and data exchange
• MUST provide standardized protocols for blockchain interoperability
• MUST implement robust consensus mechanisms
• SHOULD enable seamless integration with existing blockchain networks
• SHOULD support atomic swaps and cross-chain transactions

3.1.1.3.2 Development Environment

• MUST provide comprehensive developer tools and SDKs
• MUST include detailed technical documentation
• MUST provide testing and simulation environments
• SHOULD offer formal verification tools for smart contracts
• SHOULD support multiple programming languages

3.1.1.3.3 Governance & Protocol Management

• MUST implement decentralized governance mechanisms
• MUST provide transparent voting and proposal systems
• MUST support delegation and representative governance
• SHOULD enable community participation in protocol upgrades
• SHOULD include mechanisms for parameter adjustments

3.1.1.3.4 Security & Verification

• MUST implement formal verification methods
• MUST include robust cryptographic primitives
• MUST implement protection against common attack vectors
• SHOULD provide security auditing tools
• SHOULD support secure key management

3.1.1.3.5 Performance

• MUST achieve high transaction throughput
• MUST scale effectively with network growth
• MUST handle concurrent operations efficiently
• SHOULD maintain low latency for cross-chain operations
• SHOULD optimize resource utilization

3.1.1.3.6 Security

• MUST ensure network-wide security guarantees
• MUST protect against various attack vectors
• MUST maintain data integrity across chains
• SHOULD implement robust consensus mechanisms
• SHOULD provide secure key management solutions

3.1.1.3.7 Reliability

• MUST ensure consistent network operation
• MUST provide redundancy for critical components
• MUST maintain data consistency across nodes
• SHOULD implement fault tolerance mechanisms
• SHOULD handle network partitions gracefully

3.1.1.3.8 Usability

• MUST provide intuitive developer interfaces
• MUST support easy deployment and testing
• MUST provide clear error handling and reporting
• SHOULD offer comprehensive documentation
• SHOULD include debugging and monitoring tools

3.1.1.4 Constraints

• MUST maintain decentralization while scaling
• MUST ensure backward compatibility
• MUST operate within network resource limits
• SHOULD minimize environmental impact
• MAY comply with regulatory requirements

3.1.1.5 Quality Attributes

3.1.1.5.1 Scalability

• MUST support horizontal scaling of network
• MUST maintain performance under load
• MUST enable efficient state management
• SHOULD handle increasing transaction volumes
• SHOULD support dynamic resource allocation

3.1.1.5.2 Maintainability

• MUST support seamless protocol upgrades
• MUST provide clear upgrade paths
• MUST maintain backward compatibility
• SHOULD enable modular component updates
• SHOULD minimize downtime during updates

3.1.1.5.3 Interoperability

• MUST support cross-chain communication
• MUST enable data exchange between chains
• MUST maintain consistency across chains
• SHOULD implement standard protocols
• SHOULD support asset transfers across networks

3.1.1.5.4 Sustainability

• MUST implement energy-efficient consensus
• MUST support long-term network growth
• MUST optimize resource utilization
• SHOULD minimize resource consumption
• SHOULD enable sustainable governance

3.1.1.6 Success Criteria

• Network performance and scalability metrics
• Developer adoption and satisfaction rates
• Cross-chain integration success rates
• Security audit results and vulnerability metrics
• Community participation in governance
• Resource utilization efficiency
• Protocol upgrade success rates

3.1.2 The Cybersecurity Altruists

3.1.2.1 Overview

The Cybersecurity Altruists meta-persona represents a diverse group of individuals united by their commitment to cybersecurity, privacy, and the democratization of knowledge. This group spans communities focused on algorithms, hacking, malware analysis, reverse engineering, cryptography, and security education.

3.1.2.2 Characteristics

• Strong technical understanding of security and cryptography
• Commitment to ethical practices and responsible disclosure
• Focus on education and knowledge sharing
• Emphasis on practical, hands-on learning
• Value transparency and open-source collaboration

3.1.2.3 Requirements

3.1.2.3.1 Security

• MUST implement state-of-the-art cryptographic protocols
• MUST provide robust anonymity and privacy guarantees
• MUST enable secure key management and storage
• MUST support secure communication channels
• MUST implement defense-in-depth security measures

3.1.2.3.2 Technical

• MUST support security research and analysis tools
• MUST enable malware analysis in isolated environments
• MUST provide cryptographic primitives for custom implementations
• MUST support security testing and validation
• MUST enable secure code deployment and updates

3.1.2.3.3 Privacy

• MUST minimize data collection and retention
• MUST implement zero-knowledge protocols where possible
• MUST protect metadata from correlation attacks
• MUST enable selective disclosure of information
• MUST support anonymous credentials

3.1.2.3.4 Integration

• MUST support common security tools
• MUST enable integration with analysis platforms
• MUST provide APIs for security automation
• MUST support standard security protocols
• MUST enable custom security module development

3.1.2.3.5 Educational

• MUST provide documentation and learning resources
• MUST support security testing environments
• MUST enable collaborative learning and research
• MUST facilitate knowledge sharing and discussion
• MUST support security certification and validation

3.1.2.3.6 Operational

• MUST maintain high availability and resilience
• MUST support incident response and recovery
• MUST enable security monitoring and alerts
• MUST provide audit logging capabilities
• MUST support secure backup and recovery

3.1.2.3.7 Performance

• MUST handle real-time security analysis
• MUST process large volumes of security data efficiently
• MUST provide responsive threat detection
• MUST support concurrent security operations
• MUST maintain performance under attack conditions

3.1.2.4 Constraints

• MUST operate within ethical boundaries
• MUST comply with responsible disclosure practices
• MUST maintain separation of security contexts
• MUST respect privacy regulations
• MUST ensure secure isolation of analysis environments
• MUST prevent misuse of security tools

3.1.2.5 Quality Attributes

3.1.2.5.1 Security

• Comprehensive security testing capabilities
• Strong isolation mechanisms
• Robust cryptographic implementations
• Secure communication protocols
• Defense-in-depth architecture

3.1.2.5.2 Reliability

• High availability for security services
• Resilient against attacks
• Consistent security monitoring
• Dependable backup systems
• Stable testing environments

