Personas/The Guardians of Liberty

From Logos

The Guardians of Liberty[edit]

Metapersona Overview[edit]

The Guardians of Liberty encompasses a diverse cluster of communities united by a shared commitment to individual liberty, minimal government intervention, and the sanctity of personal choice. These communities collectively advocate for a political and economic landscape where freedom is paramount, and coercion is minimized. Members are deeply invested in exploring alternative models of governance that prioritize voluntary association, decentralized decision-making, and the preservation of civil liberties. This cluster includes a wide array of libertarian thought, from minarchists who support a minimal state to anarcho-capitalists and market anarchists who envision a stateless society driven by free-market principles. Despite their differences, these communities are bound by a common ethos that values personal responsibility, economic freedom, and skepticism of centralized authority.

Shared Values & Beliefs[edit]

The core values shared across these communities include individual liberty, personal responsibility, and voluntary cooperation. Members uphold the belief that individuals have the right to make choices about their lives without undue interference from the state. They advocate for free markets as the most effective means of promoting prosperity and innovation, emphasizing the importance of property rights and the non-aggression principle. This principle, which asserts that aggression against another’s person or property is inherently wrong, serves as a moral foundation for their philosophy. While the manifestation of these values may vary—such as the emphasis on digital rights within the free culture movement or the focus on polycentric law within anarcho-capitalism—the underlying belief in voluntary association and minimal coercion remains consistent.

Common Goals & Aspirations[edit]

Across these communities, there is a shared aspiration to create a society where individual freedoms are maximized, and government intervention is minimized. Members seek to influence public policy to reflect libertarian ideals, advocating for reduced taxation, deregulation, and the protection of civil liberties. Long-term goals include the promotion of alternative governance models, such as polycentric law and unacracy, that allow individuals to choose their legal frameworks and minimize state control. Communities like the Free State Project aim to create tangible examples of libertarian societies, while others focus on advancing digital rights and open-source technology to empower individuals. Despite differing approaches, the overarching aspiration is to foster a world where personal autonomy and voluntary cooperation are the norms.

The Dominant Myth / Shared Narratives[edit]

The dominant narrative within these communities centers on the belief that freedom is the natural state of humanity and that government intervention often leads to inefficiencies, corruption, and the erosion of individual rights. This narrative is reinforced by historical examples of government overreach and economic mismanagement, which serve as cautionary tales for the community. The idea that a decentralized, market-driven society can better meet human needs and promote innovation is a common thread that binds these communities. The myth of the self-reliant individual, capable of thriving in a world free from coercive authority, is celebrated and serves as a guiding principle for their advocacy.

Collective Pain Points[edit]

Common challenges faced by these communities include widespread misconceptions about libertarian philosophy, political marginalization, and resistance from entrenched systems. Members often grapple with the perception of libertarianism as radical or impractical, which can hinder their ability to gain broader acceptance. The dominance of state-centric systems and the influence of corporate interests present significant barriers to implementing decentralized solutions. Additionally, internal disagreements over strategy and priorities can create divisions within the movement. Despite these challenges, the communities remain resilient, driven by a shared commitment to their values and goals.

Unified Market Opportunities[edit]

There is a significant opportunity to develop products and services that align with libertarian values, such as decentralized technologies, open-source software, and alternative currencies. These tools can empower individuals to exercise greater control over their lives and reduce reliance on state systems. Educational resources that demystify libertarian principles and demonstrate their practical applications can help bridge the gap between philosophy and everyday life. By addressing the shared needs for autonomy, transparency, and voluntary cooperation, businesses can tap into a market that values innovation and freedom.

Communication Strategies[edit]

Effective communication with this cluster requires an emphasis on shared values of freedom, personal responsibility, and voluntary cooperation. Messaging should highlight the tangible benefits of libertarian principles, using real-world examples to demonstrate their efficacy. It’s important to engage in respectful dialogue and acknowledge the diverse perspectives within the community. Humor and satire can be powerful tools for conveying messages, as seen in libertarian meme communities. Additionally, leveraging digital platforms to reach tech-savvy audiences can enhance engagement and amplify the message.

Bridging Opportunities[edit]

Opportunities to build bridges between these communities lie in their shared commitment to individual liberty and skepticism of centralized authority. Collaborative efforts to promote digital rights, privacy, and open-source technology can unite members across different subreddits. Initiatives like the Free State Project and seasteading experiments can serve as focal points for collaboration, showcasing the practical implementation of libertarian ideals. By emphasizing common ground and fostering open dialogue, these communities can strengthen their collective influence and drive meaningful change.

Additional Insights[edit]

Analyzing these communities together reveals a dynamic and evolving landscape where libertarian principles are being tested and refined. The diversity of thought within the cluster reflects a willingness to explore innovative solutions to complex societal challenges. While the path to achieving their goals may be fraught with obstacles, the communities’ resilience and adaptability position them as key players in the broader discourse on freedom and governance. As technology continues to reshape the world, the emphasis on decentralization and voluntary cooperation may gain increasing relevance, offering new avenues for growth and influence.

Total Addressable Market[edit]

Total Raw Subscribers: 1.8M

  • r/libertarian: 503.1K
  • r/anarchism: 273.3K
  • r/anarcho_capitalism: 195.3K
  • r/economiccollapse: 178.1K
  • r/libertarianmeme: 147.3K
  • r/anonymous: 98.6K
  • r/goldandblack: 92.9K
  • r/austrian_economics: 47.9K
  • r/stallmanwasright: 46.7K
  • r/occupywallstreet: 39.3K
  • r/ronpaul: 23.8K
  • r/descentintotyranny: 13.8K
  • r/asklibertarians: 11.6K
  • r/classical_liberals: 10.6K
  • r/agorism: 9.3K
  • r/freeculture: 9.0K
  • r/ancap101: 7.7K
  • r/concentrationofwealth: 4.9K
  • r/mhoc: 4.5K
  • r/governmentoppression: 4.4K
  • r/liberty: 4.4K
  • r/badgovnofreedom: 4.3K
  • r/minarchy: 4.2K
  • r/libertyinourlifetime: 4.2K
  • r/anarchosyndicalism: 3.7K
  • r/marketanarchism: 3.5K
  • r/pirateparty: 3.3K
  • r/enddemocracy: 3.0K
  • r/polycentric_law: 2.8K
  • r/freegaming: 2.5K
  • r/newaustriansociety: 2.2K
  • r/geolibertarianism: 2.1K
  • r/ancapcopypasta: 1.5K
  • r/ancapgaming: 501
  • r/occupychi: 281
  • r/occupyaustin: 185
  • r/unacracy: 130

Conservative (90% overlap): 176.5K
Moderate (30% overlap): 1.2M
Optimistic (10% overlap): 1.6M

libertarian_economic_political_government_principles [Node 82][edit]

This meta-persona combines 37 communities.

Communities[edit]

agorism, anarchism, anarcho_capitalism, anarchosyndicalism, ancap101, ancapcopypasta, ancapgaming, anonymous, asklibertarians, austrian_economics, badgovnofreedom, classical_liberals, concentrationofwealth, descentintotyranny, economiccollapse, enddemocracy, freeculture, freegaming, geolibertarianism, goldandblack, governmentoppression, libertarian, libertarianmeme, liberty, libertyinourlifetime, marketanarchism, mhoc, minarchy, newaustriansociety, occupyaustin, occupychi, occupywallstreet, pirateparty, polycentric_law, ronpaul, stallmanwasright, unacracy

Combined Personas[edit]

r/agorism[edit]

The Revolutionary Minds of r/Agorism[edit]

Summary[edit]

The r/Agorism community is a vibrant and dynamic group of individuals dedicated to the practice and philosophy of agorism. This revolutionary ideology, rooted in left-libertarian principles, advocates for a society where all interactions are voluntary exchanges, achieved through counter-economics. The community engages in discussions and activities that challenge state-imposed restrictions, emphasizing the importance of free markets, the black market, and civil disobedience. Members are united by their desire for a decentralized, stateless society where individuals can freely engage in economic activities without state intervention. The community is characterized by a diverse range of personalities, including entrepreneurs, activists, and thinkers, all sharing a common vision of a free and just society.

What are the related subreddits to this community?[edit]

  • r/Anarchism
  • r/anarchocommunism
  • r/Anarcho_Capitalism
  • r/anarchosyndicalism
  • r/anarchotranshumanist
  • r/austrian_economics
  • r/Classical_Liberals
  • r/Communalists
  • r/cryptoleftists
  • r/GoldandBlack
  • r/GeoLibertarianism
  • r/georgism
  • r/Green_Anarchism
  • r/IndividualAnarchism
  • r/LibertarianFeminism
  • r/LibertarianLeft
  • r/LibertarianSocialism
  • r/MarketAnarchism
  • r/Market_Socialism
  • r/mutualism
  • r/Postleftanarchism
  • r/PublicChoice
  • r/Rothbardian
  • r/SocialistRA
  • r/veganarchism
  • r/voluntarism
  • r/3Dprinting
  • r/agoristliving
  • r/anarchist_aid
  • r/anarcho_hackers
  • r/anticapitalism
  • r/Anticonsumption
  • r/AntiTax
  • r/antiwork
  • r/barter
  • r/CooperativeAgorism
  • r/cooperatives
  • r/CryptoAnarchy
  • r/CryptoCurrency
  • r/crypto
  • r/CryptoMarkets
  • r/Counter_Economics
  • r/darknetplan
  • r/deschooling
  • r/DIY
  • r/DumpsterDiving
  • r/economicdemocracy
  • r/Entrepreneur
  • r/Floathouse
  • r/freeculture
  • r/freemigration
  • r/freeganism
  • r/freelance
  • r/GuerrillaGardening
  • r/HackBloc
  • r/Homesteading
  • r/intentionalcommunity
  • r/OffGrid
  • r/noip
  • r/onions
  • r/Permaculture
  • r/Polycentric_Law
  • r/PostScarcity
  • r/Rad_Decentralization
  • r/SelfSufficiency
  • r/smallbusiness
  • r/socialistprogrammers
  • r/squatting
  • r/startups
  • r/SyndiesUnited
  • r/unschool
  • r/upcycling
  • r/ZeroWaste
  • r/Anarchist_Strategy
  • r/Ancapraxis
  • r/AnimalLiberationFront
  • r/AntifascistsofReddit
  • r/BlackLivesMatter
  • r/citizenjournalism
  • r/copwatch
  • r/DirectAction
  • r/EnvironmentalAction
  • r/Libertyinourlifetime
  • r/foodnotbombs
  • r/IronFrontUSA
  • r/IWW
  • r/Police_v_Video
  • r/seasteading

What are the dominant personality types in the community?[edit]

The r/Agorism community is characterized by a high level of openness to new ideas, as members are imaginative and creative, often exploring innovative means of achieving a stateless society. They exhibit conscientiousness towards others by planning ahead and considering the impact of their actions on the broader community. Generally, the community leans towards introversion, as members might prefer solitary contemplation and online interaction over large social gatherings. There is a strong sense of agreeableness, with members being cooperative and kind, though there is also a healthy skepticism towards mainstream societal norms. Emotional stability varies, with some members displaying high resilience against socio-political challenges, while others may occasionally express anxiety regarding state oppression.

Subgroup Personalities[edit]

  • Belongers: Approximately 10% of the community, these individuals find solace in the shared ideals and practices of agorism, seeking out like-minded individuals to form tight-knit networks.
  • Emulators: Around 5% of the community, these members admire influential agorists and strive to replicate their successes, often engaging in entrepreneurial ventures or adopting counter-economic practices.
  • Doomsdayers: Comprising about 15% of the community, they anticipate societal collapse and prepare for self-sufficiency, often discussing strategies for survival and resilience.
  • Survivalists: Making up 20% of the community, these individuals carefully manage their resources and actively seek out cost-effective solutions to support their agorist lifestyle.
  • Achievers: Roughly 15% of the community, they are ambitious and productive, often leading initiatives to spread agorism and create alternative markets.
  • Saviors: Around 10% of the community, they are driven by a desire to improve the world, often participating in mutual aid and community-building activities.
  • Integrators: Approximately 25% of the community, they focus on building bridges between different agorist practices and philosophies, emphasizing collaboration and shared goals.

What are the goals and aspirations of the community?[edit]

The r/Agorism community aspires to create a decentralized, stateless society where individuals can engage in voluntary exchanges without state interference. Members aim to dismantle oppressive structures through counter-economics and civil disobedience, ultimately achieving a society based on mutual aid and cooperation. Long-term, they envision a world where individuals have the freedom to pursue their interests and fulfill their potential without the constraints of state-imposed regulations. They desire a future where communities are self-sufficient, resilient, and capable of thriving independently.

What are the values held by the community?[edit]

The community values individual autonomy, voluntary cooperation, and mutual aid. They believe in the power of free markets to foster innovation and prosperity, rejecting state intervention and coercion. Members hold a deep respect for personal freedom and the right to self-determination, often advocating for decentralization and the dismantling of hierarchical structures. They value resilience and self-sufficiency, emphasizing the importance of preparedness and adaptability in a rapidly changing world.

What are the motivations of the community?[edit]

The primary motivation for the community is the pursuit of freedom and autonomy. Members are driven by a desire to escape state control and create a society where individuals can thrive without interference. They are motivated by the belief in the efficacy of counter-economics as a means to achieve their goals, seeing it as a practical and actionable pathway to a stateless society. Additionally, they are inspired by a sense of solidarity and shared purpose, finding motivation in the collective effort to bring about meaningful change.

What are the pain points of the community?[edit]

The community faces several challenges, including state oppression, legal and economic barriers to practicing counter-economics, and societal misconceptions about agorism. Members often struggle with navigating a system that is inherently hostile to their ideals, facing potential legal repercussions for their activities. There is also a constant battle against misinformation and misunderstanding, as agorism is often conflated with negative stereotypes or dismissed as unrealistic.

What are the anticipated solutions to the pain points of the community?[edit]

The community believes that education and outreach are key to overcoming misconceptions and spreading awareness about agorism. They emphasize the importance of building resilient networks and communities that can support one another in times of need. By engaging in counter-economics and creating alternative markets, they aim to gradually reduce dependence on the state and demonstrate the viability of their philosophy. Additionally, they advocate for open dialogue and collaboration with other like-minded groups to strengthen their movement.

Who are the key villains?[edit]

  • State Institutions: Seen as the primary oppressor, state institutions are viewed as the enforcers of coercive laws and regulations that hinder freedom and voluntary exchanges.
  • Corporations: Particularly those that engage in crony capitalism and exploit state power to maintain monopolies and suppress competition.
  • Mainstream Media: Often perceived as perpetuators of misinformation and negative stereotypes about agorism and alternative lifestyles.

Who are the key heroes?[edit]

  • Samuel Edward Konkin III: As the founder of agorism, he is revered for his contributions to the philosophy and his vision of a stateless society.
  • Ross Ulbricht: Seen by some as a martyr for the cause due to his creation of the Silk Road and subsequent imprisonment.
  • Modern Agorists and Content Creators: Individuals who actively promote agorism through writing, speaking, and creating content that spreads awareness and educates others about the philosophy.

Shared Experiences?[edit]

The community is shaped by shared experiences of state oppression, legal battles, and the struggle for recognition and legitimacy. Many members have faced challenges in practicing counter-economics, navigating legal gray areas, and defending their lifestyle choices to outsiders. These experiences have fostered a strong sense of camaraderie and solidarity, as members support one another in their shared journey towards a freer society.

Barriers to Entry[edit]

New members may face barriers such as a steep learning curve in understanding agorist philosophy and practices, as well as the potential legal risks associated with counter-economic activities. These barriers can affect community dynamics by creating a divide between experienced members and newcomers. However, the community is generally welcoming and supportive, offering resources and guidance to help new members integrate and participate actively.

AIO (activities, interests, and opinions)[edit]

The community engages in a variety of activities, including participating in black and gray markets, practicing self-sufficiency, and engaging in civil disobedience. Members are interested in topics such as decentralization, cryptocurrency, permaculture, and alternative education. Their opinions and beliefs are rooted in a commitment to individual freedom, voluntary cooperation, and the rejection of state control. They often hold strong views on issues such as intellectual property, privacy, and personal autonomy.

Community Rituals[edit]

Community rituals include online discussions and debates, sharing resources and educational materials, and participating in events or meetups focused on agorism and related topics. Members often celebrate milestones in the movement, such as successful counter-economic ventures or legal victories, and engage in collective actions to support one another.

In-Group Jokes, Common Phrases, and Memes[edit]

  • “Agora! Anarchy! Action!”
  • “The state is a gang of thieves writ large.”
  • “Taxation is theft.”
  • “Black markets are the freest markets.”

Glossary of Community-specific Jargon[edit]

  • Agorism: A philosophy advocating for a society where all interactions are voluntary, achieved through counter-economics.
  • Counter-Economics: Economic activities that occur outside of state-sanctioned markets, including black and gray markets.
  • Stateless Society: A society without a centralized government, where individuals freely engage in voluntary exchanges.
  • Crony Capitalism: A form of capitalism where business success is dependent on close relationships with government officials.

Cultural Influences[edit]

The culture of the subreddit encourages critical thinking, self-reliance, and a questioning of authority. It fosters an environment where members feel empowered to challenge the status quo and explore alternative ways of living and interacting. The culture emphasizes the importance of personal freedom and autonomy, influencing members’ behavior and attitudes towards state and societal norms.

Communication style[edit]

The preferred communication style within the community is direct and open, with an emphasis on respectful debate and discussion. Members value evidence-based arguments and are encouraged to share resources and information to support their views. Quotes such as “The market always finds a way” exemplify the community’s belief in the power of voluntary exchanges and the ingenuity of individuals.

Conflict and Resolution[edit]

Conflicts within the community are typically resolved through open dialogue and discussion. Members are encouraged to engage in respectful debate, focusing on the issues rather than personal attacks. The community values diversity of thought and seeks to find common ground, emphasizing the importance of unity in achieving shared goals.

How to communicate with them on an emotional level?[edit]

To communicate effectively with the community on an emotional level, it is important to acknowledge their desire for freedom and autonomy. Messages that resonate with their values of personal responsibility, resilience, and mutual aid are likely to have a strong emotional impact. Common emotional triggers include stories of overcoming oppression, achieving self-sufficiency, and creating positive change through grassroots efforts.

How to communicate with them on a material level?[edit]

On a material level, communication should emphasize practical solutions and tangible benefits of agorism. Highlighting successful counter-economic ventures, opportunities for collaboration, and strategies for reducing dependence on the state can resonate with their material needs. Information on tools and resources that support agorist practices, such as cryptocurrency platforms or permaculture techniques, can also be effective.

External Perception[edit]

Outsiders often perceive the community as radical or fringe due to their rejection of state authority and embrace of counter-economics. This perception can lead to misunderstandings and stereotypes, affecting the community’s ability to engage with broader audiences. However, members are generally resilient and committed to educating others about their philosophy, seeking to dispel misconceptions and build bridges with like-minded individuals.

Additional Notes & Insights[edit]

The r/Agorism community is dynamic and evolving, with members continually exploring new ideas and strategies for achieving their goals. They are deeply committed to their philosophy and are willing to take risks to live according to their principles. The community is characterized by a strong sense of solidarity and support, with members actively working to create a network of resources and connections that empower individuals to thrive outside of state control.



r/anarchism[edit]

The Revolutionary Spirits of r/Anarchism[edit]

Summary[edit]

The r/anarchism subreddit community embodies a collective of individuals who align themselves with the principles of anarchism, which fundamentally opposes oppressive systems such as the state, capitalism, racism, sexism, speciesism, and organized religion. Members advocate for a self-managed, classless, stateless society where borders, hierarchies, and coercive authorities are dismantled. This vision is one where individuals take collective responsibility for their well-being and the environment, fostering a society built on mutual aid and cooperation. The community is composed of diverse voices united in their commitment to challenge and dismantle existing oppressive structures while promoting equity, solidarity, and justice for all marginalized groups.

What are the related subreddits to this community?[edit]

  • /r/metanarchism
  • /r/Anarchy101
  • /r/DebateAnarchism
  • /r/AnarchismZ

What are the dominant personality types in the community?[edit]

The r/anarchism community predominantly consists of individuals who score high on Openness, reflecting their embrace of novel ideas and experiences. They tend to be skeptical of traditional structures and are imaginative and creative in their approaches to societal change. Conscientiousness may vary, as the community values collective responsibility over individual planning. Extroversion levels range from average to low, with many members preferring deep, meaningful conversations over superficial interactions. Agreeableness also varies, as members are cooperative within their community but highly critical of authorities and oppressive systems. Lastly, the community exhibits low Neuroticism, displaying resilience in their advocacy efforts despite external stressors.

Subgroup Personalities[edit]

  • Belongers: 10% - While anarchists generally reject conformity, some members find camaraderie in shared beliefs and community.
  • Emulators: 5% - A small percentage may look up to renowned anarchist figures, but emulation is not a significant trait.
  • Doomsdayers: 20% - Many members harbor strong opinions about the world’s state and are self-sufficient, with a unique sense of style.
  • Survivalists: 15% - Some members are cautious with resources, emphasizing sustainable living and frugality.
  • Achievers: 5% - Ambition within the community is directed towards societal change rather than personal success.
  • Saviors: 30% - A substantial portion is motivated by social justice, actively participating in initiatives to help others.
  • Integrators: 15% - Members who strive to balance personal success with philanthropy, often donating to causes aligned with their values.

What are the goals and aspirations of the community?[edit]

The community aspires to dismantle oppressive systems and replace them with a society that prioritizes mutual aid, direct democracy, and ecological sustainability. Long-term goals include the abolition of hierarchies, establishment of communal living arrangements, and promotion of a cooperative economy that ensures everyone’s needs are met. They envision a world where individuals live freely without coercion, contributing to a harmonious society that respects both human and non-human life.

What are the values held by the community?[edit]

The r/anarchism community values autonomy, mutual aid, solidarity, and direct action. Autonomy is cherished as a means to self-govern without authoritarian oversight. Mutual aid reflects the community’s commitment to supporting one another, while solidarity emphasizes unity in their fight against oppression. Direct action is valued as a method to effect change outside traditional political systems. These values are deeply rooted in their desire for a just, equitable society free from domination and exploitation.

What are the motivations of the community?[edit]

Members are motivated by a profound desire for social justice, equality, and freedom from oppressive structures. They are driven by the need to address systemic inequalities and environmental degradation, advocating for a world where power is decentralized and individuals have control over their lives. The community’s actions are fueled by a vision of a society where cooperation and compassion replace competition and coercion.

What are the pain points of the community?[edit]

The community faces challenges such as societal misunderstanding, misrepresentation of anarchism, and repression by state forces. They struggle with the stigma attached to anarchism, often being labeled as chaotic or violent. Internal disagreements on strategy and ideology can also pose challenges. Additionally, the community grapples with maintaining momentum in the face of systemic resistance to change.

What are the anticipated solutions to the pain points of the community?[edit]

The community anticipates solutions such as increased education and outreach to clarify anarchist principles, fostering alliances with other social justice movements, and employing creative tactics to bypass state repression. They emphasize the importance of building resilient networks of support and mutual aid to sustain their efforts. Internal conflicts are addressed through consensus-building and open dialogue to strengthen solidarity.

Who are the key villains?[edit]

Key villains include oppressive state apparatuses and capitalist enterprises that perpetuate inequality and exploitation. Specific entities mentioned include: - The state and its law enforcement agencies - Corporations profiting from exploitation - Political figures who uphold oppressive policies

Who are the key heroes?[edit]

Key heroes are individuals and groups who have significantly contributed to the anarchist movement and its ideals. Influential figures include: - Emma Goldman: Anarchist activist and writer known for her advocacy of free speech and social justice. - Noam Chomsky: Linguist and political dissident whose works have influenced anarchist thought. - The Zapatista Army of National Liberation (EZLN): A revolutionary group in Mexico fighting for indigenous rights and autonomy.

Shared Experiences?[edit]

Shared experiences include participation in protests and direct actions, involvement in mutual aid networks, and engagement with anarchist literature and theory. Historical events such as the Spanish Civil War and the Zapatista uprising have shaped the community’s identity, providing inspiration and lessons for contemporary struggles.

Barriers to Entry[edit]

Barriers include societal misconceptions about anarchism and the perceived radical nature of its principles. New members may face a learning curve in understanding the nuances of anarchist theory and practice. However, the community is generally welcoming to those genuinely interested in learning and contributing.

AIO (activities, interests, and opinions)[edit]

Activities include organizing protests, participating in mutual aid initiatives, and engaging in educational events. Interests span across social justice, environmentalism, and anti-capitalism. Opinions within the community emphasize the rejection of hierarchies, the importance of community solidarity, and the necessity of direct action to achieve change.

Community Rituals[edit]

Community rituals involve collective decision-making processes such as consensus meetings and assemblies. Celebrating historical anarchist victories and commemorating fallen comrades are also common practices. The community often engages in symbolic gestures, such as flying the black flag, to signify their resistance.

In-Group Jokes, Common Phrases, and Memes[edit]

  • “No gods, no masters” - A phrase expressing the rejection of all forms of authority.
  • “ACAB” (All Cops Are Bastards) - A slogan used to critique policing and its role in societal oppression.
  • “Rest in power” - A phrase used to honor deceased comrades who fought for social justice.

Glossary of Community-specific Jargon[edit]

  • “Direct action”: Actions taken outside of established political channels to achieve social or political goals.
  • “Mutual aid”: Voluntary reciprocal exchange of resources and services for mutual benefit.
  • “Black bloc”: A tactic used in protests where individuals wear black clothing to maintain anonymity.

Cultural Influences[edit]

The culture of the subreddit encourages critical thinking, radical empathy, and a commitment to egalitarian principles. It influences members to question societal norms and engage in transformative actions that align with anarchist values.

Communication Style[edit]

The community favors direct, honest communication with an emphasis on inclusivity and respect. Members value dialogue that challenges oppressive ideas while fostering an environment of solidarity and support.

Conflict and Resolution[edit]

Conflicts are typically resolved through consensus-building and open discussion. Members are encouraged to address disagreements constructively, focusing on shared goals and values to maintain unity.

How to communicate with them on an emotional level?[edit]

To communicate effectively, appeal to their sense of justice and solidarity. Highlight shared values and emphasize the importance of mutual aid and collective action. Emotional triggers include stories of resilience and empowerment against oppression.

How to communicate with them on a material level?[edit]

Emphasize tangible benefits of anarchist principles, such as community-led initiatives and cooperative enterprises. Discuss practical solutions that address systemic issues and outline clear steps for achieving societal change.

External Perception[edit]

Outsiders often perceive the community as radical or extreme, with misconceptions about anarchism’s goals and methods. This perception can lead to misunderstandings and hostility, which the community seeks to address through education and outreach.

Additional Notes & Insights[edit]

The r/anarchism community is diverse, with members from various backgrounds and experiences. They are united by a shared vision of a world free from oppression and exploitation. While challenges persist, the community remains committed to its ideals, continuously adapting and evolving in its pursuit of justice and equality.



r/anarcho_capitalism[edit]

The Anarcho-Capitalist Advocates[edit]

Summary[edit]

The /r/anarcho_capitalism subreddit embodies a community driven by the principles of free-market capitalism intertwined with anarchism. Members of this community advocate for a stateless society where voluntary transactions and private property reign supreme. This vision is underpinned by the belief in the Non-Aggression Principle (NAP), which posits that aggression, defined as initiating or threatening any coercive interference with an individual or their property, is inherently illegitimate. The subreddit serves as a hub for discussions on how societies can function without government intervention, relying instead on voluntary and market-based solutions.

Members frequently engage in debates about the inefficiencies and moral failings of state governance, often pointing to historical and contemporary examples where government intervention has led to negative outcomes. The community is characterized by a strong emphasis on individual liberty, personal responsibility, and the importance of property rights. They often express disdain for collectivist ideologies and government overreach, advocating instead for a society where free-market principles guide all interactions.

What are the related subreddits to this community?[edit]

  • /r/Libertarian
  • /r/GoldAndBlack
  • /r/Voluntarism
  • /r/MarketAnarchism
  • /r/Agorism
  • /r/Austrian_Economics
  • /r/Polycentric_Law
  • /r/Classical_Liberals

What are the dominant personality types in the community?[edit]

Within the /r/anarcho_capitalism community, the dominant personality types can be estimated using the Big Five personality traits (OCEAN) and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI):

  1. Openness to Experience: Members of this community generally score high on openness, as they are imaginative and willing to explore unconventional ideas about governance and society. They are receptive to new and radical ideas that challenge the status quo.
  2. Conscientiousness: While the community values personal responsibility and the Non-Aggression Principle, individual conscientiousness may vary. Some members may be highly organized and diligent in advocating for their beliefs, while others may prioritize spontaneity and flexibility.
  3. Extraversion: The group includes both extroverts and introverts. Extroverts actively engage in discussions and debates, promoting their ideas and engaging with others, while introverts may prefer to consume content and reflect on the discussions.
  4. Agreeableness: The community tends to score low on agreeableness when interacting with opposing views or ideologies, as they are often critical of collectivist principles and government intervention. However, they may demonstrate higher agreeableness when engaging with like-minded individuals.
  5. Neuroticism: Emotional stability varies; some members may be highly rational and composed, while others might express anxiety or frustration regarding government policies and societal trends they perceive as threats to individual freedom.

In terms of MBTI, the community likely includes a mix of types, but certain types such as INTP (The Thinker) and ENTP (The Debater) may be more prevalent due to their analytical and critical thinking skills, which align with the community’s focus on debating and reimagining societal structures.

Subgroup Personalities[edit]

The /r/anarcho_capitalism community can be dissected into various subgroups based on personality and behavioral traits:

  • Belongers (10%): While not a prominent group in this community, some individuals may seek camaraderie and support from like-minded peers who share their values and beliefs about free-market anarchism.
  • Emulators (5%): A small portion of the community might admire and seek to emulate influential figures in the anarcho-capitalist movement, such as Murray Rothbard and Ludwig von Mises, aligning their ideas and lifestyle with these role models.
  • Doomsdayers (15%): This segment may focus on the potential collapse of current governmental systems, preparing for a self-sufficient lifestyle that aligns with anarcho-capitalist ideals.
  • Survivalists (20%): Often practical and resourceful, survivalists in the community prioritize self-reliance and minimal dependence on governmental systems, echoing the community’s principles of voluntaryism.
  • Achievers (10%): Driven individuals who strive to succeed within a free-market framework, these members may focus on entrepreneurship and innovation as pathways to personal and societal advancement without government interference.
  • Saviors (5%): A minority within the community may be motivated by a desire to improve society by promoting anarcho-capitalist principles and educating others about the benefits of a stateless society.
  • Integrators (35%): Many members aim to harmonize their beliefs with practical actions, such as advocating for policies that reduce government intervention or participating in agorist activities to demonstrate the viability of a market-based society.

What are the goals and aspirations of the community?[edit]

The primary goals and aspirations of the /r/anarcho_capitalism community revolve around creating a society where individuals can thrive without government interference. This includes:

  1. Promoting Voluntaryism: Advocating for all societal interactions to be voluntary and consensual, free from coercion or force.
  2. Abolishing Government: Aspiring to dismantle existing state structures and replace them with decentralized, market-based systems that respect individual liberty and property rights.
  3. Enhancing Personal Freedom: Ensuring that individuals have the autonomy to make choices regarding their lives, property, and associations without external constraints.
  4. Fostering Economic Prosperity: Encouraging entrepreneurship and innovation within a free-market framework to drive economic growth and improve living standards.
  5. Educating the Public: Raising awareness about the principles of anarcho-capitalism and its potential benefits to society, thereby gaining more advocates for their cause.
  6. Building Self-Sufficient Communities: Establishing networks and systems that allow for self-reliance and resilience, reducing dependence on government services.

What are the values held by the community?[edit]

The /r/anarcho_capitalism community holds several core values:

  1. Individual Liberty: Valuing personal freedom and autonomy above all else, believing that individuals should have the right to govern themselves without external interference.
  2. Non-Aggression Principle (NAP): Adhering to the belief that aggression—defined as initiating force or coercion against others—is inherently wrong and should be avoided in all interactions.
  3. Property Rights: Emphasizing the importance of private property as a fundamental component of personal freedom and economic prosperity.
  4. Voluntary Exchange: Supporting free-market principles where goods and services are exchanged voluntarily, and prices are determined by supply and demand without government intervention.
  5. Self-Ownership: Upholding the idea that individuals own their bodies and lives and have the right to make decisions about them without coercion.
  6. Decentralization: Advocating for decentralized systems of governance and decision-making to prevent the concentration of power and ensure that individuals maintain control over their lives.

What are the motivations of the community?[edit]

The motivations of the /r/anarcho_capitalism community are deeply rooted in their desire for a society that prioritizes individual freedom and voluntary interactions. Key motivations include:

  1. Desire for Freedom: A fundamental drive to live in a society where individuals are free to make their own choices without government interference.
  2. Distrust of Government: A belief that government is inherently coercive and inefficient, motivating members to seek alternatives that minimize or eliminate its role in society.
  3. Economic Prosperity: The conviction that free markets and voluntary exchange lead to greater innovation, efficiency, and wealth creation than centrally planned economies.
  4. Moral Conviction: A strong adherence to the Non-Aggression Principle and the belief that it is morally wrong to initiate force against others.
  5. Self-Determination: The aspiration to control one’s own life and destiny, free from external control or mandates.
  6. Community Building: A motivation to foster communities that embody anarcho-capitalist principles, providing real-world examples of their viability.

What are the pain points of the community?[edit]

The /r/anarcho_capitalism community faces several challenges and pain points:

  1. Misunderstanding and Stereotypes: Members often encounter misconceptions about anarcho-capitalism, being mislabeled as radicals or extremists.
  2. Government Overreach: Frustration with government regulations, taxes, and interventions that they perceive as infringing on personal freedoms and market efficiency.
  3. Social Isolation: Difficulty in finding like-minded individuals or communities, leading to feelings of isolation or marginalization.
  4. Economic Barriers: Challenges in demonstrating the viability of anarcho-capitalist principles in a world dominated by state-controlled systems.
  5. Resistance to Change: Encountering resistance from those who are invested in or benefit from the current governmental and economic systems.
  6. Public Perception: Struggling to shift public perception towards accepting or understanding anarcho-capitalist ideals, given the dominance of statist narratives.

What are the anticipated solutions to the pain points of the community?[edit]

Anticipated solutions to the pain points of the /r/anarcho_capitalism community include:

  1. Education and Outreach: Increasing efforts to educate the public about anarcho-capitalism through articles, videos, and discussions that challenge misconceptions and stereotypes.
  2. Building Networks: Creating stronger networks and communities both online and offline to provide support and solidarity for members, fostering a sense of belonging.
  3. Demonstrating Success: Highlighting successful examples of voluntary and market-based solutions to societal problems, showcasing their effectiveness compared to government interventions.
  4. Advocacy and Policy Change: Engaging in political advocacy to promote policies that reduce government intervention and expand individual freedoms.
  5. Encouraging Innovation: Supporting entrepreneurial ventures and technological innovations that align with anarcho-capitalist principles, providing practical alternatives to state systems.
  6. Cultural Shift: Working towards a cultural shift that values individual liberty and voluntary interactions, challenging the prevailing narratives that favor state control.

Who are the key villains?[edit]

Key villains identified by the community often include:

  1. Government Entities: Viewed as the primary source of coercion and inefficiency, representing a system that restricts individual freedom.
  2. Politicians: Criticized for perpetuating state power and enacting policies that infringe on personal liberties.
  3. Bureaucrats: Seen as enforcers of government regulations and obstacles to free-market operations.
  4. Large Corporations: Especially those that engage in crony capitalism, using government connections to stifle competition and secure favorable treatment.
  5. Collectivist Ideologues: Opponents of individualism and free markets, advocating for increased government control and regulation.
  6. Media Outlets: Accused of promoting statist narratives and misrepresenting anarcho-capitalist principles.

Who are the key heroes?[edit]

Key heroes within the community often include:

  1. Murray Rothbard: Celebrated as a founding figure of anarcho-capitalism, whose writings and theories continue to inspire the community.
  2. Ludwig von Mises: Recognized for his contributions to Austrian economics, which underpin many anarcho-capitalist beliefs.
  3. Friedrich Hayek: Valued for his defense of free markets and critique of centralized planning.
  4. David Friedman: Appreciated for his works on market anarchism and the practical application of anarcho-capitalist principles.
  5. Current Influencers: Individuals like Jeff Deist and Tom Woods, who actively promote anarcho-capitalist ideas through podcasts, books, and public speaking.
  6. Entrepreneurs: Those who embody the principles of voluntary exchange and innovation, providing real-world examples of market-driven success without government aid.

Shared Experiences?[edit]

Shared experiences that have shaped the community’s identity include:

  1. Historical Examples of Market Success: Instances where free markets have led to prosperity and innovation, reinforcing the community’s beliefs.
  2. Government Failures: Examples of government overreach, inefficiency, and corruption that validate the community’s critique of the state.
  3. Economic Crises: Events like the 2008 financial crisis, which are often attributed to government intervention and used as arguments against state-controlled economies.
  4. Libertarian Movements: The broader libertarian movement’s experiences and achievements, providing a sense of shared purpose and history.
  5. Technological Advancements: The rise of cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology, seen as tools for achieving greater personal freedom and financial autonomy.

Barriers to Entry[edit]

Barriers to entry for new members include:

  1. Complex Ideology: The nuanced and often misunderstood principles of anarcho-capitalism can be challenging for newcomers to grasp fully.
  2. Misconceptions: Prevalent stereotypes and misconceptions about anarcho-capitalism may deter potential members or lead to initial skepticism.
  3. Social Stigma: Association with radical or fringe ideologies can discourage individuals from openly engaging with the community.
  4. Engagement Levels: The community’s high level of engagement in debates and discussions may be intimidating for those not accustomed to such environments.
  5. Diverse Perspectives: While sharing core values, members may have differing views on implementation and priorities, leading to complex internal dynamics.

These barriers can affect community dynamics by creating a learning curve for new members, necessitating patience and openness to diverse perspectives for successful integration.

AIO (activities, interests and opinions)[edit]

The activities, interests, and opinions of the community include:

  1. Debating and Discussion: Active engagement in discussions on theoretical and practical aspects of anarcho-capitalism.
  2. Economic Theory: Interest in Austrian economics, the Non-Aggression Principle, and free-market theories.
  3. Political Advocacy: Some members participate in political activism or advocacy for libertarian policies.
  4. Entrepreneurship: A strong emphasis on entrepreneurial activities and market-based solutions as alternatives to government intervention.
  5. Crypto and Technology: Enthusiasm for cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology as tools for achieving greater economic freedom.
  6. Historical Analysis: Analyzing historical examples of government failures and market successes to support their worldview.
  7. Philosophical Exploration: Discussions on the ethical and philosophical underpinnings of anarcho-capitalism and individual liberty.

Community Rituals[edit]

Community rituals and traditions include:

  1. Reading and Sharing Literature: Regularly recommending and discussing foundational texts by figures like Rothbard, Mises, and Hayek.
  2. Engagement with Influencers: Following and sharing content from prominent anarcho-capitalist influencers and thought leaders.
  3. Online Debates: Participating in debates and discussions on forums and social media platforms to refine ideas and spread awareness.
  4. Celebrating Market Innovations: Highlighting and supporting innovations and entrepreneurs that align with anarcho-capitalist principles.
  5. Commemorating Historical Events: Marking significant historical events that showcase the failures of government intervention or the successes of free markets.

In-Group Jokes, Common Phrases and Memes[edit]

In-group jokes, phrases, and memes include:

  1. “Taxation is theft.”
  2. “Who will build the roads?”
  3. “Statist tears.”
  4. “Ancapistan.”
  5. “The market provides.”
  6. “NAP violation.”
  7. “Don’t tread on me.”
  8. “Genius economist.”
  9. “Non-aggression principle.”
  10. “Voluntary exchange.”

Glossary of Community-specific Jargon[edit]

  1. Ancap: Short for anarcho-capitalist, referring to individuals who advocate for a stateless society with free markets.
  2. NAP (Non-Aggression Principle): A foundational ethical stance that opposes the initiation of force or coercion against others.
  3. Statist: A derogatory term for individuals who support or advocate for state intervention and control.
  4. Voluntaryism: The belief that all human interactions should be voluntary and free from coercion.
  5. Agorism: A strategy for achieving a free society through counter-economics and non-compliance with oppressive state regulations.
  6. Crony Capitalism: A form of capitalism where business success is influenced by close relationships between business people and government officials.
  7. Libertarian: Referring to individuals who advocate for minimal government intervention in personal and economic affairs.
  8. Austrian Economics: A school of economic thought that emphasizes the spontaneous organizing power of the price mechanism.

Cultural Influences[edit]

The culture of the subreddit influences member behavior by promoting a strong commitment to individual liberty, voluntary interactions, and skepticism of government power. Members are encouraged to think critically, engage in debates, and seek out market-based solutions to societal problems. This culture fosters a sense of community among like-minded individuals and reinforces shared values.

Communication style[edit]

The preferred communication style within the community is direct, analytical, and often confrontational when discussing opposing viewpoints. Members value logical reasoning and evidence-based arguments. For example, phrases like “Taxation is theft” are used to provoke thought and challenge conventional beliefs about government and economics.

