Personas/The Developers of Freedom

The Developers of Freedom

Metapersona Overview

The amalgamation of personas from the r/opensource, r/foss, and r/gnu subreddits forms a cohesive cluster united by the shared commitment to the principles of open-source and free software. These communities are bound by a deep-seated belief in the democratization of technology, advocating for software that is freely accessible, modifiable, and distributable. Members of these communities are typically tech-savvy individuals ranging from novice enthusiasts to seasoned developers, all of whom are driven by a passion for collaboration and innovation. They engage in discussions about software freedom, digital rights, and the ethical use of technology. Despite their varied backgrounds, these communities share a collective goal of reducing dependency on proprietary software and fostering an environment where technology serves the public good.

Shared Values & Beliefs

At the core of these communities lies a set of shared values that revolve around transparency, collaboration, and freedom. Transparency is paramount, ensuring that software can be trusted and improved by anyone. Collaboration is seen as a catalyst for innovation, where collective efforts lead to superior technological solutions. Freedom encompasses the right to use, modify, and distribute software, empowering individuals and communities to tailor technology to their specific needs. While these values manifest consistently across the communities, the r/gnu community emphasizes software freedom as a fundamental human right, whereas r/opensource and r/foss focus more on the practical and ethical benefits of open-source development.

Common Goals & Aspirations

These communities collectively aspire to create a world where open-source and free software are the norms, promoting transparency and user empowerment. They aim to influence policy, increase the adoption of open-source solutions in various industries, and cultivate an inclusive environment for diverse contributions. The r/opensource community is particularly focused on democratizing technology and fostering innovation, while r/foss emphasizes reducing corporate dependency and promoting ethical technology use. Meanwhile, r/gnu is dedicated to educating the public on software freedom and advocating for free software adoption across private and public sectors.

The Dominant Myth / Shared Narratives

The dominant narrative across these communities is the vision of a digital utopia where technology is a tool for empowerment rather than control. This narrative is rooted in the belief that open-source and free software can liberate individuals from the constraints of proprietary systems, enabling them to innovate and collaborate freely. A recurring theme is the “David vs. Goliath” storyline, where open-source advocates challenge the dominance of large tech corporations. This myth is embodied by figures like Richard Stallman and Linus Torvalds, who are celebrated as champions of software freedom and open innovation.

Collective Pain Points

Common challenges faced by these communities include overcoming the dominance of proprietary software, securing sustainable funding for open-source projects, and increasing public awareness of open-source principles. Despite their shared goals, each community frames these issues differently. For instance, r/foss emphasizes the need for greater education and outreach to dispel myths about open-source software, whereas r/opensource focuses on building partnerships with organizations to support open-source initiatives. The r/gnu community grapples with the philosophical battle against proprietary software and the need for more contributors to sustain their projects.

Unified Market Opportunities

Products and services that emphasize transparency, user control, and collaboration would likely appeal to these communities. Solutions that facilitate open-source project contributions, provide educational resources on open-source principles, and offer sustainable funding models for open-source development could meet their shared needs. Additionally, developing user-friendly interfaces for open-source software could attract a broader audience, addressing usability concerns and increasing adoption rates.

Communication Strategies

To resonate with this broader cluster of communities, communication should emphasize the shared values of freedom, collaboration, and transparency. Messaging themes that highlight the ethical and practical benefits of open-source software, such as cost savings, security, and innovation, would be effective. Storytelling that showcases successful open-source projects and their positive societal impact can further engage these communities. It is also essential to address misconceptions and provide clear, jargon-free information to make open-source principles more accessible to newcomers.

Bridging Opportunities

Opportunities to build bridges between these communities lie in their shared commitment to promoting open-source and free software. Collaborative projects that span multiple communities, such as joint hackathons or advocacy campaigns, could leverage their collective strengths. Common ground can be found in their mutual goal of reducing reliance on proprietary systems and advocating for digital rights. Initiatives that foster mentorship and knowledge sharing among these communities could also strengthen their ties and enhance their collective impact.

Additional Insights

Analyzing these communities together reveals a robust ecosystem dedicated to transforming the tech industry through open-source and free software. This ecosystem thrives on collaboration and innovation, providing a fertile ground for technological advancements that prioritize user empowerment and ethical considerations. By addressing shared challenges and fostering a more inclusive environment, these communities can expand their influence and drive significant change in the digital landscape. Additionally, the growing interest in digital privacy and security presents an opportunity for these communities to position open-source solutions as viable alternatives to proprietary systems.