3.1.2.5.3 Usability

• Intuitive security tools
• Clear documentation
• Accessible learning resources
• Efficient workflow support
• User-friendly interfaces

3.1.2.5.4 Maintainability

• Modular security components
• Easy updates and patches
• Flexible configuration
• Clear audit trails
• Systematic testing procedures

3.1.2.6 Success Criteria

• Demonstrated resistance to known attack vectors
• Strong privacy guarantees verified through audits
• Active security research community
• Comprehensive security documentation
• Regular security updates and improvements
• High adoption rate among security professionals
• Positive impact on cybersecurity education
• Successful vulnerability discoveries and responsible disclosures
• Effective knowledge sharing and collaboration
• Measurable improvement in security practices

3.1.3 The Digital Preservationists

3.1.3.1 Overview

The Digital Preservationists and Data Custodians meta-persona represents communities focused on preserving digital content and ensuring data accessibility. This includes archivists, data hoarders, personal server enthusiasts, and Usenet users.

3.1.3.2 Characteristics

• Strong commitment to preserving digital content and cultural heritage
• Deep appreciation for data integrity and historical records
• Focus on privacy and secure data storage
• Value collaboration and knowledge-sharing
• Emphasis on data redundancy and backup systems

3.1.3.3 Requirements

3.1.3.3.1 Data Preservation and Archival

• MUST provide robust data preservation capabilities
  • Support for multiple redundant storage mechanisms
  • Ability to verify data integrity over time
  • Tools for detecting and preventing bit rot
  • Support for various data formats and metadata standards
• MUST support long-term data accessibility
  • Format migration tools to prevent obsolescence
  • Version control for preserved content
  • Standardized metadata schemas for cataloging
  • Search and retrieval mechanisms for archived content

3.1.3.3.2 Storage and Infrastructure

• MUST provide flexible storage options
  • Support for distributed storage across multiple nodes
  • Integration with various storage backends (local, network, cloud)
  • Scalable architecture to handle growing data volumes
  • Efficient storage utilization through deduplication
• MUST ensure data integrity and reliability
  • Checksumming and verification mechanisms
  • Error detection and correction capabilities
  • Automated backup and synchronization features
  • Recovery mechanisms for corrupted or lost data

3.1.3.3.3 Privacy and Security

• MUST implement strong privacy protections
  • End-to-end encryption for stored data
  • Access control mechanisms
  • Audit logging for data access and modifications
  • Secure key management
• MUST protect against censorship
  • Decentralized architecture resistant to takedowns
  • Support for content replication across nodes
  • Mechanisms to bypass network restrictions
  • Resistance to denial of service attacks

3.1.3.3.4 Organization and Management

• MUST provide robust data organization capabilities
  • Flexible tagging and categorization systems
  • Support for custom metadata fields
  • Advanced search and filtering capabilities
  • Tools for managing large collections
• MUST support collaborative workflows
  • Multi-user access controls
  • Shared collections and workspaces
  • Version control for collaborative editing
  • Activity tracking and notification systems

3.1.3.3.5 Interoperability and Standards

• MUST support open standards and protocols
  • Implementation of common archival standards
  • Support for standard metadata formats
  • APIs for integration with other tools
  • Export capabilities in standard formats
• MUST provide migration capabilities
  • Tools for importing from existing systems
  • Format conversion utilities
  • Bulk data transfer mechanisms
  • Preservation of original metadata

3.1.3.3.6 Performance and Efficiency

• MUST be resource-efficient
  • Optimized storage utilization
  • Efficient bandwidth usage
  • Scalable processing capabilities
  • Support for hardware acceleration
• MUST provide monitoring and maintenance tools
  • System health monitoring
  • Storage usage analytics
  • Performance metrics
  • Automated maintenance tasks

3.1.3.4 Constraints

• MUST operate within storage capacity limits
• MUST handle bandwidth constraints
• MUST respect data retention policies
• MUST operate within resource limitations
• SHOULD minimize environmental impact

3.1.3.5 Quality Attributes

3.1.3.5.1 Data Integrity

• MUST ensure long-term data preservation
• MUST prevent data corruption
• MUST maintain data authenticity
• MUST enable data verification
• MUST support data recovery

3.1.3.5.2 Scalability

• MUST handle growing data volumes
• MUST support increasing user base
• MUST enable distributed storage
• MUST maintain performance at scale
• MUST support system expansion

3.1.3.5.3 Reliability

• MUST ensure continuous data access
• MUST prevent data loss
• MUST maintain system availability
• MUST support redundant operations
• MUST enable disaster recovery

3.1.3.5.4 Interoperability

• MUST enable system integration
• MUST maintain format compatibility
• MUST support data migration
• MUST enable cross-platform operation

3.1.3.6 Success Criteria

• Demonstrated ability to preserve data integrity over long periods
• Successful recovery from simulated data loss scenarios
• Effective resistance to censorship attempts
• Efficient handling of large-scale data collections
• Positive user feedback on organization and management features
• Successful integration with existing preservation tools
• Measurable performance improvements in data operations
• Strong privacy protections verified through security audits

3.1.4 The Digital Freedom Seekers

• SHOULD support DIY solutions
• SHOULD enable local control

3.1.5.6 Success Metrics

• Environmental impact reduction
• Resource utilization efficiency
• Community participation levels
• System independence achieved
• Knowledge sharing effectiveness
• Local resilience improvements
• Sustainability goals met
• Community self-sufficiency levels

3.1.6 The Crypto Enthusiasts

3.1.6.1 Overview

The Crypto Enthusiasts meta-persona represents cryptocurrency traders, investors, and financial enthusiasts who are deeply engaged in crypto markets. They value financial independence, market analysis capabilities, and secure trading environments.