Conflict and Resolution[edit]

The community handles conflicts or disagreements through debates and discussions, often relying on logical reasoning and evidence to resolve differences. While conflicts can be intense, there is an underlying respect for the diversity of opinions within the broader framework of anarcho-capitalism.

How to communicate with them on an emotional level?[edit]

To communicate with this community on an emotional level, it is important to appeal to their values of freedom and individual autonomy. Highlighting stories of individuals overcoming government oppression or achieving success through voluntary exchange can resonate deeply. Emotional triggers include injustice, coercion, and the triumph of personal liberty.

How to communicate with them on a material level?[edit]

On a material level, effective communication involves demonstrating the tangible benefits of market-based solutions over government intervention. Providing examples of successful entrepreneurship, innovation, and economic prosperity within a free-market framework can have a significant impact. Material needs include the desire for greater economic opportunities, self-determination, and reduced government interference.

External Perception:[edit]

The community is often perceived by outsiders as radical or extreme due to its rejection of government structures. This perception can lead to misunderstandings and stereotypes, affecting the community’s ability to gain broader acceptance. However, members often use these perceptions as opportunities to educate others about their principles and challenge prevailing narratives.

Additional Notes & Insights[edit]

An important insight about the /r/anarcho_capitalism community is the diversity of thought and approach within the shared framework of anarcho-capitalism. While united by core values, members may have differing views on implementation and priorities, leading to rich and dynamic discussions. Additionally, the community’s engagement with technology, particularly cryptocurrencies, reflects its adaptability and forward-thinking mindset in pursuing a freer society.



r/anarchosyndicalism[edit]

The Revolutionary Syndicalists: Navigators of Change[edit]

Summary[edit]

The /r/anarchosyndicalism community embodies a collective of individuals deeply committed to the principles of anarcho-syndicalism, a theory advocating for the empowerment of workers through rank-and-file unions as a means to dismantle capitalist structures. Community members are characterized by their dedication to solidarity, direct action, and direct democracy. They believe that the working class, as the producers of wealth, hold inherent power capable of halting capitalism through a general strike and the occupation of workplaces. This community envisions a world free from bosses and wage slavery, organized around socialist principles where production is for need, not profit. Their discussions often focus on the viability of syndicalism, its application in modern contexts, and its potential to address systemic injustices and inequalities.

What are the related subreddits to this community?[edit]

  • /r/Anarchism
  • /r/AnarchoCommunism
  • /r/IWW
  • /r/LibertarianSocialism
  • /r/LibertarianCommunism

What are the dominant personality types in the community?[edit]

The community predominantly features individuals with high openness to new ideas, as they embrace radical change and innovative societal models. They demonstrate conscientiousness in their commitment to collective well-being and social justice. Introversion seems prevalent, as members often engage deeply with ideological discussions and theoretical explorations. High agreeableness is evident in their cooperative efforts and solidarity with fellow workers. Emotional stability varies, with some members expressing frustration and anxiety over current socio-political conditions, while others remain calm and resolute in their activism.

Subgroup Personalities[edit]

  • Belongers: 15% - Members who strive to connect and align with like-minded individuals, focusing on community solidarity.
  • Emulators: 5% - Few are influenced by external appearances or status symbols, valuing authenticity over emulation.
  • Doomsdayers: 20% - Members who express skepticism and caution, often preparing for systemic failures.
  • Survivalists: 10% - Individuals who prioritize resourcefulness and strategic planning in their activism.
  • Achievers: 10% - Driven by the ambition to create impactful change and demonstrate the success of syndicalist models.
  • Saviors: 30% - A significant portion is motivated by altruism and a desire to improve societal conditions.
  • Integrators: 10% - Members who balance personal prosperity with contributions to collective causes and movements.

What are the goals and aspirations of the community?[edit]

The community aspires to dismantle capitalist structures and replace them with a society organized around worker self-management and direct democracy. They seek to empower workers through education and mobilization, aiming to achieve a general strike that disrupts the capitalist economy. Long-term goals include establishing a world free from hierarchical oppression, where resources are distributed equitably, and production serves human needs rather than profit. They envision a future where communities are self-sufficient, decisions are made collectively, and all individuals have equal access to opportunities and resources.

What are the values held by the community?[edit]

The community values solidarity, mutual aid, and collective action. They prioritize direct democracy and worker self-management, viewing these as integral to achieving social justice. Anti-capitalism and anti-authoritarianism are core tenets, as members believe these systems perpetuate inequality and exploitation. They hold a deep commitment to egalitarianism, striving for a world where all individuals can live with dignity and autonomy. Environmental sustainability is also a key value, recognizing the interconnectedness of ecological and social issues.

What are the motivations of the community?[edit]

Members are motivated by a desire to challenge and transform existing power structures that they perceive as unjust and oppressive. They are driven by the belief that the working class holds the potential to create a more equitable and sustainable society. Their actions are fueled by a commitment to social justice, human rights, and the empowerment of marginalized groups. The urgency of addressing climate change and economic inequality also motivates their activism, as they seek solutions that prioritize collective well-being over individual profit.

What are the pain points of the community?[edit]

The community faces challenges such as societal resistance to radical change and the entrenched power of capitalist systems. They struggle with internal divisions and debates over strategy and ideology. The lack of widespread understanding and acceptance of anarcho-syndicalist principles presents a barrier to broader support and mobilization. Additionally, the community grapples with the isolation and burnout that can accompany activism, as well as the practical difficulties of implementing syndicalist models in a predominantly capitalist world.

What are the anticipated solutions to the pain points of the community?[edit]

The community anticipates that education, outreach, and coalition-building will be key to overcoming societal resistance and fostering broader support for their ideals. They advocate for creating practical examples of syndicalist models in action, demonstrating their viability and benefits. Internal dialogue and consensus-building are seen as crucial for resolving ideological divisions and strengthening the movement. Building resilient networks of mutual aid and support can help address burnout and isolation, while strategic direct action can challenge and disrupt entrenched power structures.

Who are the key villains?[edit]

  • Large corporations: Seen as exploiters of labor and perpetuators of inequality.
  • Authoritarian governments: Viewed as oppressive and obstructive to worker empowerment.
  • Capitalist economic systems: Criticized for prioritizing profit over human and ecological well-being.
  • Influential capitalist figures: Often perceived as symbols of wealth inequality and systemic injustice.

Who are the key heroes?[edit]

  • Noam Chomsky: Respected for his advocacy of anarchism and critique of capitalist systems.
  • Emma Goldman: Celebrated for her contributions to anarchist thought and activism.
  • The Industrial Workers of the World (IWW): Valued for their historical and ongoing role in promoting worker solidarity and direct action.
  • Various grassroots organizers and activists: Recognized for their efforts to implement syndicalist principles and empower communities.

Shared Experiences?[edit]

The community shares experiences of participating in labor strikes, grassroots organizing, and collective actions. Many members have engaged in discussions and debates on anarchist and socialist theory, often influenced by key historical events such as the Spanish Civil War and the rise of labor movements. They commonly express a sense of solidarity and camaraderie, united by their shared vision of a more just and equitable society.

Barriers to Entry[edit]

New members may face challenges in understanding the complex theories and historical contexts underpinning anarcho-syndicalism. The community can be insular, with established norms and jargon that may be unfamiliar to newcomers. Additionally, the radical nature of the ideology may deter those accustomed to more mainstream perspectives. However, the community is generally welcoming and supportive, offering resources and guidance to help newcomers integrate and engage with the movement.

AIO (activities, interests, and opinions)[edit]

Activities include organizing and participating in protests, strikes, and community actions. Members are interested in labor rights, anti-capitalism, environmental sustainability, and social justice. They hold strong opinions on the need for systemic change and the importance of direct action and worker empowerment. The community values critical thinking, open dialogue, and the exchange of ideas to advance their collective goals.

Community Rituals[edit]

Common rituals include solidarity events, reading and discussing anarchist literature, and participating in educational workshops and seminars. The community often commemorates historical labor movements and celebrates international solidarity days, such as May Day. These activities reinforce their shared identity and commitment to collective action and social change.

In-Group Jokes, Common Phrases, and Memes[edit]

  • “No gods, no masters”: A phrase emphasizing anti-authoritarianism and self-governance.
  • “General strike now!”: A rallying call for collective worker action.
  • “Solidarity forever”: A slogan expressing unity and mutual support among workers.
  • “Direct action gets the goods”: A phrase advocating for immediate and decisive action to achieve goals.

Glossary of Community-specific Jargon[edit]

  • Direct Action: Immediate, collective action taken to achieve a political or social goal, bypassing formal channels.
  • Syndicalism: A movement advocating for worker control of industry through trade unions.
  • General Strike: A widespread work stoppage across multiple industries, aimed at effecting systemic change.
  • Rank-and-file: Ordinary workers, as opposed to leaders or managers, who are central to grassroots organizing.

Cultural Influences[edit]

The culture of the subreddit influences members to prioritize collective action, critical thinking, and historical awareness. It fosters a sense of solidarity and shared purpose, encouraging members to actively engage in discussions and initiatives that promote social justice and worker empowerment. The community’s emphasis on direct democracy and mutual aid shapes members’ attitudes and behaviors, reinforcing their commitment to egalitarian principles.

Communication style[edit]

The preferred communication style is direct and candid, often characterized by passionate and earnest exchanges. Members value open dialogue and are encouraged to express their thoughts and ideas freely. They frequently use slogans and historical references to convey their messages, emphasizing solidarity and collective action. For example, phrases like “An injury to one is an injury to all” encapsulate their core beliefs and are commonly used in discussions.

Conflict and Resolution[edit]

Conflicts within the community are typically addressed through open discussion and consensus-building. Members engage in respectful debate to resolve disagreements, often drawing on historical examples and theoretical frameworks to support their positions. The community values inclusivity and aims to foster an environment where diverse perspectives can be shared and considered. When conflicts arise, they are seen as opportunities for growth and deeper understanding.

How to communicate with them on an emotional level?[edit]

To communicate effectively with this community, it is important to acknowledge their values and aspirations, emphasizing themes of solidarity, empowerment, and social justice. Messages that resonate emotionally often highlight the struggles and triumphs of the working class, invoking a sense of shared purpose and camaraderie. Emotional triggers include stories of collective action, historical victories, and the potential for transformative change. Engaging with empathy and sincerity is key to building meaningful connections.

How to communicate with them on a material level?[edit]

To engage on a material level, focus on practical solutions and actionable steps that align with their goals. Highlight initiatives that demonstrate the viability of syndicalist models, such as successful worker cooperatives or community-led projects. Emphasize the tangible benefits of collective action, such as improved working conditions and equitable resource distribution. Providing resources, tools, and opportunities for direct involvement can help members feel empowered and motivated to take action.

External Perception[edit]

Outsiders may perceive the community as radical or utopian, often misunderstanding or oversimplifying their goals and principles. This perception can lead to skepticism or dismissal of their ideas. However, the community’s commitment to education and outreach aims to challenge misconceptions and foster greater understanding of anarcho-syndicalism. While external perception may pose challenges, it also presents opportunities for dialogue and coalition-building with like-minded individuals and groups.

Additional Notes & Insights[edit]

The /r/anarchosyndicalism community is a vibrant and dynamic space where ideas are actively debated and refined. Members are often well-versed in historical and theoretical contexts, drawing on a rich tradition of anarchist thought to inform their activism. The community is characterized by a strong sense of purpose and a deep commitment to creating a more just and equitable world. Despite challenges, they remain hopeful and resilient, continually striving to embody the principles they advocate.



r/ancap101[edit]

The Ancap101 Community Persona[edit]

Summary[edit]

The /r/ancap101 community is a dynamic and intellectually vibrant group centered around the principles of anarcho-capitalism—a political philosophy that advocates for the elimination of the state in favor of a society organized around voluntary exchanges and the free market. Members of this community are often characterized by their deep-seated belief in individual liberty, personal responsibility, and the Non-Aggression Principle (NAP), which posits that aggression against others or their property is inherently illegitimate. The community is diverse, with discussions ranging from philosophical debates on the ethics of capitalism and anarchism to practical discussions on how a stateless society might handle issues like law enforcement, environmental regulation, and social welfare.

What are the related subreddits to this community?[edit]

  • /r/Anarcho_Capitalism
  • /r/ShitStatistsSay
  • /r/GoldandBlack
  • /r/AncapCopypasta
  • /r/Seasteading
  • /r/Libertarian
  • /r/FuckCars

What are the dominant personality types in the community?[edit]

The community is predominantly composed of individuals who display high openness to new ideas, as evidenced by their willingness to explore alternative political and economic systems. They tend to have high conscientiousness, particularly in their commitment to personal responsibility and ethical principles like the NAP. While the community includes both extroverts and introverts, there is a general trend towards introversion, as discussions often involve deep, reflective analysis of complex topics. Members exhibit moderate agreeableness, balancing a cooperative spirit with a critical approach to discussions. Emotional stability varies, but there is a noticeable trend towards low neuroticism, as members often exhibit calm and rational discourse even in heated debates.

Subgroup Personalities[edit]

  • Belongers: 5% - They value being part of the community and often engage in discussions that reinforce community bonds.
  • Emulators: 10% - These members look up to prominent figures in the libertarian and anarcho-capitalist movements and aspire to emulate their success.
  • Doomsdayers: 15% - They are skeptical of state intervention and often discuss the potential collapse of government systems.
  • Survivalists: 20% - Focused on self-sufficiency, they are cautious about state dependencies and advocate for decentralized solutions.
  • Achievers: 25% - Highly ambitious, these members are driven to innovate and lead in creating alternatives to state-based systems.
  • Saviors: 10% - They are motivated by a desire to improve societal conditions through voluntary cooperation and market solutions.
  • Integrators: 15% - While they earn in the market, they often support philanthropic efforts aligned with libertarian values.

What are the goals and aspirations of the community?[edit]

The community aspires to create a society where individuals can live freely without coercive state interventions. They envision a future where voluntary interactions replace government mandates, allowing for greater personal freedom and economic prosperity. Long-term, they hope to demonstrate the viability of anarcho-capitalism through successful examples of private governance, voluntary community projects, and innovative market solutions to social issues.

What are the values held by the community?[edit]

The core values include individual liberty, voluntary association, property rights, and the NAP. They hold these values because they believe they lead to a more ethical and prosperous society, free from the coercive power of the state. The community also values personal responsibility, believing that individuals should be accountable for their actions without reliance on state safety nets.

What are the motivations of the community?[edit]

Members are motivated by a desire for freedom from state control and a belief in the ethical superiority of voluntary interactions over coercion. They are driven by a vision of a society where innovation and cooperation flourish without the constraints of government regulation. The community is also motivated by a sense of justice, seeking to correct perceived wrongs perpetrated by state systems.

What are the pain points of the community?[edit]

Challenges include widespread misunderstanding and misrepresentation of anarcho-capitalism, resistance from statist ideologies, and the practical difficulties of implementing a stateless society. Members also grapple with internal debates on the best methods to transition from current systems to a fully voluntary society.

What are the anticipated solutions to the pain points of the community?[edit]

Solutions involve education and outreach to clarify misconceptions, building communities that model anarcho-capitalist principles, and engaging in intellectual discourse to refine theories and practices. They also focus on technological innovations and decentralized systems that reduce reliance on the state.

Who are the key villains?[edit]

  • The State: Seen as the primary villain due to its coercive nature and infringement on personal liberties.
  • Statist Politicians: Viewed as perpetuators of state power and coercion.
  • Large Corporations with State Ties: Criticized for crony capitalism and benefiting from state interventions.

Who are the key heroes?[edit]

  • Murray Rothbard: Celebrated for his foundational work in anarcho-capitalist theory.
  • Ludwig von Mises and Friedrich Hayek: Respected for their contributions to economic theory that supports free markets.
  • Modern Influencers: Individuals like Tom Woods and Dave Smith who promote libertarian ideas through media and education.

Shared Experiences?[edit]

Key experiences include exposure to libertarian literature, participation in debates on forums and social media, and involvement in events or communities that practice voluntary principles. These experiences shape the community’s identity and reinforce their commitment to anarcho-capitalism.

Barriers to Entry[edit]

New members may face barriers such as the complexity of anarcho-capitalist theory and the need to unlearn statist assumptions. These barriers can impact community dynamics by creating divisions between seasoned members and newcomers.

AIO (activities, interests and opinions)[edit]

Activities include reading and discussing libertarian literature, engaging in debates, and participating in community projects that align with anarcho-capitalist values. Opinions often center around skepticism of state solutions and support for market-based alternatives.

Community Rituals[edit]

Rituals include regular discussions on key anarcho-capitalist texts, celebrating notable figures in the movement, and participating in events like online debates or conferences. These rituals strengthen community bonds and reaffirm shared values.

In-Group Jokes, Common Phrases and Memes[edit]

  • “Taxation is theft.”
  • “Build the roads!”
  • Memes about the NAP and voluntarism.

Glossary of Community-specific Jargon[edit]

  • NAP: Non-Aggression Principle, a core ethical stance against initiating force.
  • Statist: Someone who supports the existence of a state.
  • Voluntarism: The principle of voluntary association and exchange.
  • Hoppean: Referring to the ideas of Hans-Hermann Hoppe, particularly regarding property rights and social order.

Cultural Influences[edit]

The culture of the subreddit promotes a critical view of state power and a strong belief in individualism. This influences members to prioritize personal responsibility and seek market solutions to societal problems.

Communication style[edit]

The preferred communication style is analytical and debate-oriented, often using logical arguments and references to libertarian literature. Quotes like “The market will provide” are common.

Conflict and Resolution[edit]

Conflicts are typically resolved through discussion and debate, with a focus on logic and evidence. The community values free speech and open discourse, fostering an environment where disagreements can be explored constructively.

How to communicate with them on an emotional level?[edit]

To connect emotionally, emphasize shared values of freedom and personal responsibility. Appeal to their desire for a just and voluntary society, and acknowledge the emotional challenges of living under coercive systems.

How to communicate with them on a material level?[edit]

Highlight the practical benefits of market solutions and voluntary interactions. Discuss examples of successful private initiatives and innovations that align with anarcho-capitalist principles.

External Perception:[edit]

Outsiders may perceive the community as idealistic or impractical, which can lead to misunderstandings. This perception can create a defensive stance within the community but also motivates members to engage in education and outreach.

Additional Notes & Insights[edit]

The /r/ancap101 community is deeply committed to exploring and advocating for a stateless society. While they face challenges both internally and externally, their dedication to the principles of anarcho-capitalism drives them to seek solutions and build a community rooted in voluntary cooperation and market freedom.



r/ancapcopypasta[edit]

The AnCap CopyPasta Community Persona[edit]

Summary[edit]

The /r/AnCapCopyPasta community represents a group of individuals who are deeply invested in the ideologies of anarcho-capitalism. This community is dedicated to sharing, discussing, and disseminating arguments, resources, and information that support the principles of a stateless society governed by voluntary interactions and free markets. Members of this community emphasize the importance of individual liberty, private property, and minimal to no government intervention in personal and economic matters. They frequently engage in discussions that challenge traditional state-driven systems and propose alternative solutions based on anarcho-capitalist theories. The community values robust debate, intellectual rigor, and the use of historical and contemporary examples to illustrate their points. They often employ humor, satire, and memes to convey their messages, making the community both educational and entertaining.

What are the related subreddits to this community?[edit]

  • /r/GoldAndBlack
  • /r/Libertarian
  • /r/Anarcho_Capitalism
  • /r/FreeMarketAnarchism
  • /r/LibertarianMeme
  • /r/QualitySocialism
  • /r/FragileCommunism
  • /r/Anarcho_Capitalism
  • /r/Neoliberal

What are the dominant personality types in the community?[edit]

The community is likely to exhibit personality traits associated with high openness to new ideas, as members are imaginative and often challenge conventional political systems. They may also score high on conscientiousness, as they are diligent in researching and understanding complex economic theories. The extroversion level could vary, with some members actively engaging in debates and discussions, while others may prefer to observe and learn. Agreeableness might be lower, as members often engage in contentious debates and are unafraid to challenge opposing viewpoints. Neuroticism is likely low, as members seem confident in their beliefs and are not easily swayed by emotional arguments.

Subgroup Personalities[edit]

Belongers: 10% - These members strive to fit into the community by actively participating in discussions and adopting the core beliefs of anarcho-capitalism.

Emulators: 5% - A small group that looks up to prominent libertarian figures and seeks to emulate their success by adopting similar views.

Doomsdayers: 15% - Members who are pessimistic about current government systems and advocate for self-sufficiency and alternative societal structures.

Survivalists: 20% - Individuals who are cautious with their resources and prioritize economic freedom and personal responsibility.

Achievers: 10% - Ambitious members who strive to spread anarcho-capitalist ideas and achieve success through entrepreneurship.

Saviors: 10% - Socially conscious individuals who believe that anarcho-capitalism can positively impact society and actively work towards this goal.

Integrators: 30% - Members who integrate anarcho-capitalist principles into their daily lives and support various libertarian causes and organizations.

What are the goals and aspirations of the community?[edit]

The community aspires to promote and popularize anarcho-capitalist ideas as viable alternatives to state-driven systems. They aim to educate others on the benefits of a stateless society, where voluntary exchanges and free markets govern interactions. Long-term goals include influencing public policy to reduce government intervention, supporting the growth of private enterprise, and fostering a culture of individual liberty and personal responsibility.

What are the values held by the community?[edit]

The community values individual liberty, private property rights, voluntary interactions, free markets, and minimal government intervention. They hold these values because they believe they lead to a more prosperous, just, and free society. The community also values intellectual rigor and open debate, as they see these as essential tools for understanding and promoting their beliefs.

What are the motivations of the community?[edit]

The community is motivated by a desire for personal and economic freedom, a belief in the inefficiency and corruption of government systems, and a commitment to creating a society based on voluntary cooperation. They are driven by the conviction that anarcho-capitalism can lead to greater prosperity and innovation by unleashing individual potential and reducing bureaucratic constraints.

What are the pain points of the community?[edit]

The community faces challenges in gaining mainstream acceptance for their ideas, dealing with misconceptions about anarcho-capitalism, and addressing practical concerns about implementing a stateless society. They also struggle with internal disagreements on the best strategies for achieving their goals and the nuances of specific policies.

What are the anticipated solutions to the pain points of the community?[edit]

The community seeks to address these challenges by increasing public awareness and understanding of anarcho-capitalism through educational efforts, debates, and outreach. They aim to build alliances with like-minded individuals and organizations to strengthen their influence. Additionally, they focus on developing practical solutions and transition plans to address concerns about implementing a stateless society.

Who are the key villains?[edit]

Key villains include government institutions and officials, as they represent the coercive force that anarcho-capitalists oppose. Specific names or nouns are not provided, but the community often critiques the Federal Reserve, taxation agencies, and regulatory bodies as antagonists to their ideals.

Who are the key heroes?[edit]

Key heroes include prominent libertarian thinkers and figures who have contributed to the development and dissemination of anarcho-capitalist ideas. Influential individuals such as Murray Rothbard, Ludwig von Mises, and Friedrich Hayek are often revered for their intellectual contributions. Key influencers within the community may include popular libertarian authors, podcasters, and activists who play a role in spreading these ideas.

Shared Experiences?[edit]

Shared experiences include participating in debates and discussions about libertarian and anarcho-capitalist principles, reading foundational texts, and engaging with content that critiques government systems. The community also shares experiences of facing opposition and skepticism from those who support traditional political structures.

Barriers to Entry[edit]

Barriers to entry for new members may include a steep learning curve to understand complex economic theories and philosophical arguments. The community’s use of specialized jargon and references to specific thinkers and texts may also be intimidating to newcomers. However, once these barriers are overcome, the community is generally welcoming and eager to engage in discussions.

AIO (activities, interests, and opinions)[edit]

The community’s activities include participating in online forums, attending libertarian conferences, and engaging with educational content such as books, podcasts, and videos. Their interests revolve around economic theory, political philosophy, and current events related to government and individual liberty. Opinions within the community are often critical of government intervention and supportive of free-market solutions.

Community Rituals[edit]

Community rituals include sharing and discussing copypastas, memes, and arguments that support anarcho-capitalist principles. Regular participation in debates and discussions on related subreddits is also a common practice. These rituals help reinforce the community’s values and foster a sense of belonging among members.

In-Group Jokes, Common Phrases, and Memes[edit]

  • “Taxation is theft!”
  • “Who will build the roads?”
  • “The NAP (Non-Aggression Principle)”
  • “The market will provide.”
  • “Vote with your wallet.”
  • “Statism is the most dangerous superstition.”

Glossary of Community-specific Jargon[edit]

  • NAP (Non-Aggression Principle): A fundamental anarcho-capitalist principle that opposes the initiation of force.
  • Statism: The belief in the necessity of a centralized government to manage society.
  • Voluntaryism: The philosophy that all interactions should be voluntary and consensual.
  • Minarchism: A belief in a minimal state that only provides essential services like defense and law enforcement.
  • Agorism: A strategy of using counter-economic activities to undermine and replace the state.

Cultural Influences[edit]

The culture of the subreddit influences members to prioritize individual liberty, question authority, and seek alternatives to government intervention. It encourages critical thinking and open debate on economic and political issues. The community’s culture also values humor and satire as tools for engaging with complex topics.

Communication Style[edit]

The preferred communication style within the community is direct, logical, and often confrontational. Members value well-reasoned arguments supported by evidence and are not afraid to challenge opposing viewpoints. Humor and sarcasm are frequently used to make points and engage with others. Examples include memes and satirical posts that critique government actions or policies.

Conflict and Resolution[edit]

The community handles conflicts through debates and discussions, often relying on logical arguments and evidence to resolve disagreements. Members are encouraged to engage respectfully, but heated exchanges are not uncommon. The community values intellectual rigor and open dialogue as means of resolving conflicts and refining ideas.

How to communicate with them on an emotional level?[edit]

To communicate with the community for maximum emotional impact, it is important to appeal to their values of individual liberty and personal responsibility. Highlighting stories of government overreach or inefficiency can resonate emotionally, as can showcasing examples of successful voluntary cooperation and innovation. Emotional triggers that resonate with the community include themes of freedom, autonomy, and self-determination.

How to communicate with them on a material level?[edit]

To communicate with the community for maximum material impact, emphasize practical examples of how free markets and voluntary interactions lead to better outcomes. Data and case studies that demonstrate the benefits of reduced government intervention and increased economic freedom can be compelling. Highlighting the cost-effectiveness and efficiency of private solutions compared to government programs can also resonate with the community.

External Perception[edit]

The community may be perceived by outsiders as radical or extreme due to their advocacy for a stateless society and minimal government. This perception can lead to misunderstandings and stereotypes about anarcho-capitalism. It may also create challenges in engaging with individuals who hold more traditional political views. However, the community’s emphasis on logical arguments and evidence can help counteract these perceptions and foster constructive dialogue.

Additional Notes & Insights[edit]

The community is dynamic and continually evolving, with members actively engaging in discussions and debates to refine their understanding of anarcho-capitalism. They draw inspiration from historical and contemporary examples of voluntary cooperation and free-market success. The community’s use of humor and satire helps make complex ideas more accessible and engaging, contributing to its appeal and growth.



r/ancapgaming[edit]

The Anarcho-Capitalist Gamer[edit]

Summary[edit]

The /r/ancapgaming community is a unique blend of anarcho-capitalist philosophy and gaming enthusiasm. Members are united by their shared belief in the principles of anarcho-capitalism, which they apply to their gaming experiences. They seek to explore and create gaming environments that mirror their libertarian values, often critiquing mainstream games for their perceived statist narratives. The community is characterized by a strong emphasis on autonomy, voluntary cooperation, and a disdain for coercive structures, reflecting their broader ideological commitments. This subreddit serves as a hub for discussions about games that align with or challenge their ideals, and it fosters the creation of gaming groups that prioritize anarcho-capitalist principles.

What are the related subreddits to this community?[edit]

  • Anarcho-Capitalism
  • Gaming
  • Games
  • Gamer News
  • True Gaming

What are the dominant personality types in the community?[edit]

The community predominantly displays high levels of openness to new ideas, as members are constantly seeking games that align with or challenge their philosophical beliefs. They are conscientious, often planning gaming sessions with like-minded individuals and considering the impact of their actions within virtual environments. While the community is not highly extroverted, members engage in discussions and collaborations, balancing social interactions with solitary gaming experiences. Agreeableness varies, as debates on philosophical topics can lead to disagreements, but the overarching cooperative spirit prevails. Emotional stability (low neuroticism) is common, as members approach gaming and philosophical discussions with a rational mindset.

Subgroup Personalities[edit]

Belongers: 15% - They enjoy connecting with fellow anarcho-capitalists and participating in gaming sessions that align with their community’s values.

Emulators: 10% - Some members admire game developers who successfully integrate libertarian principles into their games and aspire to create similar experiences.

Doomsdayers: 20% - A segment of the community is skeptical of mainstream games, viewing them as perpetuators of statist ideologies, and they actively seek alternatives.

Survivalists: 10% - These individuals are budget-conscious gamers who carefully select games that offer the best value, avoiding expensive titles that contradict their beliefs.

Achievers: 15% - Ambitious members strive to excel in games that allow for the expression of anarcho-capitalist principles, often seeking to dominate in competitive environments.

Saviors: 10% - Socially conscious gamers aim to create positive change within the gaming world by promoting libertarian ideals and supporting independent developers.

Integrators: 20% - These members balance their gaming pursuits with charitable efforts, often donating to causes that promote freedom and voluntary cooperation.

What are the goals and aspirations of the community?[edit]

The community aspires to create and participate in gaming environments that reflect their anarcho-capitalist values. They seek to influence the gaming industry by promoting games that prioritize autonomy, voluntary cooperation, and non-aggression. Long-term goals include developing games that accurately represent their philosophical beliefs and fostering a global network of like-minded gamers. Additionally, they aim to educate others about anarcho-capitalism through gaming, using virtual worlds as platforms for philosophical exploration and debate.

What are the values held by the community?[edit]

The community values autonomy, voluntary cooperation, and the non-aggression principle. They believe in the importance of individual freedom and the right to engage in consensual interactions without coercion. These values are reflected in their gaming preferences, as they seek out games that allow for open-world exploration, player-driven economies, and minimal authoritative control. The community also values creativity and innovation, encouraging the development of games that challenge conventional narratives and promote libertarian ideals.

What are the motivations of the community?[edit]

Members are motivated by a desire to see their philosophical beliefs represented in the gaming industry. They are driven by the pursuit of freedom, both in virtual worlds and real life, and seek to challenge mainstream gaming narratives that they perceive as promoting statist ideologies. The community is also motivated by the potential of gaming as an educational tool, aiming to use games to spread awareness of anarcho-capitalist principles. Additionally, they find motivation in the camaraderie and sense of belonging that comes from connecting with like-minded individuals.

What are the pain points of the community?[edit]

The community faces challenges in finding games that align with their philosophical beliefs, as many mainstream titles incorporate themes of government control and coercion. They are also frustrated by the lack of representation and understanding of anarcho-capitalism within the gaming industry. Additionally, the community struggles with misconceptions and stereotypes about their beliefs, which can lead to conflicts both within and outside the gaming world. Another pain point is the difficulty in creating and promoting games that accurately reflect their values, given the industry’s commercial pressures.

What are the anticipated solutions to the pain points of the community?[edit]

The community anticipates solutions such as supporting independent developers who share their values and creating their own games that embody anarcho-capitalist principles. They also aim to raise awareness about their philosophy through gaming discussions and collaborations, hoping to influence mainstream perceptions. By fostering a strong online presence and engaging in constructive debates, they seek to dispel myths and educate others about the benefits of voluntary cooperation and non-aggression. Additionally, the community is exploring ways to leverage crowdfunding and open-source platforms to develop games that align with their ideals.

Who are the key villains?[edit]

Key villains include mainstream game developers and publishers who produce titles that promote government control and coercion, as well as media outlets that perpetuate misconceptions about anarcho-capitalism. Specific names are not provided, but the community often critiques large gaming corporations for prioritizing profit over creative freedom and ethical considerations.

Who are the key heroes?[edit]

Key heroes include independent game developers and creators who integrate libertarian principles into their games. Influencers within the community, such as prominent members of related subreddits and gaming groups, play a crucial role in promoting anarcho-capitalist values. Specific names are not provided, but figures like Peter Schiff are occasionally mentioned in discussions.

Shared Experiences?[edit]

Shared experiences include playing games that challenge mainstream narratives, participating in online discussions about gaming and philosophy, and collaborating on projects that promote anarcho-capitalist ideals. Events such as gaming sessions on platforms like Minecraft and Arma 3, where community members can practice voluntary cooperation, are common. The community also shares experiences of frustration with games that misrepresent their beliefs.

Barriers to Entry[edit]

Barriers to entry include a deep understanding of anarcho-capitalist philosophy and familiarity with its application in gaming. New members may struggle to find games that align with the community’s values or may face challenges in articulating their beliefs in debates. These barriers can create a steep learning curve, affecting community dynamics by potentially isolating newcomers who do not share the same level of philosophical commitment.

AIO (activities, interests, and opinions)[edit]

Activities include playing and discussing games that reflect libertarian values, participating in online forums and gaming groups, and collaborating on the development of anarcho-capitalist-themed games. Interests revolve around open-world and sandbox games, player-driven economies, and games that allow for autonomy and voluntary cooperation. Opinions are often critical of mainstream gaming narratives and supportive of independent creators who challenge conventional ideals.

Community Rituals[edit]

Community rituals include organizing gaming sessions on platforms like Minecraft and Arma 3, hosting discussions about philosophical themes in games, and collaborating on game development projects. These activities reinforce the community’s values and provide opportunities for members to connect and share their experiences.

In-Group Jokes, Common Phrases, and Memes[edit]

  • “Black and yellow dominating the sandbox” – a reference to the anarcho-capitalist flag colors.
  • “Who will build the roads?” – a common question posed to libertarians, often used humorously.
  • “Ancapistan” – a fictional anarcho-capitalist utopia.
  • “NAP” – abbreviation for the non-aggression principle, frequently mentioned in discussions.

Glossary of Community-specific Jargon[edit]

  • “NAP” (Non-Aggression Principle): A core anarcho-capitalist belief that aggression is inherently illegitimate.
  • “Ancapistan”: A hypothetical anarcho-capitalist society where voluntary cooperation is the norm.
  • “Black and yellow”: Colors representing anarcho-capitalism, often used in community branding.

Cultural Influences[edit]

The culture of the subreddit influences members to approach gaming with a critical eye, evaluating games based on their alignment with anarcho-capitalist values. This perspective encourages members to seek out or create games that challenge conventional narratives and promote voluntary cooperation. The community’s culture also fosters a sense of camaraderie and shared purpose among members.

Communication Style[edit]

The preferred communication style within the community is direct and focused on philosophical discussions. Members often use logical arguments and references to anarcho-capitalist literature to support their points. Humor and in-group jokes are common, fostering a sense of belonging and shared identity. For example, “Who will build the roads?” is frequently used to challenge statist assumptions.

Conflict and Resolution[edit]

Conflicts are typically resolved through rational debate and discussions grounded in anarcho-capitalist principles. Members are encouraged to present logical arguments and respect differing viewpoints. Constructive criticism is valued, and personal attacks are discouraged. The community aims to maintain a respectful and open-minded atmosphere.

How to communicate with them on an emotional level?[edit]

To communicate effectively with the community on an emotional level, it is essential to acknowledge their passion for freedom and autonomy. Emphasizing the values of voluntary cooperation and non-aggression can resonate deeply with members. Sharing personal stories or experiences that highlight the benefits of these principles can create an emotional connection. Emotional triggers include the desire for creative freedom, frustration with coercive structures, and the aspiration to build a better gaming world.

How to communicate with them on a material level?[edit]

To communicate effectively on a material level, focus on the practical benefits of anarcho-capitalist principles in gaming. Highlight how these values can lead to more immersive and player-driven gaming experiences. Emphasize the potential for innovation and creativity when developers are free from restrictive structures. Offering tangible examples of successful games or projects that embody these ideals can inspire and motivate the community.

External Perception[edit]

The community is often perceived by outsiders as niche and ideologically driven. This perception can lead to misunderstandings and stereotypes about anarcho-capitalism. However, the community’s focus on voluntary cooperation and creative freedom can also attract interest and admiration from those who appreciate alternative perspectives. This external perception influences the community by motivating members to clarify their beliefs and engage in constructive dialogue with others.

Additional Notes & Insights[edit]

The /r/ancapgaming community is a vibrant and dynamic group that combines a passion for gaming with a commitment to anarcho-capitalist values. Members are dedicated to exploring and promoting games that reflect their beliefs, often challenging mainstream narratives in the process. The community’s emphasis on autonomy and voluntary cooperation fosters a unique gaming culture that values creativity, innovation, and philosophical exploration. While facing challenges in representation and understanding, the community remains steadfast in its pursuit of a gaming world that aligns with its ideals.



r/anonymous[edit]

The Enigmatic Legion of r/anonymous[edit]

Summary[edit]

The r/anonymous community represents a collective consciousness more than it does a cohesive group. This subreddit is a digital space where individuals rally around shared ideals of freedom of speech, transparency, and anti-censorship. It serves as an aggregation point for news and articles related to the hacktivist group Anonymous, acting as a forum for discussion rather than a planning hub for operations. The community values anonymity and operates under the belief that anyone can be Anonymous, emphasizing that it is an idea rather than a formal organization. This ethos is encapsulated in the phrase often associated with Anonymous: “We are Legion. We do not forgive. We do not forget. Expect us.” The members of this subreddit share a common disdain for overreaching authority, corruption, and systemic injustice, and they often engage in discussions about digital privacy, governmental transparency, and social justice issues.

What are the related subreddits to this community?[edit]

Related subreddits include /r/YourAnonNews, /r/Anarchism, /r/Activism, /r/Privacy, and /r/CyberSecurity. These subreddits share overlapping interests in activism, privacy rights, and digital security, which align with the core tenets of the r/anonymous community.

What are the dominant personality types in the community?[edit]

Within the framework of the Big Five personality traits, the r/anonymous community is likely to exhibit high Openness to Experience, as members are often interested in new ideas, technologies, and societal changes. They may score lower on Conscientiousness, reflecting a more rebellious or non-conformist attitude. The community likely skews towards Introversion, as the anonymous nature of the interactions provides a platform for those who may not be as outgoing in real life. Agreeableness may vary widely, with some members being cooperative and community-oriented, while others may exhibit more disagreeable traits, especially when debating contentious topics. Neuroticism levels may also vary, with some members displaying anxiety or emotional volatility, particularly in discussions about perceived injustices.

Subgroup Personalities[edit]

  • Belongers: Approximately 10% of the community may align with the Belongers subgroup, seeking a sense of community and solidarity within the anonymous collective.
  • Emulators: Around 5% might be Emulators, drawn to the perceived power and notoriety of the Anonymous brand.
  • Doomsdayers: About 20% could be categorized as Doomsdayers, often expressing cynicism about societal structures and a belief in the inevitable collapse of current systems.
  • Survivalists: Roughly 15% may fit the Survivalist profile, focusing on securing personal privacy and safety in a digital age rife with surveillance.
  • Achievers: A smaller segment, perhaps 5%, might be Achievers, utilizing their skills to gain recognition within the community or to advance personal projects.
  • Saviors: A significant portion, around 30%, are likely Saviors, motivated by a desire to effect positive change and challenge injustice.
  • Integrators: The remaining 15% could be Integrators, balancing their personal interests with a commitment to broader social causes.

What are the goals and aspirations of the community?[edit]

The r/anonymous community aspires to maintain and expand digital privacy, freedom of speech, and the free flow of information. Members seek to expose corruption, challenge censorship, and support whistleblowers. Long-term, they envision a more transparent and equitable society where citizens are informed and empowered to hold authorities accountable. They desire a world where technology is used to enhance freedom rather than suppress it and where individuals can engage in activism without fear of retribution.

What are the values held by the community?[edit]

The community values anonymity, freedom of information, and resistance to censorship. They uphold the right to privacy and the protection of civil liberties as fundamental. There is a strong emphasis on individual empowerment, collective action, and the democratization of information. These values stem from a shared belief that systemic change is necessary to rectify inequalities and injustices perpetuated by powerful institutions.

What are the motivations of the community?[edit]

The community is motivated by a desire to disrupt unjust systems and to advocate for transparency and accountability. They are driven by a commitment to protect individual freedoms and to resist the encroachment of authoritarianism. The shared goal of challenging power structures and exposing corruption fuels their activities and discussions. Additionally, there is a motivation to educate others about digital privacy and security, empowering more people to take control of their personal data and online presence.

What are the pain points of the community?[edit]

The community faces challenges related to maintaining anonymity in an increasingly surveilled world. They are concerned about the erosion of privacy rights and the growing power of corporations and governments to control information. There is frustration with apathy and misinformation among the general public, which can impede collective efforts to address pressing issues. Additionally, internal conflicts and disagreements about tactics and objectives can create tension within the community.

What are the anticipated solutions to the pain points of the community?[edit]

To address these challenges, the community advocates for stronger privacy protections and more robust encryption technologies. They call for increased public awareness and education about digital rights and cybersecurity. Collaborative efforts to develop open-source tools and platforms that prioritize user privacy are seen as essential solutions. Additionally, fostering a more unified and strategic approach to activism could help mitigate internal conflicts and enhance the community’s impact.