Total Addressable Market

Total Raw Subscribers: 277.0K

• r/opensource: 248.7K
• r/gnu: 15.6K
• r/foss: 12.7K

Estimated Total TAM: Conservative (90% overlap): 27.7K
Moderate (30% overlap): 193.9K
Optimistic (10% overlap): 249.3K

foss_opensource [Node 0]

This meta-persona combines 3 communities.

Communities

opensource, foss, gnu

The Open Source Advocates

Summary

The /r/opensource community is a vibrant and passionate collective of individuals who are dedicated to the principles of open-source software development and usage. This community is characterized by a strong belief in the freedom of information and collaboration, aiming to create and support software that is free for anyone to use, modify, and distribute. Members of this community are often developers, programmers, and tech enthusiasts who contribute to open-source projects, promote the use of open-source software, and engage in discussions about software freedom and digital rights. They are motivated by a desire to democratize technology, reduce dependency on proprietary software, and foster innovation through shared knowledge and collaboration. The community is also committed to advocating for policies that support open-source initiatives and the ethical use of technology.

What are the related subreddits to this community?

• /r/software
• /r/linux
• /r/programming
• /r/gnu
• /r/libredesign
• /r/noip
• /r/coolgithubprojects
• /r/tinycode
• /r/CarHacking

What are the dominant personality types in the community?

The /r/opensource community predominantly features individuals with high openness to new experiences, as they are imaginative, creative, and open to change through collaboration and innovation. Conscientiousness is another prevalent trait, as community members often plan ahead, contribute to projects, and consider the broader implications of their work on society. The extroversion level varies, with a mix of introverts who prefer working independently on code and extroverts who engage actively in discussions and collaborations. Agreeableness is a strong trait, with community members generally being cooperative and supportive of one another’s efforts. The community tends to have low neuroticism, as members are often relaxed and stable, focusing on productive collaboration rather than conflict.

Subgroup Personalities

• Belongers: 20% - These individuals strive to fit within the open-source community, actively participating in projects and discussions to maintain a sense of belonging.
• Emulators: 5% - A small group looks up to successful open-source projects and developers, aspiring to achieve similar success and recognition through their contributions.
• Doomsdayers: 10% - Some members have strong opinions on the dangers of proprietary software and are vocal about the potential negative impacts on digital freedom.
• Survivalists: 15% - These members are cautious with resources, often contributing to projects that focus on efficiency and sustainability.
• Achievers: 15% - Ambitious individuals who take pride in their contributions, often seeking to work on high-impact projects that showcase their skills.
• Saviors: 30% - A significant portion of the community is driven by the desire to make a positive impact, advocating for software that benefits society and enhances digital freedom.
• Integrators: 5% - A smaller group focuses on philanthropy, using their skills and resources to support open-source initiatives and related charitable causes.

What are the goals and aspirations of the community?

The /r/opensource community aspires to create a world where open-source software is the norm, providing transparency, flexibility, and freedom to users. They aim to reduce reliance on proprietary software, foster innovation through collaboration, and ensure that technology serves the public good. Long-term aspirations include influencing policy to support open-source initiatives, increasing the adoption of open-source software across industries, and creating an inclusive environment where diverse voices contribute to the development and improvement of technology.

What are the values held by the community?

The community values transparency, collaboration, and freedom. Transparency ensures that software can be understood and trusted by anyone, fostering innovation and security. Collaboration is key to the community’s ethos, as they believe that working together leads to better solutions and shared knowledge. Freedom is a fundamental value, encompassing the ability to use, modify, and distribute software without restrictions, empowering individuals and communities to tailor technology to their needs.

What are the motivations of the community?

The community is motivated by a desire to democratize technology, reduce dependency on proprietary systems, and promote ethical practices in software development. They are driven by the belief that open-source software can lead to more secure, efficient, and innovative technological solutions. The community is also motivated by a sense of responsibility to advocate for digital rights and ensure that technology serves the greater good.

What are the pain points of the community?

Challenges include overcoming the dominance of proprietary software companies, securing funding and resources for open-source projects, and addressing the lack of awareness and understanding of open-source principles among the general public. The community also faces difficulties in maintaining and supporting large-scale projects without sufficient contributors or financial backing.