Characteristics

• Deep understanding of cryptocurrency markets and trading
• Strong focus on financial independence and sovereignty
• Value security and privacy in financial transactions
• Emphasis on real-time market analysis and decision-making
• Interest in innovative financial instruments and DeFi

3.1.6.2 Requirements

3.1.6.2.1 Trading and Market Analysis

• MUST provide real-time market data and analytics
• MUST enable advanced trading features and order types
• MUST provide historical data analysis capabilities
• SHOULD support multiple cryptocurrency pairs and markets
• SHOULD integrate with external market data sources
• SHOULD support technical analysis tools and indicators

3.1.6.2.2 Financial Management

• MUST support portfolio tracking and management
• MUST enable transaction history tracking
• MUST provide risk management tools
• SHOULD provide profit/loss analysis tools
• SHOULD support tax reporting features
• SHOULD integrate with DeFi protocols and platforms

3.1.6.2.3 Security and Access Control

• MUST implement robust authentication mechanisms
• MUST provide secure key management solutions
• MUST implement anti-phishing protections
• SHOULD enable multi-signature capabilities
• SHOULD support hardware wallet integration
• SHOULD support cold storage options

3.1.6.2.4 Market Integration

• MUST support cross-chain transactions
• MUST provide liquidity pool integration
• MUST enable smart contract interactions
• SHOULD enable atomic swaps between cryptocurrencies
• SHOULD support decentralized exchange protocols
• SHOULD support yield farming and staking

3.1.6.2.1 Performance

• MUST handle high-frequency trading operations
• MUST scale effectively under high load
• MUST provide reliable uptime and availability
• SHOULD optimize resource usage for mobile devices
• SHOULD maintain low latency for market data updates
• SHOULD handle concurrent operations efficiently

3.1.6.2.2 Security

• MUST protect against common attack vectors
• MUST ensure data integrity and privacy
• MUST protect user assets and information
• SHOULD provide regular security audits
• SHOULD implement secure communication protocols
• SHOULD implement fraud detection systems

3.1.6.2.3 Usability

• MUST provide intuitive user interfaces
• MUST offer clear navigation and workflows
• MUST include comprehensive documentation
• SHOULD provide customizable dashboards
• SHOULD support mobile and desktop platforms
• SHOULD support multiple languages

3.1.6.2.4 Reliability

• MUST ensure consistent system operation
• MUST provide data backup mechanisms
• MUST handle network disruptions gracefully
• SHOULD implement automatic failover
• SHOULD maintain transaction integrity
• SHOULD implement error recovery procedures

3.1.6.4 Constraints

• MUST ensure data privacy compliance
• MUST handle high transaction volumes
• SHOULD support cross-border operations
• SHOULD maintain decentralization
• SHOULD minimize operational costs

3.1.6.5 Quality Attributes

3.1.6.5.1 Scalability

• MUST handle increasing user base
• MUST maintain performance under load
• MUST optimize resource utilization
• SHOULD enable horizontal scaling
• SHOULD support growing transaction volumes
• SHOULD support modular expansion

3.1.6.5.2 Interoperability

• MUST support multiple blockchain networks
• MUST implement standard protocols
• MUST enable data portability
• SHOULD support API integration
• SHOULD enable cross-platform integration
• SHOULD support third-party tools

3.1.6.5.3 Maintainability

• MUST support regular updates
• MUST provide clear documentation
• MUST implement monitoring tools
• SHOULD support easy troubleshooting
• SHOULD enable modular components
• SHOULD enable easy configuration

3.1.6.5.4 Accessibility

• MUST support various device types
• MUST provide clear error messages
• MUST support accessibility standards
• SHOULD offer help and guidance
• SHOULD accommodate different user skills
• SHOULD enable customizable interfaces

3.1.6.6 Success Metrics

• Trading volume and frequency
• User satisfaction ratings
• System uptime and reliability
• Security incident frequency
• Market data accuracy
• Transaction success rates
• Portfolio performance tracking
• User base growth rate

3.1.7 The Guardians of Liberty

3.1.7.1 Overview

The Guardians of Liberty meta-persona represents a diverse group of communities united by their commitment to individual liberty, minimal government intervention, and free-market principles.

3.1.7.2 Characteristics

• Strong belief in individual liberty and personal responsibility
• Skepticism of centralized authority and government intervention
• Support for free-market capitalism and voluntary exchange
• Emphasis on property rights and non-aggression
• Value transparency and accountability in governance
• Focus on decentralized solutions and private alternatives

3.1.7.3 Requirements

3.1.7.3.1 Economic Freedom and Markets

• MUST support free market principles
  • Enable voluntary peer-to-peer transactions
  • Minimize intermediaries and central control
  • Allow price discovery through market mechanisms
  • Support multiple competing currencies and payment systems
• MUST protect property rights
  • Provide secure ownership and transfer mechanisms
  • Enable voluntary contracts and agreements
  • Support dispute resolution without central authority
  • Protect intellectual property through voluntary means

3.1.7.3.2 Decentralization and Governance

• MUST be decentralized
  • Avoid single points of failure or control
  • Enable distributed decision-making
  • Support multiple competing governance models
  • Allow opt-in/opt-out flexibility
• MUST support voluntary association
  • Enable formation of voluntary communities
  • Allow multiple legal frameworks to coexist
  • Support private governance solutions
  • Enable exit rights and mobility

3.1.7.3.3 Privacy and Security

• MUST protect individual privacy
  • Implement strong encryption by default
  • Minimize data collection and retention
  • Enable anonymous or pseudonymous participation
  • Protect against surveillance and tracking
• MUST ensure security without central authority
  • Enable peer-to-peer security mechanisms
  • Support reputation and trust systems
  • Allow for private security solutions
  • Enable community-based protection

3.1.7.3.4 Innovation and Competition

• MUST foster innovation
  • Remove barriers to entry
  • Enable experimentation with new models
  • Support technological advancement
  • Allow market-driven standards
• MUST enable competition
  • Support multiple competing solutions
  • Prevent monopolistic control
  • Enable easy switching between providers
  • Reduce lock-in effects

3.1.7.3.5 Transparency and Accountability

• MUST provide transparency
  • Enable audit of system operations
  • Make rules and protocols visible
  • Support open-source development
  • Enable public verification
• MUST ensure accountability
  • Track and expose violations
  • Enable reputation systems
  • Support voluntary certification
  • Enable community oversight