Who are the key villains?[edit]

Key villains include governments and corporations perceived as overstepping their bounds in terms of surveillance and censorship. Entities like the NSA, large tech companies with questionable data practices, and authoritarian regimes are often criticized. Specific individuals may include political leaders or corporate executives known for their roles in implementing or supporting invasive policies.

Who are the key heroes?[edit]

Key heroes within the community include whistleblowers like Edward Snowden and Julian Assange, who are celebrated for exposing government surveillance and corruption. Hacktivists who have successfully challenged unjust systems or protected digital rights are also admired. Influential figures in the digital privacy and cybersecurity fields, who advocate for open-source solutions and user empowerment, are respected as well.

Shared Experiences?[edit]

Shared experiences that have shaped the community’s identity include high-profile hacktivist operations, major data leaks, and significant legal battles over digital rights. Events like the Arab Spring, Occupy Wall Street, and various Anonymous operations have left lasting impacts on the community’s ethos. The persecution of whistleblowers and activists also resonates deeply, reinforcing the community’s commitment to protecting those who challenge power.

Barriers to Entry[edit]

Barriers to entry for new members include the complexity of understanding the community’s decentralized nature and the technical knowledge required to participate in certain discussions or activities. The anonymity of the group can be intimidating for newcomers unfamiliar with the culture and norms. These barriers can create a steep learning curve, potentially leading to misunderstandings or misaligned expectations.

AIO (activities, interests and opinions)[edit]

Activities within the community include participating in discussions about activism, digital security, and current events. Interests span a wide range of topics, from hacktivism and cybersecurity to social justice and privacy rights. Opinions often reflect skepticism towards authority and a preference for decentralization and transparency. Members hold strong beliefs in the power of collective action and the importance of maintaining digital freedoms.

Community Rituals[edit]

Community rituals may include the sharing of impactful news articles, engaging in coordinated online actions, and participating in discussions about significant events or anniversaries. Celebrating victories in the fight for digital rights or marking the anniversary of notable operations are common practices. These rituals help reinforce the community’s values and foster a sense of solidarity among members.

In-Group Jokes, Common Phrases and Memes[edit]

  • “We are Legion. We do not forgive. We do not forget. Expect us.”
  • References to “the lulz,” indicating actions taken for amusement or to provoke a reaction.
  • “Anon cat” or variations, referencing the playful side of the community.
  • “Operation [X],” denoting various coordinated actions or campaigns.

Glossary of Community-specific Jargon[edit]

  • “DDoS”: Distributed Denial of Service, a common tactic used in hacktivism.
  • “OpSec”: Operational Security, referring to the practices used to maintain anonymity and security.
  • “Skiddies”: Script Kiddies, a derogatory term for inexperienced hackers who use pre-made tools without understanding them.
  • “Moralfags”: A term used to describe members who prioritize ethical considerations in their actions.

Cultural Influences[edit]

The culture of the subreddit influences its members by fostering a mindset that prioritizes anonymity, collective action, and resistance to authority. This culture encourages critical thinking and skepticism about mainstream narratives, promoting a DIY ethos when it comes to digital security and activism.

Communication style[edit]

The preferred communication style within the community is often direct and concise, with a focus on sharing relevant information and insights. Humor and sarcasm are commonly used, and discussions can be intense and passionate. There is an emphasis on anonymity and using pseudonyms to protect identities.

Conflict and Resolution[edit]

Conflicts within the community are handled through discussion and debate, with an emphasis on reaching a consensus or agreeing to disagree. Members may use humor or sarcasm to diffuse tension, and there is a general understanding that disagreements are a natural part of a diverse, decentralized group.

How to communicate with them on an emotional level?[edit]

To communicate with the community on an emotional level, it’s important to acknowledge shared values and motivations, such as the desire for justice and transparency. Emotional appeals should resonate with the community’s commitment to digital rights and individual freedoms, emphasizing the impact of collective action and the importance of standing up against injustice.

How to communicate with them on a material level?[edit]

Material communication should focus on practical solutions and actionable information. Providing resources, tools, and strategies that empower members to protect their privacy and advocate for change will resonate with the community. Clear, concise communication that respects their intelligence and autonomy is key.

External Perception:[edit]

Externally, the community may be perceived as secretive, rebellious, or even threatening due to its association with hacktivism and anonymity. This perception can lead to misunderstandings and mistrust from outsiders, which may inadvertently strengthen the community’s resolve and solidarity.

Additional Notes & Insights[edit]

The r/anonymous community is a dynamic and evolving entity that reflects broader societal trends in digital privacy, activism, and resistance to authority. Its members are united by a shared belief in the power of anonymity and collective action to effect change. While the community faces internal and external challenges, it remains a vibrant and influential force in the ongoing discourse around digital rights and social justice.



r/asklibertarians[edit]

The Inquisitive Libertarian[edit]

Summary[edit]

The /r/asklibertarians community is composed of individuals who are deeply engaged in the exploration and understanding of libertarian philosophy. This subreddit serves as a platform for both libertarians and non-libertarians to ask questions about the ideology, discuss its principles, and debate its application in real-world scenarios. The community values open dialogue, intellectual curiosity, and the pursuit of individual liberty. Members are motivated by a desire to minimize government intervention in personal and economic affairs, advocating for the protection of individual rights and free markets. They are united by a belief in the Non-Aggression Principle (NAP), which posits that aggression against another’s person or property is inherently wrong. The subreddit reflects a wide spectrum of libertarian thought, from minarchists, who support a minimal state, to anarcho-capitalists, who advocate for the complete abolition of the state in favor of private governance.

What are the related subreddits to this community?[edit]

  • /r/Anarcho_Capitalism
  • /r/Libertarian
  • /r/LibertarianLeft
  • /r/LibertarianSocialism
  • /r/libertarianmeme
  • /r/libertarianbestof
  • /r/Shitstatistssay
  • /r/Agorism
  • /r/austrian_economics
  • /r/DebateaCommunist
  • /r/DebateAnarchism

What are the dominant personality types in the community?[edit]

Members of the /r/asklibertarians community tend to score high on openness to experience, as they are often engaged in discussions that challenge conventional political and social norms. They exhibit conscientiousness in their efforts to understand and articulate complex philosophical ideas. The community includes both extroverts, who actively participate in debates and discussions, and introverts, who may prefer to read and reflect on the content. Agreeableness varies, with some members displaying a cooperative and friendly approach, while others may be more argumentative and skeptical. Emotional stability is also diverse; while some members remain calm and composed in discussions, others may exhibit higher levels of neuroticism, particularly when discussing contentious topics like government overreach or individual rights.

Subgroup Personalities[edit]

  • Belongers: 10% - These members seek to connect with like-minded individuals and find a sense of community within the libertarian movement.
  • Emulators: 5% - Some members aspire to emulate prominent libertarian figures and scholars, drawing inspiration from their successes and ideas.
  • Doomsdayers: 15% - A portion of the community is wary of government overreach and the erosion of personal freedoms, expressing pessimism about future societal trends.
  • Survivalists: 20% - These individuals are pragmatic and cautious, advocating for self-reliance and careful scrutiny of government actions.
  • Achievers: 10% - Ambitious members who strive to promote libertarian principles and effect change in political and social systems.
  • Saviors: 25% - Many members are motivated by a desire to protect and expand individual freedoms, viewing their activism as a means to improve society.
  • Integrators: 15% - Some members focus on integrating libertarian values with broader societal goals, supporting initiatives that align with their principles but also benefit the community.

What are the goals and aspirations of the community?[edit]

The primary goal of the /r/asklibertarians community is to foster a deeper understanding of libertarian philosophy among its members and the broader public. They aim to provide a welcoming space for inquiry and debate, encouraging individuals to question their assumptions and consider libertarian perspectives. Long-term aspirations include influencing public policy to reduce government intervention, promote free markets, and protect individual rights. The community also seeks to build a network of informed and engaged libertarians who can advocate for these principles in various spheres of influence.

What are the values held by the community?[edit]

  • Individual Liberty: The belief that individuals should have the freedom to make their own choices, free from coercive interference.
  • Non-Aggression Principle (NAP): The principle that aggression against another’s person or property is inherently wrong.
  • Free Markets: Support for economic systems that allow voluntary exchanges and competition without government interference.
  • Personal Responsibility: The idea that individuals are accountable for their actions and should be free to pursue their own paths.
  • Limited Government: Advocacy for a government that exists solely to protect individual rights and provide basic public services.

What are the motivations of the community?[edit]

The /r/asklibertarians community is motivated by a desire to live in a society where individuals are free to pursue their own happiness and goals without undue interference from the state. They are driven by a belief in the moral and practical superiority of voluntary interactions over coercive ones. Members are often motivated by personal experiences with government overreach or a philosophical commitment to individualism and autonomy.

What are the pain points of the community?[edit]

Members of the /r/asklibertarians community often express frustration with the widespread misunderstanding and misrepresentation of libertarian ideas. They face challenges in communicating the nuances of their philosophy to those who equate libertarianism with an absence of compassion or social responsibility. Additionally, they are concerned about the increasing size and scope of government, which they see as a threat to individual liberties and economic prosperity.

What are the anticipated solutions to the pain points of the community?[edit]

The community anticipates that increased education and outreach will help address misconceptions about libertarianism. By engaging in respectful dialogue and providing clear explanations of their principles, they hope to build bridges with those who may be skeptical of their ideas. They also advocate for grassroots activism and political participation to promote policies that align with libertarian values, aiming to gradually reduce government intervention and expand individual freedoms.

Who are the key villains?[edit]

  • The State: Viewed as the primary antagonist, representing the coercive power that infringes on individual rights and liberties.
  • Statists: Individuals or groups who advocate for expansive government control and regulation, opposing libertarian ideals.
  • Mainstream Media: Criticized for perpetuating misconceptions about libertarianism and failing to adequately represent their views.

Who are the key heroes?[edit]

  • Ron Paul: Celebrated for his principled advocacy of libertarian ideals and his influence on the movement.
  • Milton Friedman: Respected for his contributions to economic theory and his defense of free markets.
  • John Stossel: Acknowledged for his efforts to promote libertarian ideas through media and journalism.

Shared Experiences?[edit]

The community is shaped by shared experiences of engaging with libertarian literature, participating in political campaigns, and encountering government overreach. These experiences reinforce their commitment to libertarian principles and motivate them to continue advocating for change.

Barriers to Entry[edit]

New members may find it challenging to engage with the community if they are unfamiliar with libertarian philosophy or if they hold preconceived notions about the ideology. However, the community generally welcomes newcomers and encourages them to ask questions and participate in discussions.

AIO (activities, interests, and opinions)[edit]

Members are interested in exploring philosophical and economic theories, discussing current events through a libertarian lens, and participating in political activism. They hold opinions that emphasize individual liberty, skepticism of government power, and the importance of personal responsibility.

Community Rituals[edit]

Regular participation in discussions, sharing of libertarian literature and media, and engagement in political activism are common rituals within the community. Members often celebrate libertarian milestones and events, such as Ron Paul’s presidential campaigns and significant policy victories.

In-Group Jokes, Common Phrases, and Memes[edit]

  • “Taxation is theft”
  • “The NAP (Non-Aggression Principle)”
  • “Live and let live”
  • “Repeal the commerce clause”
  • “I don’t want the government involved in [insert issue] at all”

Glossary of Community-specific Jargon[edit]

  • NAP (Non-Aggression Principle): A foundational libertarian principle that opposes the initiation of force against others.
  • Statist: A term used to describe individuals who support extensive government control and regulation.

Cultural Influences[edit]

The culture of the subreddit emphasizes skepticism toward government authority and a commitment to individual liberty. This influences members to critically evaluate policies and engage in discussions that prioritize freedom and autonomy.

Communication style[edit]

The preferred communication style within the community is direct and evidence-based, often relying on logical arguments and historical examples to support claims. Members appreciate respectful debate and are generally open to hearing diverse perspectives.

Conflict and Resolution[edit]

Conflicts within the community are typically resolved through discussion and debate, with an emphasis on finding common ground and understanding diverse viewpoints. Members are encouraged to engage respectfully and avoid personal attacks.

How to communicate with them on an emotional level?[edit]

To communicate emotionally with the community, it is important to acknowledge shared values of liberty and autonomy. Discussing personal stories of overcoming government oppression or highlighting the benefits of individual empowerment can resonate on an emotional level. Emotional triggers include appeals to freedom, self-reliance, and personal responsibility.

How to communicate with them on a material level?[edit]

To communicate materially, focus on practical examples of how libertarian principles can lead to better outcomes in areas like economics, healthcare, and personal freedoms. Highlighting successful libertarian policies and initiatives can demonstrate tangible benefits and encourage support for libertarian solutions.

External Perception:[edit]

The community is often perceived by outsiders as overly idealistic or disconnected from practical realities. This perception can lead to misunderstandings and dismissive attitudes toward libertarian ideas. However, members are committed to clarifying misconceptions and demonstrating the practicality of their philosophy.

Additional Notes & Insights[edit]

The /r/asklibertarians community values open dialogue and intellectual exploration. Members are passionate about their beliefs and eager to engage with others in discussions about the role of government and individual rights. They strive to create a welcoming environment for both newcomers and seasoned libertarians, fostering a space for learning and growth.



r/austrian_economics[edit]

The /r/austrian_economics Community Persona[edit]

Summary[edit]

The /r/austrian_economics community embodies individuals who are passionate about the principles of Austrian Economics, which emphasizes the subjective theory of value and the importance of individual action in economic processes. Members are driven by a strong belief in free markets, minimal government intervention, and the idea that economic phenomena emerge from individual actions. This community is characterized by a shared interest in economic theories that prioritize individual liberty, the role of entrepreneurship, and skepticism towards central banking and government interference. The community values intellectual discussions, often referencing key figures such as Ludwig von Mises, Friedrich Hayek, and Murray Rothbard, and engages in debates about contemporary economic issues through the lens of Austrian Economics.

What are the related subreddits to this community?[edit]

  • r/Anarcho_Capitalism
  • r/AskLibertarians
  • r/EndlessWar
  • r/liberland
  • r/Libertarian
  • r/libertarian_history
  • r/OpenSource
  • r/ronpaul
  • r/PeterSchiff
  • r/politics

What are the dominant personality types in the community?[edit]

The community is likely dominated by individuals with high openness to new ideas, given their interest in complex economic theories and philosophical discussions. Conscientiousness is also prevalent, as members show a strong commitment to understanding and applying economic principles. The community may exhibit a mix of extroversion and introversion, with some members actively engaging in debates and others preferring to absorb information. Agreeableness varies, as discussions can become contentious, reflecting a spectrum from cooperative to disagreeable interactions. Emotional stability is generally high, as members engage in rational discourse, though some may show frustration with opposing views.

Subgroup Personalities[edit]

Belongers: 15% - They seek to fit into the community by aligning with its core beliefs and participating in collective discussions. Emulators: 10% - These members admire prominent figures within the Austrian Economics sphere and strive to emulate their ideas and success. Doomsdayers: 20% - They focus on perceived economic and governmental failures, advocating for self-sufficiency and alternative economic systems. Survivalists: 10% - These individuals are cautious about economic policies and prioritize financial prudence and research-based decisions. Achievers: 15% - Ambitious members who aim to apply Austrian Economics principles to achieve personal and professional success. Saviors: 10% - They are motivated by a desire to educate others and promote economic freedom as a means of improving society. Integrators: 20% - Members who integrate Austrian Economics principles into broader philosophical and social frameworks, often engaging in philanthropy.

What are the goals and aspirations of the community?[edit]

The community aspires to promote a deeper understanding of Austrian Economics, influence economic policy towards free-market principles, and advocate for reduced government intervention in the economy. They aim to educate others on the benefits of individual liberty and entrepreneurship and to challenge mainstream economic thought. Long-term, they desire a societal shift towards economic systems that prioritize personal freedom and voluntary interactions over centralized control.

What are the values held by the community?[edit]

The community values individual liberty, personal responsibility, and economic freedom. They believe in the power of free markets to allocate resources efficiently and view government intervention as a source of economic distortion. The community holds entrepreneurship in high regard, seeing it as a driver of innovation and progress. They value intellectual discourse and the rigorous examination of economic theories.

What are the motivations of the community?[edit]

Members are motivated by a desire to see economic systems that align with their principles of individual freedom and market efficiency. They are driven by a belief in the superiority of Austrian Economics in explaining economic phenomena and in shaping effective economic policies. The community seeks to challenge and change the status quo of economic thought and policy-making.

What are the pain points of the community?[edit]

The community faces challenges in gaining mainstream acceptance for Austrian Economics, often encountering resistance from proponents of Keynesian and other economic theories. They are frustrated by government policies they see as overreaching and economically harmful, such as central banking and heavy regulation. There is also a struggle to effectively communicate complex economic concepts to a broader audience.

What are the anticipated solutions to the pain points of the community?[edit]

Educating the public and policymakers about Austrian Economics through accessible content and real-world examples is seen as a solution. Building alliances with like-minded individuals and organizations to amplify their message and influence policy is also a strategy. They anticipate leveraging digital platforms to reach wider audiences and engage in meaningful discourse.

Who are the key villains?[edit]

  • Central banks (e.g., Federal Reserve): Seen as perpetuators of inflation and economic instability.
  • Government agencies: Criticized for regulatory overreach and economic intervention.
  • Keynesian economists: Viewed as proponents of flawed economic policies that undermine free markets.

Who are the key heroes?[edit]

  • Ludwig von Mises: Celebrated for foundational contributions to Austrian Economics.
  • Friedrich Hayek: Respected for his work on the role of knowledge and markets.
  • Murray Rothbard: Valued for his advocacy of libertarian principles and critiques of government intervention.
  • Ron Paul: Admired for his political efforts to promote Austrian Economics and individual liberty.

Shared Experiences?[edit]

Common experiences include studying key Austrian Economics texts, engaging in debates on economic policy, and participating in events or forums dedicated to Austrian Economics. The community often references historical economic crises as validation of their theories and draws on shared intellectual heritage to strengthen their identity.

Barriers to Entry[edit]

New members may find the complex theories and dense literature daunting. The community’s strong ideological stance can also be intimidating to those unfamiliar with Austrian Economics. These barriers can affect dynamics by creating an environment that favors those with prior knowledge or a strong interest in the subject.

AIO (activities, interests and opinions)[edit]

Activities include reading and discussing Austrian Economics literature, attending related conferences, and participating in online debates. Interests revolve around economic theory, political philosophy, and current economic events. Opinions are generally skeptical of government intervention and supportive of free-market solutions.

Community Rituals[edit]

Rituals include celebrating the birthdays of key figures like Ludwig von Mises and Friedrich Hayek, participating in annual conferences such as those hosted by the Mises Institute, and engaging in regular discussion threads on foundational texts or current events.

In-Group Jokes, Common Phrases and Memes[edit]

  • “End the Fed”
  • “Who will build the roads?”
  • “Taxation is theft”
  • “Read Human Action”
  • “There is no such thing as a free lunch”

Glossary of Community-specific Jargon[edit]

  • “Praxeology”: The study of human action, a foundational concept in Austrian Economics.
  • “Catallactics”: The theory of exchange and market processes.
  • “Malinvestment”: Investment in unproductive or misaligned ventures due to distorted economic signals.
  • “Boom-Bust Cycle”: Economic cycles caused by artificial expansion and contraction of credit.

Cultural Influences[edit]

The culture of the subreddit emphasizes intellectual exploration and debate, valuing rigorous analysis and historical context. This culture influences members to approach economic discussions with a critical and analytical mindset, often challenging conventional beliefs.

Communication style[edit]

The community prefers detailed, well-reasoned arguments and often engages in lengthy discussions to explore economic concepts. Direct quotes from influential Austrian Economists are frequently used to illustrate points. For example, “The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design.” – F.A. Hayek

Conflict and Resolution[edit]

Conflicts are typically handled through debate, with members presenting evidence and arguments to support their positions. While disagreements can be heated, they are generally resolved through continued discussion and reference to Austrian Economics principles.

How to communicate with them on an emotional level?[edit]

To communicate effectively, appeal to their values of individual liberty and economic freedom. Highlight stories of entrepreneurial success and innovation resulting from market forces. Address their frustrations with government overreach by acknowledging these pain points and emphasizing shared goals of economic prosperity and freedom.

How to communicate with them on a material level?[edit]

Discuss the tangible benefits of Austrian Economics, such as efficient resource allocation and increased innovation. Provide data and case studies that demonstrate the success of market-driven policies. Address material needs by discussing policies that reduce economic barriers and promote individual entrepreneurship.

External Perception:[edit]

Outsiders may perceive the community as niche or overly theoretical, sometimes viewing it as disconnected from mainstream economic thought. This perception can lead to misunderstandings about the community’s goals and principles. The community’s emphasis on individualism can also be misinterpreted as a lack of concern for social welfare.

Additional Notes & Insights[edit]

The /r/austrian_economics community is deeply committed to its principles and values, drawing on a rich intellectual tradition to inform its discussions and advocacy. Despite challenges in gaining broader acceptance, the community remains a vibrant hub for those passionate about Austrian Economics and its application to real-world issues.



r/badgovnofreedom[edit]

The Vigilant Dissenters: Guardians of Freedom[edit]

Summary[edit]

The r/badgovnofreedom community is composed of individuals who are deeply concerned about governmental overreach and the erosion of personal freedoms. These individuals are vigilant in their advocacy for civil liberties, privacy rights, and freedom of speech. They are characterized by a strong distrust of government and law enforcement, often perceiving them as entities that infringe upon individual rights and freedoms. This community is not limited to any single nation but extends globally, highlighting instances of government misconduct, corruption, and authoritarianism. Members of this group are not only aware of their rights but are also proactive in defending them, often resorting to whistleblowing and activism to bring attention to issues they deem critical. Their discussions often revolve around current events that showcase governmental failures and abuses, and they actively share tools and strategies to protect personal privacy and circumvent censorship.

What are the related subreddits to this community?[edit]

  • r/anonymous
  • r/Bad_Cop_No_Donut
  • r/Censorship
  • r/cyberlaws
  • r/descentintotyranny
  • r/FirstAmendment
  • r/freespeech
  • r/FuturistParty
  • r/GovernmentOppression
  • r/NSALeaks
  • r/privacy
  • r/PowerInAction
  • r/reinstatearticle8
  • r/restorethefourth
  • r/runforit
  • r/Stand
  • r/watchingcongress
  • r/WikiLeaks
  • r/yro

What are the dominant personality types in the community?[edit]

Within the r/badgovnofreedom community, dominant personality traits can be aligned with the Big Five personality traits model:

  • Openness: Members tend to be open to new ideas, particularly those related to civil liberties and privacy technologies. They are imaginative and willing to explore alternative narratives and solutions outside mainstream discourse.
  • Conscientiousness: There is a strong sense of duty to protect others and raise awareness about rights violations. Members often plan ahead, sharing strategies to mitigate risks associated with government surveillance.
  • Extroversion: The community is a mix of extroverts who actively engage in discussions and introverts who prefer to absorb information silently. However, the shared interest in activism suggests a collective willingness to engage publicly when necessary.
  • Agreeableness: While members may be cooperative with like-minded individuals, there is a general distrust towards authorities and those perceived to endorse government overreach, which can lead to disagreements.
  • Neuroticism: Given the nature of the discussions, there is a tendency towards higher levels of anxiety and concern about the state of personal freedoms and privacy.

Subgroup Personalities[edit]

  • Belongers: 10% - These individuals seek affiliation with like-minded peers to feel grounded in a community that shares their values.
  • Emulators: 5% - A minority, they might look up to prominent activists or whistleblowers, aspiring to make a similar impact.
  • Doomsdayers: 25% - A significant portion harbors pessimistic views about the future of civil liberties and governmental accountability.
  • Survivalists: 15% - They are cautious with their resources, focusing on practical measures to protect themselves from government overreach.
  • Achievers: 10% - This group is ambitious in their activism, striving to achieve tangible changes in laws and policies.
  • Saviors: 20% - Many members are motivated by a desire to protect and help others by raising awareness about rights violations.
  • Integrators: 15% - Some members focus on integrating their activism with broader humanitarian efforts, supporting nonprofit organizations focused on civil liberties.

What are the goals and aspirations of the community?[edit]

The primary goals of the r/badgovnofreedom community are to raise awareness about government overreach and to protect individual freedoms from infringement. They aspire to create a world where freedom of speech, privacy, and civil liberties are respected and upheld universally. Long-term, they envision a society where governments are transparent and accountable to their citizens, allowing for open discourse without fear of reprisal. They aim to empower individuals with knowledge and tools to protect their rights and advocate for policy changes that reinforce constitutional liberties.

What are the values held by the community?[edit]

The community values transparency, accountability, and the protection of civil liberties. They hold privacy and free speech in high regard, viewing these as fundamental rights that should be defended at all costs. The community also values activism and the role of the individual in effecting change, believing that informed and engaged citizens are crucial to maintaining a free society. These values stem from a deep-seated belief in the importance of personal autonomy and skepticism towards unchecked governmental power.

What are the motivations of the community?[edit]

The motivations of the r/badgovnofreedom community are driven by a desire to safeguard personal freedoms and prevent governmental abuse of power. Members are motivated by past and ongoing violations of rights, which fuel their activism and engagement in discussions. The community is also motivated by a sense of duty to inform and protect others, sharing resources and strategies to counteract surveillance and censorship. A shared concern for future generations and the preservation of democratic principles further motivates their actions.

What are the pain points of the community?[edit]

Key challenges faced by the community include government surveillance, censorship, and the erosion of civil liberties. Members are frustrated by the lack of accountability and transparency within governmental institutions. They also struggle with the perception of being marginalized or labeled as extremists due to their vocal stance on privacy and freedom issues. Additionally, there is a constant concern for personal safety and privacy, particularly for those living in oppressive regimes.

What are the anticipated solutions to the pain points of the community?[edit]

To address these challenges, the community seeks to promote awareness and education on privacy rights and legal protections. They advocate for the adoption of privacy-enhancing technologies and support legislative reforms aimed at curbing government overreach. Building alliances with like-minded organizations and individuals to amplify their voice and influence policy is also a key strategy. They emphasize the importance of grassroots activism and public pressure to hold governments accountable.

Who are the key villians?[edit]

  • Governmental Institutions: Perceived as the primary violators of personal freedoms and privacy rights.
  • Law Enforcement Agencies: Often viewed as enforcers of oppressive policies and surveillance practices.
  • Big Tech Companies: Criticized for their role in facilitating government surveillance and censorship.
  • Authoritarian Leaders: Both foreign and domestic, seen as proponents of policies that undermine civil liberties.

Who are the key heroes?[edit]

  • Whistleblowers: Individuals like Edward Snowden and Chelsea Manning are celebrated for exposing governmental overreach.
  • Civil Liberties Organizations: Groups like the ACLU and Electronic Frontier Foundation are regarded as allies in the fight for privacy and free speech.
  • Activist Journalists: Those who risk personal safety to report on government misconduct are considered heroes within the community.

Shared Experiences?[edit]

The community shares experiences of being surveilled, censored, or threatened due to their activism or outspoken views. Many have encountered challenges in accessing information or communicating securely. Historical events, such as the Snowden revelations and instances of police brutality, have galvanized the community and shaped its collective identity. These experiences foster a sense of camaraderie and shared purpose among members.

Barriers to Entry[edit]

New members must demonstrate an understanding of the community’s values and issues, as well as a commitment to protecting personal freedoms. There is often a vetting process to ensure that new members are genuine and not infiltrators from opposition groups. This barrier can create a sense of exclusivity but also reinforces trust within the community, ensuring that members are aligned in their goals and values.

AIO (activities, interests and opinions)[edit]

Activities include sharing news articles, discussing privacy tools, and organizing advocacy campaigns. Members are interested in privacy technologies, civil liberties, and legal developments related to government transparency. Opinions within the community are often critical of government actions that infringe upon rights, and there is a strong belief in the need for vigilance and activism to safeguard freedoms.

Community Rituals[edit]

Regular discussions and posts analyzing current events related to government overreach are a staple. Members often participate in online campaigns or petitions supporting whistleblowers and advocating for policy changes. Celebrating victories in privacy rights or successful advocacy efforts is common, reinforcing the community’s sense of purpose and achievement.

In-Group Jokes, Common Phrases and Memes[edit]

  • “Big Brother is watching” - A reference to government surveillance.
  • “1984 was not an instruction manual” - A critique of authoritarian policies.
  • “Give up your password or go to jail” - Commenting on legal overreach regarding personal data access.

Glossary of Community-specific Jargon[edit]

  • “Surveillance State”: A term used to describe government systems that excessively monitor citizens.
  • “Whistleblower”: An individual who exposes information on government misconduct.
  • “Privacy tools”: Technologies that help protect personal data from surveillance.

Cultural Influences[edit]

The culture of the subreddit emphasizes skepticism towards authority and a strong belief in individual rights. This culture influences members to be proactive in protecting their privacy and advocating for civil liberties. The community’s culture fosters an environment where questioning and challenging governmental actions are encouraged.

Communication style[edit]

The preferred communication style is direct and assertive, often employing factual evidence and personal anecdotes to support arguments. Members value clear, concise communication that effectively highlights issues of concern. Quotes like “Privacy is not for the innocent, it’s for the aware” are used to underscore the importance of vigilance.

Conflict and Resolution[edit]

Conflicts are typically resolved through factual debates and referencing credible sources. The community values evidence-based discussions and encourages members to back their claims with data. There is a strong emphasis on maintaining a respectful tone, even when disagreements arise.

How to communicate with them on an emotional level?[edit]

To connect emotionally, appeal to their sense of justice and desire for a fair and transparent society. Acknowledge their concerns about government overreach and emphasize shared values of freedom and autonomy. Emotional triggers include stories of individuals affected by rights violations and successes in advocacy efforts.

How to communicate with them on a material level?[edit]

Provide practical resources and tools that aid in protecting privacy and advocating for rights. Emphasize the tangible benefits of using privacy-enhancing technologies and participating in activism. Highlight case studies or examples where community efforts have led to material changes in policy or public awareness.

External Perception:[edit]

Outsiders may perceive the community as overly critical or paranoid, which can lead to misunderstandings about their intentions. This perception can sometimes result in the community being dismissed or marginalized in broader discussions. However, members often use this external perception as motivation to continue their advocacy and outreach efforts.

Additional Notes & Insights[edit]

The r/badgovnofreedom community is a diverse and dynamic group that serves as a vital platform for discussing and addressing issues related to government accountability and personal freedoms. Their commitment to these causes is unwavering, and they continue to adapt and evolve in response to new challenges and developments in the landscape of civil liberties and privacy rights.



r/classical_liberals[edit]

The Classical Liberal Mindset[edit]

Summary[edit]

The /r/classical_liberals community is a group deeply rooted in the values of classical liberalism, which emphasizes individual liberty, economic freedom, and limited government intervention. Members of this community are typically driven by a desire to uphold civil liberties and political freedoms within a framework of representative democracy. They value free-market capitalism and are generally wary of substantial wealth redistribution and excessive government control, distinguishing themselves from more socialist-leaning ideologies. The community is characterized by a commitment to personal responsibility, the rule of law, and a belief that individuals should be free to pursue their own paths to success without undue interference.

Members often engage in discussions about the balance between freedom and order, advocating for reasonable limits on liberty to ensure a functional society. They are inspired by historical figures such as John Locke, Adam Smith, and Friedrich Hayek, who championed principles of economic liberalism and individual rights. The community is a space for thoughtful discourse on how these principles can be applied in modern society, seeking solutions that align with their ideological roots while addressing contemporary challenges.

What are the related subreddits to this community?[edit]

  • /r/Libertarian
  • /r/Conservative
  • /r/GaryJohnson
  • /r/libertymovement
  • /r/neoliberal
  • /r/randpaul/
  • /r/LibertarianPartyUSA/
  • /r/CapitalismVSocialism
  • /r/LearnLiberty
  • /r/Liberal
  • /r/tuesday

What are the dominant personality types in the community?[edit]

In terms of the OCEAN model (The Big Five), the dominant personality traits within the /r/classical_liberals community are:

  • Openness to new ideas: Members are generally open to discussing new ideas and perspectives, particularly those that challenge state control and promote individual freedoms. They value creativity and intellectual exploration.
  • Conscientiousness toward others: There is a strong sense of responsibility and duty to uphold the principles of classical liberalism, with members often planning their discussions and contributions carefully to align with these ideals.
  • Extroversion level: The community appears to have a mix of extroverts and introverts. Some members actively engage in lively debates and discussions, while others prefer to consume content and reflect on it privately.
  • Agreeableness with others: There is a cooperative spirit among members when it comes to promoting classical liberal values, though debates can become heated when discussing interpretations and applications of these principles.
  • Neuroticism or level of emotional stability: Members tend to exhibit low levels of neuroticism, maintaining a calm and reasoned approach to discussions, though some may become anxious about perceived threats to their ideological values.

Subgroup Personalities[edit]

  • Belongers (10%): A smaller portion of the community seeks to align with like-minded individuals, finding comfort in shared beliefs and traditional values within classical liberalism.
  • Emulators (15%): Some members aspire to emulate successful classical liberal figures and thinkers, adopting their philosophies and lifestyles as a model for personal success.
  • Doomsdayers (20%): This group is more pessimistic, often focusing on perceived threats to individual freedoms from government overreach and advocating for self-sufficiency.
  • Survivalists (10%): These individuals are cautious in their economic engagements, emphasizing the importance of personal responsibility and fiscal prudence.
  • Achievers (15%): Members in this subgroup are ambitious and driven, seeking personal and professional success through the application of classical liberal principles.
  • Saviors (10%): A socially conscious segment of the community is motivated by a desire to impact society positively through the promotion of liberty and freedom.
  • Integrators (20%): These members strive to balance personal success with philanthropy, often supporting causes that align with classical liberal values through charitable efforts.

What are the goals and aspirations of the community?[edit]

The long-term goals and aspirations of the /r/classical_liberals community include:

  • Promoting Individual Liberty: Advocating for policies and practices that increase personal freedoms and reduce government intervention in individual lives.
  • Economic Freedom: Supporting free-market capitalism and opposing excessive regulation that stifles economic growth and innovation.
  • Rule of Law: Ensuring that all laws are applied fairly and justly, protecting individual rights while maintaining social order.
  • Educational Advocacy: Increasing awareness and understanding of classical liberal principles among the broader public.
  • Political Influence: Seeking to influence political discourse and policy-making in favor of classical liberal values, both domestically and internationally.

What are the values held by the community?[edit]

The community upholds several core values, including:

  • Freedom of Expression: A staunch belief in the right to free speech and open discourse, essential for a thriving democracy.
  • Personal Responsibility: Emphasizing the importance of individuals being accountable for their actions and decisions.
  • Meritocracy: Supporting the idea that success should be based on individual effort and ability rather than predetermined status or privilege.
  • Limited Government: Advocating for a government that exists primarily to protect individual rights and freedoms, rather than control or dictate personal choices.
  • Economic Liberalism: Endorsing free-market principles as the most effective means of promoting prosperity and innovation.

What are the motivations of the community?[edit]

The motivations driving the /r/classical_liberals community include:

  • Preservation of Liberty: A desire to protect and expand individual freedoms against perceived threats from authoritarian policies and ideologies.
  • Promotion of Rational Discourse: Encouraging thoughtful discussion and debate on political and philosophical issues, grounded in reason and evidence.
  • Economic Prosperity: Belief in the power of free markets to drive economic growth and improve living standards for all.
  • Intellectual Engagement: A passion for engaging with and disseminating classical liberal ideas through education and advocacy.

What are the pain points of the community?[edit]

The community faces several challenges and pain points, including:

  • Political Misunderstanding: Frustration with misrepresentations of classical liberalism as synonymous with other ideologies, such as libertarianism or neoliberalism.
  • Government Overreach: Concerns about increasing government intervention in personal and economic affairs, which they view as a threat to individual freedoms.
  • Cultural Shifts: Anxiety about cultural trends that prioritize collective over individual rights, seen as undermining classical liberal values.
  • Polarization: Difficulty in navigating a polarized political landscape where nuanced classical liberal positions may be overshadowed by more extreme viewpoints.

What are the anticipated solutions to the pain points of the community?[edit]

To address these challenges, the community anticipates solutions such as:

  • Education and Outreach: Increasing efforts to educate the public and policymakers about the principles and benefits of classical liberalism.
  • Engagement in Political Processes: Actively participating in political discussions and elections to advocate for policies aligned with classical liberal values.
  • Building Alliances: Forming coalitions with other groups that share similar values to amplify their voice and influence.
  • Promoting Civil Discourse: Encouraging respectful and open dialogue across ideological divides to foster understanding and cooperation.

Who are the key villains?[edit]

The community identifies certain key “villains,” including:

  • Authoritarian Governments: Viewed as the primary threat to individual freedoms and economic liberties.
  • Collectivist Ideologies: Ideologies that prioritize group rights over individual rights are seen as antithetical to classical liberal values.
  • Censorship Advocates: Individuals or groups advocating for restrictions on free speech are perceived as undermining a core tenet of classical liberalism.

Who are the key heroes?[edit]

The community celebrates several key heroes, including:

  • John Locke: An early advocate for individual rights and the social contract, whose ideas form the foundation of classical liberal thought.
  • Adam Smith: Known for his work on economic liberalism and the benefits of free markets.
  • Friedrich Hayek: A 20th-century economist and philosopher who defended free markets and warned against the dangers of central planning.
  • Milton Friedman: An influential economist who championed free-market principles and individual freedom.

Shared Experiences?[edit]

The community shares certain common experiences that shape its identity, such as:

  • Engagement with Classical Texts: A shared interest in studying and discussing key texts and figures in the classical liberal tradition.
  • Debate and Discourse: Participation in debates and discussions on political, economic, and philosophical topics.
  • Advocacy and Activism: Involvement in efforts to promote classical liberal values through various forms of activism and advocacy.

Barriers to Entry[edit]

New members may face barriers such as:

  • Understanding Complex Ideologies: The nuanced nature of classical liberalism may require a significant investment of time and effort to fully understand.
  • Confronting Misconceptions: New members may need to navigate and correct common misconceptions about classical liberal principles.

AIO (activities, interests, and opinions)[edit]

The community is engaged in a variety of activities, interests, and opinions, including:

  • Reading and Discussing Classical Liberal Texts: Many members are interested in exploring the works of historical figures like Locke, Smith, and Hayek.
  • Debating Political and Economic Issues: Members frequently engage in discussions and debates on contemporary political and economic issues from a classical liberal perspective.
  • Advocating for Policy Change: The community is interested in promoting policies that align with classical liberal values, such as reducing government intervention and expanding individual freedoms.

Community Rituals[edit]

While the community may not have formal rituals, there are certain traditions and practices that members engage in:

  • Regular Discussions and Debates: Members frequently participate in discussions and debates on various topics related to classical liberalism.
  • Engagement with Historical Texts: Many members take part in reading and analyzing the works of influential classical liberal thinkers.
  • Celebrating Key Anniversaries: The community may recognize significant anniversaries related to classical liberal figures or events.

In-Group Jokes, Common Phrases, and Memes[edit]

Common jokes, phrases, and memes within the community might include:

  • “Taxation is theft”: A humorous expression of the belief that taxes are an unjust infringement on personal property rights.
  • “Liberalism is not a dirty word”: A phrase used to emphasize the distinction between classical liberalism and other forms of liberalism.
  • “Make Liberty Great Again”: A playful adaptation of a popular political slogan, emphasizing the community’s commitment to individual freedom.

Glossary of Community-specific Jargon[edit]

  • Classical Liberalism: A political ideology that emphasizes individual liberty, economic freedom, and limited government.
  • Free Market: An economic system where prices and production are determined by unrestricted competition between privately owned businesses.
  • Rule of Law: The principle that all members of society, including governing officials, are equally subject to the law.

Cultural Influences[edit]

The culture of the subreddit influences its members by fostering a commitment to individual liberty and economic freedom. It encourages critical thinking and open dialogue, shaping the attitudes and behaviors of its members to prioritize these values in their personal and political lives.

Communication Style[edit]

The preferred communication style within the community is direct and reasoned, often involving detailed arguments supported by historical and economic evidence. Members value respectful discourse and are generally open to engaging with differing viewpoints, provided they are presented thoughtfully.

Conflict and Resolution[edit]

Conflicts or disagreements within the community are typically handled through open debate and discussion. Members are encouraged to present reasoned arguments and engage with opposing views in a respectful manner, with the goal of reaching a deeper understanding of the issues at hand.

How to communicate with them on an emotional level?[edit]

To communicate with the community on an emotional level, it’s important to appeal to their values of individual freedom and personal responsibility. Highlighting stories of personal achievement and the positive impact of free markets can resonate deeply. Emotional triggers that resonate with the community include threats to individual liberties and examples of government overreach.

How to communicate with them on a material level?[edit]

When communicating with the community on a material level, focus on the tangible benefits of economic freedom and reduced government intervention. Emphasize the potential for innovation and prosperity that comes from free-market policies and highlight successful examples of these principles in action.

External Perception:[edit]

Outsiders may perceive the community as overly idealistic or resistant to necessary government intervention. This perception can sometimes result in misunderstandings about the community’s values and goals. However, the community remains committed to advocating for its principles and engaging in constructive dialogue with those who hold differing views.