What are the anticipated solutions to the pain points of the community?

The community anticipates solutions such as increased advocacy and education on the benefits of open-source software, fostering partnerships with organizations and governments to support open-source initiatives, and developing sustainable funding models to support project development and maintenance. Efforts to streamline contribution processes and improve documentation can also help attract and retain contributors.

Who are the key villains?

• Proprietary software companies that restrict user freedom and stifle innovation.
• Organizations that violate open-source licenses and exploit community contributions without giving back.
• Governments or entities that enact policies detrimental to open-source initiatives and digital rights.

Who are the key heroes?

• Richard Stallman: Advocate for free software and founder of the GNU Project.
• Linus Torvalds: Creator of the Linux kernel, a cornerstone of open-source software.
• GitHub: Provides a platform for collaboration and sharing of open-source projects.
• Mozilla: Supports open-source projects and advocates for internet freedom and privacy.

Shared Experiences?

Common experiences include contributing to open-source projects, participating in events like Hacktoberfest, and advocating for digital rights and open-source adoption. Community members often share stories of collaboration, innovation, and challenges faced in promoting open-source principles.

Barriers to Entry

Barriers include a lack of understanding of open-source principles, the complexity of contributing to projects, and insufficient documentation or mentorship for newcomers. These barriers can hinder participation and limit the diversity of contributors within the community.

AIO (activities, interests and opinions)

Activities include contributing to open-source projects, engaging in discussions about software freedom and digital rights, and participating in community events. Interests often involve technology, programming, and collaboration. Opinions are generally aligned with the values of transparency, freedom, and ethical technology development.

Community Rituals

Rituals include participating in events like Hacktoberfest, celebrating open-source milestones, and recognizing significant contributions from community members. These rituals foster a sense of belonging and celebrate the community’s achievements.

In-Group Jokes, Common Phrases and Memes

• “Free as in freedom, not free as in beer.”
• “Many eyes make all bugs shallow.”
• “The year of the Linux desktop.”
• “RTFM” (Read The Fucking Manual)

Glossary of Community-specific Jargon

• Fork: A copy of a repository that allows independent development.
• Commit: A save point in the version history of a project.
• Pull Request (PR): A request to merge changes from one branch to another.
• Issue: A discussion thread related to a bug, feature, or task.

Cultural Influences

The culture of the subreddit emphasizes collaboration, transparency, and the ethical use of technology. These values influence members’ behavior and attitudes, fostering a supportive and inclusive environment.

Communication style

The preferred communication style is respectful, collaborative, and solution-oriented. Direct quotes from the rules include: “Be Respectful” and “No Spam / Excessive self-promotion.”

Conflict and Resolution

Conflicts are typically handled through discussion and consensus-building, with an emphasis on maintaining a respectful and inclusive environment. Moderators play a role in enforcing community standards.

How to communicate with them on an emotional level?

To communicate effectively, emphasize shared values of freedom, collaboration, and innovation. Highlight success stories and the impact of open-source projects on society. Use emotional triggers such as the empowerment of individuals through technology and the importance of digital rights.

How to communicate with them on a material level?

Focus on the practical benefits of open-source software, such as cost savings, security, and customization. Provide clear examples of successful open-source implementations and encourage participation in projects and community events.

External Perception:

Outsiders may perceive the community as niche or overly technical, which can lead to misunderstandings about the accessibility and benefits of open-source software. This perception can affect the community by limiting its reach and potential impact.

Additional Notes & Insights

The /r/opensource community is a diverse and dynamic group that plays a crucial role in advocating for digital rights and technological innovation. By fostering collaboration and transparency, they are driving positive change in the tech industry and beyond. The community’s commitment to inclusivity and ethical practices sets it apart as a model for others to follow.

Advocates of Open Source: A Deep Dive into the /r/foss Community

Summary

The /r/foss community is a vibrant and passionate group committed to the principles and promotion of Free and Open Source Software (FOSS). Members of this community are driven by the belief that software should be freely accessible, modifiable, and distributable, allowing users full control over their digital environments. This community is characterized by a strong sense of collaboration and innovation, as members frequently share resources, discuss alternatives to proprietary software, and contribute to open-source projects. The collective goal is to empower individuals through technology, reduce dependency on corporate-controlled ecosystems, and promote the ethical use of software. Members are typically tech-savvy, with a range of expertise from beginners exploring open-source options to seasoned developers contributing to major projects. They value transparency, privacy, and the democratization of technology. This community also acts as a support network, providing advice and solutions to technical challenges, and fostering a culture of learning and sharing.