3.1.7.3.6 Economic Efficiency

• MUST promote efficiency
  • Minimize transaction costs
  • Enable price signals
  • Support resource optimization
  • Reduce waste and overhead
• MUST scale effectively
  • Handle growing transaction volume
  • Support network effects
  • Enable efficient resource allocation
  • Adapt to changing demands

3.1.7.4 Success Criteria

• Demonstrated reduction in central points of control
• Increased options for voluntary association
• Strong privacy and security measures
• Efficient market operations
• Evidence of innovation and competition
• Effective transparency and accountability
• Growing adoption and network effects
• Positive user feedback on freedom and choice

3.1.7.5 Impact on System Design

• Architecture must prioritize decentralization
• Security must be built-in at protocol level
• Interfaces must support voluntary interaction
• System must enable market mechanisms
• Privacy must be protected by default
• Competition must be enabled at all levels
• Transparency must be verifiable

3.1.8 The Meme-Driven Financial Revolutionaries

3.1.8.1 Overview

The Meme-Driven Financial Revolutionaries meta-persona represents communities united by humor, creativity, and financial acumen, with a strong focus on democratizing finance and challenging traditional systems.

3.1.8.2 Requirements

3.1.8.2.1 Decentralized Financial Infrastructure

• MUST provide robust decentralized financial infrastructure that cannot be manipulated by centralized entities
• MUST support peer-to-peer financial transactions without intermediaries
• MUST provide transparency in all financial operations and transactions
• SHOULD enable creation and trading of digital assets in a decentralized manner

3.1.8.2.2 Community Engagement & Communication

• MUST support rich media content sharing, including memes and creative content
• MUST provide tools for collective decision making and governance
• MUST enable real-time communication and collaboration between users
• SHOULD support creation of sub-communities or groups with shared interests
• SHOULD enable community-driven content curation and moderation

3.1.8.2.3 Content Creation & Sharing

• MUST provide tools for creating and sharing memes and creative content
• MUST enable attribution and tracking of content creation/sharing
• SHOULD include features for content discovery and trending topics
• SHOULD support various media formats (images, videos, animations)

3.1.8.2.4 Market Analysis & Trading

• MUST provide transparent market data and analytics
• MUST support decentralized trading mechanisms
• SHOULD include tools for tracking and analyzing market trends
• SHOULD enable community-driven market analysis and insights

3.1.8.2.5 Security

• MUST protect users from centralized control and manipulation
• MUST provide robust authentication and authorization mechanisms
• SHOULD protect user privacy and data sovereignty
• SHOULD ensure secure storage and transmission of financial data

3.1.8.2.6 Performance

• MUST handle high-volume content sharing and trading activities
• MUST scale effectively to support growing communities
• SHOULD maintain performance during peak usage periods
• SHOULD provide real-time updates for market data and communications

3.1.8.2.7 Usability

• MUST provide an intuitive interface for both financial and social features
• MUST be accessible to users with varying levels of technical expertise
• SHOULD include clear documentation and user guides
• SHOULD support easy content creation and sharing

3.1.8.2.8 Reliability

• MUST ensure consistent availability of core services
• MUST maintain data integrity across the network
• SHOULD include backup mechanisms for user content and data
• SHOULD provide redundancy for critical financial operations

3.1.8.3 Constraints

• MUST operate in a fully decentralized manner
• MUST protect user privacy and data sovereignty
• SHOULD support integration with existing decentralized systems

3.1.8.4 Quality Attributes

3.1.8.4.1 Transparency

• All system operations MAY be transparent and verifiable
• Financial transactions MAY be traceable and auditable
• Community governance decisions MUST be transparent
• System updates and changes MUST be clearly communicated

3.1.8.4.2 Decentralization

• No single entity SHOULD have control over the system
• MUST maintain decentralized governance
• MUST distribute power and control among users
• SHOULD resist centralization attempts

3.1.8.4.3 Community-Driven

• System evolution SHOULD be guided by community needs
• Features SHOULD support collective decision making
• MUST enable community-driven content moderation
• SHOULD foster collaboration and shared ownership

3.1.8.4.4 Innovation

• MUST support experimentation with new financial models3.1.8.2
• SHOULD enable creation of novel community-driven applications
• MUST adapt to emerging community needs
• SHOULD encourage creative problem-solving

3.1.8.6 Success Metrics

• Level of community engagement and participation
• Volume and quality of user-generated content
• Effectiveness of decentralized governance
• User satisfaction with financial features
• System resistance to centralization attempts
• Community growth and retention rates

3.1.9 The Crypto Miners

3.1.9.1 Overview

The Crypto Miners meta-persona represents a community focused on cryptocurrency mining operations, hardware optimization, and trading of mining equipment. While this persona is focused on “Mining”, this persona is associated with Node Operation and Security of the network, and the term mining is not appropriate, node operator is more general to the different roles this persona may take on, and primarily focused on network security and operation.

3.1.9.2 Characteristics

• Strong technical understanding of hardware and mining operations
• Focus on efficiency and profitability
• Value transparency and community support
• Emphasis on security and trust in transactions
• Adaptability to changing market conditions

3.1.9.3 Requirements

3.1.9.3.2 Technical

• MUST support efficient distribution of mining software updates
• MUST enable real-time monitoring of mining operations
• SHOULD provide mechanisms for verifying hardware authenticity
• SHOULD support integration with mining pool protocols

3.1.9.3.3 Privacy

• MUST protect sensitive operational data (hashrates, power consumption, etc.)
• MUST enable selective disclosure of mining operation details
• MUST maintain privacy of trading history and transactions
• MUST protect location data of mining operations

3.1.9.3.4 Community

• MUST facilitate knowledge sharing and technical support
• MUST enable reputation systems for traders and sellers
• MUST support community governance of trading platforms
• MUST provide mechanisms for dispute resolution

3.1.9.3.5 Economic

• MUST minimize transaction fees and overhead costs
• SHOULD support multiple payment methods for equipment trading
• SHOULD enable price discovery mechanisms for hardware
• SHOULD provide market analytics tools