Additional Notes & Insights[edit]

The /r/classical_liberals community is a vibrant and intellectually engaged group, united by a shared belief in the principles of classical liberalism. While they face challenges in promoting their ideology in a complex and often polarized political landscape, they remain dedicated to advocating for individual liberty, economic freedom, and limited government. Through thoughtful discourse and active engagement, they seek to influence public policy and contribute to a more free and prosperous society.



r/concentrationofwealth[edit]

The Voices of Economic Discontent: r/ConcentrationOfWealth Community Persona[edit]

Summary[edit]

The r/ConcentrationOfWealth community is defined by its critical examination of wealth concentration and income inequality. Members are united by a shared concern about the disproportionate distribution of wealth, the social and economic implications of capitalism, and the need for systemic change. The community is characterized by a diverse array of voices, including activists, economists, and everyday citizens who express frustration over the current economic system. They advocate for solutions such as wealth redistribution, a living wage, universal basic income, and increased taxation on the ultra-wealthy. The discourse within this community is often passionate, driven by a sense of urgency to address the disparities and injustices perpetuated by the existing capitalist framework. The overarching persona is one of a socially conscious, economically aware individual who seeks to challenge the status quo and promote a more equitable society.

What are the related subreddits to this community?[edit]

  • /r/Automate
  • /r/BasicIncome
  • /r/Rad_decentralization
  • /r/Inequality

What are the dominant personality types in the community?[edit]

The community predominantly features personality types that align with high openness to new ideas, as members are imaginative and welcome change. There is also a significant presence of conscientiousness, as members plan ahead and consider societal impacts. Introversion is prevalent, as many prefer thoughtful, analytical discussions over socializing. Agreeableness varies; while some members are cooperative, others may display skepticism or disagreement, particularly towards perceived systemic injustices. Neuroticism is present to an extent, reflecting members’ anxiety and frustration about economic inequalities and their potential consequences.

Subgroup Personalities[edit]

  • Belongers: 10% - These individuals align with group ideals, emphasizing community and shared values.
  • Emulators: 5% - Few focus on emulating success through wealth, as the community largely critiques such pursuits.
  • Doomsdayers: 25% - A significant portion, pessimistic about current trends, advocating for systemic overhaul.
  • Survivalists: 20% - Budget-conscious individuals seeking practical solutions to economic challenges.
  • Achievers: 15% - Driven by a desire for systemic change, these members pursue activism and advocacy.
  • Saviors: 15% - Socially conscious members focused on creating positive societal impacts.
  • Integrators: 10% - Wealthy individuals reinvesting their resources into community and philanthropic efforts.

What are the goals and aspirations of the community?[edit]

The community aspires to dismantle systemic barriers that perpetuate wealth inequality and to build a more equitable economic system. Long-term goals include implementing policies that ensure fair wages, establishing universal basic income, and promoting wealth redistribution through taxation. Members seek to create a society where economic opportunities are accessible to all, and the influence of wealth on politics and policies is minimized. There is a collective vision of a future where prosperity is shared, and social welfare systems are robust and inclusive.

What are the values held by the community?[edit]

The community values economic justice, equity, and transparency. Members prioritize social welfare and advocate for policies that address poverty and inequality. They value collective well-being over individual wealth accumulation and believe in holding corporations and the wealthy accountable. There is a strong emphasis on empathy and solidarity with marginalized groups, reflecting a commitment to creating a fair and just society for all.

What are the motivations of the community?[edit]

Members are motivated by a desire to rectify economic injustices and to challenge the power structures that enable wealth concentration. They are driven by personal experiences of financial hardship, a sense of moral duty, and the belief that economic systems should benefit the many rather than the few. The community is also motivated by the potential for societal transformation through collective action and advocacy.

What are the pain points of the community?[edit]

The community faces challenges such as systemic inequality, lack of access to economic opportunities, and the influence of wealth on politics. Members are frustrated by stagnant wages, rising living costs, and the perception that the economic system is rigged in favor of the wealthy. There is also concern about the environmental and social impacts of unchecked capitalism.

What are the anticipated solutions to the pain points of the community?[edit]

Members anticipate solutions such as implementing progressive taxation, increasing the minimum wage, and establishing universal basic income. They advocate for policies that promote wealth redistribution and greater economic transparency. The community also supports efforts to reduce corporate influence in politics and to strengthen social safety nets.

Who are the key villains?[edit]

  • Jeff Bezos: Criticized for amassing wealth while Amazon workers face poor conditions.
  • Elon Musk: Viewed as emblematic of wealth concentration and corporate influence.
  • Ken Griffin: Known for opposing progressive tax measures.
  • Corporations: Seen as exploiting workers and influencing policy for profit.

Who are the key heroes?[edit]

  • Bernie Sanders: Advocated for wealth redistribution and economic justice.
  • Andrew Yang: Promoted universal basic income.
  • Robert Reich: Criticized economic inequality and advocated for policy reforms.
  • MarshallBrain: Influential community member promoting discussion and awareness.

Shared Experiences?[edit]

Members share experiences of economic hardship, disillusionment with political systems, and a desire for systemic change. The financial struggles of millennials compared to previous generations are a common topic. Many members have witnessed stagnant wages and rising living costs, fueling their advocacy for economic reform.

Barriers to Entry[edit]

New members may face challenges in understanding the complex economic discussions and aligning with the community’s values. The community’s focus on systemic issues may be daunting for those unfamiliar with economic theories. However, active participation and a willingness to learn can facilitate integration.

AIO (activities, interests and opinions)[edit]

Members engage in discussions about income inequality, economic theories, and policy reforms. They are interested in activism, social justice, and sustainability. Opinions are often critical of capitalism and supportive of progressive economic policies. There is a strong belief in the power of collective action to drive change.

Community Rituals[edit]

  • Discussion Threads: Regularly engage in discussions on economic topics.
  • Link Sharing: Share articles and resources related to wealth inequality.
  • Activism Planning: Organize and plan for advocacy and activism efforts.
  • Support: Provide emotional and informational support to members facing economic challenges.

In-Group Jokes, Common Phrases and Memes[edit]

  • “Trickle-down economics is a myth.”
  • “Eat the rich.”
  • “Tax the billionaires.”
  • “Late-stage capitalism.”
  • “Bootlicker” (referring to those defending the wealthy).

Glossary of Community-specific Jargon[edit]

  • “CoW”: Concentration of Wealth.
  • “Universal Basic Income (UBI)”: A proposed economic policy where all citizens receive a regular, unconditional sum of money.
  • “Wealth Tax”: A tax based on the market value of assets owned.
  • “Late-stage Capitalism”: Criticism of current economic systems focusing on inequality and corporate power.

Cultural Influences[edit]

The community’s culture is influenced by economic inequality and social justice movements. There is a strong emphasis on critical thinking and challenging dominant economic narratives. The culture encourages skepticism of corporate motives and promotes grassroots activism.

Communication style[edit]

The preferred communication style is direct and analytical. Members value evidence-based discussions and are often critical of rhetoric lacking substance. Quotes like “Billionaires should 👏 not 👏 exist 👏” highlight the blunt and assertive nature of communication within the community.

Conflict and Resolution[edit]

Conflicts are addressed through debate and discussion, with a focus on evidence and logical reasoning. Members are encouraged to engage respectfully, though disagreements can be intense due to the passionate nature of the topics. Moderators play a role in maintaining civility.

How to communicate with them on an emotional level?[edit]

To connect emotionally, emphasize shared values of fairness and justice. Acknowledge the challenges posed by economic inequality and express solidarity. Emotional triggers include stories of economic hardship and the impact of inequality on everyday lives. Highlighting collective action and community empowerment resonates deeply.

How to communicate with them on a material level?[edit]

Focus on tangible solutions to economic issues, such as policy proposals and advocacy efforts. Highlight successful examples of wealth redistribution and social welfare programs. Communicate the benefits of systemic changes in improving quality of life and economic opportunities for all.

External Perception[edit]

Outsiders may perceive the community as radical or overly critical of capitalism. This perception can lead to misunderstandings about the community’s goals and values. However, it also attracts individuals seeking alternatives to the current economic system, enhancing the community’s appeal to like-minded individuals.

Additional Notes & Insights[edit]

The community serves as a hub for those disillusioned by economic systems and seeking change. It provides a platform for amplifying voices advocating for economic justice and equality. The community’s discussions often extend beyond economics, addressing broader social and political issues. Its emphasis on solidarity and collective action fosters a sense of belonging and purpose among members.



r/descentintotyranny[edit]

The Vigilant Observers of /r/DescentIntoTyranny[edit]

Summary[edit]

The /r/DescentIntoTyranny community is characterized by a diverse group of individuals who are deeply concerned about the erosion of personal freedoms and the increasing power of government and corporations. These members are vigilant and skeptical, often questioning mainstream narratives and advocating for transparency and accountability in governance. They draw parallels between historical and current events to highlight potential threats to civil liberties, emphasizing the need for public awareness and action against perceived authoritarian measures. The community is united by a shared belief in the importance of protecting individual rights and maintaining a system of checks and balances to prevent tyranny.

What are the related subreddits to this community?[edit]

  • /r/EndlessWar
  • /r/snowden
  • /r/OperationGrabAss
  • /r/Bad_Cop_No_Donut
  • /r/libertarian
  • /r/EnoughObamaSpam
  • /r/AmericanPolitics
  • /r/privacy
  • /r/Stand
  • /r/ReportInjustice
  • /r/conspiracy

What are the dominant personality types in the community?[edit]

The community likely encompasses a range of personality types, with a significant presence of: - High Openness: Members often explore various theories and historical parallels, showing a willingness to entertain unconventional ideas. - Moderate Conscientiousness: There is concern for societal structures and the impact of governance on personal freedoms, indicating a level of conscientiousness. - Low to Moderate Extroversion: While discussions are vibrant, many members may be more introverted, preferring online discourse to in-person activism. - Low Agreeableness: Skepticism towards authority and mainstream narratives suggests a lower agreeableness, with members often challenging consensus views. - High Neuroticism: Given the focus on potential threats and societal issues, members may exhibit higher levels of anxiety or concern about the future.

Subgroup Personalities[edit]

  • Belongers: 10% - They resonate with the community through shared concerns about the erosion of freedoms and align with others who share similar views.
  • Emulators: 5% - This subgroup admires whistleblowers and activists, aspiring to emulate their courage in standing up against authority.
  • Doomsdayers: 40% - A significant portion of the community is deeply pessimistic about current trends towards authoritarianism and are vocal about these concerns.
  • Survivalists: 20% - Focused on practical solutions and self-sufficiency, they seek information on how to protect themselves from perceived threats.
  • Achievers: 5% - Driven by a desire to make significant impacts, they may engage in activism or pursue careers in fields that influence policy and governance.
  • Saviors: 10% - Motivated by a sense of duty to protect civil liberties and human rights, they actively engage in advocacy and public awareness campaigns.
  • Integrators: 10% - They aim to integrate their knowledge and resources to support movements and causes that align with their values, often donating to related organizations.

What are the goals and aspirations of the community?[edit]

The community aspires to: - Preserve and restore personal freedoms and civil liberties.

  • raise public awareness about governmental overreach and corporate influence. - Advocate for transparency and accountability in governance. - Support whistleblowers and activists who expose corruption and injustice. - Foster a community of like-minded individuals who are vigilant about protecting democratic values.

What are the values held by the community?[edit]

  • Freedom and Privacy: A strong belief in the right to personal freedoms and privacy against surveillance and control.
  • Transparency and Accountability: Emphasizing the need for open governance and holding authorities accountable for their actions.
  • Skepticism and Critical Thinking: Encouraging questioning of mainstream narratives and official statements.
  • Solidarity with Whistleblowers: Supporting individuals who reveal truths about government and corporate misconduct.

What are the motivations of the community?[edit]

  • A desire to prevent the loss of civil liberties and personal freedoms.
  • A commitment to uncovering and opposing authoritarian actions by government and corporations.
  • A drive to educate others about the importance of vigilance and civic engagement to protect democratic institutions.

What are the pain points of the community?[edit]

  • Increasing surveillance and erosion of privacy rights.
  • Perceived lack of accountability and transparency in government and corporations.
  • Growing influence of corporate interests in politics and policy-making.
  • The challenge of combating misinformation and media bias.

What are the anticipated solutions to the pain points of the community?[edit]

  • Advocacy for stronger privacy protections and reforms to surveillance laws.
  • Supporting candidates and policies that prioritize transparency and accountability.
  • Raising awareness and educating the public about corporate influence and media manipulation.
  • Building networks and alliances with other groups focused on civil liberties and human rights.

Who are the key villains?[edit]

  • Government agencies like the NSA and FBI, perceived as overstepping their bounds in surveillance.
  • Large corporations like Google and Facebook, seen as complicit in data collection and censorship.
  • Political figures who support or implement policies viewed as authoritarian or repressive.

Who are the key heroes?[edit]

  • Whistleblowers like Edward Snowden, celebrated for revealing government surveillance practices.
  • Activists and journalists who expose corruption and advocate for civil liberties.
  • Organizations like the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) that fight for digital rights.

Shared Experiences?[edit]

  • Concerns about privacy and surveillance stemming from revelations like those by Edward Snowden.
  • Frustration with perceived government overreach and corporate influence in politics.
  • Engagement in online discussions and activism focused on protecting personal freedoms.

Barriers to Entry[edit]

  • A strong emphasis on skepticism and critical thinking may intimidate newcomers unfamiliar with the community’s discourse.
  • The community’s focus on complex and often controversial topics may require new members to invest time in understanding the issues.

AIO (activities, interests and opinions)[edit]

  • Activities: Engaging in discussions, sharing articles and resources, participating in online activism.
  • Interests: Privacy rights, government transparency, digital security, civil liberties.
  • Opinions: Critical of government surveillance, skeptical of corporate motives, supportive of whistleblowers and activists.

Community Rituals[edit]

  • Sharing and discussing breaking news related to civil liberties and government actions.
  • Celebrating whistleblowers and activists on anniversaries of key disclosures.
  • Hosting AMAs or discussions with experts on relevant topics.

In-Group Jokes, Common Phrases and Memes[edit]

  • “Wake up, Sheeple!” - Used to encourage others to question mainstream narratives.
  • “Orwellian” - Describing policies or actions perceived as authoritarian.
  • “We the people” - Emphasizing collective responsibility to protect democratic values.

Glossary of Community-specific Jargon[edit]

  • “Surveillance State”: A government that extensively monitors its citizens.
  • “Big Brother”: A reference to government or corporate entities perceived as overly controlling.
  • “Whistleblower”: An individual who exposes misconduct or illegal activities within organizations.

Cultural Influences[edit]

The culture of the subreddit fosters a climate of vigilance and skepticism, urging members to question authority and remain informed about potential threats to personal freedoms. This culture influences members to actively seek out information and engage in advocacy.

Communication style[edit]

The preferred communication style is direct and fact-based, often supported by evidence or historical parallels. Members value respectful debate and are willing to engage with differing viewpoints to refine their understanding of issues.

Conflict and Resolution[edit]

Conflicts are typically addressed through discussion and evidence-based debate. The community values critical thinking and is open to revisiting stances if new information emerges.

How to communicate with them on an emotional level?[edit]

To communicate effectively, acknowledge their concerns about personal freedoms and validate their skepticism. Messages that resonate emotionally often emphasize the importance of vigilance and collective action to protect democratic values.

How to communicate with them on a material level?[edit]

Provide well-researched information and actionable steps they can take to advocate for change. Highlight opportunities for civic engagement and support for organizations aligned with their values.

External Perception:[edit]

Outsiders may perceive the community as overly skeptical or conspiratorial. This perception can lead to misunderstandings about the community’s motivations and goals, creating challenges in broader public discourse.

Additional Notes & Insights[edit]

The community thrives on a shared commitment to protecting civil liberties and is driven by a deep-seated belief in the importance of questioning authority. While diverse in their approaches, members are united by a common goal of preserving democratic freedoms for future generations.



r/economiccollapse[edit]

The Guardians of Economic Resilience[edit]

Summary[edit]

The /r/economiccollapse community is a gathering of individuals who are deeply concerned with the fragility and potential downfall of the global economic system. Members of this subreddit are characterized by their skepticism of mainstream economic narratives and their preparedness mindset, often assuming the worst-case scenarios regarding economic policies and events. They are analytical, inquisitive, and frequently engage in discussions about systemic risks, such as inflation, debt, financial instability, and potential socioeconomic crises. This community is not monolithic; it comprises various subgroups with differing perspectives on the economy, ranging from those seeking to understand complex financial systems to those preparing for significant societal upheaval.

What are the related subreddits to this community?[edit]

  • /r/collapse
  • /r/econmonitor
  • /r/economiccollapsememes
  • /r/economy
  • /r/finance
  • /r/preppers
  • /r/REBubble2021
  • /r/stockmarketcrash

What are the dominant personality types in the community?[edit]

The community is diverse, with members displaying a range of personality traits. However, some dominant traits can be identified:

  • Openness to New Ideas: Many members are open-minded and curious, constantly seeking new information about economic theories and trends.
  • Conscientiousness toward Others: There is a strong sense of responsibility and foresight, as members are keen on preparing for future economic challenges.
  • Extroversion Level: The community leans towards introversion, with members preferring deep, thoughtful discussions rather than socializing for entertainment.
  • Agreeableness with Others: Members often exhibit skepticism and critical thinking, leading to a lower agreeableness score, as debates and differing opinions are common.
  • Neuroticism or Level of Emotional Stability: There is a heightened level of neuroticism, as concerns about economic collapse can lead to anxiety and worry about the future.

Subgroup Personalities[edit]

  • Belongers: 20%
  • Emulators: 5%
  • Doomsdayers: 30%
  • Survivalists: 25%
  • Achievers: 5%
  • Saviors: 10%
  • Integrators: 5%

What are the goals and aspirations of the community?[edit]

The community aims to increase awareness about potential economic dangers and encourages preparedness for various financial scenarios. Members aspire to educate themselves and others about economic systems’ vulnerabilities, promote self-sufficiency, and advocate for systemic change to avert potential collapses. Long-term, they hope for a more resilient economic system that can withstand shocks and provide stability for all.

What are the values held by the community?[edit]

Values include self-reliance, critical thinking, education, and preparedness. Members prioritize being informed about economic issues and believe in questioning mainstream narratives. They value community support and sharing knowledge, as collective wisdom is seen as vital for navigating uncertain economic futures.

What are the motivations of the community?[edit]

The community is motivated by a desire to protect themselves and their loved ones from economic instability. They are driven by a sense of responsibility to foresee potential risks and prepare accordingly. Many are motivated by past economic hardships or the belief that the current system is unsustainable, urging them to seek alternative solutions and strategies.

What are the pain points of the community?[edit]

Pain points include the perceived inadequacy of mainstream economic policies, distrust in governmental and financial institutions, and the fear of unpreparedness for potential economic downturns. Members often struggle with the anxiety of anticipating future crises and the challenge of convincing others of the importance of preparedness.

What are the anticipated solutions to the pain points of the community?[edit]

Solutions include advocating for more transparent and robust economic policies, promoting financial literacy, and encouraging personal and community preparedness. Members often discuss alternative economic models and strategies to increase resilience against economic shocks, such as diversifying investments and developing sustainable living practices.

Who are the key villains?[edit]

Key villains include large financial institutions, certain government agencies, and influential economic policymakers perceived as prioritizing short-term gains over long-term stability. Specific names mentioned include: - Elon Musk - Donald Trump - Jeff Bezos - Health insurance companies

Who are the key heroes?[edit]

Key heroes are individuals and organizations advocating for economic reform and transparency. Influential figures in the community include: - Bernie Sanders - Warren Buffett (for his critical stance on tax fairness) - Public figures known for advocating economic justice

Shared Experiences?[edit]

Shared experiences include living through past economic recessions, witnessing financial crises, and being impacted by policies perceived as unjust. Many members have stories of personal or familial financial struggles, sparking their interest in economic matters and preparedness.

Barriers to Entry[edit]

Barriers include the complexity of economic topics and the community’s critical nature, which can be daunting for newcomers. This environment requires new members to quickly familiarize themselves with economic jargon and theories to participate meaningfully.

AIO (activities, interests and opinions)[edit]

Activities include analyzing economic data, discussing financial news, and sharing preparedness tips. Interests range from macroeconomic trends to personal finance strategies. Opinions often center around skepticism of mainstream economic narratives and a belief in the importance of self-sufficiency and community resilience.

Community Rituals[edit]

Rituals include regular discussions on key financial reports and economic indicators, as well as the sharing of personal preparedness plans. The community often comes together to dissect major economic events and their potential implications.

In-Group Jokes, Common Phrases and Memes[edit]

  • “We’re all Luigi.”
  • “Delay, deny, defend” (a reference to perceived corporate tactics)
  • “Eat the rich”
  • “Private profits, public losses”

Glossary of Community-specific Jargon[edit]

  • Doomer: A person who is pessimistic about the future of the economy.
  • Prepper: Someone who actively prepares for potential economic or societal collapse.
  • Oligarch: A term used to describe extremely wealthy individuals perceived to have undue influence over economic policies.

Cultural Influences[edit]

The culture of the subreddit encourages critical thinking and questioning of economic policies. Members often challenge conventional wisdom and seek alternative perspectives, fostering a culture of vigilance and preparedness.

Communication style[edit]

The preferred communication style is analytical and data-driven, with a focus on evidence and logical arguments. Members appreciate well-researched posts and discussions that delve deeply into economic topics. For example: “Can someone provide a source for that claim? Data trumps feelings.”

Conflict and Resolution[edit]

Conflicts are typically handled through debate and discussion, with moderators stepping in to enforce rules when necessary. Members are encouraged to back their claims with evidence, and civil discourse is promoted to resolve disagreements.

How to communicate with them on an emotional level?[edit]

To communicate effectively, tap into the community’s desire for security and stability. Acknowledge their concerns and emphasize shared goals of preparedness and resilience. Emotional triggers include the fear of economic instability and the desire for a fairer economic system.

How to communicate with them on a material level?[edit]

Emphasize practical solutions and tangible steps for economic preparedness. Provide resources for financial literacy and strategies for building personal and community resilience. Material needs include reliable information and tools for navigating economic challenges.

External Perception:[edit]

Outsiders may perceive the community as overly pessimistic or alarmist. This perception can create a sense of isolation but also strengthens the community’s resolve to seek the truth and prepare for potential crises.

Additional Notes & Insights[edit]

The community’s focus on preparedness and critical analysis of economic policies can serve as a valuable resource for those seeking to understand complex financial systems. Their skepticism and vigilance offer a counterbalance to mainstream narratives, encouraging broader discussions about economic sustainability and resilience.



r/enddemocracy[edit]

The Libertarian Skeptics of Democracy[edit]

Summary[edit]

The /r/EndDemocracy community revolves around a critical evaluation of democracy, considering it a collectivist system that leads to tyranny and systemic inefficiencies. The subreddit serves as a platform for exploring the perceived failures of democracy and discussing alternative political structures, primarily those aligned with libertarian ideals. Members generally advocate for decentralized governance models, such as markets for law, which they believe would allow for greater individual autonomy and reduce the potential for governmental overreach. While they reject associations with the alt-right and disapprove of fascism and monarchy as alternatives, they are unified in their belief that democracy, in its current form, is inadequate for ensuring true freedom and prosperity.

What are the related subreddits to this community?[edit]

  • /r/seasteading
  • /r/sneakpeekbot
  • /r/AnCap101
  • /r/polycentric_law
  • /r/goldandblack
  • /r/unacracy

What are the dominant personality types in the community?[edit]

The community members largely exhibit traits associated with high Openness, as they are receptive to exploring new political ideas and systems. They show moderate Conscientiousness, with a strong focus on planning and discussing alternative systems. They tend to be more Introverted, preferring detailed discussions over broad social engagement. Agreeableness is moderate, as they are open to collaboration but often skeptical of mainstream political ideologies. Neuroticism appears to be low, with members demonstrating a stable emotional demeanor, focusing on rational discourse rather than emotional reactions.

Subgroup Personalities[edit]

  • Belongers: 10% - Members who align with libertarian communities and ideologies, seeking acceptance and commonality within these networks.
  • Emulators: 5% - Those who aspire to adapt successful libertarian models from influential thinkers or regions known for libertarian policies.
  • Doomsdayers: 25% - Individuals with a pessimistic outlook on current democratic systems, harboring strong opinions on the need for radical change.
  • Survivalists: 15% - Cautious individuals who scrutinize political systems to ensure their personal and financial security.
  • Achievers: 20% - Ambitious members who strive to implement libertarian principles in their personal lives and broader communities.
  • Saviors: 10% - Altruistic participants focused on promoting societal welfare through libertarian reforms.
  • Integrators: 15% - Members who work towards philanthropic goals, often investing in or supporting libertarian initiatives and charities.

What are the goals and aspirations of the community?[edit]

The primary goal of the community is to critique and dismantle the current democratic system, which they view as inherently flawed and oppressive. Their long-term aspiration is to establish a political structure that prioritizes individual autonomy and decentralized governance. They envision a future where governance is market-driven, allowing individuals to choose their own legal frameworks and minimizing centralized power. The community desires a society that maximizes personal freedom, reduces governmental coercion, and fosters genuine prosperity and progress through innovative political experimentation.

What are the values held by the community?[edit]

The community values individual autonomy, freedom from coercive governmental control, and the decentralization of political power. They hold a strong belief in market-driven solutions and the efficacy of self-regulation. The rejection of collectivist ideologies is central to their values, as they perceive them as threats to personal liberty. The community values intellectual discourse and the exploration of alternative governance models, particularly those that emphasize voluntary association and mutual consent.

What are the motivations of the community?[edit]

Members are motivated by a desire to escape what they perceive as the inherent tyranny of democratic systems. They are driven by the belief that individual freedom and autonomy are paramount and that current political structures fail to deliver these ideals. Their motivation stems from a conviction that decentralized, market-based governance would lead to more equitable and efficient societal outcomes. They also seek to educate others on the perceived flaws of democracy and promote discourse on viable alternatives.

What are the pain points of the community?[edit]

The community struggles with the widespread acceptance of democratic systems and the difficulty of implementing radical political change. They face challenges in effectively communicating their ideas to a broader audience and often encounter resistance due to the entrenched nature of democratic ideologies. Another significant pain point is the association of their views with extremist or fringe groups, which they actively seek to disassociate from. Members also grapple with the practical challenges of developing and testing alternative governance models.

What are the anticipated solutions to the pain points of the community?[edit]

The community anticipates that increased discourse and education on the failures of democracy will gradually shift public perception and open up avenues for exploring alternative systems. They believe that technological advancements and globalization may facilitate the implementation of decentralized governance models. The community also sees potential in creating experimental zones or seasteading initiatives to test and refine libertarian principles in practice. By fostering a network of like-minded individuals and communities, they hope to build momentum for systemic change.

Who are the key villians?[edit]

  • Democratic Governments: Criticized for perpetuating collectivist tyranny and inefficiencies.
  • Mainstream Media: Viewed as complicit in promoting pro-democracy narratives and stifling dissenting opinions.
  • Lobbyists and Political Elites: Seen as corrupt actors who manipulate democratic systems for personal gain.

Who are the key heroes?[edit]

  • Ludwig von Mises: Celebrated for his contributions to libertarian economic theory.
  • Murray Rothbard: Praised for his anarcho-capitalist ideas and critiques of state power.
  • Hans-Hermann Hoppe: Influential for his work on decentralization and private law society concepts.
  • Justin Amash: Acknowledged for his libertarian political stance and advocacy for limited government.

Shared Experiences?[edit]

The community shares experiences of disillusionment with democratic processes and a collective journey towards libertarian thought. Historical examples of democratic failures, such as gerrymandering and political corruption, are frequently discussed. Influential literature and thought leaders, like Ayn Rand and Friedrich Hayek, have shaped their ideological framework. Shared participation in online discussions and forums, like /r/seasteading and /r/polycentric_law, reinforces their sense of community.

Barriers to Entry[edit]

New members may face challenges in aligning with the community’s libertarian ideology, requiring a foundational understanding of libertarian principles and critiques of democracy. The community’s complex discussions and niche terminologies can be intimidating for newcomers, potentially hindering initial engagement. However, once acclimated, members find a supportive network for exploring alternative political ideas.

AIO (activities, interests and opinions)[edit]

Activities include participating in online discussions, reading and sharing libertarian literature, and attending related events or meetups. Interests center around political philosophy, economic theory, and exploring innovative governance models. Opinions are generally critical of democracy, supportive of decentralization, and optimistic about the potential for market-driven political systems.

Community Rituals[edit]

Regularly sharing influential articles, books, and videos that critique democracy and promote libertarian ideas is a common ritual. Engaging in debates and discussions on the effectiveness of alternative governance models is another frequent activity. Members often celebrate anniversaries or milestones of significant libertarian works or events.

In-Group Jokes, Common Phrases and Memes[edit]

  • “Democracy is just Monarchy with Extra Steps.”
  • “You can’t fix democracy.”
  • “Voting ad absurdum.”
  • “Tyranny of the majority, so to speak.”

Glossary of Community-specific Jargon[edit]

  • Unacracy: A system based on unanimous decision-making and individual choice in governance.
  • Decentralized Law: Legal frameworks that are market-driven and chosen voluntarily by individuals.
  • Polycentric Law: A legal system with multiple overlapping jurisdictions, emphasizing choice and competition.

Cultural Influences[edit]

The culture of the subreddit fosters a critical perspective on traditional political systems, encouraging members to question and challenge mainstream ideologies. This culture influences members to seek out and engage with libertarian literature and thought leaders, often leading to a shared skepticism of state power and centralized governance.

Communication style[edit]

The community prefers a rational and analytical communication style, often using detailed arguments and referencing libertarian literature. Direct quotes and citations from influential thinkers are common, as they lend credibility to discussions and reinforce shared beliefs.

Conflict and Resolution[edit]

Conflicts are typically addressed through structured debates, with members encouraged to present evidence and rational arguments. Moderators play a role in maintaining discussions and ensuring that debates remain respectful and productive. The community values intellectual rigor and often resolves disagreements by reaching a consensus through logical reasoning.

How to communicate with them on an emotional level?[edit]

To resonate emotionally with the community, it is important to acknowledge their frustrations with the current political system and validate their desire for freedom and autonomy. Emotional triggers include the perceived injustices of democratic governance and the potential for a more equitable and free society through libertarian principles. Communicating a vision of a future where individuals have greater control over their lives can have a significant emotional impact.

How to communicate with them on a material level?[edit]

On a material level, highlighting the practical benefits of decentralized governance, such as increased efficiency, lower taxes, and greater personal freedom, can be effective. Demonstrating real-world examples or case studies of successful libertarian policies can reinforce their beliefs and motivate action.

External Perception:[edit]

Outsiders may perceive the community as radical or extreme due to their strong criticisms of democracy and advocacy for libertarian ideals. This perception can lead to misunderstandings and resistance to their ideas. However, the community is generally unfazed by external opinions, focusing instead on internal discourse and the pursuit of their goals.

Additional Notes & Insights[edit]

The community is characterized by a strong commitment to exploring and advocating for libertarian principles. Their discussions often reflect deep philosophical inquiry and a willingness to challenge conventional political ideologies. Despite external perceptions, they are united by a shared vision of a more free and equitable society, driven by individual choice and decentralized governance.



r/freeculture[edit]

The Free Culture Revolutionaries[edit]

Summary[edit]

The /r/freeculture community embodies the passionate advocates of the free culture movement, rooted in the belief that media, technology, and ideas should remain free from restrictive ownership and privatization. Members of this community are dedicated to the advancement of free software, open access, and creative commons—rejecting the constraints imposed by digital rights management (DRM) and restrictive copyright laws. They see themselves as digital activists, working towards a world where information and culture are freely accessible to all, fostering creativity, innovation, and collaboration. This community is driven by a shared vision of dismantling monopolistic control over information and empowering individuals to actively participate in cultural creation and technological development. Their ethos is deeply intertwined with the ideals of transparency, freedom, and the democratization of knowledge.

What are the related subreddits to this community?[edit]

  • /r/LibreDesign
  • /r/LibreStudio
  • /r/FreeGaming

What are the dominant personality types in the community?[edit]

Members of the /r/freeculture community predominantly display high levels of openness to new experiences, as they are imaginative, creative, and seek innovative solutions to the challenges posed by proprietary restrictions. They exhibit conscientiousness, often meticulously planning campaigns and considering the broader impact of their actions on society. While the community may include both extroverts and introverts, the focus on online activism and discussion suggests a balanced mix, with extroverts engaging in community-building and introverts contributing through thoughtful content creation. Members are generally agreeable, cooperative, and altruistic, driven by a desire to improve the world through cultural liberation. Neuroticism varies across the community, with some members displaying heightened sensitivity to perceived injustices, while others maintain a calm, stable approach to advocacy.

Subgroup Personalities[edit]

  • Belongers: 10%
  • Emulators: 5%
  • Doomsdayers: 20%
  • Survivalists: 15%
  • Achievers: 15%
  • Saviors: 25%
  • Integrators: 10%

What are the goals and aspirations of the community?[edit]

The /r/freeculture community aspires to create a world where access to information and cultural resources is unrestricted by legal and technological barriers. They aim to dismantle DRM and reform copyright laws to ensure that creative works enter the public domain more quickly. The community seeks to promote and expand the use of free software, encouraging individuals and organizations to adopt open-source solutions. They envision a future where collaborative innovation is the norm, and the internet remains a space for free expression and unrestricted access to knowledge.

What are the values held by the community?[edit]

The community values freedom, transparency, and accessibility. They believe in the democratization of knowledge and the empowerment of individuals to engage in cultural creation without fear of legal reprisal. Collaboration and open exchange of ideas are central tenets, as is the push for ethical technology that respects user autonomy. They value the preservation of cultural heritage and the prevention of monopolistic practices that hinder innovation and creativity.

What are the motivations of the community?[edit]

The /r/freeculture community is motivated by a deep-seated belief in the right to access information and cultural works without undue restriction. They are driven by the desire to challenge corporate control over media and technology and to ensure that the internet remains a bastion of free expression. Their activism is fueled by the conviction that open access leads to greater innovation, creativity, and societal progress.

What are the pain points of the community?[edit]

The community faces challenges in overcoming entrenched corporate interests that resist changes to copyright and DRM policies. They struggle against the perception that free culture equates to lost revenue for creators, and they often find themselves combating misinformation and misunderstanding about the movement’s goals. Additionally, the legal and technological hurdles to implementing open-access solutions can be significant.

What are the anticipated solutions to the pain points of the community?[edit]

The community advocates for legislative reform to reduce the duration and scope of copyright protection, promoting public domain and fair use principles. They encourage the development and adoption of alternative business models that reward creators without relying on restrictive practices. Technological solutions, such as open-source platforms and decentralized networks, are seen as ways to circumvent current barriers and empower individuals to take control of their digital rights.

Who are the key villains?[edit]

  • Amazon: Criticized for DRM practices and monopolistic control over digital content.
  • Sony Pictures: Known for aggressive copyright enforcement that stifles creativity.
  • Microsoft: Viewed with suspicion for proprietary software and privacy concerns.
  • Netflix: Criticized for pushing DRM in HTML5 and limiting content sharing.
  • Disney: Frequently associated with lobbying for extended copyright terms.

Who are the key heroes?[edit]

  • Richard Stallman: A leading figure in the free software movement, advocating for user freedoms.
  • Aaron Swartz: Celebrated for his activism in promoting open access to information.
  • Cory Doctorow: Known for his advocacy of digital rights and free culture.
  • Free Software Foundation (FSF): A pivotal organization in promoting software freedom.
  • Creative Commons: Provides tools for creators to share their work under flexible terms.

Shared Experiences?[edit]

The community is shaped by shared experiences of censorship battles, such as the fight against SOPA and PIPA, and the ongoing struggle against DRM. The legacy of Aaron Swartz and the impact of the Snowden revelations on digital privacy have also deeply influenced the community’s identity. Key events include the rise of open-source projects like Wikipedia and Linux, which serve as proof of concept for the community’s ideals.

Barriers to Entry[edit]

New members may face a steep learning curve in understanding the nuances of copyright law and open-source technology. The community’s technical jargon and ideological fervor can be intimidating to outsiders. However, once engaged, new members often find a welcoming environment that encourages learning and participation.

AIO (activities, interests and opinions)[edit]

Community members actively engage in discussions about copyright reform, DRM, and the promotion of free software. They share news, organize campaigns, and create educational content to raise awareness. Opinions are strongly in favor of open access, privacy rights, and against corporate control over technology and media.

Community Rituals[edit]

Regular participation in online discussions, sharing of open-source resources, and support for projects like Wikipedia and Creative Commons are common practices. Community members often celebrate milestones in the free culture movement, such as the release of works into the public domain and victories in copyright reform.

In-Group Jokes, Common Phrases and Memes[edit]

  • “DRM is a jail.”
  • “Information wants to be free.”
  • “Copyleft, not copyright.”
  • “Free as in freedom, not free as in beer.”

Glossary of Community-specific Jargon[edit]

  • DRM (Digital Rights Management): Technology that restricts the use of digital content.
  • Copyleft: A licensing practice that allows derivative works while ensuring they remain free.
  • Public Domain: Creative works to which no exclusive intellectual property rights apply.
  • Open Source: Software with source code that anyone can inspect, modify, and enhance.

Cultural Influences[edit]

The culture of the subreddit is heavily influenced by the ideals of the open-source and free software movements. Members are inspired by the successes of projects like Linux and Wikipedia and motivated by the challenges posed by corporate control over digital content.

Communication style[edit]

The community prefers direct, informative communication that emphasizes education and advocacy. Discussions are often technical, with a focus on sharing knowledge and resources. Quotes such as “Information wants to be free” encapsulate the community’s ethos.

Conflict and Resolution[edit]

Conflicts are typically resolved through discussion and consensus-building. The community values open dialogue and often relies on evidence-based arguments to address disagreements. Moderators play a key role in maintaining respectful discourse.

How to communicate with them on an emotional level?[edit]

To connect emotionally, emphasize shared values such as freedom, transparency, and community empowerment. Highlight stories of individuals or projects that have successfully challenged restrictive practices. Emotional triggers include injustices related to DRM and censorship, as well as victories in open access.

How to communicate with them on a material level?[edit]

Focus on practical solutions that address the community’s goals, such as open-source software recommendations or legislative campaigns. Provide actionable steps for participation and emphasize the tangible benefits of free culture, such as cost savings and increased innovation.

External Perception:[edit]

Outsiders may perceive the community as idealistic or radical, often misunderstanding their objectives as anti-business. This perception can lead to challenges in gaining mainstream support, but it also galvanizes members to clarify their mission and engage in public education.

Additional Notes & Insights[edit]

The /r/freeculture community is a vibrant, passionate group committed to reshaping the digital landscape. They represent a diverse array of backgrounds and skills, unified by a common mission to promote freedom and accessibility in culture and technology. Their dedication to advocacy and education positions them as key players in the ongoing dialogue about the future of information and creativity.



r/freegaming[edit]

The Open Source Gaming Enthusiast[edit]

Summary[edit]

The /r/freegaming community is a vibrant and passionate group dedicated to promoting and engaging with free and open-source games. This community embodies the principles of the free culture movement, advocating for the use of free software, open formats, and free media as a form of resistance against the privatization of technology, media, and ideas. Members are not just interested in playing games but are deeply involved in the development, discussion, and dissemination of open-source gaming projects. They value collaboration, creativity, and the freedom to modify and share content. The community is diverse, comprising developers, artists, designers, gamers, and activists who all share a common goal: to make gaming more accessible and equitable for everyone. This group is highly motivated by the belief in freedom as a right, extending this philosophy to the digital world and embracing it through gaming.

What are the related subreddits to this community?[edit]

  • /r/FreeCulture
  • /r/LibreDesign
  • /r/LibreStudio
  • /r/opensourcegames
  • /r/godot
  • /r/freesoftware

What are the dominant personality types in the community?[edit]

In terms of the Big Five personality traits, the /r/freegaming community likely exhibits high levels of Openness to new ideas, as members are imaginative, creative, and readily embrace change, especially in the form of new gaming technologies and platforms. Conscientiousness is also prominent, with members often planning projects and considering the impact of their work on the broader community. Introversion may be slightly more common than Extroversion, given the technical nature of the discussions and the solitary aspect of coding and game development. However, there is also a social element, with members engaging in group projects and discussions. Agreeableness is high, as the community is cooperative and supportive, emphasizing collaboration and mutual assistance. Neuroticism varies, with some members expressing anxiety over the state of open-source gaming, while others display a relaxed, stable approach to challenges.

Subgroup Personalities[edit]

  • Belongers: Approximately 20% of the community. These individuals value fitting in with the open-source movement and strive to align their personal and professional lives with the principles of free software.
  • Emulators: Around 5% of the community. They admire successful open-source projects and aspire to replicate their success by contributing to or creating similar projects.
  • Doomsdayers: About 10% of the community. These members have strong opinions on the negative impacts of proprietary software and are often vocal about the need for open solutions.
  • Survivalists: Roughly 30% of the community. These individuals are cautious with their resources and time, often seeking the best open-source tools and games that offer the most value.
  • Achievers: Approximately 15% of the community. They are ambitious, seeking to make significant contributions to open-source projects and often pursue leadership roles.
  • Saviors: Around 10% of the community. These members are socially conscious and aim to use open-source gaming to make a positive impact on society.
  • Integrators: About 10% of the community. These individuals seek to balance their personal success with contributions to open-source initiatives, often donating time and resources to various projects.