What are the related subreddits to this community?

• /r/degoogle
• /r/python
• /r/linux
• /r/opensource
• /r/privacy

What are the dominant personality types in the community?

The /r/foss community predominantly features individuals with high Openness to new experiences, as members are constantly exploring and advocating for innovative software solutions. They exhibit significant Conscientiousness, often planning and discussing long-term projects and changes in the software landscape. While Extroversion is less pronounced, community interactions suggest a balance between introverted and extroverted tendencies, as members engage in both solitary coding projects and community discussions. Agreeableness is evident in the collaborative nature of open-source projects and the willingness to help others. Neuroticism levels appear low, as the community generally maintains a calm and logical approach to problem-solving and discussions, though moments of frustration can arise in debates about proprietary software or ethical concerns.

Subgroup Personalities

• Belongers: 15% - They integrate into the community to align with like-minded individuals and share common values.
• Emulators: 5% - They aspire to the success and influence of pioneering open-source developers and projects.
• Doomsdayers: 10% - They are wary of corporate control and advocate for self-sufficiency and transparency in technology.
• Survivalists: 10% - They are practical and cautious, often seeking cost-effective and reliable open-source solutions.
• Achievers: 20% - They are driven by the desire to create and innovate, often contributing significantly to projects.
• Saviors: 30% - They are motivated by the belief in the ethical and societal benefits of open-source software.
• Integrators: 10% - They balance personal success with contributions to the community and often support philanthropic efforts.

What are the goals and aspirations of the community?

The community aims to increase the adoption and development of open-source software, reduce reliance on proprietary systems, and advocate for digital rights and privacy. Long-term aspirations include fostering a global movement towards open-source solutions in all technology sectors, creating a more transparent and ethical digital ecosystem, and ensuring that technology remains accessible and beneficial to all.

What are the values held by the community?

The core values include freedom, transparency, collaboration, and privacy. Community members believe in the right to access, modify, and share software freely. They value the ethical implications of software development and strive to create technology that respects user autonomy and privacy.

What are the motivations of the community?

Members are motivated by the desire to empower individuals through technology, challenge the dominance of proprietary software, and promote ethical standards in software development. They are driven by a sense of community and the potential for innovation that open-source software represents.

What are the pain points of the community?

Challenges include resistance from mainstream users and organizations to adopt open-source solutions, the financial sustainability of open-source projects, and the need for greater awareness and education about the benefits of open-source software. Additionally, the community faces the ongoing challenge of countering misinformation and misconceptions about open-source technology.

What are the anticipated solutions to the pain points of the community?

The community is focused on increasing outreach and education to raise awareness of open-source benefits, fostering partnerships with organizations to support open-source initiatives financially, and enhancing the usability and accessibility of open-source software to attract more users.

Who are the key villains?

• Microsoft: Viewed as a major player in proprietary software that restricts user freedom.
• Apple: Criticized for its closed ecosystem and control over software usage.
• Google: Despite some open-source projects, its data collection practices are opposed.
• Patent Trolls: Entities that threaten open-source innovation through aggressive litigation.

Who are the key heroes?

• Linus Torvalds: Creator of Linux, a foundational figure in open-source.
• Richard Stallman: Advocate for free software and founder of the Free Software Foundation.
• GitHub: Provides a platform for collaborative software development.
• Mozilla Foundation: Promotes open internet principles and develops open-source software.

Shared Experiences?

Common experiences include collaboration on open-source projects, participation in community discussions and events, and dealing with the challenges of transitioning from proprietary to open-source software. These experiences shape the community’s identity and reinforce their commitment to their values.

Barriers to Entry

New members may face a learning curve in understanding open-source principles and technical aspects. However, the community is generally welcoming and supportive, offering numerous resources and guidance to help newcomers integrate and contribute effectively.

AIO (activities, interests and opinions)

Activities include coding, software development, and advocacy for digital rights. Members are interested in technology, privacy, and ethical software. Opinions often emphasize the importance of transparency, user rights, and community-driven development.

Community Rituals

Rituals include celebrating software releases, participating in coding sprints, and engaging in discussions about new developments in the open-source world. These rituals foster a sense of belonging and reinforce community values.