3.1.9.4 Constraints

• MUST operate within hardware limitations
• MUST respect network protocol requirements
• MUST maintain operational security
• MUST ensure sustainable resource usage
• MAY consider environmental impact

3.1.9.5 Quality Attributes

3.1.9.5.1 Performance

• Efficient resource utilization
• High throughput capabilities
• Low latency operations
• Scalable infrastructure
• Optimized processing

3.1.9.5.2 Security

• Robust access controls
• Secure communications
• Protected operations data
• Fraud prevention
• Trust mechanisms

3.1.9.5.3 Reliability

• Consistent uptime
• Fault tolerance
• Error recovery
• Stable operations
• Predictable performance

3.1.9.5.4 Maintainability

• Easy updates
• Simple configuration
• Clear monitoring
• Efficient troubleshooting
• Modular components

3.1.9.6 Success Criteria

• Secure and active trading marketplace
• Reduced instances of fraud
• Active knowledge sharing community
• Efficient distribution of mining software
• Strong privacy protections for operators

3.1.10 The Truth Seekers

3.1.10.1 Overview

The Truth Seekers meta-persona represents communities deeply invested in uncovering truths, defending free speech, and challenging authoritarian control.

3.1.10.2 Characteristics

• Strong advocates for transparency and accountability
• Deeply concerned about surveillance and censorship
• Value investigative journalism and whistleblowing
• Skeptical of authority and mainstream narratives
• Committed to exposing corruption and misconduct
• Focus on protecting civil liberties and privacy rights

3.1.10.3 Requirements

3.1.10.3.1 Transparency

• MUST provide complete transparency in system operations and governance
• MUST enable auditing of all system components and decisions
• MUST support whistleblowing and secure information sharing
• MUST ensure all governance decisions are publicly visible
• SHOULD maintain public records of all system changes

3.1.10.3.2 Free Speech

• MUST protect against censorship and content manipulation
• MUST ensure equal access to communication platforms
• MUST prevent centralized control over content moderation
• MUST support anonymous and pseudonymous communication
• SHOULD enable resistance against surveillance and tracking

3.1.10.3.3 Security

• MUST implement strong encryption for all communications
• MUST protect user identities and metadata
• MUST prevent unauthorized surveillance or monitoring
• MUST ensure secure storage of sensitive information
• SHOULD support secure whistleblowing channels

3.1.10.3.4 Accountability

• MUST provide mechanisms for community oversight
• MUST enable tracking of administrative actions
• MUST support investigation of misconduct
• MUST ensure consequences for abuse of power
• SHOULD implement democratic governance processes

3.1.10.3.5 Technical

• MUST be fully open source and auditable
• MUST support secure communication channels
• MUST enable decentralized content distribution
• MUST implement robust privacy protections
• SHOULD support integration with investigative tools

3.1.10.3.6 Documentation

• MUST maintain comprehensive system documentation
• MUST provide transparency reports
• MUST document all governance decisions
• MUST track and publish all system changes
• SHOULD maintain guides for secure system usage

3.1.10.4 Success Criteria

• Zero instances of undetected censorship
• Complete transparency in system operations
• Strong protection for whistleblowers
• Active community oversight
• Regular transparency reporting
• Successful resistance to surveillance attempts

3.1.10.5 Constraints and Concerns

• MUST balance transparency with security
• MUST protect sensitive information
• MUST prevent abuse of reporting systems
• MUST ensure system resilience
• SHOULD mitigate risks of targeted attacks

3.1.10.6 Impact Metrics

• Number of successful information disclosures
• Level of community oversight participation
• Frequency of transparency reports
• Response time to reported issues
• User privacy protection effectiveness
• System resistance to censorship attempts

3.1.10.7 Risks

• Potential for system abuse
• Surveillance and monitoring attempts
• Legal challenges to transparency
• Coordinated attacks on the system
• Manipulation of oversight processes

3.1.10.8 Opportunities

• Growing demand for transparency
• Increasing awareness of surveillance issues
• Strong community support for oversight
• Rising interest in investigative tools
• Potential for positive societal impact

3.1.11 The Developers of Freedom

3.1.11.1 Overview

The Developers of Freedom meta-persona represents communities deeply committed to the principles of open-source and free software development. This group is characterized by their dedication to software freedom, transparency, and collaborative development practices. They are typically tech-savvy individuals ranging from enthusiasts to seasoned developers, united by their passion for creating and promoting technology that respects user freedoms.

3.1.11.2 Requirements

3.1.11.2.1 Software Freedom & Licensing

• MUST implement and respect free software licenses
• MUST provide complete source code access
• MUST enable unrestricted modification and distribution
• MUST protect user freedoms through copyleft
• SHOULD support multiple open source license compatibility

3.1.11.2.2 Development Environment

• MUST provide easy to setup development environment
• MUST maintain transparent development processes
• MUST enable collaborative development workflows
• MUST support distributed version control
• MUST implement continuous integration

3.1.11.2.3 Documentation & Education

• MUST provide complete technical documentation
• MUST maintain user guides and tutorials
• MUST document contribution guidelines
• SHOULD support multiple languages

3.1.11.2.4 Community Collaboration

• MUST enable community contributions
• MUST implement transparent governance
• MUST support code review processes
• SHOULD facilitate mentorship programs
• SHOULD enable knowledge sharing

3.1.11.2.5 Transparency

• MUST provide visibility into all system components
• MUST maintain open development processes
• MUST document design decisions
• SHOULD enable system auditing
• SHOULD provide build reproducibility

3.1.11.2.6 Accessibility

• MUST support multiple platforms
• MUST maintain backwards compatibility
• MUST provide localization support
• SHOULD ensure user-friendly interfaces
• SHOULD support accessibility standards

3.1.11.2.7 Security

• MUST implement secure development practices
• MUST enable security auditing
• MUST protect user privacy
• SHOULD support secure communication
• SHOULD implement access controls

3.1.11.2.8 Sustainability

• MUST ensure long-term maintainability
• MUST support community governance
• MUST enable distributed development
• SHOULD implement sustainable funding models
• SHOULD support project forking