What are the goals and aspirations of the community?[edit]

The long-term aspirations of the /r/freegaming community include fostering a global culture of open-source gaming, where anyone can access, modify, and share games without restrictions. They aim to develop a robust ecosystem of free games that rival their proprietary counterparts in quality and diversity. The community desires to build a supportive network for developers and gamers that encourages innovation and collaboration, ultimately leading to a more inclusive and participatory gaming industry. They hope to raise awareness about the benefits of open-source gaming, inspiring more people to join the movement and contribute to its growth.

What are the values held by the community?[edit]

The /r/freegaming community values freedom, collaboration, transparency, and accessibility. They believe that software and media should be freely available to all, without the constraints of proprietary licenses. This value is rooted in the belief that technology should empower individuals rather than restrict them. The community values collaboration, seeing it as a means to achieve greater innovation and creativity. Transparency is critical, as it builds trust and ensures that projects remain open and accessible. Accessibility is another core value, with the community striving to make gaming available to people of all backgrounds and abilities.

What are the motivations of the community?[edit]

The community is motivated by a desire to challenge the status quo of the gaming industry and promote a more equitable distribution of resources and opportunities. They are driven by the belief that open-source gaming can democratize access to technology and empower individuals to create and share their work. The community is also motivated by a sense of community and belonging, as members find fulfillment in contributing to a collective cause and seeing the tangible results of their efforts. The satisfaction of learning, teaching, and collaborating on projects further fuels their engagement.

What are the pain points of the community?[edit]

Pain points for the community include the lack of mainstream recognition and support for open-source games, which can limit their reach and development resources. There is also frustration with the dominance of proprietary software and the challenges of creating games that can compete with commercial offerings. The community faces technical challenges, such as ensuring compatibility across different platforms and managing the collaborative aspects of open-source development. Additionally, there is a need for more contributors, as projects often require diverse skills and expertise.

What are the anticipated solutions to the pain points of the community?[edit]

The community seeks to address these pain points by increasing awareness and advocacy for open-source gaming, encouraging more people to contribute to and support these projects. They aim to develop partnerships with educational institutions and organizations to provide resources and training for developers. Improving documentation and accessibility for newcomers is also a priority, as it can help lower the barriers to entry and increase participation. The community looks to leverage crowdfunding and donation platforms to secure funding for ongoing projects and innovations. Additionally, they hope to foster a more inclusive and supportive environment that nurtures new talent and encourages collaboration.

Who are the key villians?[edit]

  • Proprietary software companies that restrict access and control over technology, such as Microsoft and Apple.
  • Digital rights management (DRM) systems that limit the use and sharing of media.
  • Game developers and publishers that refuse to embrace open-source principles or actively oppose them.
  • Individuals or entities that spread misinformation about the viability and benefits of open-source gaming.

Who are the key heroes?[edit]

  • Richard Stallman: A key influencer in the free software movement, promoting the importance of software freedom.
  • Linus Torvalds: Creator of the Linux kernel, which supports many open-source gaming projects.
  • Organizations like the Free Software Foundation and the Open Source Initiative that provide advocacy and support for open-source initiatives.
  • Key contributors and moderators within the /r/freegaming community who actively promote and develop open-source games.

Shared Experiences?[edit]

The community has shared experiences of participating in collaborative projects, contributing to open-source game development, and advocating for software freedom. Events such as Libre Game Nights and participation in open-source conventions or hackathons have shaped the community’s identity. There is a collective memory of significant milestones in open-source gaming, such as the release of popular open-source games like Battle for Wesnoth or platforms like Godot Engine.

Barriers to Entry[edit]

Barriers to entry for new members include the technical knowledge required to contribute to open-source projects and the steep learning curve associated with understanding open-source principles and community dynamics. These barriers can affect community dynamics by limiting diversity and the influx of new ideas and talents. To mitigate these barriers, the community emphasizes the importance of mentorship, providing resources and support to newcomers, and fostering a welcoming environment.

AIO (activities, interests and opinions)[edit]

The community is actively involved in developing, playing, and promoting open-source games. Members frequently engage in discussions about game mechanics, software development, and the principles of the free culture movement. Interests include programming, game design, digital art, and advocacy for software freedom. Opinions are often centered around the belief that open-source gaming is the future and that collaborative efforts can lead to more innovative and inclusive gaming experiences.

Community Rituals[edit]

Community rituals include participating in Libre Game Nights, where members gather to play and discuss open-source games. There are also regular discussions and collaborations on platforms like GitHub, where members contribute code and ideas to ongoing projects. Celebrating the release of new games or significant updates is a common tradition, often accompanied by community-wide announcements and discussions.

In-Group Jokes, Common Phrases and Memes[edit]

  • “Free as in freedom, not as in beer.”
  • “FLOSS” (Free/Libre and Open Source Software).
  • “GNU/Linux, not just Linux.”
  • References to “The Cathedral and the Bazaar,” a book that is influential within open-source circles.

Glossary of Community-specific Jargon[edit]

  • FOSS: Free and Open Source Software.
  • DRM: Digital Rights Management, often criticized for restricting user freedoms.
  • GPL: General Public License, a widely used free software license.
  • Fork: Creating a new project from an existing open-source project.

Cultural Influences[edit]

The culture of the subreddit emphasizes collaboration, transparency, and the democratization of technology. This culture influences members to prioritize community-driven development and to value contributions from individuals of all skill levels. The open-source ethos of sharing and collective improvement shapes the community’s behavior and attitudes, fostering a cooperative and innovative environment.

Communication style[edit]

The preferred communication style within the community is direct and informative, with an emphasis on clarity and openness. Members are encouraged to share their thoughts and feedback constructively, often using technical language familiar to those in the software development field. Examples include discussions on GitHub, where detailed feedback and collaborative problem-solving are common.

Conflict and Resolution[edit]

Conflicts within the community are typically resolved through discussion and consensus-building. Members are encouraged to present their viewpoints respectfully and to consider alternative perspectives. Moderators and influential community members often step in to mediate disputes and ensure that discussions remain productive and inclusive.

How to communicate with them on an emotional level?[edit]

To communicate with the community on an emotional level, it is essential to emphasize the shared values of freedom, collaboration, and empowerment. Highlighting stories of successful open-source projects and the personal growth experienced by contributors can resonate emotionally. Emotional triggers that resonate with the community include the satisfaction of creating and sharing something valuable and the camaraderie of working towards a common goal.

How to communicate with them on a material level?[edit]

Effective material communication involves demonstrating the tangible benefits of open-source gaming, such as cost savings, customization options, and the ability to modify and improve games. Highlighting successful open-source projects and their impact on the gaming industry can inspire confidence and attract new contributors. Providing clear instructions and resources for getting involved can also facilitate material engagement.

External Perception:[edit]

Outsiders may perceive the community as niche or overly technical, which can lead to misconceptions about the accessibility and appeal of open-source gaming. This perception can create challenges in attracting new members and gaining mainstream recognition. To address this, the community works to demystify open-source principles and showcase the diversity and creativity present within open-source gaming.

Additional Notes & Insights[edit]

The /r/freegaming community is a microcosm of the broader free culture movement, highlighting the potential for open-source principles to transform industries beyond software. Their efforts demonstrate the power of collaboration, transparency, and shared values in driving innovation and fostering inclusive communities. As the open-source gaming movement continues to grow, the community’s influence and impact are likely to expand, paving the way for a more equitable and accessible gaming landscape.



r/geolibertarianism[edit]

GeoLibertarian Community Persona[edit]

Summary[edit]

The r/GeoLibertarianism community embodies a unique blend of libertarian and geoist principles, advocating for the Land Value Tax (LVT) as a means to address economic inequalities and promote efficient land use. Members are often driven by a desire to balance individual liberty with communal responsibility, seeing LVT as a mechanism to reduce speculation, promote fairness, and ensure that the economic value derived from land benefits all members of society. This community values intellectual discourse, often referencing historical figures like Henry George and engaging deeply with economic theories. They are united by a shared vision of a society where natural resources are managed for the collective good without infringing on personal freedoms.

What are the related subreddits to this community?[edit]

Confederation of Libertarian Subreddits includes:

  • r/Anarcho_Capitalism
  • r/austrian_economics
  • r/Libertarian
  • r/LibertarianLeft
  • r/libertarian_history
  • r/Libertario
  • r/Liberty
  • r/Objectivism
  • r/mises
  • r/philosophyofliberty
  • r/ronpaul
  • r/voluntarism

Confederation of Geoist Subreddits includes:

  • r/Geoanarchism
  • r/Georgism

What are the dominant personality types in the community?[edit]

The community likely features high Openness, as members are open to new ideas and enjoy engaging with complex economic and philosophical concepts. Conscientiousness might be moderate, as while they are detail-oriented in their discussions, the nature of online forums can also attract less structured discussions. Extroversion levels vary, but many members may lean towards introversion, preferring thoughtful discussions over large social interactions. Agreeableness might be mixed; while there’s a cooperative spirit in pursuing common goals like economic justice, debates can also become contentious. Neuroticism is likely low, given the analytical nature of the discourse and the focus on rational arguments over emotional responses.

Subgroup Personalities[edit]

  • Belongers: 15%. These individuals align with the community to fit in with like-minded thinkers.
  • Emulators: 5%. Few seek to imitate prominent figures, although admiration for intellectuals like Henry George exists.
  • Doomsdayers: 10%. Some members express pessimism about current economic systems and advocate for radical change.
  • Survivalists: 20%. Many are pragmatic, focusing on realistic applications of LVT to improve economic stability.
  • Achievers: 25%. A substantial portion is driven by the desire to create and promote innovative economic systems.
  • Saviors: 15%. Members often express a desire to improve societal conditions through fairer economic policies.
  • Integrators: 10%. A minority focuses on philanthropic efforts, integrating economic theories with social justice initiatives.

What are the goals and aspirations of the community?[edit]

The primary goal of the community is to implement the Land Value Tax as a means to promote economic fairness and reduce inequality. They aspire to create a society where land speculation is minimized, and the economic rent from land is used for the public good. There is a long-term vision of integrating geoist principles into mainstream economic policies, thus transforming the way natural resources are managed. The community also desires to educate others about the benefits of LVT and foster a broader understanding of geoism.

What are the values held by the community?[edit]

The community values economic justice, sustainability, and efficiency. They believe in the fair distribution of resources and the idea that natural resources should benefit everyone, not just landowners. Personal freedom is highly valued, but not at the expense of societal well-being. They hold a deep respect for intellectual discourse and value evidence-based arguments.

What are the motivations of the community?[edit]

Members are motivated by the belief that current economic systems are flawed and that LVT offers a practical solution to many societal issues. They are driven by a desire to reduce poverty, increase access to resources, and promote a fairer distribution of wealth. The community is also motivated by the intellectual challenge of refining and advocating for geoist principles.

What are the pain points of the community?[edit]

One major challenge is the lack of mainstream recognition and understanding of geoist principles. The community faces opposition from those who benefit from the current system and skepticism from those unfamiliar with LVT. There is also the challenge of effectively communicating complex economic theories to the broader public.

What are the anticipated solutions to the pain points of the community?[edit]

The community anticipates overcoming these challenges through education and advocacy. By creating accessible resources, engaging in public discourse, and building alliances with like-minded groups, they hope to increase awareness and support for LVT. They also see potential in demonstrating successful implementations of LVT in local contexts as a proof of concept.

Who are the key villains?[edit]

Key villains include traditional landowners and real estate speculators who benefit from the current system, as well as policymakers who resist change. Some members may view certain economic theorists or schools of thought that oppose LVT as ideological adversaries.

Who are the key heroes?[edit]

Key heroes include historical figures like Henry George, who laid the groundwork for geoist thought. Influential economists who advocate for LVT, as well as community leaders who promote geoism, are also considered heroes. Key influencers within the subreddit include top posters and commenters like Omnizoa and haestrod, who contribute significantly to discussions.

Shared Experiences?[edit]

The community shares a common experience of discovering and embracing geoism, often after feeling dissatisfied with traditional economic models. Many members have had encounters with skepticism or hostility when discussing geoism outside the community. They share a sense of camaraderie born from a mutual commitment to economic reform.

Barriers to Entry[edit]

Barriers include the complexity of geoist theories and the niche nature of the community, which can be intimidating to newcomers. Additionally, the strong emphasis on intellectual discourse may deter those less familiar with economic theory. These barriers can lead to a perception of exclusivity, affecting community dynamics by limiting diversity of thought.

AIO (activities, interests, and opinions)[edit]

Activities include engaging in discussions on economic theory, organizing advocacy efforts, and participating in related subreddits. Interests center around economic justice, sustainability, and political philosophy. Opinions are often critical of current economic systems and supportive of LVT as a solution to societal issues.

Community Rituals[edit]

Community rituals include regular discussions on foundational texts like Henry George’s “Progress and Poverty,” sharing resources for educating others about geoism, and celebrating successes in advocacy efforts. These rituals reinforce community identity and shared goals.

In-Group Jokes, Common Phrases, and Memes[edit]

  • “Taxation is theft… except LVT.”
  • “Henry George was right.”
  • “Land can’t hide offshore.”
  • “Location, location, location.”

Glossary of Community-specific Jargon[edit]

  • LVT (Land Value Tax): A tax on the unimproved value of land.
  • Geoism: An economic philosophy advocating for the communal ownership of land and natural resources.
  • Economic Rent: The excess payment made to a factor of production over what is needed to keep it in its current use.
  • Speculation: Buying land to hold and sell at a higher price rather than for productive use.

Cultural Influences[edit]

The culture of the subreddit emphasizes rational discourse and evidence-based arguments. Members are influenced by classical liberalism and the writings of Henry George. This culture fosters a strong sense of community identity and purpose, shaping attitudes toward economic reform.

Communication Style[edit]

The preferred communication style is analytical and evidence-driven. Members value detailed explanations and logical reasoning. A common phrase might be, “Can you provide a source for that claim?” This style reflects the community’s emphasis on intellectual rigor.

Conflict and Resolution[edit]

Conflicts are typically resolved through debate and reference to authoritative texts or studies. The community values respectful discourse, though debates can become heated. There is an understanding that discussions should ultimately aim to advance shared goals.

How to communicate with them on an emotional level?[edit]

To communicate effectively, appeal to their desire for fairness and justice. Highlight the potential societal benefits of LVT, such as reducing inequality and promoting sustainability. Emotional triggers include stories of economic hardship that LVT could alleviate and visions of a more equitable society.

How to communicate with them on a material level?[edit]

Focus on the practical benefits of LVT, such as increased economic efficiency and reduced tax burdens on labor and production. Emphasize how LVT can address real-world issues like housing affordability and urban development.

External Perception[edit]

Outsiders may perceive the community as overly theoretical or niche. This perception can lead to misunderstandings about geoism and its goals. However, the community is also seen as intellectually rigorous and committed to positive economic change.

Additional Notes & Insights[edit]

The community is characterized by a strong sense of purpose and intellectual curiosity. While niche, it offers a unique perspective on economic issues that can provide valuable insights into broader economic debates. The challenge lies in effectively communicating these ideas to a wider audience.



r/goldandblack[edit]

The Free Market Advocates of r/GoldandBlack[edit]

Summary[edit]

The r/goldandblack community is a vibrant and engaged group primarily centered on the philosophies of anarcho-capitalism and libertarianism. Members of this community are deeply committed to the principles of individual sovereignty, private property, and the discipline of a free market. They advocate for a society where the state is eliminated, and individuals are empowered to make choices free from government intervention. This community upholds a voluntary society where law and order are maintained through private means rather than state control. Members often discuss the implications of state actions on personal liberties and emphasize a non-aggression principle. The community is also skeptical of traditional political structures and seeks to differentiate itself by promoting ideas that challenge the status quo, including innovative approaches to economic and social issues.

What are the related subreddits to this community?[edit]

  • r/AnCap101
  • r/ancap_bookclub
  • r/AnCapCopyPasta
  • r/ancapgaming
  • r/AnCap_Investing
  • r/AnCapMeme
  • r/ancapraxis
  • r/AskLibertarians
  • r/btc
  • r/bitcoincash
  • r/CapitalismVSocialism
  • r/antiwar
  • r/austrian_economics
  • r/EndDemocracy
  • r/LateStageStatism
  • r/LearnLiberty
  • r/Liberland
  • r/Libertarian
  • r/LibertarianCA
  • r/lpus
  • r/libertarianbestof
  • r/LibertarianLectures
  • r/libertarianmeme
  • r/LibertyInOurLifetime
  • r/NewAustrianSociety
  • r/polycentric_law
  • r/QualitySocialism
  • r/Rational_Liberty
  • r/ShitStatistsSay
  • r/socialismfacts

What are the dominant personality types in the community?[edit]

The community predominantly exhibits high openness to new experiences, as members are imaginative and willing to explore alternative societal structures. They tend to have high conscientiousness, as they are meticulous and adhere to a strong ethical framework guided by the non-aggression principle. The community leans towards introversion, valuing deep, meaningful discussions over social gatherings. Members are agreeable in the sense of being cooperative within their in-group, though they may appear untrusting towards external authorities. They generally demonstrate low neuroticism, maintaining a calm and rational demeanor in discussions.

Subgroup Personalities[edit]

  • Belongers: 15%
  • Emulators: 5%
  • Doomsdayers: 20%
  • Survivalists: 25%
  • Achievers: 10%
  • Saviors: 15%
  • Integrators: 10%

What are the goals and aspirations of the community?[edit]

The community aspires to establish a society based on voluntary interaction and free-market principles. Long-term goals include the reduction or elimination of state influence in personal and economic affairs. Members seek to create a world where individual rights are paramount, and justice is privatized. They envision a future where technological innovation and decentralized systems empower individuals, enhance freedom, and promote prosperity without governmental interference.

What are the values held by the community?[edit]

The community values individual liberty, personal responsibility, and the sanctity of private property. They hold a strong belief in the free market as a mechanism for achieving prosperity and justice. Non-aggression is a core value, emphasizing that force should not be initiated against another’s person or property. Transparency, voluntaryism, and skepticism of authority are also highly valued, as they believe these principles foster a more ethical and effective societal structure.

What are the motivations of the community?[edit]

Members are motivated by a desire for freedom from state control and the belief that individuals are best suited to make decisions for themselves. They are driven by the conviction that a free market yields better outcomes than centralized planning. There is a strong motivation to educate others about the benefits of anarcho-capitalism and to challenge the perceived inefficiencies and injustices of current governmental systems.

What are the pain points of the community?[edit]

The community faces challenges such as misconceptions about anarcho-capitalism and libertarianism, often being mischaracterized as extreme or unfeasible. They struggle with the pervasive influence of statism in society, which they see as infringing on personal liberties. Another significant pain point is the lack of mainstream acceptance and understanding of their ideas, leading to difficulties in gaining broader support.

What are the anticipated solutions to the pain points of the community?[edit]

The community anticipates overcoming challenges through education and outreach, aiming to dispel myths and promote understanding of their philosophies. They advocate for incremental changes towards a more voluntary society, using technology and innovation to bypass traditional state mechanisms. Building alliances with like-minded individuals and groups is also seen as a pathway to achieving their goals.

Who are the key villains?[edit]

  • The State: Seen as the primary oppressor of individual liberties.
  • Central Banks: Viewed as enablers of economic manipulation and inflation.
  • Crony Capitalists: Criticized for exploiting government connections to stifle competition.

Who are the key heroes?[edit]

  • Murray Rothbard: Celebrated for his foundational work in anarcho-capitalism.
  • Ludwig von Mises: Respected for his contributions to Austrian economics.
  • Ron Paul: Admired for his advocacy of liberty and limited government.

Shared Experiences?[edit]

The community shares experiences of advocating for libertarian values in often hostile environments. Many members have undergone personal journeys of questioning authority and exploring alternative economic systems. The financial crisis of 2008 and the subsequent government bailouts are frequently cited as pivotal events that galvanized their beliefs.

Barriers to Entry[edit]

New members may face a steep learning curve in understanding complex economic theories and libertarian philosophies. There is also a cultural barrier, as new members must align with the community’s values of non-aggression and voluntaryism. These barriers can lead to initial feelings of exclusion or misunderstanding, but active participation and engagement are encouraged to overcome them.

AIO (activities, interests, and opinions)[edit]

Activities include participating in online discussions, attending libertarian conferences, and engaging in debates about state policies. Interests are centered around economic theories, cryptocurrency, and technological innovations that promote decentralization. Opinions are strongly anti-state and pro-market, with a belief in the transformative power of individual freedom.

Community Rituals[edit]

The community regularly engages in “Murray Mondays,” where discussions focus on the works and ideas of Murray Rothbard. They also participate in book clubs and online forums to discuss libertarian literature and philosophy.

In-Group Jokes, Common Phrases, and Memes[edit]

  • “Taxation is theft.”
  • “The government that governs least, governs best.”
  • “Based and red-pilled.”

Glossary of Community-specific Jargon[edit]

  • “AnCap”: Short for anarcho-capitalism.
  • “NAP”: Non-aggression principle, a core ethical stance.
  • “Voluntaryist”: Someone who advocates for voluntary interactions as the foundation of society.

Cultural Influences[edit]

The culture of the subreddit encourages critical thinking, skepticism of authority, and a strong emphasis on individualism. Members are influenced by classical liberal thinkers and contemporary libertarian scholars, shaping their discussions and viewpoints.

Communication style[edit]

The preferred communication style is rational and evidence-based, with an emphasis on logical argumentation. Direct quotes from influential libertarian texts are often used to support points. Members value respectful discourse and are quick to challenge unsupported claims.

Conflict and Resolution[edit]

Conflicts within the community are typically resolved through debate and discussion. Members are encouraged to present evidence and reasoned arguments to support their positions. There is a strong preference for resolving disagreements internally rather than seeking external mediation.

How to communicate with them on an emotional level?[edit]

To communicate effectively on an emotional level, it’s important to appeal to the community’s strong sense of justice and fairness. Highlighting stories of individuals overcoming state oppression or achieving success through free-market principles can resonate deeply. The community values authenticity and sincerity, so genuine engagement is crucial.

How to communicate with them on a material level?[edit]

On a material level, communication should focus on practical solutions to current economic and social issues. Demonstrating how libertarian principles can lead to tangible improvements in quality of life, economic prosperity, and personal freedom will have a significant impact. Providing clear examples of successful applications of these principles can strengthen the message.

External Perception[edit]

Outsiders may perceive the community as radical or unrealistic due to their advocacy for the elimination of the state. This perception can lead to misunderstandings and dismissal of their ideas. However, those who engage with the community often find them to be well-reasoned and committed to ethical principles.

Additional Notes & Insights[edit]

The community is a hub for intellectual exploration and debate, offering a wealth of resources for those interested in libertarianism and anarcho-capitalism. While the ideas may initially seem extreme, the community is dedicated to fostering understanding and promoting a vision of a freer, more voluntary society.



r/governmentoppression[edit]

The Skeptical Advocates of Liberty[edit]

Summary[edit]

The community of /r/governmentoppression is characterized by individuals who are vigilant, skeptical, and deeply concerned about the encroachment of government power on personal freedoms. They are united by a shared perception that government institutions, particularly law enforcement agencies, often overstep their boundaries, leading to systemic oppression and infringement of civil liberties. The members of this community are not bound by partisan lines; they are more focused on issues of governmental overreach, surveillance, and corruption. They gather evidence, share news articles, and engage in discussions that highlight instances of perceived oppression, aiming to raise awareness and foster dialogue about the importance of maintaining and defending individual freedoms.

What are the related subreddits to this community?[edit]

The related subreddits include /r/Censorship, /r/FreeSpeech, /r/AmIFreeToGo, /r/1984IsReality, /r/DystopiaToday, /r/RestoreTheFourth, /r/DescentIntoTyranny, /r/Bad_Cop_No_Donut, and /r/BadGovNoFreedom. Suggested subreddits also mentioned are /r/Privacy, /r/politics2, /r/Liberty, /r/libertarianmeme, /r/Propaganda, /r/evolutionReddit, /r/Whistleblowers, /r/HumanRights, /r/aclu, and /r/eff.

What are the dominant personality types in the community?[edit]

The dominant personality types within the community can be understood through the lens of the Big Five personality traits:

  • Openness to new ideas: Members are generally open to new ideas, particularly those that challenge the status quo. They are imaginative and willing to consider alternative viewpoints regarding governance and personal freedoms.
  • Conscientiousness: This varies among members. Some are highly conscientious, meticulously researching and verifying claims before sharing, while others may act more impulsively, driven by a sense of urgency to expose perceived injustices.
  • Extroversion level: Many members tend towards introversion, preferring online discussions and written expression over face-to-face interactions. However, there are extroverted individuals who actively engage in protests and public demonstrations.
  • Agreeableness: The community exhibits a low level of agreeableness towards authority figures and governmental institutions, often questioning and challenging their actions. However, they are cooperative and supportive within their community, sharing information and resources.
  • Neuroticism: A moderate to high level of neuroticism is present, manifesting as anxiety over government actions and a persistent concern for personal liberties and privacy.

Subgroup Personalities[edit]

  • Belongers: 10% - They seek validation and camaraderie within the community, aligning closely with shared beliefs and values.
  • Emulators: 5% - Few in number, they admire high-profile whistleblowers and activists, striving to emulate their courage and impact.
  • Doomsdayers: 25% - A significant portion, they hold pessimistic views about government intentions and are often self-reliant, preparing for potential crises.
  • Survivalists: 20% - Cautious and frugal, they avoid unnecessary expenses and focus on essential resources, often researching to find the best deals.
  • Achievers: 10% - Ambitious members who channel their drive into activism or advocacy, sometimes leveraging their success to support the community.
  • Saviors: 15% - Altruistic individuals motivated by a desire to protect civil liberties and support others, often engaging in community outreach.
  • Integrators: 15% - They balance personal success with philanthropic efforts, often donating to causes that align with their values of freedom and justice.

What are the goals and aspirations of the community?[edit]

The community aspires to raise awareness about government overreach and advocate for the protection of civil liberties. They aim to foster a culture of skepticism and critical thinking, encouraging individuals to question authority and seek transparency. Long-term, they hope to influence policy changes that curtail surveillance programs and enhance governmental accountability. They also strive to build a network of informed citizens who can mobilize against oppressive measures and support victims of government abuse.

What are the values held by the community?[edit]

The community values transparency, accountability, and individual freedoms. They believe in the right to privacy and freedom of speech, viewing these as fundamental human rights that must be protected from government encroachment. They hold a deep-seated distrust of centralized power, advocating for decentralized systems that empower individuals rather than institutions. Their commitment to justice and equality drives their efforts to expose corruption and demand fair treatment for all citizens.

What are the motivations of the community?[edit]

The community is motivated by a desire to protect personal freedoms and prevent government overreach. They are driven by a sense of duty to hold authorities accountable and ensure that power is not abused. The fear of living under an oppressive regime fuels their vigilance and activism, as they seek to safeguard future generations from experiencing the same. This motivation is reinforced by historical examples of government abuses and current events that highlight the potential for tyranny.

What are the pain points of the community?[edit]

The community faces challenges related to misinformation, public apathy, and the perception of being overly paranoid or conspiratorial. They struggle with the lack of accountability in governmental institutions and the difficulty of effecting meaningful change. The complexity and opacity of surveillance programs and legal frameworks pose significant barriers to their efforts. Additionally, they contend with personal risks, such as surveillance or harassment, when engaging in activism or whistleblowing.

What are the anticipated solutions to the pain points of the community?[edit]

The community seeks to address these challenges through education, advocacy, and strategic alliances. They aim to increase public awareness and foster critical thinking skills to combat misinformation. Building coalitions with like-minded organizations and leveraging technology for secure communication and information sharing are key strategies. They advocate for legal reforms to enhance governmental transparency and accountability and support platforms that amplify their message and reach broader audiences.

Who are the key villains?[edit]

Key villains include governmental agencies like the NSA and FBI, perceived as overstepping their boundaries in surveillance and data collection. Certain laws and policies, such as the Patriot Act and NDAA, are also viewed as threats to civil liberties. Some prominent political figures and tech companies are seen as complicit in enabling or facilitating government overreach.

Who are the key heroes?[edit]

Key heroes include whistleblowers like Edward Snowden and Julian Assange, who are celebrated for exposing government secrets and corruption. Organizations like the ACLU and EFF are seen as champions of privacy and digital rights. Influential figures within the community, such as prolific posters and moderators, play a crucial role in curating content and fostering discussion.

Shared Experiences?[edit]

Shared experiences include encounters with law enforcement, participation in protests, and personal stories of government overreach. Historical events, such as the revelations of the Snowden leaks and the impact of the Patriot Act, have significantly shaped the community’s identity. These experiences reinforce their collective skepticism and commitment to advocacy.

Barriers to Entry[edit]

Barriers to entry include the need for a strong understanding of complex legal and political issues, as well as a willingness to engage in critical discourse. New members must navigate a community with established norms and a deep-seated distrust of outsiders, which can affect dynamics and integration.

AIO (activities, interests and opinions)[edit]

The community is engaged in activities such as sharing news articles, participating in discussions, and attending protests. They are interested in topics related to privacy, digital security, and government transparency. Their opinions often challenge mainstream narratives, advocating for a more informed and skeptical populace.

Community Rituals[edit]

Community rituals include the regular sharing and analysis of news stories, as well as the commemoration of significant events like the anniversaries of landmark legal decisions or whistleblower revelations. These rituals reinforce a sense of solidarity and purpose.

In-Group Jokes, Common Phrases and Memes[edit]

Common phrases include “ACAB” (All Cops Are Bastards), “Big Brother is watching,” and “government overreach.” Memes often feature Orwellian themes or satirical takes on surveillance and authority figures.

Glossary of Community-specific Jargon[edit]

  • Big Brother: A reference to government surveillance and control, derived from George Orwell’s “1984.”
  • ACAB: An acronym for “All Cops Are Bastards,” reflecting distrust of law enforcement.
  • Surveillance State: A term used to describe a government that heavily monitors its citizens.
  • Whistleblower: An individual who exposes secretive information or activities within an organization, often related to wrongdoing.

Cultural Influences[edit]

The culture of the subreddit influences members to be vigilant, skeptical, and proactive in defending their rights. It fosters a critical approach to media consumption and encourages active participation in civic discourse.

Communication style[edit]

The preferred communication style is assertive and direct, often using evidence and well-reasoned arguments to support claims. Examples include sharing links to credible sources and engaging in detailed discussions about governmental policies.

Conflict and Resolution[edit]

Conflicts are typically resolved through discussion and debate, with an emphasis on evidence-based arguments. The community values transparency and accountability, often seeking clarification and justification for differing viewpoints.

How to communicate with them on an emotional level?[edit]

To communicate on an emotional level, it is important to acknowledge their fears and concerns about government overreach. Emphasizing shared values of freedom and justice can resonate deeply. Emotional triggers include stories of personal injustice or examples of successful advocacy efforts.

How to communicate with them on a material level?[edit]

To communicate on a material level, focus on providing actionable information and resources that empower members to protect their rights. This includes guides on digital security, updates on relevant legislation, and opportunities for activism.

External Perception:[edit]

The community is often perceived by outsiders as paranoid or conspiratorial, which can lead to dismissal of their concerns. This perception affects the community by reinforcing their skepticism and motivating them to prove the legitimacy of their claims.

Additional Notes & Insights[edit]

The community values independence and self-reliance, often advocating for decentralized systems and personal empowerment. They are adept at using technology to achieve their goals and are continuously adapting to new challenges in the digital landscape.



r/libertarian[edit]

The Free Thinkers of r/Libertarian: Advocates of Personal Liberty and Limited Government[edit]

Summary[edit]

The r/Libertarian community exemplifies a diverse group of individuals united by a shared belief in maximizing personal freedom and minimizing government intervention. Members of this community are typically characterized by their advocacy for individual liberties, free-market capitalism, and a skepticism of state power. They value self-reliance, personal responsibility, and the protection of civil liberties as fundamental tenets. The community often engages in discussions about the role of government, economic policies, and social issues, all through the lens of libertarianism. Members are motivated by a desire to see a society where individuals have the autonomy to make choices about their lives without coercive interference from the state. This community represents a spectrum of libertarian thought, from minarchist to anarcho-capitalist perspectives, all unified by a commitment to the principles of liberty and voluntaryism.

What are the related subreddits to this community?[edit]

The related subreddits mentioned include:

  • r/GoldandBlack
  • r/Voluntarism
  • r/ThoughtfulLibertarian
  • r/LibertyinOurLifetime
  • r/Anarcho_Capitalism
  • r/Minarchy
  • r/LibertarianDebates
  • r/ShitStatistsSay
  • r/Objectivism
  • r/Austrian_Economics
  • r/LPUS
  • r/EndDemocracy
  • r/CryptoCurrency
  • r/btc
  • r/TimeToLegalize
  • r/TheWarOnDrugs
  • r/Marijuana
  • r/Cannabis
  • r/Progun
  • r/SecondAmendment
  • r/Firearms
  • r/GunPolitics
  • r/FreeSpeech
  • r/FirstAmendment
  • r/Censorship
  • r/RestoretheFourth
  • r/ReinstateArticle8
  • r/Privacy
  • r/WikiLeaks
  • r/NSALeaks
  • r/EndlessWar
  • r/Antiwar
  • r/DescentIntoTyranny
  • r/GovernmentOppression
  • r/Bad_Cop_No_Donut

What are the dominant personality types in the community?[edit]

The dominant personality types in the r/Libertarian community can be described using the OCEAN model of personality traits:

  • Openness to New Ideas: Members of this community are generally open to new ideas, particularly when it comes to exploring alternative governance systems and economic theories. They are imaginative and creative thinkers who welcome change, especially when it aligns with principles of personal liberty and economic freedom.
  • Conscientiousness Toward Others: The community shows a varied level of conscientiousness. While many members plan ahead and take others into consideration, prioritizing voluntary cooperation and mutual respect, there is also a strong emphasis on individual responsibility and self-reliance.
  • Extroversion Level: Libertarians in this community tend to vary in extroversion. Some are extroverted, actively engaging in debates and discussions to advocate for their beliefs, while others may be more introverted, preferring to engage intellectually in online forums.
  • Agreeableness with Others: The community exhibits a spectrum of agreeableness. While there is a strong emphasis on cooperation and peaceful coexistence, there is also a notable level of disagreement with statist ideas, leading to lively debates.
  • Neuroticism or Level of Emotional Stability: Members of r/Libertarian generally exhibit emotional stability, often approaching discussions with a rational and logical mindset. However, there may be instances of heightened emotional responses when discussing perceived threats to personal freedoms.

Subgroup Personalities[edit]

The composition of subgroups within the r/Libertarian community can be estimated as follows:

  • Belongers: Approximately 10% of the community. These individuals strive to fit in with their social networks but within the context of libertarian ideals, valuing community and shared values without sacrificing personal liberty.
  • Emulators: Around 5% of the community. Emulators may look up to successful libertarian figures and advocate for policies that reflect the success and autonomy they admire.
  • Doomsdayers: About 15% of the community. These members hold strong opinions about government overreach and often prepare for self-sufficiency, skeptical of state intentions.
  • Survivalists: Approximately 20% of the community. These individuals are cautious with their resources and advocate for fiscal responsibility, often researching and supporting policies that minimize government spending and taxation.
  • Achievers: Around 25% of the community. Achievers are ambitious individuals who advocate for policies that promote economic freedom and entrepreneurship, often seeking to highlight their personal and professional successes as examples of libertarian principles in action.
  • Saviors: About 10% of the community. Saviors are socially conscious libertarians who focus on making a positive impact through voluntary charity and community service, emphasizing the importance of non-coercive aid.
  • Integrators: Approximately 15% of the community. Integrators strive to balance economic success with philanthropic efforts, often supporting initiatives that align with their values and contribute to the greater good without government intervention.

What are the goals and aspirations of the community?[edit]

The r/Libertarian community aspires to create a society where individual freedom and personal responsibility are paramount. Long-term goals include reducing government intervention in both economic and personal affairs, advocating for free markets, and protecting civil liberties. Members desire a future where voluntary interactions and mutual cooperation replace coercive governmental structures. They seek to educate others about libertarian principles, hoping to influence policy changes that reflect their values of autonomy and limited government. The community envisions a world where individuals have the liberty to pursue their own happiness, make decisions about their lives, and engage in free exchange, all within a framework of non-aggression and respect for property rights.

What are the values held by the community?[edit]

The values of the r/Libertarian community include:

  • Individual Liberty: The belief that individuals should have the freedom to make choices about their own lives without unnecessary government interference.
  • Personal Responsibility: The idea that individuals are accountable for their actions and should take responsibility for their own well-being.
  • Free Markets: The conviction that voluntary exchange and competition lead to prosperity and innovation, with minimal government regulation.
  • Non-Aggression Principle: A commitment to resolving disputes peacefully and respecting the rights of others, opposing the initiation of force.
  • Property Rights: The belief in the sanctity of private property and the right to own and control one’s possessions.
  • Skepticism of State Power: A distrust of centralized authority and a preference for decentralized, voluntary solutions to societal issues.

These values are held because they align with the community’s belief in maximizing human potential and fostering a society based on consent and cooperation rather than coercion.

What are the motivations of the community?[edit]

The motivations of the r/Libertarian community stem from a desire to live in a society that respects individual autonomy and minimizes the role of government. Members are driven by the belief that personal freedom leads to innovation, prosperity, and a more just society. They are motivated to advocate for policies that reflect their values, engage in intellectual discussions to refine their beliefs, and educate others about the benefits of libertarian principles. The community is also motivated by a desire to protect their rights and freedoms from what they perceive as government overreach and to ensure that future generations inherit a society that values liberty and voluntary cooperation.

What are the pain points of the community?[edit]

The community faces several pain points and challenges, including:

  • Government Overreach: Concerns about excessive regulation, taxation, and surveillance that infringe on personal freedoms.
  • Political Marginalization: The struggle to gain mainstream recognition and influence in a predominantly two-party political system.
  • Misunderstanding of Libertarianism: Frustration with misconceptions about libertarian beliefs and the tendency to associate them with extreme or fringe ideologies.
  • Economic Inequality: Challenges in addressing economic disparities while maintaining a commitment to free-market principles.
  • Civil Liberties Erosion: Worries about the erosion of civil liberties and privacy rights in the name of security or public safety.

These challenges are significant as they hinder the community’s ability to advance its goals and achieve broader acceptance of libertarian values.

What are the anticipated solutions to the pain points of the community?[edit]

The community anticipates solutions such as:

  • Advocacy and Education: Increasing efforts to educate the public about libertarian principles and the benefits of limited government.
  • Political Engagement: Building coalitions with like-minded individuals and organizations to amplify their voice in the political arena.
  • Policy Proposals: Developing and promoting concrete policy proposals that align with libertarian values and address societal issues.
  • Grassroots Movements: Encouraging grassroots activism to promote change at local and state levels, where libertarian ideas may gain more traction.
  • Building Alliances: Forming alliances with other groups that share common goals, such as civil liberties organizations or free-market advocates.

These solutions aim to address the community’s pain points by fostering greater understanding, acceptance, and implementation of libertarian ideas.

Who are the key villains?[edit]

Key villains identified by the community include:

  • Government Entities: Seen as villains due to perceived overreach, excessive regulation, and infringement on personal freedoms.
  • Politicians: Particularly those who advocate for expansive government programs, high taxation, or restrictive policies.
  • Corporations with Government Ties: Companies that benefit from crony capitalism and government favoritism, undermining free-market competition.
  • Media Outlets: Criticized for perpetuating misunderstandings about libertarianism and favoring mainstream political narratives.

These entities are considered villains because they are perceived as threats to individual liberty and economic freedom.

Who are the key heroes?[edit]

Key heroes in the community include:

  • Ron Paul: Revered for his staunch advocacy of libertarian principles and limited government during his political career.
  • Ayn Rand: Celebrated for her philosophical contributions to libertarian thought and her promotion of individualism and capitalism.
  • Milton Friedman: Respected for his economic theories that emphasize free markets and limited government intervention.
  • Gary Johnson: Acknowledged for his efforts to bring libertarian ideas into the political mainstream during his presidential campaigns.

These individuals are seen as heroes for their contributions to advancing libertarian ideals and inspiring others to embrace the principles of liberty.

Shared Experiences?[edit]

Shared experiences that have shaped the community’s identity include:

  • Political Campaigns: Participation in libertarian political campaigns and support for candidates who advocate for limited government.
  • Intellectual Engagement: Engagement with libertarian literature, philosophy, and economic theories that reinforce their beliefs.
  • Advocacy for Civil Liberties: Involvement in movements and initiatives that protect civil liberties and challenge government overreach.
  • Online Discussions: Active participation in online forums and communities where libertarian ideas are debated and refined.

These experiences contribute to a sense of community and shared purpose among members who are dedicated to promoting their vision of a free society.

Barriers to Entry[edit]

Barriers to entry for new members include:

  • Complexity of Ideology: The nuanced and diverse nature of libertarian thought can be challenging for newcomers to fully grasp.
  • Misconceptions and Stereotypes: Potential members may be deterred by misconceptions about libertarianism being extreme or radical.
  • Political Climate: The dominance of the two-party system may discourage individuals from exploring or aligning with libertarian ideas.
  • Intellectual Rigor: The community’s emphasis on philosophical and economic discussions may be intimidating to those new to political theory.

These barriers can affect community dynamics by limiting growth and diversity of thought, but efforts to address them through education and outreach are ongoing.