In-Group Jokes, Common Phrases and Memes

• “Free as in freedom, not free as in beer.”
• “There’s an open-source alternative for that.”
• “Embrace, extend, extinguish.”
• “Microsoft loves Linux, but do we love Microsoft?”

Glossary of Community-specific Jargon

• FOSS: Free and Open Source Software.
• GPL: General Public License, a widely used free software license.
• Fork: Creating a new project from an existing one by copying its source code.
• Merge Request: A request to merge code changes into a project’s main branch.

Cultural Influences

The culture of the subreddit emphasizes collaboration, knowledge sharing, and a strong stance on digital rights. Members are influenced by the foundational principles of open-source and motivated by the potential for technology to be a force for good.

Communication style

The community prefers respectful and constructive communication, often employing technical jargon and detailed explanations. Members value clarity and directness, and discussions are generally focused on problem-solving and innovation.

Conflict and Resolution

Conflicts are typically resolved through discussion and consensus-building. The community values transparency and logic in debates and strives to maintain a supportive environment. Disputes are addressed with a focus on mutual understanding and respect for differing opinions.

How to communicate with them on an emotional level?

To communicate effectively, emphasize shared values and goals, such as the empowerment of users and ethical technology. Highlight success stories and the positive impact of open-source software on society. Emotional triggers include the desire for freedom, autonomy, and community collaboration.

How to communicate with them on a material level?

Focus on the practical benefits of open-source software, such as cost savings, customization, and security. Provide clear examples of successful implementations and offer resources for learning and contributing to projects. Highlight the tangible outcomes of open-source development.

External Perception:

The community is often perceived as niche and technical by outsiders, with some misconceptions about the usability and security of open-source software. This perception can create barriers to broader adoption but also reinforces the community’s commitment to education and outreach.

Additional Notes & Insights

The /r/foss community is a dynamic and evolving group that plays a crucial role in the broader open-source movement. Its members are passionate advocates for change, working towards a future where technology is accessible, ethical, and empowering for all.

GNU Community Persona: The Free Software Pioneers

Summary

The /r/gnu community is an online gathering place centered around the GNU Project and its broader mission of promoting free software. This community is largely made up of individuals who are passionate about software freedom, open-source development, and the philosophies championed by the Free Software Foundation (FSF) and its founder, Richard Stallman. Members of this community are typically well-versed in technical topics, particularly those related to GNU/Linux operating systems and free software licenses. They value freedom, privacy, and user control over software, often engaging in discussions that emphasize the ethical dimensions of software use and development. The community is characterized by its strong commitment to the ideals of free software, advocating for the use and development of software that respects users’ freedoms to run, modify, and share code.

What are the related subreddits to this community?

• /r/FreeSoftware
• /r/linux
• /r/cpp
• /r/autotldr

What are the dominant personality types in the community?

The dominant personality types in the /r/gnu community can be best described using the Big Five personality traits:

• Openness to new ideas: Members are highly open to new ideas, particularly those that challenge proprietary systems and promote innovation through open collaboration.
• Conscientiousness toward others: Conscientiousness varies, with a strong focus on ethical considerations and the well-being of the wider community over individual relationships.
• Extroversion level: The community leans towards introversion, with many members preferring online discussions and debates over face-to-face interactions.
• Agreeableness with others: Members may vary in agreeableness, often engaging in heated debates over philosophical differences, but united in their shared goals.
• Neuroticism or level of emotional stability: Members generally exhibit low neuroticism, showing resilience and steadfastness in advocating their values despite external criticism.

Subgroup Personalities

• Belongers: 10%
• Emulators: 5%
• Doomsdayers: 15%
• Survivalists: 20%
• Achievers: 10%
• Saviors: 30%
• Integrators: 10%

What are the goals and aspirations of the community?

The community aspires to create a world where all software is free and respects users’ freedoms. They aim to educate the public about the importance of software freedom, advocate for the adoption of free software in both private and public sectors, and inspire developers to contribute to free software projects. Long-term aspirations include the widespread replacement of proprietary software with free alternatives and the establishment of a digital environment that prioritizes user autonomy and ethical computing.

What are the values held by the community?

The community values freedom, transparency, collaboration, and ethical responsibility. They believe that software should empower users rather than restrict them, that source code should be open and accessible for improvement, and that collaboration leads to better, more secure software. They hold these values because they see software freedom as a cornerstone of a free society, enabling individuals to control the technology that influences their lives.