3.1.11.3 Constraints

• MUST maintain software freedom principles
• MUST avoid proprietary dependencies
• MUST respect user privacy
• SHOULD minimize resource requirements
• SHOULD ensure cross-platform compatibility

3.1.11.4 Quality Attributes

3.1.11.4.1 Maintainability

• MUST support modular architecture
• MUST implement clean code practices
• MUST maintain comprehensive documentation
• SHOULD enable easy debugging
• SHOULD support testing frameworks

3.1.11.4.2 Interoperability

• MUST support open standards
• MUST enable system integration
• MUST provide stable APIs
• SHOULD support data portability
• SHOULD implement standard protocols

3.1.11.4.3 Community Support

• MUST maintain active communication channels
• MUST provide support resources
• MUST enable issue tracking
• SHOULD facilitate user forums
• SHOULD support community events

3.1.11.4.4 Innovation

• MUST enable experimental features
• MUST support plugin architecture
• MUST allow system customization
• SHOULD encourage new solutions
• SHOULD support research initiatives

3.1.11.5 Success Metrics

• Community contribution levels
• Documentation completeness
• Code quality metrics
• User adoption rates
• Security audit results
• Community satisfaction
• Development velocity
• Integration success rates

3.2 Operational Concept

TODO

The Logos system operates as a sovereign digital infrastructure enabling private, censorship-resistant communication, storage, and computation. Key operational aspects include:

3.3 Capability Requirements

TODO ## 3.4 Operational Requirements

TODO

3.5 User Requirements

The Metapersona Stakeholder requirements consolidate down to the following needs:

3.5.1 Privacy

• PRIV-NEED-1: Zero metadata collection and retention for all operations
• PRIV-NEED-2: Strong anonymity guarantees with unlinkability
• PRIV-NEED-3: End-to-end encryption for all communications and data
• PRIV-NEED-4: Resistance to traffic analysis and correlation attacks
• PRIV-NEED-5: User control over privacy settings and data retention
• PRIV-NEED-6: Clear documentation of privacy features and implications
• PRIV-NEED-7: Private and untraceable value exchange & transaction capabilities
• PRIV-NEED-8: Anonymous and censorship-resistant network routing & communication

3.5.2 Security

• SEC-NEED-1: Comprehensive security testing and audits
• SEC-NEED-2: Formal verification for critical components
• SEC-NEED-3: Incident response mechanisms and recovery procedures
• SEC-NEED-4: Protection against state-level adversaries
• SEC-NEED-5: Secure key management and storage solutions
• SEC-NEED-6: Defense-in-depth architecture implementation
• SEC-NEED-7: Data verification
• SEC-NEED-8: Deterministic reproducibility of build system and all system components
• SEC-NEED-9: Complete audit trail and tamper detection of system changes and operations i.e signed version control

3.5.3 Sovereignty

• SOV-NEED-1: No central points of control or failure
• SOV-NEED-2: User sovereignty over data and identity
• SOV-NEED-3: Voluntary participation mechanisms and freedom of association
• SOV-NEED-4: Low exit costs and ability to leave or fork the system
• SOV-NEED-5: Resistance to capture and coercion
• SOV-NEED-6: Protection from state-level adversaries
• SOV-NEED-7: Transparency in system operations
• SOV-NEED-8: Independence from centralized control and institutional overreach

3.5.4 Technical

• TECH-NEED-1: Modular architecture for extensibility
• TECH-NEED-2: Comprehensive developer tools and documentation
• TECH-NEED-3: Testing and simulation environments
• TECH-NEED-4: Support for multiple programming languages
• TECH-NEED-5: Robust consensus
• TECH-NEED-6: Standardized protocols for cross-system interoperability
• TECH-NEED-7: Stable APIs for application development
• TECH-NEED-8: Clear licensing and copyright attribution
• TECH-NEED-10: Continuous integration/deployment infrastructure
• TECH-NEED-11: Code review and contribution workflow tools
• TECH-NEED-12: Multi-language documentation and translations
• TECH-NEED-13: Developer onboarding and mentorship resources

3.5.5 Data Preservation Needs

• DATA-NEED-1: Robust data preservation
• DATA-NEED-2: Redundant storage capabilities
• DATA-NEED-3: Format migration tools
• DATA-NEED-4: Public (Non-Identifying) Metadata management
• DATA-NEED-5: Long-term data accessibility
• DATA-NEED-6: Version control for preserved content
• DATA-NEED-7: Standardized metadata schemas
• DATA-NEED-8: Search and retrieval

3.5.6 Financial Freedom Needs

• FIN-NEED-1: Advanced market analysis tools with privacy preservation
• FIN-NEED-2: Portfolio management / Crypto price tracking
• FIN-NEED-3: Cross-chain operations and interoperability
• FIN-NEED-4: DeFi protocol integration without compromising anonymity
• FIN-NEED-5: High-performance trading infrastructure
• FIN-NEED-6: Atomic swaps and liquidity pool interactions
• FIN-NEED-7: Private yield farming and staking capabilities
• FIN-NEED-8: Variable order types and trading strategies
• FIN-NEED-9: Risk management and position monitoring tools
• FIN-NEED-11: Secure trade execution

3.5.7 Network Operation Needs

• OP-NEED-1: Performance monitoring and management tools
• OP-NEED-2: Economic incentives for sustainable operations
• OP-NEED-3: Clear performance metrics and diagnostics
• OP-NEED-4: Hardware optimization support
• OP-NEED-5: Automatic failover
• OP-NEED-6: High availability and uptime
• OP-NEED-7: Graceful degradation under stress
• OP-NEED-8: Self-healing capabilities
• OP-NEED-10: Privacy-preserving network management tools

3.5.8 Service Provider Needs

• PROV-NEED-1: Reliable platform services for sustainable businesses
• PROV-NEED-2: Privacy-preserving user discovery and engagement
• PROV-NEED-3: Integration capabilities with existing systems
• PROV-NEED-4: Sustainable business models preserving privacy

3.5.9 Community and Governance Needs

• GOV-NEED-1: Transparent operations and oversight
• GOV-NEED-2: Knowledge sharing and education platforms
• GOV-NEED-3: Fair incentive mechanisms
• GOV-NEED-4: Open participation
• GOV-NEED-5: Comprehensive education material
• GOV-NEED-6: Merit-based contribution
• GOV-NEED-7: Contributor recognition and credit attribution
• GOV-NEED-8: Community-driven roadmap planning
• GOV-NEED-9: Mentorship and skill development programs

3.5.10 Environmental Sustainability Needs

• ENV-NEED-1: Resource optimization and efficiency
• ENV-NEED-2: Environmental impact tracking
• ENV-NEED-3: Sustainable operations support
• ENV-NEED-4: Resilient infrastructure design

3.6 Quality of Service Requirements

3.6.1 Scalability Requirements

• QOS-7: The system MUST scale horizontally with network growth.
• QOS-8: The system MUST handle increasing user and transaction loads.
• QOS-9: The system MUST maintain performance as network size grows.