AIO (activities, interests and opinions)[edit]

The r/Libertarian community engages in a variety of activities, interests, and opinions, including:

  • Activities: Participating in political campaigns, attending libertarian conferences and events, engaging in online discussions, and supporting grassroots advocacy efforts.
  • Interests: Economic theory, political philosophy, civil liberties, cryptocurrency, gun rights, and voluntaryism.
  • Opinions: Favoring limited government, advocating for free markets, opposing coercive policies, and prioritizing individual autonomy and responsibility.

The community holds diverse opinions on how best to achieve their goals, but they are united by a shared commitment to the values of liberty and personal freedom.

Community Rituals[edit]

Community rituals in r/Libertarian include:

  • Debate and Discussion: Regular engagement in debates and discussions on political and economic topics, often drawing on libertarian literature and thought.
  • Celebration of Libertarian Figures: Honoring influential libertarian thinkers and politicians through discussions, events, and shared media.
  • Promotion of Libertarian Principles: Actively promoting the principles of liberty and voluntary cooperation through social media, articles, and outreach.

These rituals help reinforce the community’s identity and shared values, fostering a sense of belonging among members.

In-Group Jokes, Common Phrases and Memes[edit]

In-group jokes, common phrases, and memes within the r/Libertarian community include:

  • “Taxation is Theft”: A popular phrase emphasizing opposition to involuntary taxation.
  • “Am I Being Detained?”: A meme highlighting skepticism of authority and asserting individual rights.
  • “Don’t Tread on Me”: A phrase and symbol representing resistance to government overreach and the desire for personal freedom.

These expressions serve as both humorous and serious reminders of the community’s core values and beliefs.

Glossary of Community-specific Jargon[edit]

Community-specific jargon includes:

  • Voluntaryism: The belief in voluntary interactions and the rejection of coercive government action.
  • Non-Aggression Principle (NAP): A foundational libertarian principle that opposes the initiation of force.
  • Minarchism: A form of libertarianism advocating for a minimal state limited to protecting individuals from aggression and enforcing contracts.
  • Anarcho-Capitalism: A libertarian philosophy that advocates for the elimination of the state in favor of a system of private property and voluntary exchanges.

These terms help members communicate complex ideas succinctly and reinforce their shared ideological framework.

Cultural Influences[edit]

The culture of the r/Libertarian subreddit influences members’ behavior and attitudes by:

  • Fostering Critical Thinking: Encouraging members to question authority and conventional wisdom, leading to a culture of skepticism and inquiry.
  • Promoting Intellectual Engagement: Valuing thoughtful discussion and exploration of political and economic theories, contributing to a community of learners.
  • Emphasizing Personal Responsibility: Reinforcing the belief in individual accountability and the importance of self-reliance.

These cultural influences shape how members approach political and social issues, emphasizing the importance of liberty and voluntary cooperation.

Communication style[edit]

The preferred communication style within the community is typically:

  • Rational and Analytical: Emphasizing logical arguments and evidence-based discussions.
  • Direct and Candid: Members often communicate their ideas and opinions clearly and without undue politeness.
  • Humorous and Satirical: Utilizing humor and satire to critique government policies and highlight perceived absurdities.

Examples include the use of memes and phrases like “Taxation is Theft” to convey complex ideas in an accessible and engaging manner.

Conflict and Resolution[edit]

The community handles conflicts or disagreements by:

  • Encouraging Debate: Fostering open discussions where differing viewpoints can be expressed and debated.
  • Promoting Respectful Discourse: Encouraging members to engage respectfully, even when opinions differ.
  • Moderation: Utilizing moderation to maintain community standards and ensure productive discussions.

While conflicts can arise due to the diverse range of opinions within the community, the emphasis on rational discourse helps facilitate resolution.

How to communicate with them on an emotional level?[edit]

To communicate with the r/Libertarian community for maximum emotional impact:

  • Appeal to Values: Emphasize the importance of individual freedom, personal responsibility, and voluntary cooperation.
  • Highlight Threats to Liberty: Address concerns about government overreach and the erosion of civil liberties.
  • Use Personal Stories: Share anecdotes or examples that illustrate the benefits of libertarian principles in action.

Emotional triggers that resonate with the community include threats to personal autonomy, instances of government abuse, and success stories of individual empowerment.

How to communicate with them on a material level?[edit]

To communicate with the community for maximum material impact:

  • Focus on Policy Proposals: Present concrete policy ideas that align with libertarian values and demonstrate practical benefits.
  • Emphasize Economic Freedom: Highlight the advantages of free markets and reduced regulation in promoting prosperity.
  • Address Practical Concerns: Discuss solutions to real-world issues, such as tax reform, education choice, and healthcare freedom.

Material needs and transformations desired by the community include increased economic opportunities, lower taxes, and greater personal control over life decisions.

External Perception:[edit]

The community is perceived by outsiders as:

  • Ideologically Diverse: Seen as encompassing a wide range of beliefs and approaches to achieving liberty.
  • Misunderstood: Often subject to misconceptions and stereotypes, such as being overly radical or unrealistic.
  • Principled: Recognized for its commitment to individual rights and consistent application of libertarian principles.

This perception can affect the community by influencing how they are represented in public discourse and how their ideas are received by others.

Additional Notes & Insights[edit]

Additional insights about the community include:

  • Growing Influence: The community is gaining visibility and influence, particularly in discussions about civil liberties and economic policy.
  • Youth Engagement: A significant portion of the community consists of younger individuals attracted to the ideas of freedom and innovation.
  • Cross-Ideological Appeal: Libertarian ideas often resonate with individuals across the political spectrum, offering potential for coalition-building.

These insights highlight the community’s potential to impact broader political and social trends as they continue to advocate for their vision of a free society.



r/libertarianmeme[edit]

The Libertarian Meme Community Persona[edit]

Summary[edit]

The /r/libertarianmeme community represents a unique blend of humor intertwined with a strong ideological leaning towards libertarian principles. The members of this community exhibit a deep skepticism towards government intervention, championing individual liberty, free markets, and personal responsibility. They often express disdain for both major political parties in the United States, viewing them as two sides of the same coin that perpetuate a cycle of government overreach and inefficiency. This community thrives on satire and humor, using memes to highlight perceived hypocrisies in political discourse and to promote libertarian ideals. The community is characterized by a sense of camaraderie among members who share a common belief in minimizing government intervention and maximizing personal freedoms. They are often well-versed in political theory, quick to reference historical events or figures, and enjoy engaging in spirited debates about the role of government and individual rights.

What are the related subreddits to this community?[edit]

  • r/LPUS
  • r/GoldandBlack
  • r/LibertyInOurLifetime
  • r/Libertarian
  • r/RonPaul
  • r/Anarcho_Capitalism
  • r/NationalDivorce
  • r/EndDemocracy
  • r/politicalcompassmemes

What are the dominant personality types in the community?[edit]

The dominant personality types in the /r/libertarianmeme community can be described using the Big Five personality traits: - Openness to Experience: Members are often open to new ideas, valuing creativity and innovation. They appreciate humor and satire, especially when it challenges conventional political narratives. - Conscientiousness: While they advocate for personal responsibility, community members may exhibit varied levels of conscientiousness. They plan their arguments and discussions carefully, often presenting well-reasoned critiques of government policies. - Extraversion: The community is a mix of extroverts and introverts. Extroverts actively engage in discussions and debates, while introverts may prefer to observe and upvote content that resonates with their beliefs. - Agreeableness: Members can be cooperative when discussing shared libertarian values but may become unyielding and disagreeable when debating opposing viewpoints, particularly those advocating for increased government intervention. - Emotional Stability (Neuroticism): Generally, the community exhibits emotional stability, though passionate debates can occasionally lead to heightened emotions and anxiety, especially regarding perceived threats to personal freedoms.

Subgroup Personalities[edit]

  • Belongers (10%): These members value community and cultural identity, often sharing memes that resonate with fellow libertarians and reinforce shared beliefs.
  • Emulators (5%): While not as prevalent, some members admire prominent libertarian figures and aspire to emulate their success and influence.
  • Doomsdayers (20%): A significant portion of the community harbors a pessimistic view of government actions, often preparing for perceived societal collapse or increased authoritarianism.
  • Survivalists (15%): These individuals are pragmatic and cautious, focusing on self-sufficiency and financial independence to minimize reliance on government systems.
  • Achievers (10%): Ambitious and driven, they seek to promote libertarian ideals through activism or political involvement, often showcasing their successes within the community.
  • Saviors (25%): Many members are motivated by a desire to protect individual freedoms and advocate for social justice through a libertarian lens, emphasizing voluntary cooperation and mutual aid.
  • Integrators (15%): These members aim to balance personal success with philanthropic efforts, supporting libertarian causes and charities that align with their values.

What are the goals and aspirations of the community?[edit]

The community’s goals include promoting libertarian principles, reducing government intervention, and advocating for policies that enhance personal freedom and responsibility. Long-term aspirations involve influencing political discourse, increasing the visibility of libertarian candidates, and ultimately reshaping societal norms to prioritize individual liberty over collective control.

What are the values held by the community?[edit]

The community values individual freedom, personal responsibility, minimal government intervention, free markets, and voluntary cooperation. They believe in the protection of civil liberties and the right to self-determination, often opposing policies they perceive as infringing on these rights.

What are the motivations of the community?[edit]

Motivations include a desire to live in a society where individuals are free to make their own choices without government interference, a belief in the efficiency of free markets, and a commitment to the principles of non-aggression and personal accountability.

What are the pain points of the community?[edit]

Pain points include frustration with government overreach, perceived erosion of civil liberties, economic policies that favor large corporations or special interests over individual entrepreneurs, and media narratives that marginalize libertarian viewpoints.

What are the anticipated solutions to the pain points of the community?[edit]

Anticipated solutions involve advocating for policy changes that reduce government size and influence, promoting educational initiatives to increase awareness of libertarian principles, and supporting candidates who prioritize individual liberty and free markets.

Who are the key villains?[edit]

Key villains include government institutions perceived as overreaching, politicians advocating for increased regulation and control, and media outlets that misrepresent or ignore libertarian perspectives. Specific names and organizations include the Federal Reserve, the IRS, and prominent political figures known for supporting expansive government policies.

Who are the key heroes?[edit]

Key heroes include libertarian thought leaders, activists, and politicians who champion individual freedom and challenge government overreach. Influential figures such as Ron Paul, Edward Snowden, and organizations like the Cato Institute and the Mises Institute are celebrated for their contributions to the libertarian cause.

Shared Experiences?[edit]

Shared experiences include frustration with government policies perceived as infringing on personal freedoms, the challenge of advocating for libertarian principles in a predominantly two-party political system, and the camaraderie found in a community that values humor and satire as tools for political expression.

Barriers to Entry[edit]

Barriers to entry for new members include understanding the nuanced libertarian philosophy, navigating the community’s in-group jokes and references, and aligning with the community’s values of individual freedom and skepticism towards government authority.

AIO (activities, interests and opinions)[edit]

Activities include creating and sharing memes, engaging in political discussions, and participating in activism. Interests revolve around political philosophy, economics, and current events. Opinions often challenge mainstream political narratives, advocating for reduced government intervention and increased personal liberty.

Community Rituals[edit]

Rituals include sharing and upvoting memes that resonate with libertarian values, celebrating achievements of libertarian figures, and participating in discussions that critique government policies and promote individual freedoms.

In-Group Jokes, Common Phrases and Memes[edit]

  • “Taxation is Theft”
  • “Become Ungovernable”
  • “The Tree of Liberty”
  • “Non-Aggression Principle”
  • “Based and Red-Pilled”
  • “Roads?!”
  • “Boogaloo”
  • “Who Will Build the Roads?”

Glossary of Community-specific Jargon[edit]

  • Boogaloo: A humorous term for a hypothetical civil uprising or conflict against government overreach.
  • Based: A term used to describe someone who is unapologetically expressing libertarian or conservative views.
  • Red-Pilled: Refers to a person who has awakened to libertarian or anti-establishment political realities.
  • Taxation is Theft: A common libertarian phrase expressing the belief that taxes are a form of coercive government appropriation.

Cultural Influences[edit]

The culture of the subreddit encourages critical thinking and skepticism towards authority, fostering a community that values humor as a means of political expression and engagement.

Communication style[edit]

The preferred communication style is informal, humorous, and often satirical. Members use memes and witty commentary to convey their messages, valuing brevity and impact. Examples include phrases like “Taxation is theft!” or “Become ungovernable!”

Conflict and Resolution[edit]

Conflicts are typically resolved through open discussion and debate, with members encouraged to support their arguments with logic and reasoning. Moderators may intervene to enforce community guidelines and maintain a respectful environment.

How to communicate with them on an emotional level?[edit]

To communicate effectively, emphasize shared values of freedom and individual rights, use humor and satire to engage, and validate their concerns about government overreach. Emotional triggers include threats to personal liberties and instances of government misconduct.

How to communicate with them on a material level?[edit]

Highlight policies or products that enhance personal freedom or efficiency, demonstrate how they align with libertarian principles, and offer practical solutions to reduce government dependency.

External Perception:[edit]

Outsiders may perceive the community as radical or fringe due to their staunch advocacy for minimal government. This perception can lead to misunderstandings about libertarian principles, but members often embrace their outsider status as a badge of honor.

Additional Notes & Insights[edit]

The /r/libertarianmeme community is a vibrant and dynamic group that uses humor to navigate complex political landscapes. Their dedication to individual freedom and skepticism towards authority is unwavering, and they continue to find innovative ways to express their beliefs through memes and discussions.



r/liberty[edit]

The Liberty Advocates: Guardians of Individual Freedom[edit]

Summary[edit]

The /r/liberty community represents a diverse group of individuals united by a fervent commitment to personal freedom and skepticism of government overreach. Members of this subreddit, known affectionately as “liberty lovers,” prioritize individual rights, self-determination, and minimal government interference in personal affairs. The community is characterized by its dedication to civil liberties, opposition to restrictive legislation, and advocacy for personal responsibility. Members often discuss topics related to government surveillance, regulation, and policies they perceive as infringing upon personal freedoms. They are driven by a belief in the inherent rights of individuals, often viewing government as an entity that should protect, rather than grant, these rights. This community is deeply influenced by libertarian principles, valuing autonomy and the protection of individual liberties above all else.

What are the related subreddits to this community?[edit]

  • r/autotldr
  • r/Anarcho_Capitalism
  • r/PoliticalModeration
  • r/conspiracy
  • r/Libertarian

What are the dominant personality types in the community?[edit]

The community exhibits a strong inclination towards the personality traits identified in the OCEAN model:

  • Openness to new ideas: Members are imaginative and open to new experiences, often questioning traditional narratives and exploring alternative viewpoints.
  • Conscientiousness: While there is a mix, many members show conscientiousness in their detailed discussions and planning for how to achieve greater liberty.
  • Extroversion level: The community includes both extroverts who actively engage in debates and introverts who prefer thoughtful reflection and research.
  • Agreeableness: There is a spectrum, but many members are skeptical of authority, leading to lower agreeableness with government institutions.
  • Neuroticism: Some members express anxiety about government overreach, reflecting higher levels of neuroticism.

Subgroup Personalities[edit]

  • Belongers: 15% - These individuals value their identity within the community, aligning with others who share their passion for liberty.
  • Emulators: 10% - They look up to libertarian figures and emulate their philosophies in discussions and lifestyle.
  • Doomsdayers: 20% - Often expressing pessimism about government intentions, they are self-sufficient and vocal in their critique of authority.
  • Survivalists: 10% - Practical and cautious, they often discuss strategies for self-reliance and reducing dependence on government systems.
  • Achievers: 15% - Ambitious and driven, these members strive to influence policy and public opinion in favor of libertarian ideals.
  • Saviors: 10% - These individuals focus on making a positive impact by advocating for policies that increase personal freedoms for all.
  • Integrators: 20% - They possess a strong desire to combine personal success with philanthropic efforts, supporting causes that align with their values.

What are the goals and aspirations of the community?[edit]

The community aspires to a future where individual freedoms are paramount, and government intervention is minimized. They seek to educate others about the benefits of libertarian principles, aiming to influence public policy to reflect these values. Long-term, they envision a society where personal responsibility and voluntary cooperation replace coercive government mandates. They aim to dismantle laws they view as unjust, particularly those concerning surveillance, gun rights, and economic regulation.

What are the values held by the community?[edit]

The community holds values such as individual liberty, personal responsibility, and skepticism of government power. They value open discussion and the freedom to express diverse opinions. Trust in the free market and voluntary interactions are key tenets, as they believe these lead to more ethical and efficient outcomes than government-imposed solutions. Their dedication to these values stems from a belief in the inherent rights of individuals to govern their own lives without undue interference.

What are the motivations of the community?[edit]

The community is motivated by a deep-seated belief in the principles of liberty and self-determination. They are driven by a desire to protect these liberties from what they perceive as government encroachments. Many members are motivated by personal experiences where they felt their freedoms were threatened. This motivation is compounded by a sense of urgency to prevent further erosion of civil liberties and to educate others about the importance of maintaining these freedoms.

What are the pain points of the community?[edit]

The community struggles with perceived overreach by government entities, particularly concerning surveillance, taxation, and regulation. They feel marginalized in mainstream political discourse and often express frustration with the bipartisan nature of American politics, which they believe fails to represent their views. The community faces challenges in mobilizing and effecting change within a system they perceive as resistant to their ideals.

What are the anticipated solutions to the pain points of the community?[edit]

Members advocate for solutions such as policy reforms to curtail government surveillance and repeal laws they see as overreaching. They support grassroots movements and education campaigns to increase awareness of libertarian values. Additionally, they promote the Free State Project and similar initiatives aimed at creating communities based on libertarian principles as a way to demonstrate the viability of their ideals.

Who are the key villains?[edit]

  • TSA (Transportation Security Administration): Seen as a symbol of government overreach and invasion of privacy.
  • NSA (National Security Agency): Criticized for surveillance practices that infringe on personal privacy.
  • FDA (Food and Drug Administration): Viewed as overly restrictive and infringing on personal choice.
  • Government officials and politicians: Particularly those perceived as supporting policies that increase government control over individual lives.

Who are the key heroes?[edit]

  • Ron Paul: Celebrated for his advocacy of libertarian principles and criticism of government overreach.
  • Edward Snowden: Admired for exposing government surveillance practices.
  • Thomas Sowell: Respected for his economic philosophies that align with libertarian values.
  • The Free State Project: Viewed as an initiative that embodies the community’s aspirations for a society based on individual liberty.

Shared Experiences?[edit]

The community bonds over shared experiences of perceived government overreach, such as intrusive security measures at airports, government surveillance, and restrictive regulations. Historical events like the passing of the PATRIOT Act and controversies surrounding government surveillance have significantly shaped their identity and reinforced their commitment to advocating for individual freedoms.

Barriers to Entry[edit]

New members may face challenges understanding the depth of philosophical discussions and the strong opinions held by long-time members. The community’s skepticism of government and mainstream narratives can be daunting for newcomers unfamiliar with libertarian principles. However, once engaged, new members find a welcoming environment for exploring ideas about liberty and personal freedom.

AIO (activities, interests and opinions)[edit]

Activities include participating in discussions about libertarian philosophy, attending liberty-focused events, and supporting initiatives like the Free State Project. Interests often revolve around economic freedom, civil liberties, and minimal government intervention. Opinions are diverse but generally critical of government overreach and supportive of individual rights.

Community Rituals[edit]

The community engages in rituals such as celebrating key libertarian figures and historical milestones relevant to individual freedoms. They often share and discuss literature and documentaries that align with their values. Online discussions and debates serve as a daily ritual, reinforcing their shared commitment to liberty.

In-Group Jokes, Common Phrases and Memes[edit]

  • “Taxation is theft.”
  • “Shall not be infringed.”
  • “Molon labe” (come and take them, often in reference to gun rights).
  • “The government is not your friend.”

Glossary of Community-specific Jargon[edit]

  • Libertarianism: A political philosophy advocating for minimal state intervention in personal and economic affairs.
  • Statist: A person who supports substantial government intervention or control.
  • Voluntarism: The principle of relying on voluntary action rather than coercion.
  • Free State Project: An initiative to recruit libertarians to move to New Hampshire to create a hub of libertarian activism.

Cultural Influences[edit]

The culture of the subreddit emphasizes a strong belief in individual rights and skepticism of authority. This culture influences members to critically evaluate government actions and advocate for personal freedoms in their daily lives and interactions.

Communication style[edit]

The community prefers direct, assertive communication, often employing humor and sarcasm to critique government policies. Members value well-reasoned arguments and evidence-based discussions, as illustrated by quotes like, “Rights are not ‘granted’ to us by the government – they are ours by our very nature.”

Conflict and Resolution[edit]

Conflicts are often resolved through debate and discussion, with an emphasis on rational argumentation. Members who violate community norms or engage in personal attacks are typically moderated to maintain a focus on constructive dialogue.

How to communicate with them on an emotional level?[edit]

To communicate effectively, appeal to their desire for autonomy and respect for individual rights. Highlight stories of personal triumph over government adversity and emphasize themes of empowerment and self-reliance. Emotional triggers include appeals to freedom, privacy, and resistance against unjust authority.

How to communicate with them on a material level?[edit]

Focus on practical solutions that enhance personal freedom and reduce government interference. Discuss policies that promote economic independence and personal responsibility. Material needs often revolve around reducing taxes, deregulation, and supporting free-market solutions.

External Perception[edit]

Outsiders may view the community as radical or extreme due to their staunch libertarian beliefs. This perception can lead to misunderstandings about their motivations and goals, but it also fosters a strong sense of identity and solidarity among members who feel misrepresented.

Additional Notes & Insights[edit]

The /r/liberty community is deeply committed to its principles, often drawing inspiration from historical figures and events that championed individual rights. While they face challenges in influencing mainstream political discourse, their dedication to educating others and advocating for liberty remains unwavering.



r/libertyinourlifetime[edit]

The Liberty Advocates of New Hampshire[edit]

Summary[edit]

The /r/libertyinourlifetime community centers around the Free State Project (FSP), a movement aiming to attract liberty-minded individuals to New Hampshire to create a society with minimal government intervention. This community is characterized by a strong emphasis on individual freedom, skeptical views on government overreach, and a commitment to creating a libertarian utopia. Members often discuss topics such as reducing taxes, minimizing government size and influence, advocating for gun rights, and promoting free-market solutions. They are proactive in local politics, striving to influence laws and policies in favor of libertarian principles. The community values personal responsibility, self-sufficiency, and the protection of constitutional rights, particularly the Second Amendment. Events like PorcFest and Liberty Forum serve as cultural hubs for like-minded individuals to network and exchange ideas.

What are the related subreddits to this community?[edit]

  • /r/GoldAndBlack
  • /r/REBubble
  • /r/sneakpeekbot
  • /r/newhampshire
  • /r/Libertarian

What are the dominant personality types in the community?[edit]

In terms of the Big Five personality traits, community members are likely to score high in Openness to new ideas, given their interest in libertarian principles and innovative governance models. Conscientiousness may vary, but there is a strong emphasis on personal responsibility and planning for the future. Extroversion levels might be moderate, as members are engaged in community events and discussions, but also value independence. Agreeableness could be mixed; while the community is cooperative internally, there may be distrust towards external governmental entities. Neuroticism levels are likely low, as members emphasize emotional stability and rational discourse.

Subgroup Personalities[edit]

  • Belongers: 15% - Value community and shared values, actively participate in FSP initiatives.
  • Emulators: 5% - Look up to libertarian thought leaders and seek to emulate their success.
  • Doomsdayers: 10% - Skeptical of government overreach, prepare for worst-case scenarios.
  • Survivalists: 20% - Focus on self-sufficiency, cautious about expenditures, seek the best deals.
  • Achievers: 15% - Ambitious in promoting libertarian ideals, involved in political activism.
  • Saviors: 10% - Aim to impact society positively through liberty-focused initiatives.
  • Integrators: 25% - Balance personal success with philanthropy, often involved in community projects and charity.

What are the goals and aspirations of the community?[edit]

The community aspires to establish New Hampshire as a model for liberty-oriented governance, showcasing the benefits of minimal government intervention. Long-term goals include reducing state and federal government powers, promoting individual freedoms, and influencing national and international perceptions of libertarianism. Members desire a society where personal responsibility is prioritized, and government mandates are minimized, allowing individuals to live freely.

What are the values held by the community?[edit]

Core values include individual liberty, personal responsibility, self-sufficiency, and the protection of constitutional rights. The community believes in the free market as a solution to societal problems and values transparency and accountability in governance. There is a strong emphasis on gun rights, property rights, and opposing government overreach, reflecting a commitment to the principles of non-aggression and voluntaryism.

What are the motivations of the community?[edit]

Members are motivated by a desire to live in a society that aligns with their libertarian values, free from excessive government control. They are driven by the belief that personal freedom leads to greater prosperity and happiness. The potential to influence policy and create a living example of libertarian ideals in practice motivates their involvement and activism.

What are the pain points of the community?[edit]

Challenges include political opposition, misconceptions about libertarianism, and the difficulty of enacting wide-scale policy changes. The community struggles with external perceptions of being radical or unrealistic and faces barriers in convincing others of the viability of their ideals. Additionally, maintaining unity and momentum in a diverse group with varying interpretations of libertarian principles can be challenging.

What are the anticipated solutions to the pain points of the community?[edit]

Solutions include increasing outreach and education efforts to dispel misconceptions about libertarianism, engaging in local politics to influence policy changes, and fostering a strong, supportive community network. Building alliances with other liberty-minded individuals and organizations can enhance their influence and effectiveness. Encouraging open dialogue and constructive debate within the community can help address internal differences and maintain focus on common goals.

Who are the key villains?[edit]

Key villains include government entities perceived to infringe on personal liberties, such as the IRS, ATF, and other regulatory bodies. Political figures and organizations advocating for increased government control and intervention are also seen as adversaries. Specific individuals are not typically named, but rather, the focus is on opposing policies and ideologies that contradict libertarian values.

Who are the key heroes?[edit]

Key heroes include influential libertarian thinkers and activists such as Ron Paul, Ayn Rand, and Ludwig von Mises. Community leaders and active members who contribute to FSP initiatives and local political efforts are also celebrated. Organizations like the Cato Institute and the Mises Institute are viewed positively for their advocacy of libertarian principles.

Shared Experiences?[edit]

Common experiences include attending events like PorcFest and Liberty Forum, participating in local political activism, and engaging in discussions about reducing government influence. Many members share a journey of moving to New Hampshire to join the FSP, motivated by the desire to live in a community that aligns with their values. These experiences create a sense of camaraderie and shared purpose among members.

Barriers to Entry[edit]

Barriers include the financial and logistical challenges of relocating to New Hampshire, especially for those living far away. New members may face a learning curve in understanding the local political landscape and integrating into established community networks. However, the community is generally welcoming and supportive, offering resources and guidance to newcomers.

AIO (activities, interests and opinions)[edit]

Activities include attending FSP events, participating in local government meetings, and engaging in discussions about libertarian philosophy. Interests often revolve around political activism, gun rights, cryptocurrency, and self-sufficiency practices. Opinions commonly reflect skepticism towards government intervention and a preference for market-based solutions to societal issues.

Community Rituals[edit]

Rituals include annual events like PorcFest and Liberty Forum, which serve as gatherings for networking and discussing libertarian ideas. Regular meetups and social events also provide opportunities for members to connect and collaborate on local initiatives. These rituals reinforce the community’s identity and commitment to their shared goals.

In-Group Jokes, Common Phrases and Memes[edit]

  • “Live Free or Die”
  • “Statist tears”
  • “Porcupine pride”
  • “Taxation is theft”
  • “Molon Labe” These phrases and memes reflect the community’s values and serve as a form of bonding and mutual understanding among members.

Glossary of Community-specific Jargon[edit]

  • “Free Stater”: A member of the Free State Project.
  • “Statist”: Someone who supports government intervention and control.
  • “PorcFest”: An annual libertarian festival in New Hampshire.
  • “Molon Labe”: A phrase meaning “come and take them,” used in defense of gun rights.
  • “Non-aggression principle (NAP)”: A core libertarian principle opposing the initiation of force.

Cultural Influences[edit]

The culture of the subreddit is heavily influenced by libertarian philosophy, emphasizing individual freedom and skepticism towards government authority. This culture shapes members’ behavior and attitudes, fostering a community that values debate, activism, and personal responsibility.

Communication style[edit]

The preferred communication style is direct and assertive, often employing humor and sarcasm. Members value open and honest discourse and are not afraid to challenge opposing views. For example, phrases like “Taxation is theft” encapsulate their straightforward approach to expressing core beliefs.

Conflict and Resolution[edit]

Conflicts are typically handled through open discussion and debate, with an emphasis on finding common ground. The community values rational discourse and encourages members to back up their positions with evidence and logical reasoning. Disagreements are seen as opportunities for growth and understanding.

How to communicate with them on an emotional level?[edit]

To resonate emotionally, appeal to their values of freedom, independence, and self-determination. Highlight stories of individuals overcoming government oppression or successfully advocating for personal liberties. Use language that evokes a sense of empowerment and community, reinforcing their identity as liberty advocates.

How to communicate with them on a material level?[edit]

Focus on practical benefits of policies or products that enhance personal freedom and self-sufficiency. Highlight cost savings, increased autonomy, and improved quality of life. Provide clear, factual information that aligns with their preference for evidence-based decision-making.

External Perception:[edit]

Outsiders may perceive the community as radical or idealistic, often misunderstanding the nuances of libertarian philosophy. This perception can lead to challenges in gaining wider support, but it also serves to galvanize members to clarify their mission and educate others on their principles.

Additional Notes & Insights[edit]

The community is dynamic and continually evolving, with members coming from diverse backgrounds but united by a common goal. They are resilient in the face of opposition and proactive in seeking solutions to societal challenges through the lens of personal freedom and responsibility.



r/marketanarchism[edit]

The Market Anarchist Collective[edit]

Summary[edit]

The /r/MarketAnarchism community represents a diverse collective of individuals deeply committed to the principles of voluntary exchange, decentralization, and the critique of state intervention in markets. This community is characterized by a shared belief in the potential for markets to operate without coercive state structures, fostering an environment where individuals can freely associate, trade, and cooperate. Members are driven by a desire to explore and implement systems of mutual aid, cooperative ownership, and decentralized decision-making, rejecting both state capitalism and authoritarian socialism. They seek to create a society where power is distributed horizontally, and economic relationships are based on mutual benefit rather than hierarchical control.

What are the related subreddits to this community?[edit]

  • /r/AAnarchism
  • /r/Anarchy
  • /r/Anarchism
  • /r/Agorism
  • /r/DebateAnarchism
  • /r/DebateaCommunist
  • /r/GeoAnarchism
  • /r/GeoLibertarianism
  • /r/NeoAnarchism
  • /r/PostAnarchism
  • /r/Mutualism
  • /r/Panarchism
  • /r/libertarianleft
  • /r/AnarchistNews

What are the dominant personality types in the community?[edit]

Members of the /r/MarketAnarchism community predominantly exhibit high openness to new experiences, showcasing a strong willingness to explore and consider alternative economic systems and social structures. They demonstrate conscientiousness by engaging thoughtfully with others, often emphasizing the importance of mutual respect and cooperation. While the community includes a mix of introverts and extroverts, discussions often reveal a preference for introspection and deep analysis. Agreeableness varies, with some members highly valuing harmony and consensus, while others prioritize rigorous debate. Emotional stability is generally high, with members approaching discussions with a rational and analytical mindset, though passionate debates can occasionally lead to heightened emotions.

Subgroup Personalities[edit]

  • Belongers: Approximately 15% of the community identifies with this subgroup, valuing the sense of belonging and shared purpose within the anarchist community.
  • Emulators: A small portion, around 5%, seeks to emulate successful anarchist thinkers and movements, often aspiring to create impactful projects or initiatives.
  • Doomsdayers: Roughly 10% express skepticism about the current socio-economic system and advocate for self-sufficiency and preparedness.
  • Survivalists: About 20% are cautious with resources, emphasizing frugality and sustainable living practices.
  • Achievers: Comprising 15%, these individuals are driven by the ambition to implement practical anarchist solutions, often engaging in entrepreneurial ventures.
  • Saviors: A significant 25% are motivated by a desire to make a positive impact, focusing on community building and mutual aid.
  • Integrators: Around 10% allocate resources towards philanthropic efforts, supporting causes aligned with their values.

What are the goals and aspirations of the community?[edit]

The community aspires to create a society where individuals can freely associate and cooperate without coercive state interference. They aim to explore and implement decentralized economic models, such as mutual aid networks, cooperative ownership structures, and alternative currencies. Long-term aspirations include fostering a culture of self-sufficiency, resilience, and mutual support, where individuals and communities can thrive without reliance on hierarchical institutions. Members also seek to educate and engage with broader audiences, promoting awareness and understanding of market anarchism as a viable alternative to existing systems.

What are the values held by the community?[edit]

The /r/MarketAnarchism community values autonomy, voluntary cooperation, and decentralization. They hold a strong commitment to economic and social justice, advocating for systems that prioritize mutual aid, equity, and sustainability. The community emphasizes the importance of personal responsibility, ethical behavior, and the rejection of coercive power structures. Transparency, open dialogue, and respect for diverse perspectives are also highly valued, fostering an inclusive and collaborative environment.

What are the motivations of the community?[edit]

Members are motivated by a desire to live in a society free from coercive authority and hierarchical control. They are driven by the belief that decentralized, voluntary systems can better meet human needs and promote individual and collective well-being. The community is inspired by historical and contemporary examples of successful anarchist initiatives and seeks to build upon these models. The pursuit of knowledge, self-improvement, and the desire to contribute positively to society are also key motivators.

What are the pain points of the community?[edit]

The community faces challenges such as societal misconceptions about anarchism, the dominance of state-centric systems, and the difficulty of implementing large-scale decentralized solutions. Members often struggle with limited resources and the need for greater collaboration and networking to achieve their goals. Additionally, the community grapples with internal debates over the best strategies and approaches to advance their vision.

What are the anticipated solutions to the pain points of the community?[edit]

The community anticipates addressing these challenges through increased education and outreach, fostering collaborations with like-minded groups, and developing practical tools and resources for decentralized living. They aim to create more robust networks for mutual aid and support, leveraging technology to enhance communication and coordination. By building resilient, self-sufficient communities that demonstrate the viability of market anarchist principles, they hope to inspire broader societal change.

Who are the key villains?[edit]

  • State institutions: Seen as the primary enforcer of coercive power and hierarchical control.
  • Corporations: Criticized for perpetuating economic inequality and environmental degradation through state-supported monopolistic practices.
  • Intellectual property regimes: Viewed as barriers to innovation and knowledge sharing, often enforced through state power.

Who are the key heroes?[edit]

  • Murray Rothbard: Celebrated for his contributions to libertarian thought and market anarchism.
  • Kevin Carson: Recognized for his work on mutualism and critiques of state capitalism.
  • Samuel Edward Konkin III: Honored for his development of agorism and counter-economic strategies.
  • Benjamin Tucker: Respected for his advocacy of individualist anarchism and free-market principles.

Shared Experiences?[edit]

The community shares experiences of engaging in mutual aid projects, participating in decentralized networks, and exploring alternative economic models. Members often discuss historical and contemporary examples of anarchist experiments, learning from both successes and failures. The shared experience of questioning and challenging state authority and mainstream economic systems unites the community in their pursuit of a more equitable and decentralized society.

Barriers to Entry[edit]

New members may face barriers such as unfamiliarity with anarchist theory, misconceptions about anarchism, and the complexity of navigating diverse perspectives within the community. These barriers can affect community dynamics by creating initial misunderstandings or tensions, but are often overcome through education, dialogue, and inclusive practices.

AIO (activities, interests and opinions)[edit]

Community activities include engaging in discussions on anarchist theory, participating in mutual aid projects, and exploring decentralized technologies such as blockchain and alternative currencies. Members are interested in sustainable living, cooperative ownership models, and historical anarchist movements. Opinions are diverse, with ongoing debates about the best strategies for achieving a stateless society and the role of markets in such a society.

Community Rituals[edit]

Rituals include regular discussions and debates on key anarchist texts and ideas, sharing resources for mutual aid and self-sufficiency, and organizing events or meetups for community building. The community also participates in online campaigns and collaborations with other anarchist groups to promote awareness and action.

In-Group Jokes, Common Phrases and Memes[edit]

  • “Taxation is theft”
  • “Anarchy is order”
  • “Markets not capitalism”
  • “Mutual aid is our weapon”
  • “Agorism: because the black market is the free market”

Glossary of Community-specific Jargon[edit]

  • Agorism: A strategy for achieving a stateless society through counter-economic activity.
  • Mutual aid: Voluntary reciprocal exchange of resources and services for mutual benefit.
  • Decentralization: Distributing power and decision-making away from central authorities.
  • Voluntaryism: A philosophy advocating that all forms of human association should be voluntary.

Cultural Influences[edit]

The culture of the subreddit influences members to value critical thinking, open dialogue, and a commitment to exploring alternatives to state-centric systems. It fosters a spirit of experimentation and innovation in the pursuit of decentralized and equitable solutions.

Communication style[edit]

The preferred communication style is respectful, open, and collaborative, with an emphasis on rational discourse and mutual understanding. Members are encouraged to ask questions, share insights, and engage in constructive debates.

Conflict and Resolution[edit]

Conflicts are typically resolved through open dialogue, mediation by respected community members, and a focus on finding common ground. The community values diversity of thought and encourages respectful disagreement as a means of refining ideas and strategies.

How to communicate with them on an emotional level?[edit]

To communicate effectively on an emotional level, appeal to shared values such as autonomy, justice, and mutual aid. Highlight the potential for empowerment and self-determination through decentralized systems. Emotional triggers include the desire for freedom from coercion, the aspiration for a just and equitable society, and the satisfaction of contributing to a greater good.

How to communicate with them on a material level?[edit]

Focus on practical solutions that address material needs, such as tools for self-sufficiency, resources for mutual aid projects, and technologies that enhance decentralization. Highlight the tangible benefits of market anarchism, such as increased autonomy, reduced reliance on hierarchical systems, and the potential for sustainable prosperity.

External Perception:[edit]

Outsiders often perceive the community as radical or idealistic, sometimes misunderstanding the principles and goals of market anarchism. This perception can create challenges in gaining wider acceptance, but also presents opportunities for outreach and education to clarify misconceptions and demonstrate the practical potential of anarchist models.

Additional Notes & Insights[edit]

The /r/MarketAnarchism community is a vibrant and dynamic space for exploring alternative economic and social systems. Members are united by a shared commitment to decentralization, voluntary cooperation, and the pursuit of a society free from coercive authority. Despite challenges, the community is resilient and continually seeks to grow and adapt, drawing on a rich tradition of anarchist thought and practice.



r/mhoc[edit]

The Political Enthusiasts of /r/mhoc[edit]

Summary[edit]

The /r/mhoc community is a vibrant and dynamic group of individuals deeply invested in the simulation of the UK Parliament. This subreddit allows political enthusiasts to engage in debates, draft legislation, and simulate the operations of various parliamentary bodies such as the House of Commons, House of Lords, and devolved parliaments like the Scottish Parliament, Welsh Senedd, and Northern Ireland Assembly. Members are drawn to this community for its unique blend of political role-play and real-world political engagement, offering a platform for individuals to express their political ideologies, test their legislative skills, and engage with like-minded individuals globally.

The community thrives on diversity, with members representing a wide array of political perspectives, from traditional parties like Labour and Conservative to more niche groups such as the Radical Socialist Party and the Crown Nationalist Party. This diversity fosters rich discussions and a competitive environment during simulated elections, where participants campaign vigorously and strategically to gain seats. The community also features various independent groupings and regional parties, reflecting the complex political landscape of the UK.

What are the related subreddits to this community?[edit]

  • /r/ukpolitics
  • /r/BritishPolitics
  • /r/europe
  • /r/ukgreens
  • /r/tories
  • /r/libdem
  • /r/LabourUK
  • /r/MHOCMP
  • /r/MHOCPress
  • /r/MHOCCampaigning
  • /r/MHOCMeta
  • /r/MHOCArchive
  • /r/MHOCStrangersBar
  • /r/downingstreet
  • /r/MillbankTower

What are the dominant personality types in the community?[edit]

The community likely exhibits a diverse range of personality types, often reflective of their political alignments and roles within the simulation. Using the OCEAN model, one might find: - Openness: High, as members are imaginative and interested in exploring a wide range of political ideas and scenarios. - Conscientiousness: Moderate, as members are detail-oriented and committed to the simulation but vary in their adherence to rules and procedures. - Extraversion: Varies, with some members being more extroverted and active in discussions, while others may prefer behind-the-scenes roles. - Agreeableness: Moderate to low, given the nature of political debate, which can be contentious and competitive. - Neuroticism: Moderate, as political debates can evoke strong emotions and stress, especially during heated discussions or elections.

Subgroup Personalities[edit]

  • Belongers: 25% - These members value community and often align themselves with larger, well-established parties to feel a sense of belonging.
  • Emulators: 15% - Motivated by success and recognition, these members often mimic successful political strategies or align with influential figures.
  • Doomsdayers: 10% - Skeptical and critical, these members often voice concerns about the direction of the simulation or the political landscape.
  • Survivalists: 20% - Pragmatic and resourceful, these members focus on practical solutions and efficient use of resources within the simulation.
  • Achievers: 20% - Ambitious and driven, these members are often leaders or key players in their parties, striving for political success.
  • Saviors: 5% - Altruistic and idealistic, these members are motivated by social justice and often champion progressive causes.
  • Integrators: 5% - Philanthropic and community-focused, these members often work towards coalition-building and fostering collaboration.