What are the motivations of the community?

The community is motivated by a desire to promote digital freedom and resist corporate control over technology. They are driven by the belief that technology should serve humanity, not the other way around. This motivation is reinforced by a sense of duty to protect user rights and to create a more equitable digital landscape.

What are the pain points of the community?

Pain points include the widespread adoption of proprietary software, the dominance of large tech corporations in software development, and the challenges of advocating for free software in a market-driven world. They also face difficulties in recruiting new contributors and maintaining funding for free software projects.

What are the anticipated solutions to the pain points of the community?

Solutions include continued advocacy and education to raise awareness about the benefits of free software, developing user-friendly free software alternatives, building strong networks of contributors, and leveraging community support for funding and resources.

Who are the key villains?

• Microsoft: Seen as a villain for its historical and ongoing promotion of proprietary software.
• Apple: Criticized for its closed ecosystem and restrictive software practices.
• Google: Viewed with suspicion due to privacy concerns and its influence over open-source projects.

Who are the key heroes?

• Richard Stallman: Founder of the Free Software Foundation and a central figure in the free software movement.
• Linus Torvalds: Creator of the Linux kernel, which is integral to many free software systems.
• Aaron Swartz: Remembered for his contributions to digital activism and the free culture movement.

Shared Experiences?

Shared experiences include participation in free software development, attending conferences like LibrePlanet, and engaging in community discussions on digital rights and software freedom. Key events include the GNU Project’s anniversaries and milestones in free software adoption.

Barriers to Entry

Barriers include a steep learning curve for those new to software development, technical jargon, and the perceived complexity of free software systems. These barriers may deter newcomers but are often mitigated by community support and educational resources.

AIO (activities, interests and opinions)

Activities include software development, advocacy, and community building. Members are interested in technology, privacy, and digital rights. They believe in the ethical implications of software and advocate for user empowerment and transparency.

Community Rituals

Rituals include celebrating the anniversaries of the GNU Project and the Free Software Foundation, participating in online discussions and debates, and contributing to free software projects. Specific traditions include attending conferences and participating in hackathons.

In-Group Jokes, Common Phrases and Memes

• “I’d like to interject for a moment…”
• “GNU/Linux, not just Linux”
• “Free as in freedom, not free as in beer”
• “Stallman was right”

Glossary of Community-specific Jargon

• GNU: “GNU’s Not Unix,” a recursive acronym for the GNU Project.
• FSF: Free Software Foundation, an organization promoting free software.
• GPL: General Public License, a widely used free software license.
• Copyleft: A licensing method that allows derivative works but requires them to be distributed under the same terms.

Cultural Influences

The culture of the subreddit emphasizes software freedom, ethical computing, and user rights, influencing members to prioritize transparency and collaboration in their work and advocacy.

Communication style

The preferred communication style is direct and technical, often using detailed explanations and references to free software principles. Examples include discussions on licensing and ethical considerations in software development.

Conflict and Resolution

Conflicts are typically resolved through discussion and debate, with an emphasis on mutual respect and adherence to community values. Disagreements may arise over philosophical differences but are often addressed through constructive dialogue.

How to communicate with them on an emotional level?

To communicate effectively, appeal to their values of freedom and user empowerment, emphasizing the ethical implications of software choices. Emotional triggers include references to user rights, autonomy, and resistance to corporate control.

How to communicate with them on a material level?

Focus on the practical benefits of free software, such as security, transparency, and cost-effectiveness. Highlight successful case studies and real-world applications of free software solutions.

External Perception:

Outsiders may perceive the community as idealistic or overly focused on niche technical issues. This perception can lead to misunderstandings about the broader implications of software freedom but also highlights the community’s dedication to its principles.

Additional Notes & Insights

The /r/gnu community is a passionate and dedicated group of individuals committed to promoting software freedom. Their efforts extend beyond technical development to encompass advocacy, education, and community building, aiming to create a more equitable and user-centric digital landscape. ## Total Addressable Market Total Raw Subscribers: 277.0K - r/opensource: 248.7K - r/gnu: 15.6K - r/foss: 12.7K

Conservative (90% overlap): 27.7K Moderate (30% overlap): 193.9K Optimistic (10% overlap): 249.3K