3.6.2 Availability Requirements

• QOS-10: The system MUST provide continuous service availability.
• QOS-11: The system MUST operate without scheduled downtime.
• QOS-12: The system MUST survive targeted attacks on nodes.

3.7 Interface Requirements

User Interface Requirements

• INT-1: The system MUST provide intuitive interfaces for common operations.
• INT-2: The system MUST support multiple interface types (CLI, GUI, API).
• INT-3: The system MUST enable customization of interfaces.

Protocol Interface Requirements

• INT-4: The system MUST implement standard networking protocols.
• INT-5: The system MUST support protocol upgrades without disruption.
• INT-6: The system MUST maintain backward compatibility.

Integration Interface Requirements

• INT-7: The system MUST provide APIs for external service integration.
• INT-8: The system MUST support standard data formats and schemas.
• INT-9: The system MUST enable secure cross-system communication.

Module Interface Requirements

• INT-10: The system MUST define clear module boundaries and interfaces.
• INT-11: The system MUST support runtime module composition.
• INT-12: The system MUST enable secure module interactions.

3.8 Environmental Requirements

Network Environment

• ENV-1: The system MUST operate over unreliable network connections.
• ENV-2: The system MUST function behind NATs and firewalls.
• ENV-3: The system MUST adapt to varying bandwidth conditions.

Hardware Environment

• ENV-4: The system MUST support diverse hardware platforms
• ENV-5: The system MUST operate within resource constraints.
• ENV-6: The system MUST adapt to different device capabilities.

Software Environment

• ENV-7: The system MUST run on multiple operating systems.
• ENV-8: The system MUST coexist with other applications.
• ENV-9: The system MUST handle different runtime environments.

Security Environment

• ENV-10: The system MUST operate in hostile network environments.
• ENV-11: The system MUST resist state-level adversaries.
• ENV-12: The system MUST maintain security under attack.

3.9 Lifecycle Requirements

Development Requirements

• LCR-1: The system MUST follow open-source development practices.
• LCR-2: The system MUST maintain comprehensive documentation.
• LCR-3: The system MUST support collaborative development.

Deployment Requirements

• LCR-4: The system MUST enable seamless updates and upgrades.
• LCR-5: The system MUST support various deployment scenarios.
• LCR-6: The system MUST maintain backward compatibility.

Maintenance Requirements

• LCR-7: The system MUST facilitate network monitoring and management.
• LCR-8: The system MUST enable problem diagnosis and resolution.
• LCR-9: The system MUST support system administration tasks.

Evolution Requirements

• LCR-10: The system MUST allow addition of new capabilities.
• LCR-11: The system MUST support protocol evolution.
• LCR-12: The system MUST enable gradual feature deployment.

4. Critical Quality Characteristics

4.1 Safety

System Safety

• SAF-1: The system MUST protect users from deanonymization attacks.
• SAF-2: The system MUST prevent data loss and corruption.
• SAF-3: The system MUST maintain operational safety under stress.

Data Safety

• SAF-4: The system MUST ensure data integrity and consistency.
• SAF-5: The system MUST prevent unauthorized data modification.
• SAF-6: The system MUST maintain secure backups where needed.

Operational Safety

• SAF-7: The system MUST fail safely under error conditions.
• SAF-8: The system MUST prevent cascading failures.
• SAF-9: The system MUST maintain safety during updates.

4.2 Security

Network Security

• SEC-1: The system MUST resist sophisticated traffic analysis attacks.
• SEC-2: The system MUST prevent Sybil & Eclipse attacks.
• SEC-3: The system MUST protect against denial of service.
• SEC-4: The system MUST implement secure routing protocols with path diversity.
• SEC-5: The system MUST support anonymous network routing capabilities.

Data Security

• SEC-6: The system MUST encrypt all (senstive) data.
• SEC-7: The system MUST implement secure (and distributed) key management.
• SEC-8: The system MUST prevent unauthorized access through zero-knowledge proofs.
• SEC-9: The system MUST support secure backup and recovery mechanisms.
• SEC-10: The system MUST implement perfect forward secrecy.

Operational Security

• SEC-11: The system MUST detect and prevent attacks.
• SEC-12: The system MUST maintain security during partial network compromise.
• SEC-13: The system MUST support secure recovery procedures with minimal trust.
• SEC-14: The system MUST implement deterministic reproducible builds for verification.
• SEC-15: The system MUST be security audited.

4.3 Privacy

Data Privacy

• PRV-1: The system MUST minimize data collection and retention.
• PRV-2: The system MUST enable anonymous operations.
• PRV-3: The system MUST prevent correlation attacks.

Communication Privacy

• PRV-4: The system MUST hide communication patterns.
• PRV-5: The system MUST protect metadata.
• PRV-6: The system MUST enable private group communication.

User Privacy

• PRV-7: The system MUST support pseudonymous identities.
• PRV-8: The system MUST enable selective disclosure.
• PRV-9: The system MUST prevent profile building.

4.4 Usability

Accessibility

• USB-1: The system MUST be usable by individuals with varying technical expertise.
• USB-2: The system MUST provide clear error messages and recovery options.
• USB-3: The system MUST support multiple languages and locales.

Learnability

• USB-4: The system MUST provide intuitive interfaces for common operations.
• USB-5: The system MUST include comprehensive user documentation.
• USB-6: The system MUST offer progressive complexity disclosure.