What are the goals and aspirations of the community?[edit]

The primary goals of the /r/mhoc community are to simulate the UK Parliament effectively, engage members in meaningful political discourse, and provide a platform for political education and expression. Long-term aspirations include expanding the simulation to include more complex political scenarios, increasing member engagement, and fostering a community that is both inclusive and informative.

What are the values held by the community?[edit]

The community values political engagement, diversity of thought, and respectful debate. Members hold a strong belief in democracy and the importance of political discourse, often mirroring real-world political values such as transparency, accountability, and representation.

What are the motivations of the community?[edit]

Members are motivated by a passion for politics, the opportunity to express their political views, and the desire to engage in a unique form of role-play. The simulation provides a safe space for members to explore political ideologies, test legislative skills, and engage with a diverse community.

What are the pain points of the community?[edit]

Challenges include managing political disagreements, ensuring fair and balanced simulation outcomes, and maintaining member engagement. The community also faces the difficulty of accurately simulating complex political systems and ensuring that all voices are heard.

What are the anticipated solutions to the pain points of the community?[edit]

Solutions include implementing clear rules and guidelines for participation, fostering a culture of respect and inclusivity, and continuously improving the simulation mechanics to ensure fairness and engagement. Regular feedback from members and adapting to new technologies and ideas can also help address these challenges.

Who are the key villains?[edit]

While individual members or parties may sometimes be perceived as antagonists in specific scenarios, the real “villains” are often systemic issues such as unfair simulation mechanics or external influences that disrupt the community’s harmony.

Who are the key heroes?[edit]

Key heroes within the community are often the moderators and long-standing members who contribute significantly to maintaining the simulation, ensuring fair play, and fostering a welcoming environment. Influential figures also include party leaders and those who champion important causes within the simulation.

Shared Experiences?[edit]

Shared experiences that shape the community’s identity include participating in simulated elections, engaging in high-stakes debates, and collaboratively drafting legislation. These experiences foster a sense of camaraderie and collective learning.

Barriers to Entry[edit]

Barriers to entry include understanding the complex rules of the simulation, navigating the community’s culture, and finding a political niche within the established parties and groupings. New members may initially struggle with the depth of political knowledge required but can overcome this through active participation and engagement with the community.

AIO (activities, interests, and opinions)[edit]

Activities include drafting and debating legislation, participating in elections, and engaging in political discourse. Interests are centered around politics, governance, and policy-making. Opinions vary widely, reflecting the diverse political spectrum represented within the community.

Community Rituals[edit]

Community rituals include regular elections, debates, and the ceremonial formation of government coalitions and opposition. These rituals mimic real-world political processes and are integral to the simulation.

In-Group Jokes, Common Phrases, and Memes[edit]

  • “Vote Snake!” – A humorous rallying cry during elections.
  • “Full Communism” – A meme referencing radical left-wing policies.
  • “Olliemustgo” – A phrase used during political controversies, referencing a prominent member.
  • “Green Surge” – Refers to the rise in popularity of the Green Party within the simulation.

Glossary of Community-specific Jargon[edit]

  • “MP” – Member of Parliament in the simulation.
  • “VoNC” – Vote of No Confidence.
  • “GE” – General Election.
  • “HoL” – House of Lords.
  • “Quad” – The Quadrumvirate, a group of four senior moderators.

Cultural Influences[edit]

The culture of the subreddit influences members to engage respectfully, value diverse opinions, and participate actively in political discourse. The simulation encourages a deep understanding of parliamentary processes and fosters a collaborative environment.

Communication Style[edit]

The preferred communication style is formal and respectful, reflecting the parliamentary setting. Direct quotes and evidence-based arguments are highly valued, and members are encouraged to engage in constructive debate.

Conflict and Resolution[edit]

Conflicts are typically resolved through moderated discussions, where members are encouraged to address issues respectfully. The community relies on established rules and guidelines to ensure fair resolutions.

How to communicate with them on an emotional level?[edit]

To communicate emotionally, appeal to members’ passion for politics, highlighting shared goals and values. Emphasize the importance of their contributions to the simulation and the impact of their participation on the community’s success.

How to communicate with them on a material level?[edit]

Communicate material benefits by offering resources that enhance their simulation experience, such as guides, tools, and opportunities for skill development. Highlight how engagement can lead to personal growth and a deeper understanding of political processes.

External Perception[edit]

Outsiders may perceive the community as a niche group of political enthusiasts, which can lead to misconceptions about its seriousness or inclusivity. This perception emphasizes the need for outreach and education to attract diverse members.

Additional Notes & Insights[edit]

The /r/mhoc community is a unique blend of political role-play and real-world engagement, offering members a platform to explore and express their political identities. As the community grows, maintaining its inclusive and respectful culture will be crucial to its continued success.



r/minarchy[edit]

The Libertarian Minimalist: The /r/minarchy Community Persona[edit]

Summary[edit]

The /r/minarchy community embodies the principles of minarchism, a branch of libertarianism advocating for a minimal state apparatus. Members of this community are united by their belief that the state’s sole purpose should be to protect citizens from aggression, theft, breach of contract, and fraud. They argue for the existence of a minimal government that includes only essential institutions like the military, police, and courts. This belief is rooted in the conviction that a laissez-faire economy, coupled with minimal government interference, yields the best ethical and pragmatic outcomes. The community values individual rights, negative rights over collective rights, private property, free markets, and voluntary association, often engaging in discussions about reducing the size and scope of government.

What are the related subreddits to this community?[edit]

  • /r/Libertarian
  • /r/Libertarianism
  • /r/voluntarism
  • /r/Anarcho_Capitalism
  • /r/libertarianhumor
  • /r/libertarianmeme
  • /r/Liberland
  • /r/GaryJohnson
  • /r/LibertarianPartyUSA
  • /r/asklibertarians
  • /r/shitstatistssay
  • /r/minarchism

What are the dominant personality types in the community?[edit]

The dominant personality types within the /r/minarchy community can be described using the OCEAN model:

  • Openness: Members tend to be open to new ideas, especially those challenging traditional governmental structures. They often engage in imaginative discussions about voluntaryist societies and minimalist governance.
  • Conscientiousness: Community members show conscientiousness in their careful consideration of others’ rights and the implications of government actions. They advocate for planning and respect for individual autonomy.
  • Extroversion: The community is a mix of introverts and extroverts, with discussions often reflecting deep, introspective thought but also lively debates.
  • Agreeableness: There is moderate agreeableness; while members are cooperative when discussing shared goals of reducing government, there can be distrust toward those advocating for more state intervention.
  • Neuroticism: The community generally exhibits low neuroticism, showing emotional stability and rational discourse, though there is some anxiety about government overreach and loss of freedoms.

Subgroup Personalities[edit]

  • Belongers: 10% - Members who align with family and community norms, focusing on shared values and collective identity within the libertarian ideology.
  • Emulators: 5% - Individuals who aspire to emulate successful libertarian figures, though they remain a small segment due to the community’s focus on individualism.
  • Doomsdayers: 15% - Members who are pessimistic about current government overreach and advocate for self-sufficiency and minimal state influence.
  • Survivalists: 10% - Cautious spenders who focus on economic efficiency and minimal government interference to ensure personal financial stability.
  • Achievers: 20% - Ambitious individuals who strive for personal success and advocate for free markets as a means to achieve it.
  • Saviors: 15% - Socially conscious members who wish to make a positive impact by reducing government and empowering communities through voluntary actions.
  • Integrators: 25% - Individuals who balance personal success with philanthropic efforts, often supporting libertarian causes financially.

What are the goals and aspirations of the community?[edit]

The community aspires to create a society where individual rights are paramount, and government intervention is minimal. They envision a future where voluntary associations replace many government functions, and individuals are free to pursue personal success without coercive taxation. Long-term aspirations include influencing public policy towards libertarian ideals, promoting awareness about the negative impacts of government overreach, and fostering a thriving community of like-minded individuals who value freedom and personal responsibility.

What are the values held by the community?[edit]

  • Individual Rights: The belief in protecting and prioritizing individual freedoms over collective mandates.
  • Voluntary Association: Favoring voluntary interactions and contracts over government-imposed mandates.
  • Economic Freedom: Advocating for free markets and minimal government interference in economic activities.
  • Negative Rights: Emphasizing rights that prevent others from infringing on an individual’s freedom, rather than entitlements to specific resources or outcomes.
  • Personal Responsibility: Encouraging individuals to take responsibility for their actions and well-being without relying on the state.

What are the motivations of the community?[edit]

The community is motivated by a desire to maximize personal freedom and minimize government control. They are driven by the belief that individuals are best suited to make decisions affecting their lives, and that government intervention often leads to inefficiencies and infringements on personal liberties. The pursuit of ethical and pragmatic solutions to societal issues through minimal state intervention is a core motivator, as is the aspiration to create a more just and equitable society through voluntary cooperation.

What are the pain points of the community?[edit]

  • Government Overreach: Concerns about excessive government control and regulation infringing on personal freedoms.
  • Taxation: Viewing taxation as coercive and a violation of individual property rights.
  • Economic Intervention: Frustration with government interference in the economy, which is seen as harmful to market efficiency and personal prosperity.
  • Public Misunderstanding: Challenges in conveying the benefits of minimal government to a broader audience often skeptical of libertarian principles.

What are the anticipated solutions to the pain points of the community?[edit]

  • Education and Advocacy: Increasing awareness and understanding of libertarian principles through education and public discourse.
  • Policy Influence: Engaging in political processes to advocate for policies that align with minimal government intervention.
  • Community Building: Strengthening the community of like-minded individuals to create a support network for promoting and implementing libertarian ideals.
  • Voluntary Initiatives: Encouraging voluntary solutions to societal issues as alternatives to government programs.

Who are the key villians?[edit]

  • Excessive Government Institutions: Seen as the primary entities infringing on personal freedoms through overregulation and taxation.
  • Prominent Statists: Individuals or politicians advocating for increased government control and intervention.
  • Corporatism and Crony Capitalism: Entities that exploit government connections for unfair advantages, viewed as antithetical to free market principles.

Who are the key heroes?[edit]

  • Ron Paul: Revered for his consistent advocacy for libertarian principles and minimal government.
  • Milton Friedman: Celebrated for his economic theories promoting free markets and minimal state intervention.
  • Ayn Rand: Influential for her philosophical contributions to individualism and limited government through her works.
  • John Locke: Acknowledged for his foundational ideas on individual rights and the social contract.
  • Robert Nozick: Respected for his philosophical arguments supporting minimal state functions.

Shared Experiences?[edit]

  • Economic Crises: Events like the 2008 financial crisis have reinforced skepticism towards government intervention in markets.
  • Political Campaigns: Support for libertarian candidates and initiatives has shaped the community’s political identity.
  • Intellectual Engagement: Reading and discussing works by libertarian thinkers have contributed to a shared intellectual foundation.

Barriers to Entry[edit]

New members may face challenges in understanding complex libertarian theories and overcoming preconceived notions about government roles. The community’s strong emphasis on ideological purity can sometimes create a barrier for those with differing views, affecting community dynamics by potentially discouraging diverse perspectives.

AIO (activities, interests and opinions)[edit]

  • Activities: Engaging in discussions and debates about libertarian philosophy and policy, participating in political activism.
  • Interests: Economics, individual rights, political theory, voluntaryism, and minimal state governance.
  • Opinions: Strongly favor limited government, oppose coercive taxation, and advocate for personal responsibility and free markets.

Community Rituals[edit]

  • Book Discussions: Regular discussions on influential libertarian literature.
  • Debate Sessions: Organizing debates on the merits and challenges of minarchism and libertarianism.
  • Annual Meetups: Gathering at libertarian conferences or events to strengthen community ties.

In-Group Jokes, Common Phrases and Memes[edit]

  • “Taxation is theft”
  • “Government is a necessary evil”
  • “Libertarian paradise”
  • “Voluntaryism is the future”
  • “Who will build the roads?”

Glossary of Community-specific Jargon[edit]

  • Minarchy: A political philosophy advocating for a minimal state focused on protecting individual rights.
  • Voluntaryism: The principle that all human interactions should be voluntary and free from coercion.
  • Negative Rights: Rights that require others to abstain from interfering with an individual’s actions, as opposed to providing goods or services.
  • Statist: A person who supports significant government intervention in personal and economic affairs.
  • Laissez-faire: An economic system with minimal government interference in markets.

Cultural Influences[edit]

The culture of the subreddit influences members to prioritize individualism, personal responsibility, and skepticism towards government authority. This cultural framework encourages members to critically evaluate government actions and advocate for voluntary solutions to societal issues.

Communication style[edit]

The preferred communication style is rational and evidence-based, often using logical arguments and references to libertarian literature. Members value respectful discourse but are quick to challenge ideas that contradict their principles. Example: “Let’s not forget that taxation is inherently coercive, as it involves the threat of force against those who do not comply.”

Conflict and Resolution[edit]

Conflicts are typically resolved through rational debate and reference to libertarian principles. Members encourage open dialogue and discourage personal attacks. Moderation policies aim to maintain civility and focus on constructive discussions.

How to communicate with them on an emotional level?[edit]

To communicate effectively on an emotional level, emphasize shared values of freedom, autonomy, and justice. Highlight stories that demonstrate the negative impacts of government overreach and the benefits of personal responsibility. Emotional triggers include appeals to independence, fairness, and the moral superiority of voluntary actions over coercive government policies.

How to communicate with them on a material level?[edit]

Focus on the practical benefits of minimal government, such as economic efficiency, lower taxes, and increased personal prosperity. Highlight successful examples of voluntary solutions to societal issues and the inefficiencies of government programs. Emphasize the tangible benefits of personal freedom and economic opportunity.

External Perception:[edit]

Outsiders may perceive the community as radical or unrealistic due to its strong advocacy for minimal government. This perception can lead to misunderstandings about the community’s goals and principles, sometimes resulting in dismissive attitudes or mischaracterizations of libertarianism.

Additional Notes & Insights[edit]

The /r/minarchy community is deeply committed to exploring and promoting the principles of minimal government and maximal personal freedom. Members are engaged in ongoing debates about the best ways to achieve these ideals and are eager to educate others about the benefits of a libertarian society. Despite challenges in public perception, the community remains dedicated to its mission of advocating for individual rights and limited government.



r/newaustriansociety[edit]

The New Austrian Perspective: A Deep Dive into the /r/newaustriansociety Community[edit]

Summary[edit]

The /r/newaustriansociety community is a vibrant, intellectually driven group focused on promoting and evolving Austrian economics and libertarian philosophy for the modern era. Members are deeply engaged in discussions that explore the nuances of economic theories, particularly those that align with Austrian principles, while also incorporating insights from other economic frameworks that can be harmonized within their ideological base. The community is characterized by a commitment to high-quality discourse, often involving rigorous debate on complex economic concepts such as monetary policy, market dynamics, and the role of government intervention. This subreddit serves as a hub for both established economists and newcomers to explore the intricacies of Austrian economics, encouraging a spirit of inquiry and critical thinking.

What are the related subreddits to this community?[edit]

  • r/austrian_economics
  • r/economy
  • r/AskEconomics
  • r/GoldandBlack
  • r/CapitalismVSocialism
  • r/Libertarian
  • r/Anarcho_Capitalism
  • r/AskLibertarians

What are the dominant personality types in the community?[edit]

The community predominantly features individuals who exhibit high levels of Openness to new ideas, as they are imaginative, creative, and embrace change, particularly in economic thought. They are Conscientiousness as evidenced by their structured and thoughtful contributions to discussions. Many members display a mix of Introversion, valuing solitary deep dives into theoretical discussions, and Extroversion, actively engaging in debates and community events. Agreeableness varies widely, with discussions often driving cooperative exchanges, though some debates become contentious. Emotional Stability (low Neuroticism) is commonly observed, with members maintaining a calm and reasoned discourse even when faced with opposing views.

Subgroup Personalities[edit]

  • Belongers: Approximately 15% of the community, these individuals seek to fit into the broader libertarian and Austrian school communities, often aligning their views with well-established theories and norms.
  • Emulators: Around 10% are emulators, aspiring to match the success and intellectual rigor of prominent economists and commentators within the Austrian and libertarian spheres.
  • Doomsdayers: Comprising about 20%, these members hold strong, often pessimistic views about current economic policies, advocating for self-sufficiency and unique economic models.
  • Survivalists: Roughly 15% focus on pragmatic economic solutions that ensure financial stability and sustainability, often skeptical of mainstream economic interventions.
  • Achievers: A significant 25% are highly ambitious, driven to contribute meaningfully to economic discourse, often through publishing papers or leading discussions.
  • Saviors: About 10% are motivated by a desire to impact the world positively through economic policy, focusing on socially conscious economic reforms.
  • Integrators: Making up around 5%, these individuals look to balance personal economic success with broader philanthropic efforts, often integrating diverse economic theories.

What are the goals and aspirations of the community?[edit]

The community aims to refine and expand Austrian economic theories to address contemporary challenges, fostering a deeper understanding of market dynamics, monetary policy, and government intervention. They aspire to influence public policy and economic thought by integrating Austrian principles with modern economic realities, ultimately seeking to enhance individual liberty and economic well-being on a global scale.

What are the values held by the community?[edit]

The community highly values intellectual rigor, individual liberty, free-market principles, and skepticism towards centralized economic planning. They hold a deep respect for the historical foundations of Austrian economics while remaining open to innovative ideas that can be cohesively integrated. These values are held because they believe in the power of free markets to efficiently allocate resources and improve societal welfare without the need for intrusive government intervention.

What are the motivations of the community?[edit]

Members are motivated by a desire to understand complex economic phenomena through the lens of Austrian economics, to challenge the status quo of mainstream economic thought, and to promote policy changes that align with their ideological beliefs. They are compelled by the potential of Austrian principles to offer more sustainable and liberty-enhancing economic solutions.

What are the pain points of the community?[edit]

The community grapples with misconceptions about Austrian economics, often facing criticism for being overly theoretical or ideologically rigid. They also encounter challenges in gaining broader acceptance within mainstream economic circles and in effectively communicating their ideas to a wider audience.

What are the anticipated solutions to the pain points of the community?[edit]

The community seeks to address these challenges by producing high-quality research, engaging in public discourse, and collaborating with like-minded individuals and organizations to spread awareness and acceptance of Austrian economic principles. They also focus on clarifying misconceptions and demonstrating practical applications of their theories.

Who are the key villains?[edit]

  • Centralized government institutions that enforce stringent economic regulations.
  • Economists and policymakers who advocate for extensive government intervention in markets.
  • Certain mainstream economic theories that contradict Austrian principles, such as Keynesian economics.

Who are the key heroes?[edit]

  • Influential Austrian economists like Ludwig von Mises and Friedrich Hayek who laid the groundwork for the community’s economic philosophy.
  • Contemporary thought leaders and educators who continue to advance Austrian economics and libertarian philosophy.

Shared Experiences?[edit]

Members often share experiences of intellectual discovery when encountering Austrian economics, their journey from mainstream economic thought to Austrian principles, and their participation in conferences or debates that shaped their understanding. These experiences form a collective narrative of seeking truth and challenging conventional economic wisdom.

Barriers to Entry[edit]

New members might find the community’s discussions dense and challenging due to the complex nature of Austrian economics. This can affect dynamics by creating a learning curve that requires dedication and intellectual curiosity to overcome, though it also fosters a tight-knit group of committed individuals.

AIO (activities, interests and opinions)[edit]

Activities include participating in discussions, reading and sharing economic literature, and attending conferences. Interests revolve around economic theory, public policy, and libertarian philosophy. Opinions are diverse but generally align with a skepticism towards government intervention and a belief in the efficacy of free markets.

Community Rituals[edit]

Regular discussions on seminal works of Austrian economics, annual meet-ups or conferences, and book clubs focusing on relevant literature are common rituals that strengthen community bonds.

In-Group Jokes, Common Phrases and Memes[edit]

  • “Praxeology saves the day!”
  • “Time preference explained again…”
  • Memes about Keynesian economics as the “enemy.”

Glossary of Community-specific Jargon[edit]

  • “Praxeology”: The study of human action, central to Austrian economics.
  • “Time Preference”: The preference for present goods over future goods.
  • “Catallactics”: The study of exchange and market phenomena.

Cultural Influences[edit]

The culture of the subreddit encourages rigorous debate, intellectual growth, and an openness to integrating different economic ideas as long as they align with the core principles of Austrian economics.

Communication style[edit]

The community prefers a formal yet engaging style, often using technical economic terminology. Members are encouraged to support their assertions with evidence or logical reasoning, fostering a culture of informed debate.

Conflict and Resolution[edit]

Conflicts are typically resolved through structured debates, with moderators ensuring that discussions remain respectful and evidence-based. The community values diversity of thought but requires that all arguments are well-reasoned and grounded in economic theory.

How to communicate with them on an emotional level?[edit]

To communicate effectively, acknowledge the community’s passion for economic freedom and convey messages that resonate with their values of liberty and skepticism towards centralized control. Highlight shared goals and the potential for Austrian principles to improve societal outcomes.

How to communicate with them on a material level?[edit]

Focus on the practical benefits of Austrian economics, such as increased economic efficiency, innovation, and personal freedom. Provide concrete examples and case studies that demonstrate the success of free-market principles in real-world scenarios.

External Perception:[edit]

Outsiders may perceive the community as niche or overly academic, but this perception often draws interest from those seeking alternative economic perspectives. This can lead to increased curiosity and engagement from individuals disillusioned with mainstream economic thought.

Additional Notes & Insights[edit]

The community’s commitment to intellectual rigor and free-market principles positions it as a unique voice in the broader economic discourse. By continuing to engage with contemporary issues and demonstrating the relevance of Austrian economics, the community can expand its influence and impact.



r/occupyaustin[edit]

The Activists of Occupy Austin[edit]

Summary[edit]

The /r/OccupyAustin community represents a passionate group of individuals committed to social justice and systemic change. This community is deeply rooted in the broader Occupy Movement, which was initially sparked by Occupy Wall Street in 2011. The members of this community are characterized by their dedication to addressing economic inequality, corporate influence in politics, and other social injustices. They are often seen as progressive, valuing inclusivity and diversity in their activism. The community is driven by a sense of urgency and responsibility to address what they perceive as systemic failures in governance and the economy. They value direct action, community organization, and grassroots mobilization to bring about change.

What are the related subreddits to this community?[edit]

  • r/occupywallstreet

What are the dominant personality types in the community?[edit]

Members of the /r/OccupyAustin community often exhibit high levels of Openness to new ideas, as they are imaginative, creative, and welcoming of change. They are likely to score high on Conscientiousness, as they plan ahead and consider the impact of their actions on others. The community tends to attract individuals with a mix of Extroversion and Introversion; while some members thrive in social settings and public demonstrations, others prefer behind-the-scenes organizing. They generally score high in Agreeableness, valuing cooperation and kindness, though they may exhibit lower Agreeableness when dealing with perceived injustices. There is a range of Neuroticism, with some members experiencing anxiety and emotional instability due to the issues they are addressing, while others maintain emotional stability in their activism.

Subgroup Personalities[edit]

  • Belongers: Approximately 20%. They seek community and solidarity with like-minded individuals and emphasize unity within the movement.
  • Emulators: Around 5%. They are less focused on emulating celebrities and more on aligning with influential activists.
  • Doomsdayers: Roughly 15%. They hold strong opinions about systemic collapse and focus on self-sufficiency and independence.
  • Survivalists: Approximately 10%. They are cautious with resources, often focusing on sustainable practices and frugality.
  • Achievers: Around 10%. They are ambitious within the movement, seeking to create significant change and often taking leadership roles.
  • Saviors: About 30%. They are driven by a desire to make a positive impact and are often involved in charitable activities and advocacy.
  • Integrators: Approximately 10%. They are focused on earning resources to support social causes and often engage in philanthropy.

What are the goals and aspirations of the community?[edit]

The primary goals of the /r/OccupyAustin community include addressing economic inequality, reducing corporate influence in politics, and advocating for systemic reforms in governance and the economy. They aspire to create a more equitable society where the needs of the 99% are prioritized over the interests of the wealthiest 1%. Long-term aspirations include fostering sustainable communities, promoting social justice, and achieving meaningful policy changes at local, national, and global levels.

What are the values held by the community?[edit]

The community values inclusivity, equality, and social justice. They believe in the power of grassroots mobilization and direct action to enact change. Transparency and accountability in government and corporate practices are crucial to their platform. They also prioritize sustainability and environmental stewardship, viewing these as integral to achieving long-term social and economic justice.

What are the motivations of the community?[edit]

The community is motivated by a sense of injustice and inequality in the current socio-economic system. They are driven by a desire to create a fairer society where wealth and power are more evenly distributed. Their motivation stems from both personal experiences of systemic failure and a broader awareness of global inequities. They are compelled to act by a deep-seated belief in the potential for collective action to bring about positive change.

What are the pain points of the community?[edit]

The community faces challenges such as public perception and media portrayal, often being labeled as disorganized or lacking clear objectives. They also encounter logistical issues related to organizing events and maintaining momentum. Additionally, they struggle with internal disagreements and maintaining cohesion among diverse viewpoints. Access to resources and funding for sustained activism is another significant challenge.

What are the anticipated solutions to the pain points of the community?[edit]

To address their pain points, the community focuses on improving internal communication and decision-making processes to enhance cohesion. They aim to leverage social media and alternative media outlets to improve public perception and counteract negative portrayals. Building alliances with other activist groups and organizations can provide additional resources and support. They also emphasize the importance of clear messaging and strategic planning to maintain momentum and achieve their goals.

Who are the key villains?[edit]

  • Corporations like Bank of America and financial institutions perceived as contributing to economic inequality and corruption.
  • Government entities and politicians seen as complicit in systemic failures and corporate influence.
  • Media outlets that misrepresent or underreport the movement’s activities and objectives.

Who are the key heroes?[edit]

  • Influential activists and organizers within the community who inspire and mobilize others.
  • Allies from other Occupy movements and social justice organizations who support the community’s efforts.
  • Community members who consistently contribute resources, time, and energy to sustain the movement.

Shared Experiences?[edit]

The community’s identity is shaped by shared experiences of organizing protests, participating in direct action, and facing challenges from authorities. Key events include the initial occupation of public spaces and subsequent evictions, which have galvanized members and reinforced their commitment. The community also shares experiences of solidarity with other social justice movements.

Barriers to Entry[edit]

Barriers to entry for new members include navigating the community’s organizational structure and understanding its decision-making processes. The intensity of commitment required for sustained involvement can also be daunting. These barriers can affect community dynamics by creating a divide between core members and newcomers, making it challenging to integrate fresh perspectives.

AIO (activities, interests, and opinions)[edit]

The community is actively involved in organizing protests, marches, and educational events. They have a strong interest in social justice, economic reform, and environmental sustainability. Opinions within the community often focus on critiquing corporate influence, advocating for policy change, and promoting grassroots activism.

Community Rituals[edit]

Community rituals include regular General Assemblies (GAs) for decision-making and consensus-building. These meetings are a cornerstone of the movement’s democratic process. The community also engages in collective actions, such as marches and demonstrations, which serve as both protest and a means of building solidarity.

In-Group Jokes, Common Phrases, and Memes[edit]

  • “We are the 99%”: A rallying cry emphasizing the movement’s focus on economic inequality.
  • “Occupy Everything”: Expresses the movement’s expansive vision for activism.
  • “Sparkle hands”: A gesture used during GAs to indicate agreement or support.

Glossary of Community-specific Jargon[edit]

  • “GA” (General Assembly): The primary decision-making forum within the movement.
  • “The 1%”: Refers to the wealthiest segment of society perceived as holding disproportionate power and influence.
  • “Direct Action”: Protest and demonstration activities aimed at enacting immediate change.

Cultural Influences[edit]

The culture of the subreddit is heavily influenced by the broader Occupy Movement, which emphasizes horizontal organization, consensus-based decision-making, and direct action. This culture fosters a sense of solidarity and shared purpose among members, influencing their behavior and attitudes.

Communication style[edit]

The preferred communication style within the community is open, collaborative, and consensus-driven. Members often use respectful and inclusive language to facilitate dialogue and decision-making. For example, “Let’s find a way to work together on this issue” illustrates the emphasis on cooperation.

Conflict and Resolution[edit]

Conflicts within the community are typically addressed through open discussion and consensus-building during GAs. Members are encouraged to voice their concerns and work collaboratively to find solutions. This process can be time-consuming but is valued for its inclusivity and democratic nature.

How to communicate with them on an emotional level?[edit]

To communicate effectively with the community, it is important to appeal to their sense of justice and collective empowerment. Emphasizing shared values and common goals can foster emotional resonance. Stories of personal or community transformation, as well as highlighting systemic injustices, can serve as emotional triggers.

How to communicate with them on a material level?[edit]

Material communication should focus on providing resources and support that align with the community’s goals. This includes offering logistical assistance for events, sharing information on relevant policy changes, and providing platforms for amplifying their message. Demonstrating tangible benefits of collaboration can enhance material impact.

External Perception:[edit]

Outsiders may perceive the community as radical or disorganized, which can lead to misunderstanding or dismissal of their objectives. This perception can affect the community by creating barriers to broader public support and media coverage. However, it also serves as a motivator for members to improve communication and outreach efforts.

Additional Notes & Insights[edit]

The /r/OccupyAustin community, while facing challenges, remains resilient and committed to its mission. The group’s adaptability and willingness to learn from past experiences are key strengths. By continuing to refine their strategies and cultivate alliances, they can enhance their impact and contribute to broader societal change. The community’s focus on inclusivity and diversity is both a core value and a potential area for growth as they strive to engage a wider audience.



r/occupychi[edit]

The Activist Advocates of /r/occupychi[edit]

Summary[edit]

The /r/occupychi community represents a fervent group of social activists driven by a desire for systemic change and justice. This persona is characterized by a strong commitment to social and economic equality, reflecting the broader Occupy movement’s ethos. Members are passionate about challenging socioeconomic disparities, corporate influence in politics, and advocating for the rights of the 99%. They are vocal, engaged in direct action, and utilize various digital platforms to mobilize, organize, and share information. This community values open discussion, collective decision-making, and grassroots organizing, often leveraging past historical movements as a guide. Their activities range from local protests to participating in larger national and international movements, reflecting a global consciousness and solidarity with similar causes worldwide.

What are the related subreddits to this community?[edit]

  • /r/chicago
  • /r/occupywallstreet
  • /r/politics
  • /r/anarchism

What are the dominant personality types in the community?[edit]

The community is predominantly composed of individuals with high Openness to new ideas, as they are imaginative, creative, and enthusiastic about change. They exhibit moderate Conscientiousness, often planning events and actions with a focus on community welfare. The Extroversion level varies, with some members being highly outgoing and active in public demonstrations, while others contribute through online discussions. Members show high Agreeableness, being cooperative and supportive of one another, although there may be moments of disagreement on tactics. The community displays moderate Neuroticism, with occasional anxiety and stress stemming from external political pressures and the challenges of activism.

Subgroup Personalities[edit]

  • Belongers: 15% - They seek solidarity and community, finding comfort in shared ideals and collective action with fellow activists.
  • Emulators: 5% - A small group looks up to prominent activists and may mimic their actions and rhetoric to gain traction within the movement.
  • Doomsdayers: 20% - Many members express pessimism about the current political and economic systems, often advocating for self-sufficiency and alternative lifestyles.
  • Survivalists: 10% - Cautious with resources, they emphasize strategic planning and resourcefulness in organizing events and protests.
  • Achievers: 10% - Driven and ambitious, these individuals focus on tangible goals and successes within the movement.
  • Saviors: 30% - A significant portion is motivated by altruistic values, striving to create a positive impact on society through activism.
  • Integrators: 10% - They balance personal ambitions with community welfare, often contributing financially or through volunteer work to support the cause.

What are the goals and aspirations of the community?[edit]

The community aspires to dismantle corporate influence in politics, achieve economic equality, and ensure social justice. Long-term goals include systemic reforms in governance, such as campaign finance reform and the establishment of equitable economic policies. They envision a society where wealth and power are more evenly distributed, and government actions are transparent and accountable to the people. The community desires to maintain momentum for the Occupy movement, influencing public discourse and policy decisions at local, national, and global levels.

What are the values held by the community?[edit]

The community values equality, justice, transparency, and collective action. They uphold the principles of democracy and free speech, advocating for the rights and voices of marginalized populations. The community cherishes solidarity and mutual support, believing in the power of grassroots movements to enact change. These values stem from a deep-seated belief in fairness and a commitment to challenging oppressive systems.

What are the motivations of the community?[edit]

Motivations include a strong desire for social and economic justice, driven by the perceived failures of current systems to address inequality and corruption. Members are motivated by a sense of duty to advocate for the disenfranchised and to create a more equitable society. They are spurred by historical precedents of successful activism and the belief that collective action can lead to meaningful change.

What are the pain points of the community?[edit]

Pain points include the frustration with slow or negligible political change, the challenge of maintaining momentum and engagement, and the risk of burnout among activists. They also face external opposition from political and corporate entities, along with internal disagreements on strategy and direction. The community struggles with limited resources and media misrepresentation, which can hinder their efforts and impact.

What are the anticipated solutions to the pain points of the community?[edit]

Solutions include fostering stronger networks and alliances with like-minded organizations, enhancing communication strategies to counter misinformation, and prioritizing self-care to prevent burnout. The community aims to leverage digital platforms for better organization and outreach, ensuring sustained engagement and support. They also focus on strategic planning and resource allocation to maximize their impact.

Who are the key villains?[edit]

  • Mayor Rahm Emanuel: Seen as a representative of corporate interests and criticized for policies perceived to stifle dissent and protest.
  • Bank of America and Fannie Mae: Criticized for their role in the foreclosure crisis and economic inequality.
  • Corporate Entities: Broadly viewed as contributors to economic disparity and corruption through undue political influence.

Who are the key heroes?[edit]

  • Matt Libman: Recognized for his activism and advocacy within the community.
  • Jesse Jackson: Acknowledged for his contributions to civil rights and social justice, aligning with the community’s values.
  • Ally Organizations: Groups like the ACLU and other Occupy chapters that provide support and solidarity.

Shared Experiences?[edit]

Common experiences include participation in protests and marches, encounters with law enforcement, and the ongoing challenge of organizing under restrictive ordinances. Many members share a history of activism, with some having participated in previous movements like the anti-globalization protests or civil rights marches. These shared experiences create a strong sense of community and resilience.

Barriers to Entry[edit]

Barriers include the need for alignment with the community’s values and goals, which may deter those with differing views. The commitment to activism can be demanding, requiring time, energy, and sometimes financial contributions. New members may face a learning curve in understanding the community’s history, strategies, and internal dynamics.

AIO (activities, interests, and opinions)[edit]

Activities include organizing and participating in protests, educational events, and community outreach. Interests center around social justice, economic reform, and political activism. Opinions are often critical of corporate influence, government policies that favor the wealthy, and systemic inequalities. The community believes in direct action and grassroots organizing as effective means for change.

Community Rituals[edit]

Rituals include regular General Assemblies for decision-making, marches, and annual events commemorating significant moments in the movement’s history. These gatherings reinforce solidarity and provide opportunities for strategic planning and community building.

In-Group Jokes, Common Phrases, and Memes[edit]

  • “We are the 99%”: A rallying cry symbolizing the community’s focus on economic inequality.
  • “Occupy Everything”: A phrase encouraging widespread activism and resistance.
  • “Fuck da police”: An expression of frustration with law enforcement practices perceived as oppressive.

Glossary of Community-specific Jargon[edit]

  • GA (General Assembly): A decision-making body where members gather to discuss and vote on actions and strategies.
  • Human Mic: A method of amplifying speech in large crowds by having participants repeat the speaker’s words.
  • Direct Action: Activities aimed at achieving immediate social or political goals, often through protests or demonstrations.

Cultural Influences[edit]

The culture of the subreddit influences behavior by fostering a participatory and inclusive atmosphere where open dialogue and collective decision-making are prioritized. Members are encouraged to question authority and engage in critical discussions about social and economic issues, reinforcing a culture of activism and advocacy.

Communication style[edit]

The preferred communication style is open, direct, and often passionate. Members value transparency and honesty, encouraging respectful debate and discussion. Quotes like “Explain our legitimate legal, social, and economic grievances” illustrate the community’s focus on articulating their concerns clearly and effectively.

Conflict and Resolution[edit]

Conflicts are typically addressed through open discussion in General Assemblies, where members are encouraged to express their views and work towards consensus. The community values collective decision-making and strives to mediate disagreements through dialogue and compromise.

How to communicate with them on an emotional level?[edit]

To communicate effectively on an emotional level, it’s important to acknowledge and validate their experiences and frustrations. Emphasize shared values and goals, and use language that resonates with their desire for justice and equality. Emotional triggers include references to systemic injustice, the power of collective action, and historical examples of successful activism.

How to communicate with them on a material level?[edit]

Focus on practical solutions and tangible outcomes that align with their goals. Highlight opportunities for involvement, resource sharing, and collaboration. Address material needs by offering support for organizing efforts, such as providing venues, materials, or financial assistance for events and actions.

External Perception[edit]

Outsiders may perceive the community as radical or confrontational, which can lead to misunderstandings or misrepresentations in the media. This perception may affect the community by creating additional challenges in garnering public support and influencing policy. However, members often view this as an opportunity to educate and engage with the broader public.

Additional Notes & Insights[edit]

The /r/occupychi community is a microcosm of the larger Occupy movement, reflecting its challenges and triumphs. Members are deeply committed to their cause, drawing strength from shared experiences and a collective vision for a more just and equitable world. The community continues to evolve, adapting to changing political landscapes while remaining steadfast in its pursuit of systemic change.



r/occupywallstreet[edit]

The 99%: Understanding the /r/occupywallstreet Community Persona[edit]

Summary[edit]

The /r/occupywallstreet community comprises a diverse group of individuals unified by a shared identity as “The 99%.” This concept highlights the stark economic disparity between the majority of the population and the wealthiest 1%. Members are characterized by their disillusionment with systemic financial inequality and corporate influence over government. They draw inspiration from the Arab Spring and advocate for nonviolent protest to address these issues. A leaderless resistance, the community thrives on open dialogue, grassroots organization, and collective action against perceived greed and corruption within the global economic system. Their dedication to social justice, economic equity, and democratic reform is palpable in their discourse and activism.

What are the related subreddits to this community?[edit]

The related subreddits include: - /r/15m - /r/occupyOakland - /r/occupyboston - /r/occupychi - /r/occupylosangeles - /r/occupyaustin - /r/occupyorlando - /r/occupySTL - /r/occupyDC - /r/occupyphilly - /r/occupyomaha - /r/occupyseattle - /r/occupyboise - /r/occupycolumbus - /r/occupysd - /r/occupyrichmond - /r/occupymiami - /r/OccuponsMontreal

What are the dominant personality types in the community?[edit]

The community exhibits a high level of openness, characterized by a willingness to embrace new ideas and change. There is a strong conscientiousness towards social justice and collective well-being, often planning and acting with the broader community’s interests in mind. The group displays a mix of extroversion and introversion, with some members actively participating in public demonstrations, while others engage more quietly through online discussions. There is a notable level of agreeableness, fostering cooperation and solidarity among members. However, there is also a degree of neuroticism, with members experiencing anxiety and frustration over systemic injustices and the slow pace of change.

Subgroup Personalities[edit]

  • Belongers: Approximately 20% of the community. They prioritize solidarity and shared identity, often engaging in activities that reinforce community bonds.
  • Emulators: About 10% strive for visibility and impact, often looking to emulate successful activists or historical movements.
  • Doomsdayers: Comprising 15%, these individuals are skeptical of systemic change and prepare for potential societal collapse.
  • Survivalists: Making up 25%, they focus on pragmatic solutions to economic instability and advocate for resourcefulness.
  • Achievers: Around 5% are driven by ambition and productivity, often organizing and leading initiatives within the community.
  • Saviors: Constituting 15%, they are motivated by altruism and the desire to effect positive change in the world.
  • Integrators: Approximately 10% seek to align financial and philanthropic goals, often supporting causes that resonate with community values.

What are the goals and aspirations of the community?[edit]

The community aspires to achieve systemic economic reform, reduce income inequality, and dismantle corporate influence in politics. They aim to foster greater transparency and accountability within financial institutions and government. Long-term, the community envisions a society where wealth and resources are equitably distributed, and democratic processes are genuinely representative of the populace. They desire a future where social justice prevails, and all individuals have access to essential services and the opportunity to thrive.

What are the values held by the community?[edit]

The community values equality, justice, and transparency. They prioritize democratic participation, advocating for policies that reflect the will of the majority rather than corporate interests. Nonviolence and peaceful protest are core tenets, with an emphasis on inclusivity and diversity within their ranks. They value education and awareness as tools for empowerment and societal change, believing that informed citizens are crucial for a functioning democracy.

What are the motivations of the community?[edit]

The community is motivated by a profound sense of injustice and the desire to create a fairer, more equitable society. They are driven by the belief that systemic change is necessary to address the root causes of economic disparity and environmental degradation. A commitment to future generations and the preservation of democratic ideals fuels their activism.