Error Prevention

• USB-7: The system MUST prevent common user errors.
• USB-8: The system MUST provide clear confirmation for critical actions.
• USB-9: The system MUST enable recovery from mistakes.

4.5 Reliability

System Reliability

• REL-1: The system MUST maintain service availability under adverse conditions.
• REL-2: The system MUST recover automatically from failures.
• REL-3: The system MUST preserve data integrity during disruptions.

Network Reliability

• REL-4: The system MUST handle network partitions gracefully.
• REL-5: The system MUST maintain service during node churn.
• REL-6: The system MUST provide reliable message delivery.

Component Reliability

• REL-7: The system MUST isolate component failures.
• REL-8: The system MUST support redundant operations.
• REL-9: The system MUST enable component replacement without disruption.

4.6 Resilience

Adaptability

• RES-1: The system MUST adapt to changing network conditions.
• RES-2: The system MUST evolve with technological advances.
• RES-3: The system MUST support protocol upgrades.

Survivability

• RES-4: The system MUST survive targeted attacks.
• RES-5: The system MUST maintain core functions under stress.
• RES-6: The system MUST preserve critical data during failures.

Recovery

• RES-7: The system MUST restore service after disruptions.
• RES-8: The system MUST rebuild network connections automatically.
• RES-9: The system MUST recover from partial system failures.

4.7 Other Quality Characteristics

Maintainability

• QC-1: The system MUST support modular updates and upgrades.
• QC-2: The system MUST enable component isolation for maintenance.
• QC-3: The system MUST provide diagnostic capabilities.

Portability

• QC-4: The system MUST run on multiple platforms and devices.
• QC-5: The system MUST adapt to different runtime environments.
• QC-6: The system MUST support cross-platform deployment.

Interoperability

• QC-7: The system MUST integrate with existing systems where needed.
• QC-8: The system MUST support standard protocols and formats.
• QC-9: The system MUST enable cross-system communication.

5. Constraints

5.1 External Constraints

Environmental Constraints

• EXT-7: The system MUST operate in diverse network environments.
• EXT-8: The system MUST handle varying resource availability.
• EXT-9: The system MUST adapt to infrastructure limitations.

5.2 Enterprise Constraints

Resource Constraints

• ENT-1: The system MUST operate within available infrastructure.
• ENT-2: The system MUST scale with available resources.
• ENT-3: The system MUST optimize resource utilization.

Organizational Constraints

• ENT-4: The system MUST follow open-source development practices.
• ENT-5: The system MUST enable distributed governance.
• ENT-6: The system MUST support distributed maintenance.

Economic Constraints

• ENT-7: The system MUST maintain sustainable operations.
• ENT-8: The system MUST provide economic incentives where needed.
• ENT-9: The system MUST optimize operational costs.

5.3 Technology Constraints

Platform Constraints

• TECH-1: The system MUST support multiple operating systems.
• TECH-2: The system MUST operate on diverse hardware.
• TECH-3: The system MUST handle varying device capabilities.

Network Constraints

• TECH-4: The system MUST operate over unreliable networks.
• TECH-5: The system MUST handle network restrictions.
• TECH-6: The system MUST adapt to bandwidth limitations.

Security Constraints

• TECH-7: The system MUST use proven cryptographic primitives.
• TECH-8: The system MUST implement secure protocols.
• TECH-9: The system MUST maintain security boundaries.

5.4 Physical Constraints

Hardware Constraints

• PHY-1: The system MUST operate within device resource limits.
• PHY-2: The system MUST adapt to storage constraints.
• PHY-3: The system MUST handle processing limitations.

Network Infrastructure

• PHY-4: The system MUST operate over existing networks.
• PHY-5: The system MUST handle network latency.
• PHY-6: The system MUST adapt to bandwidth constraints.

Environmental Factors

• PHY-7: The system MUST operate in diverse physical environments.
• PHY-8: The system MUST handle power constraints.
• PHY-9: The system MUST adapt to connectivity limitations.

6. Validation

TODO

6.1 Validation Approach

The validation of stakeholder requirements will be conducted through:

1. Technical Validation

• Prototype implementations
• Unit testing
• Performance testing
• Security audits
• Privacy analysis

2. User Validation

• Persona feedback
• User testing
• Usability studies
• Feature validation

3. Operational Validation

• Network simulations
• Load testing
• Stress testing
• Recovery testing

4. Security Validation

• Threat modeling
• Penetration testing
• Protocol analysis
• Attack simulations
• Formal verification

6.2 Validation Criteria

TODO

Functional Validation

• Demonstrated privacy preservation
• Proven censorship resistance
• Verified data security
• Confirmed interoperability

Performance Validation

• Measured latency and throughput
• Verified scalability
• Demonstrated reliability
• Confirmed resource efficiency

Security Validation

• Verified anonymity guarantees
• Proven attack resistance
• Demonstrated recovery capabilities
• Confirmed privacy preservation

User Experience Validation

• Verified usability
• Confirmed accessibility
• Demonstrated learnability
• Proven error prevention

6.3 Critical Performance Measures

Privacy Measures

• Degree of anonymity
• Information leakage metrics
• Correlation resistance
• Metadata protection

Performance Measures

• Message latency
• Network throughput
• Resource utilization
• Scalability metrics

Reliability Measures

• Service availability
• Recovery time
• Error rates
• Data integrity

Security Measures

• Attack resistance
• Compromise detection
• Recovery effectiveness
• Security boundary integrity

7. Appendices

TODO

7.1 Assumptions and Dependencies

Technical Assumptions

• Available cryptographic primitives
• Existing network infrastructure
• Hardware capabilities
• Software dependencies

Operational Assumptions

• User participation
• Resource availability
• Network connectivity
• Persona support

Environmental Assumptions

• Legal frameworks
• Technical standards
• Market conditions
• User adoption

7.2 Acronyms and Abbreviations

• NAT: Network Address Translation
• P2P: Peer-to-Peer
• RDF: Resource Description Framework
• StRS: Stakeholder Requirements Specification
• SyRS: System Requirements Specification TODO