What are the pain points of the community?[edit]

The community faces challenges such as media misrepresentation, internal fragmentation, and the difficulty of effecting tangible change within entrenched systems. They are frustrated by the slow pace of legislative reform and the perceived apathy of the general public. Financial constraints and the need for sustained engagement in the face of opposition also pose significant hurdles.

What are the anticipated solutions to the pain points of the community?[edit]

The community anticipates solutions such as increased public awareness and engagement, strategic alliances with like-minded organizations, and leveraging technology to amplify their message. They seek to influence policy through grassroots advocacy and by supporting candidates who align with their values. Building resilient networks and fostering a culture of mutual aid are seen as vital steps toward overcoming systemic barriers.

Who are the key villains?[edit]

Key villains include: - Large financial institutions like Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan Chase, seen as symbols of unchecked corporate power. - Political figures perceived as enablers of corporate interests, such as certain members of Congress. - Media outlets like Fox News, accused of misrepresenting the movement and stifling dissent.

Who are the key heroes?[edit]

Key heroes include: - Influential activists like Naomi Klein and Noam Chomsky, who provide intellectual and moral support. - Organizations such as the ACLU and the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which advocate for civil liberties and digital rights. - Grassroots leaders within the movement who organize and inspire collective action.

Shared Experiences?[edit]

Shared experiences include participation in large-scale protests like the Occupy Wall Street encampment in Zuccotti Park. Members often recount interactions with law enforcement and the challenges of organizing within decentralized structures. Moments of solidarity, such as communal gatherings and teach-ins, have shaped the community’s identity and fostered a sense of belonging.

Barriers to Entry[edit]

Barriers to entry include the community’s emphasis on ideological alignment and commitment to nonviolent principles. New members may struggle with the decentralized nature of the movement and the lack of formal leadership. However, the community is generally welcoming to those who share their values and are willing to engage constructively.

AIO (activities, interests and opinions)[edit]

Activities include organizing protests, disseminating information through social media, and participating in community-building events. Interests revolve around social justice, economic reform, and environmental sustainability. Opinions within the community are diverse but generally align with progressive and egalitarian ideals. There is a strong belief in the power of collective action to drive change.

Community Rituals[edit]

Community rituals include regular General Assemblies, where members discuss and decide on collective actions using consensus-based decision-making. The use of the “people’s mic” to amplify voices in the absence of electronic amplification is a notable tradition. Annual commemorations of significant protests serve to reinforce community bonds and reflect on achievements and challenges.

In-Group Jokes, Common Phrases and Memes[edit]

  • “We are the 99%” – a rallying cry emphasizing the movement’s focus on economic inequality.
  • “Occupy Everything” – a humorous take on the movement’s broad scope and ambition.
  • Memes highlighting the disparity between corporate profits and worker wages, often using satire to critique systemic issues.

Glossary of Community-specific Jargon[edit]

  • “The 1%” – refers to the wealthiest individuals and entities perceived as holding disproportionate power.
  • “Mic Check” – a call-and-response method used to communicate messages in large groups.
  • “General Assembly” – a decision-making body where all members can participate in shaping the movement’s direction.

Cultural Influences[edit]

The culture of the subreddit emphasizes inclusivity, transparency, and direct action. Members are encouraged to share knowledge and resources, fostering an environment of collective learning and empowerment. The subreddit serves as a digital platform for organizing and amplifying the movement’s message, reflecting the broader principles of grassroots activism.

Communication style[edit]

The preferred communication style is direct and inclusive, using clear and accessible language to engage a diverse audience. Members prioritize transparency and honesty, often sharing personal stories to illustrate broader systemic issues. The use of digital platforms allows for rapid dissemination of information and fosters a sense of immediacy and urgency.

Conflict and Resolution[edit]

Conflicts within the community are typically addressed through open dialogue and consensus-building. Members are encouraged to engage in respectful debate and to seek common ground. The decentralized nature of the movement allows for diverse perspectives, but also requires a commitment to constructive communication and mutual respect.

How to communicate with them on an emotional level?[edit]

To communicate effectively on an emotional level, appeal to shared values of justice, equality, and solidarity. Use storytelling to highlight personal experiences and connect on a human level. Emphasize the power of collective action and the potential for positive change, tapping into the community’s desire for a more equitable and sustainable future.

How to communicate with them on a material level?[edit]

Focus on practical solutions and tangible benefits, such as policy proposals that address economic inequality and environmental sustainability. Highlight successful initiatives and provide actionable steps for involvement. Use data and evidence to support claims, demonstrating a commitment to informed decision-making and accountability.

External Perception:[edit]

Externally, the community is often perceived as radical and disorganized, with critics questioning the efficacy and focus of their actions. However, supporters view the movement as a necessary challenge to entrenched power structures and a catalyst for meaningful reform. This dual perception affects the community by necessitating a delicate balance between maintaining broad appeal and adhering to core principles.

Additional Notes & Insights[edit]

The /r/occupywallstreet community represents a microcosm of broader societal discontent with economic and political systems. Their commitment to nonviolent protest and grassroots organization serves as a model for similar movements worldwide. By fostering a culture of inclusivity and open dialogue, the community continues to evolve and adapt, seeking innovative solutions to complex challenges.



r/pirateparty[edit]

The Digital Buccaneers: The r/PirateParty Community Persona[edit]

Summary[edit]

The r/PirateParty subreddit community embodies a unique blend of digital rights activism, political reform advocacy, and a commitment to individual freedoms. Members of this group are predominantly driven by concerns about privacy, governmental overreach, and the monopolistic tendencies of the current intellectual property regime. They are tech-savvy individuals who value transparency, open-source technology, and the democratization of information. This community is not just about advocating for digital rights but also about exploring and promoting innovative governance models such as liquid democracy and unconditional basic income. They are characterized by a deep distrust of traditional political structures and are often aligned with anti-establishment sentiments. Their discussions reflect a desire for a more egalitarian society where technology serves as an enabler of freedom rather than a tool for control.

What are the related subreddits to this community?[edit]

  • r/pirateparty_AU
  • r/piratepartyofcanada
  • r/Piratenpartij
  • r/piratpartiet
  • r/PiratePartyUK
  • r/USPirateParty
  • r/retroshare
  • r/autotldr
  • r/worldpolitics
  • r/technology
  • r/politics
  • r/conspiracy
  • r/NSALeaks

What are the dominant personality types in the community?[edit]

The community primarily comprises individuals with high openness to new ideas, as they are imaginative, creative, and welcome change in political and technological landscapes. They exhibit moderate conscientiousness, as they plan ahead in advocating for systemic reforms and consider the broader implications of their activism. Introversion is slightly more prevalent, given their focus on digital discussions and online activism, although extroverted tendencies appear during community-driven events or discussions. Members are highly agreeable, valuing cooperation and collaboration in their efforts to promote shared goals. Emotional stability varies, with some members showing resilience and calmness in the face of political setbacks, while others express heightened neuroticism through their passionate critiques of the status quo.

Subgroup Personalities[edit]

  • Belongers: 15% - They strive to fit within the community by adopting shared values and participating actively in discussions.
  • Emulators: 5% - They admire successful digital rights activists and mimic their strategies, often through large-scale social media campaigns.
  • Doomsdayers: 25% - Pessimistic about the current political climate, they emphasize self-sufficiency and unique approaches to societal issues.
  • Survivalists: 20% - They are cautious about financial expenditures and seek the best value in their activism efforts, leveraging free and open-source tools.
  • Achievers: 10% - Driven by ambition, they focus on productivity and success in promoting digital rights and achieving political reform.
  • Saviors: 15% - They are motivated by a desire to make a positive impact through advocacy for privacy and transparency without expecting personal gain.
  • Integrators: 10% - They balance financial success with philanthropy, often supporting non-profit organizations that align with their values.

What are the goals and aspirations of the community?[edit]

The community aspires to achieve significant reforms in intellectual property laws, advocating for more equitable and transparent systems that facilitate innovation and creativity. They aim for the widespread adoption of open-source technologies and the implementation of liquid democracy as a means to enhance political participation and accountability. A long-term vision includes establishing a society where privacy rights are upheld, and digital freedoms are protected, fostering a culture that encourages the free exchange of ideas and information.

What are the values held by the community?[edit]

The core values include transparency, privacy, digital freedom, and egalitarianism. Transparency is valued as a means to hold institutions accountable, while privacy is seen as a fundamental right that must be protected against surveillance. Digital freedom emphasizes the unrestricted access to information and the internet, and egalitarianism underscores their belief in equal opportunity and rights for all individuals. These values stem from a collective desire to challenge authoritarianism and promote a society where technology empowers rather than controls.

What are the motivations of the community?[edit]

The community is motivated by a deep-seated belief in the transformative power of technology and the internet to promote social change. They are driven by the need to protect individual rights and freedoms in the digital age, countering the perceived threats from corporate and governmental overreach. Their actions are motivated by a desire to create a more just and equitable society, where information is freely accessible, and democratic processes are enhanced through innovative governance models.

What are the pain points of the community?[edit]

Pain points include the challenges of overcoming entrenched political systems resistant to reform, the pervasive influence of large corporations on intellectual property laws, and the societal apathy towards privacy issues. They also face difficulties in gaining widespread acceptance and understanding of their proposed solutions, such as liquid democracy and basic income, which are often viewed as radical or impractical by mainstream society.

What are the anticipated solutions to the pain points of the community?[edit]

The community anticipates solutions through grassroots advocacy, increased public awareness campaigns, and building alliances with like-minded organizations and individuals. They focus on creating and promoting open-source tools and platforms that exemplify their values, as well as engaging in political processes to influence policy changes. Education and outreach are key strategies to shift public perception and garner support for their initiatives.

Who are the key villains?[edit]

  • Large corporations such as the MPAA and RIAA, which are seen as perpetuating restrictive copyright laws.
  • Governments perceived as implementing mass surveillance and infringing on privacy rights.
  • Political parties and figures resistant to transparency and democratic reforms.

Who are the key heroes?[edit]

  • Key influencers and leaders within the community include figures like Rick Falkvinge, founder of the Swedish Pirate Party, who play pivotal roles in inspiring and guiding the movement.
  • Organizations like the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and Creative Commons are regarded as champions of digital rights and are supported by the community.

Shared Experiences?[edit]

Shared experiences include legislative battles over privacy and intellectual property rights, such as opposition to the ACTA and SOPA/PIPA bills. The rise of the Icelandic Pirate Party and its electoral successes serve as a source of inspiration, demonstrating the potential for political change. The community has also been shaped by high-profile whistleblowing cases and discussions around privacy and surveillance.

Barriers to Entry[edit]

Barriers to entry include a steep learning curve regarding the community’s technical and political discussions. New members may find it challenging to engage without a background in digital rights activism or a solid understanding of the underlying issues. This can affect community dynamics by creating an environment where only those with specific knowledge feel empowered to participate fully.

AIO (activities, interests and opinions)[edit]

The community engages in activities such as online discussions, advocacy campaigns, and software development projects. They are interested in topics like digital rights, privacy, open-source technology, and democratic reform. Opinions within the community often reflect a critical stance towards traditional political institutions and a strong belief in the potential of technology to enable positive change.

Community Rituals[edit]

Rituals include regular discussions on current political developments related to digital rights, participation in online campaigns, and the sharing of educational resources. These activities reinforce community bonds and provide opportunities for members to align their efforts towards common goals.

In-Group Jokes, Common Phrases and Memes[edit]

  • “Arrr, matey!” - A playful nod to the pirate theme.
  • “The Pirates are coming” - Used when discussing the potential success of the Pirate Party in elections.
  • “Liquid democracy” - A frequently referenced concept within discussions about governance models.

Glossary of Community-specific Jargon[edit]

  • “Liquid democracy”: A form of democratic governance combining direct and representative democracy.
  • “Pirate”: Refers to members or supporters of the Pirate Party movement.
  • “Mesh Democracy”: A decentralized form of democracy leveraging technology for greater participation.

Cultural Influences[edit]

The culture of the subreddit influences members by fostering a sense of solidarity and shared purpose in advocating for digital rights and political reform. This culture encourages critical thinking and challenges members to consider alternative governance models and societal structures.

Communication style[edit]

The preferred communication style is direct and often analytical, with an emphasis on evidence-based discussions. Members value transparency and are open to diverse viewpoints, provided they align with the community’s core values. Example: “We need to show the president that we care about this. We won’t stand for the persecution of whistleblowers.”

Conflict and Resolution[edit]

Conflicts are typically resolved through open discussions and debates, with an emphasis on reaching consensus or understanding through dialogue. The community values respectful discourse and often relies on moderators to ensure that discussions remain constructive and on-topic.

How to communicate with them on an emotional level?[edit]

To communicate emotionally, it is crucial to appeal to their sense of justice and fairness, emphasizing the importance of privacy and individual rights. Highlighting stories of individuals affected by surveillance or censorship can resonate deeply, as can narratives about the power of grassroots activism in effecting change.

How to communicate with them on a material level?[edit]

Communicating materially involves focusing on the practical benefits of proposed policies, such as the economic and societal advantages of open-source technology and basic income. Demonstrating the tangible impact of reforms on everyday life can help bridge the gap between abstract ideals and material realities.

External Perception:[edit]

Outsiders may perceive the community as radical or overly focused on niche issues, which can lead to misunderstandings about their broader goals. This perception can create barriers to gaining support from mainstream audiences, though it also strengthens the community’s resolve to educate and advocate.

Additional Notes & Insights[edit]

The r/PirateParty community is a microcosm of a larger global movement advocating for transformative change in the digital age. Their commitment to privacy, transparency, and democratic reform positions them as both critics and innovators in the evolving landscape of technology and governance. While their ideas may seem ambitious, the community’s persistence and adaptability suggest a continued influence on future political and technological developments.



r/polycentric_law[edit]

The Libertarian Visionaries of /r/polycentric_law[edit]

Summary[edit]

The /r/polycentric_law community embodies a distinctive libertarian persona that champions decentralization, voluntary associations, and competition in legal and governance systems. Members of this community are driven by the belief that traditional state monopolies on law and governance are inherently inefficient, corrupt, and restrictive of individual freedom. They advocate for a radical reimagining of societal organization where multiple legal systems coexist, allowing individuals to choose and even create the governance structures under which they wish to live. This community is characterized by a strong commitment to individual liberty, personal responsibility, and the principles of voluntary association. They envision a future where traditional state functions are replaced by market-driven solutions and competitive legal frameworks, fostering an environment where personal choice and innovation thrive.

What are the related subreddits to this community?[edit]

Related subreddits include r/Anarcho_Capitalism, r/Libertarian, r/GoldandBlack, r/LibertarianMeme, and r/Seasteading. These subreddits share thematic interests in decentralization, voluntaryism, and critiques of state power.

What are the dominant personality types in the community?[edit]

In terms of the OCEAN model, community members likely score high on Openness, as they are receptive to new ideas and alternative governance structures. They may have moderate to high Conscientiousness, valuing personal responsibility and planning in a decentralized society. Extroversion might vary, with some members actively engaging in discussions and others preferring introspective analysis. Agreeableness could be moderate, as members are cooperative in discussions about shared values but may strongly oppose state interference. Neuroticism is likely low, as the community promotes rational discourse and emotional stability in the face of systemic challenges.

Subgroup Personalities[edit]

  • Belongers: Likely a small percentage (~5%), as the community values individualism over conformity.
  • Emulators: Minimal presence, as the community is driven more by principles than by status or aspiration.
  • Doomsdayers: Moderate presence (~20%), reflecting skepticism of current governmental systems and a desire for self-sufficiency.
  • Survivalists: Present (~15%), as economic caution and self-reliance are valued.
  • Achievers: Significant presence (~25%), as members are ambitious in pursuing a radically different societal model.
  • Saviors: Moderate presence (~20%), driven by the desire to create a better world through alternative systems.
  • Integrators: Present (~15%), focused on philanthropy and community-building within a decentralized framework.

What are the goals and aspirations of the community?[edit]

The community aspires to dismantle state monopolies on law and governance, replacing them with competitive, voluntary systems. They aim to create societies where individuals can freely choose their legal and governance structures, leading to increased innovation, efficiency, and respect for individual rights. Long-term aspirations include widespread adoption of polycentric legal systems, the creation of free private cities, and the establishment of peaceful, prosperous communities without centralized state control.

What are the values held by the community?[edit]

The community values individual liberty, voluntary association, free markets, and competition. They believe in the moral and practical superiority of non-coercive systems and hold that the legitimacy of governance derives from the consent of the governed. These values stem from a distrust of state power and a conviction that decentralized, market-driven solutions can best address societal needs.

What are the motivations of the community?[edit]

Members are motivated by a desire for freedom, autonomy, and the opportunity to live according to their principles without state interference. They are driven by a belief in the potential of decentralized systems to solve societal problems more effectively than centralized governance. This motivation is reinforced by historical examples of state failures and a philosophical commitment to individual rights.

What are the pain points of the community?[edit]

The community faces challenges in convincing others of the viability of their ideas, overcoming entrenched political and societal norms, and addressing concerns about security and stability in decentralized systems. They also grapple with the practicalities of implementing polycentric legal systems in a world dominated by nation-states.

What are the anticipated solutions to the pain points of the community?[edit]

Potential solutions include increasing awareness and education about polycentric law, building experimental communities (such as seasteads) to demonstrate the viability of their ideas, and developing technological tools to facilitate decentralized governance. Collaboration with like-minded individuals and groups to create scalable models of voluntary governance is also seen as a key strategy.

Who are the key villians?[edit]

Key villains include centralized governments, bureaucratic institutions, and entities that perpetuate state monopolies on law and governance. Specific names are less emphasized, as the critique is more systemic, but figures like Friedrich Engels or Karl Marx might be referenced as ideological opponents.

Who are the key heroes?[edit]

Key heroes include thinkers like Murray Rothbard, David D. Friedman, and Hans-Hermann Hoppe, who have articulated and advanced the principles of anarcho-capitalism and polycentric law. Influencers within the community, such as prominent Reddit users and authors who contribute to libertarian discourse, also play a vital role in shaping and spreading these ideas.

Shared Experiences?[edit]

Shared experiences include discussions and debates about the limitations of state governance, exploration of historical and theoretical examples of decentralized systems, and engagement with literature and media that support libertarian and anarcho-capitalist principles.

Barriers to Entry[edit]

Barriers include a steep learning curve for understanding complex libertarian theories and skepticism from those accustomed to traditional state structures. New members may need to overcome preconceived notions about anarchy and develop a nuanced understanding of decentralized governance.

AIO (activities, interests and opinions)[edit]

Activities include discussing and debating concepts related to polycentric law, engaging with academic and popular literature on libertarianism, and participating in forums and events that explore decentralization. Interests range from philosophy and economics to technology and community-building. Opinions emphasize skepticism of state power and optimism about voluntary systems.

Community Rituals[edit]

Community rituals include regular participation in discussions, sharing of influential articles and books, and collective brainstorming of solutions to societal problems through a libertarian lens. Online forums and meetups may serve as platforms for these rituals.

In-Group Jokes, Common Phrases and Memes[edit]

Common phrases include “Taxation is theft,” “Vote with your feet,” and references to “stateless societies” and “voluntaryism.” Memes often playfully critique government inefficiencies or highlight the benefits of free-market solutions.

Glossary of Community-specific Jargon[edit]

  • COLA: Community of Legal Agreement, a foundational concept for creating voluntary legal systems.
  • Voluntaryism: The principle that all forms of human association should be voluntary.
  • Ancap: Short for anarcho-capitalist, referring to the political philosophy advocating for stateless societies based on voluntary trade and private property.

Cultural Influences[edit]

The culture of the subreddit encourages critical thinking, debate, and a commitment to exploring alternatives to traditional governance. It influences members to question the status quo and actively seek innovative solutions.

Communication style[edit]

Preferred communication style is analytical and evidence-based, with an emphasis on logic and reason. Quotes such as “Show me the incentives, and I will show you the outcome” illustrate the community’s focus on systemic analysis.

Conflict and Resolution[edit]

Conflicts are typically handled through reasoned debate and reference to libertarian principles. The community values respectful discourse and seeks to resolve disagreements by appealing to shared values and evidence.

How to communicate with them on an emotional level?[edit]

To communicate effectively, emphasize shared values of freedom and autonomy, and appeal to the desire for a world where individuals can thrive without coercive interference. Emotional triggers include the concept of personal empowerment and the frustration with state inefficiencies.

How to communicate with them on a material level?[edit]

Highlight the practical benefits of decentralized systems, such as increased innovation, efficiency, and personal choice. Emphasize success stories and evidence of real-world applications of polycentric principles.

External Perception:[edit]

Outsiders may perceive the community as idealistic or radical, which can lead to misunderstandings of their goals and principles. This perception affects the community by motivating members to clarify and defend their ideas.

Additional Notes & Insights[edit]

The community is part of a broader movement advocating for systemic change towards decentralized governance. Members are actively engaged in exploring and developing practical applications of their theories, from blockchain technology to experimental communities.



r/ronpaul[edit]

The Libertarian Idealist: A Portrait of the /r/ronpaul Community[edit]

Summary[edit]

The /r/ronpaul community embodies the persona of the “Libertarian Idealist,” a group deeply rooted in the principles championed by Ron Paul, particularly those related to libertarianism and Austrian Economics. Members of this community are primarily motivated by a desire for limited government, personal freedom, and economic policies that reflect free-market ideals. They are characterized by a strong sense of individualism, skepticism of centralized government power, and a commitment to personal responsibility. The community is engaged in discussions that often revolve around the promotion of civil liberties, non-interventionist foreign policies, and the auditing of institutions like the Federal Reserve. Their discourse is marked by a passion for political change and a frustration with the status quo, which they believe stifles innovation and personal freedom.

What are the related subreddits to this community?[edit]

  • r/LPUS
  • r/Libertarian
  • r/LibertarianMeme
  • r/EndDemocracy
  • r/GoldandBlack
  • r/austrian_economics
  • r/Anarcho_Capitalism
  • r/NationalDivorce

What are the dominant personality types in the community?[edit]

The /r/ronpaul community members predominantly exhibit high levels of Openness to new ideas, as they are imaginative and advocate for innovative political and economic systems. They score high on Conscientiousness, showing a strong sense of duty to promote what they believe is a moral and practical political philosophy. Many members display Introverted tendencies, valuing deep, meaningful discussions over superficial social interactions. They often rank high in Agreeableness, particularly towards those who share their views, but can be unyielding and critical towards opposing ideologies. The community generally exhibits low Neuroticism, maintaining a calm and composed demeanor in the face of political challenges.

Subgroup Personalities[edit]

  • Belongers: Approximately 15% of the community, they find comfort in the collective identity centered around libertarian values and Ron Paul’s legacy.
  • Emulators: Around 10%, these members may aspire to the success and recognition Ron Paul achieved, often emulating his political strategies and communication style.
  • Doomsdayers: Comprising about 25%, these individuals are cautious and often predict economic or political collapse due to current policies.
  • Survivalists: Making up 20%, they are pragmatic about political engagement, carefully choosing battles that align with their financial and personal priorities.
  • Achievers: About 5% are highly motivated to enact change, often taking leadership roles in grassroots movements or political campaigns.
  • Saviors: Around 10% are driven by a desire to improve society, actively participating in discussions on how libertarian policies can benefit the greater good.
  • Integrators: The remaining 15% are focused on integrating libertarian ideals with philanthropic efforts, promoting voluntary community support systems.

What are the goals and aspirations of the community?[edit]

The /r/ronpaul community aspires to see a significant shift in political discourse towards libertarian principles. They aim for a future where government intervention is minimized, and individual liberties are maximized. Long-term, they hope to influence mainstream politics and public policy, making libertarianism a viable and respected political philosophy. They desire a society where economic policies reflect free-market ideals, and personal freedoms are protected against government overreach. Ultimately, their vision includes a comprehensive reform of the political and economic systems to align with the values of freedom, responsibility, and voluntary cooperation.

What are the values held by the community?[edit]

The community holds steadfast to values such as personal liberty, economic freedom, and limited government. They believe in the sanctity of individual rights and the importance of personal responsibility. The community values transparency and accountability in government, advocating for policies that promote fiscal responsibility and reduce national debt. They hold a deep respect for the Constitution and the rule of law, viewing these as essential to preserving freedom. Their commitment to non-interventionist foreign policy stems from a value in peace and diplomacy over military action.

What are the motivations of the community?[edit]

Members are motivated by a desire to live in a society that respects individual autonomy and minimizes coercive government influence. They are driven by a belief in the efficacy of free markets and the potential for innovation when individuals are empowered to pursue their interests. Many are motivated by a sense of justice, seeking to rectify what they see as the moral and financial failures of current governmental systems. The community’s motivation is also rooted in a desire to educate others about libertarian principles and to build a movement that can effect real political change.

What are the pain points of the community?[edit]

The community faces challenges such as political marginalization and media misrepresentation, which they believe hinder the broader acceptance of libertarian ideas. They struggle with the perception of libertarianism as impractical or extreme, which can limit their influence in mainstream politics. Additionally, members often express frustration with the slow pace of political change and the persistence of policies they view as detrimental to freedom and prosperity. They also contend with internal disagreements over strategy and priorities, which can create divisions within the movement.

What are the anticipated solutions to the pain points of the community?[edit]

The community seeks to address these challenges by increasing outreach and education efforts, aiming to demystify libertarian principles and demonstrate their practicality. They advocate for greater involvement in local and national politics to gain representation and influence policy. By building coalitions with like-minded groups and individuals, they hope to amplify their voice and effect change. Additionally, they strive for better media representation by engaging with journalists and creating their own content to accurately convey their message.

Who are the key villains?[edit]

  • Federal Reserve: Seen as a symbol of financial mismanagement and lack of transparency.
  • Mainstream Media: Often perceived as biased and dismissive of libertarian ideas.
  • Big Government: Represents the antithesis of their values, seen as overreaching and inefficient.
  • Politicians who oppose libertarian values: Individuals or parties that advocate for increased government control and intervention.
  • International interventionist organizations: Viewed as undermining national sovereignty and promoting unnecessary conflict.

Who are the key heroes?[edit]

  • Ron Paul: The community’s namesake and a figurehead for their ideals, known for his consistency and integrity.
  • Austrian Economists: Such as Ludwig von Mises and Friedrich Hayek, who provide the intellectual foundation for their economic beliefs.
  • Libertarian Politicians: Like Rand Paul and Justin Amash, who continue to advocate for libertarian policies within the political system.
  • Grassroots Activists: Individuals who tirelessly work to promote libertarian ideas and engage in political activism.

Shared Experiences?[edit]

The community has been shaped by experiences such as Ron Paul’s presidential campaigns, which galvanized support and brought attention to libertarian ideas. The financial crises and subsequent government bailouts have reinforced their skepticism of centralized economic control. Many members share a history of political disillusionment, having felt alienated by the two-party system. The rise of the internet and social media has been pivotal, providing a platform for discussion and organization that transcends traditional political barriers.

Barriers to Entry[edit]

New members may face barriers such as navigating the complex philosophical underpinnings of libertarianism and overcoming preconceived notions about its feasibility. The community’s preference for rigorous debate can be intimidating to newcomers unfamiliar with the discourse. Additionally, the passionate and sometimes uncompromising nature of discussions may deter those not fully aligned with libertarian principles. However, once engaged, new members often find a welcoming and intellectually stimulating environment.

AIO (activities, interests and opinions)[edit]

Community activities include participating in online discussions, attending libertarian conferences, and engaging in political activism. Members often express interest in economic theory, political philosophy, and historical analysis. Their opinions are shaped by a commitment to individual freedom, skepticism of authority, and a preference for voluntary solutions over coercive measures. They are critical of policies they view as infringing on personal liberties and are vocal about the need for systemic reform.

Community Rituals[edit]

Rituals include celebrating Ron Paul’s birthday, participating in “money bombs” to fund libertarian campaigns, and commemorating significant legislative victories or anniversaries. The community often gathers for events like the annual “Ron Paul Fest” and engages in coordinated online efforts to promote libertarian content. These rituals serve to strengthen community bonds and reaffirm their shared commitment to the cause.

In-Group Jokes, Common Phrases and Memes[edit]

  • “What 9000?!”
  • “Ron Paul Revolution”
  • “It’s happening!”
  • “End the Fed”
  • “Liberty, Peace, and Prosperity”

Glossary of Community-specific Jargon[edit]

  • “Money Bomb”: A coordinated fundraising effort for a libertarian cause or candidate.
  • “End the Fed”: A call to audit or abolish the Federal Reserve, reflecting distrust of centralized banking.
  • “Non-interventionism”: A foreign policy stance advocating for minimal involvement in international conflicts.
  • “Statist”: A derogatory term for someone who supports increased government control.
  • “Austrian Economics”: An economic theory favoring free markets and minimal government intervention.

Cultural Influences[edit]

The culture of the subreddit emphasizes intellectual rigor, critical thinking, and a commitment to principles over political expediency. Members are influenced by classical liberal thinkers and modern libertarian scholars, shaping a culture that values debate, education, and activism. The community’s culture fosters a sense of camaraderie among those who feel marginalized by mainstream political discourse.

Communication style[edit]

The preferred communication style is direct and fact-based, often supported by data and historical examples. Members value logical arguments and are quick to challenge unsupported claims. Quotes from respected figures in libertarian thought are frequently used to illustrate points. The community appreciates humor and memes that align with their ideals, often using satire to critique opposing viewpoints.

Conflict and Resolution[edit]

Conflicts are typically resolved through debate and reference to libertarian principles, with an emphasis on mutual respect and understanding. The community values open dialogue and encourages members to express differing opinions, provided they are presented respectfully. When disagreements arise, members are encouraged to seek common ground and focus on shared goals.

How to communicate with them on an emotional level?[edit]

To communicate effectively, it is important to appeal to their sense of justice, freedom, and personal responsibility. Emphasizing the impact of policies on individual liberties and economic well-being resonates deeply. Emotional triggers include threats to constitutional rights, government overreach, and economic mismanagement. Messages that highlight personal empowerment and the potential for positive change are likely to have a strong emotional impact.

How to communicate with them on a material level?[edit]

Messages should focus on the tangible benefits of libertarian policies, such as increased economic opportunities, reduced government waste, and greater personal freedom. Highlighting success stories of individuals or communities that have thrived under libertarian principles can be effective. Practical proposals for implementing libertarian ideas in everyday life can also resonate, demonstrating how these policies can lead to material improvements.

External Perception[edit]

The community is often perceived by outsiders as fringe or radical, due to their strong adherence to libertarian ideals and criticism of mainstream politics. This perception can lead to marginalization and dismissal of their ideas. However, the community’s commitment to education and outreach aims to challenge these perceptions, demonstrating the practicality and appeal of their philosophy to a broader audience.

Additional Notes & Insights[edit]

The /r/ronpaul community is a vibrant and passionate group that plays a significant role in promoting libertarian ideals. Their commitment to intellectual discourse and political activism positions them as a unique force in the political landscape. While they face challenges in gaining mainstream acceptance, their persistence and strategic engagement offer potential for significant influence in shaping future political discourse.



r/stallmanwasright[edit]

Advocates of Digital Freedom and User Empowerment[edit]

Summary[edit]

The /r/stallmanwasright community is primarily composed of digital freedom advocates who uphold the principles of user control over technology. They align closely with the philosophies of Richard M. Stallman, the founder of the Free Software Movement, who advocates for software that respects users’ freedoms. This community is deeply concerned about the ethical implications of technology, particularly how proprietary software can infringe on individual freedoms, privacy, and autonomy. Members are typically critical of corporate practices that prioritize profit over user rights, and they often discuss the need for transparent, open-source alternatives. The community is vigilant about the erosion of privacy through surveillance capitalism and is committed to promoting digital literacy and awareness about the importance of maintaining control over personal data and technology use. They often share experiences and insights into how proprietary systems can lead to exploitative practices, and they advocate for a future where technology serves the user rather than controls them.

What are the related subreddits to this community?[edit]

  • /r/lostgeneration
  • /r/freeculture
  • /r/linux
  • /r/NSALeaks
  • /r/programming
  • /r/LateStageColonialism
  • /r/Firefox
  • /r/privacy
  • /r/darknetplan

What are the dominant personality types in the community?[edit]

The dominant personality types in this community, based on the Big Five personality traits, include:

  • Openness to new ideas: Community members are generally highly imaginative and creative, showing a strong preference for innovation and change, especially concerning technology and societal norms.
  • Conscientiousness toward others: Members are detail-oriented and often plan ahead, taking into account the broader implications of technology on society and individual rights.
  • Extroversion level: While the community primarily consists of individuals who enjoy deep, thoughtful discussions, it includes both extroverts who actively engage in debates and introverts who prefer consuming and reflecting on content.
  • Agreeableness with others: Members tend to be cooperative and supportive, valuing respectful discourse and collaboration but can be untrusting of entities perceived as infringing on rights.
  • Neuroticism or level of emotional stability: Members exhibit a range of emotional responses, from calm and steady advocacy to passionate, sometimes anxious, concern over privacy and freedom issues.

Subgroup Personalities[edit]

  • Belongers: 10% - They find community in shared values and collective goals for digital rights.
  • Emulators: 5% - Few members seek to emulate tech industry leaders; instead, they focus on ethical leaders like Richard Stallman himself.
  • Doomsdayers: 25% - A significant portion of the community holds pessimistic views on current trends in digital rights, often skeptical of corporate intentions.
  • Survivalists: 20% - Members who are cautious about tech investments, preferring free, open-source solutions to mitigate financial risk.
  • Achievers: 10% - Though not primarily focused on material success, some members pursue personal success through technological mastery or career achievements in tech fields.
  • Saviors: 20% - A large subgroup is motivated by a desire to impact the world positively, advocating for digital rights and freedoms.
  • Integrators: 10% - This subgroup focuses on balancing personal gain with philanthropic efforts, often supporting or contributing to open-source projects.

What are the goals and aspirations of the community?[edit]

The community aspires to a future where digital rights and privacy are respected globally. They aim to eliminate the stranglehold of proprietary technology on users, advocating for open-source solutions that empower individuals. They desire to educate the public about the importance of software freedom and privacy and to influence policy-makers to enact laws that protect these rights. Long-term, they envision a world where technology is transparent, ethical, and serves the needs of users, not corporations.

What are the values held by the community?[edit]

Community values include transparency, user autonomy, privacy, and ethical technology development. They believe in the moral imperative of free software, as articulated by Richard Stallman, whereby users should have the freedom to run, study, modify, and distribute software. They value collective action and grassroots advocacy to challenge corporate and governmental overreach.

What are the motivations of the community?[edit]

The community is motivated by the desire to protect individual freedoms and privacy rights, which they see as threatened by the increasing centralization and control of technology by a few large corporations. They are driven by a commitment to social justice and a belief in the potential of technology to empower individuals if used ethically and transparently.

What are the pain points of the community?[edit]

Pain points include the pervasive use of proprietary software that restricts user freedoms, the lack of public awareness about digital rights issues, and the challenges of advocating for policy changes in a landscape dominated by corporate interests. They also struggle with the technical barriers that prevent the widespread adoption of open-source alternatives.

What are the anticipated solutions to the pain points of the community?[edit]

Solutions include increasing public awareness and education on digital rights, advocating for stronger privacy laws, and promoting the development and adoption of open-source software. They also support grassroots movements to push against corporate lobbying and influence policy changes.

Who are the key villains?[edit]

  • Amazon: Criticized for practices perceived as exploitative and privacy-invasive.
  • Google: Often seen as a major player in the surveillance economy.
  • Facebook: Frequently criticized for privacy violations and data exploitation.
  • Apple: Criticized for its walled garden approach and opposition to right-to-repair movements.
  • Microsoft: Historically viewed as a proprietary software giant that limits user freedoms.

Who are the key heroes?[edit]

  • Richard M. Stallman: Founder of the Free Software Movement, seen as a leading advocate for digital rights.
  • Aaron Swartz: Celebrated for his activism in open access and digital rights.
  • Edward Snowden: Lauded for his role in exposing mass surveillance practices.
  • Bruce Schneier: Respected for his work in cybersecurity and privacy advocacy.
  • Cory Doctorow: Known for his advocacy for digital rights and open-source software.

Shared Experiences?[edit]

Common experiences include challenges with proprietary software, concerns about privacy and surveillance, and participation in advocacy for digital rights. Many have personal anecdotes about transitioning to open-source software and the hurdles they encountered.

Barriers to Entry[edit]

Barriers include technical knowledge required to fully engage with open-source solutions, ideological alignment with the community’s values, and an understanding of the complex issues surrounding digital rights.

AIO (activities, interests and opinions)[edit]

Activities include participating in open-source projects, engaging in discussions about digital rights, and attending related conferences. Interests span from software development to privacy advocacy. Opinions are often critical of current tech industry practices and supportive of legislative reform to protect user rights.

Community Rituals[edit]

Rituals include celebrating the anniversaries of significant events in the free software movement, participating in online discussions, and sharing resources that promote digital rights and privacy.

In-Group Jokes, Common Phrases and Memes[edit]

  • “Stallman was right”
  • “Drink verification can”
  • “Proprietary software is malware”
  • “Embrace, Extend, Extinguish”

Glossary of Community-specific Jargon[edit]

  • Free Software: Software that guarantees users the freedom to run, study, change, and distribute it.
  • DRM: Digital Rights Management, often criticized for restricting user freedoms.
  • Surveillance Capitalism: A term describing the commodification of personal data by corporations.
  • Walled Garden: A closed platform where the provider controls the software and services.

Cultural Influences[edit]

The culture of the subreddit emphasizes critical thinking, skepticism towards corporate motives, and a strong commitment to ethical technology. Members are often influenced by the teachings of Richard Stallman and other digital rights advocates.

Communication style[edit]

The community prefers direct and detailed communication, often using technical language. They appreciate well-researched arguments and value transparency and honesty in discussions.

Conflict and Resolution[edit]

Conflicts are typically resolved through detailed discussions and debates, with an emphasis on respecting different viewpoints while upholding the community’s core values.

How to communicate with them on an emotional level?[edit]

To connect emotionally, emphasize shared values of freedom and privacy. Use stories that highlight the impact of digital rights on everyday life and appeal to their sense of justice and community.

How to communicate with them on a material level?[edit]

Focus on practical solutions that align with their values, such as promoting open-source software and advocating for policy changes. Highlight tangible benefits of digital rights advocacy in terms of autonomy and security.

External Perception:[edit]

Outsiders may view the community as overly idealistic or resistant to mainstream technology, but those familiar with digital rights often see them as important advocates for user freedoms.

Additional Notes & Insights[edit]

The community is a valuable resource for those interested in digital rights, offering expertise and support for individuals seeking to understand and navigate the complex landscape of technology ethics and privacy.



r/unacracy[edit]

The Visionaries of Unacracy[edit]

Summary[edit]

The r/unacracy community embodies a group of individuals who are deeply invested in exploring and advocating for an alternative political system known as unacracy. This system is based on the principle of unanimity, which contrasts sharply with traditional democracy and autocracy. The community believes that unacracy offers a more ethical and balanced approach to governance by ensuring that no individual or minority is sacrificed to the will of the majority. Instead, it focuses on creating unanimous groups from dissenting parties, allowing for decentralized decision-making and the possibility of multiple coexisting laws or policies within a society. Members of this community are likely imaginative, open to new ideas, and value individual autonomy and mutual consent. They are motivated by a desire to overcome the perceived tyranny of majority rule and to establish a political system that respects individual choice and fosters social harmony. This community is characterized by its dedication to intellectual exploration, philosophical debate, and the pursuit of innovative solutions to complex political challenges.

What are the related subreddits to this community?[edit]

  • r/AnarchismWOAdjectives
  • r/EndDemocracy
  • r/Polycentric_Law
  • r/Rad_decentralization

What are the dominant personality types in the community?[edit]

The community members are likely to exhibit high levels of openness to new experiences, as they are imaginative, curious, and willing to explore unconventional ideas like unacracy. They may also display conscientiousness, as they are focused on creating a political system that considers the needs and choices of all individuals. The level of extroversion may vary, but the community’s active engagement in discussions suggests a mix of introverted deep thinkers and extroverted advocates. Agreeableness might be moderate, as members are cooperative in seeking consensus but also willing to challenge traditional norms. Neuroticism levels could be low, given the community’s focus on rational discourse and constructive debate.

Subgroup Personalities[edit]

  • Belongers: 10% - Some members may seek to form communities with like-minded individuals who share their vision of unacracy.
  • Emulators: 5% - A small percentage might look up to thought leaders or theorists who advocate for unacratic principles.
  • Doomsdayers: 15% - Some members express strong opinions about the flaws of current political systems and may be pessimistic about their potential for reform.
  • Survivalists: 10% - These individuals are cautious and pragmatic, concerned with the practical implementation of unacracy.
  • Achievers: 20% - Driven by ambition, they work to develop and promote unacratic ideas and solutions.
  • Saviors: 25% - A significant portion of the community is motivated by a desire to create a more ethical and just society through unacracy.
  • Integrators: 15% - These members aim to harmonize various political philosophies and may donate time or resources to initiatives aligned with unacratic values.

What are the goals and aspirations of the community?[edit]

The community aspires to establish unacracy as a viable political system that can replace traditional democracy and autocracy. They aim to create a society where individual choice and unanimity are the guiding principles, ensuring that no one’s rights or preferences are overridden by a majority. Long-term aspirations include the development of decentralized communities, possibly starting with seasteading or space colonies, where unacratic principles can be tested and refined. The community desires a future where political fragmentation leads to greater diversity and innovation in governance, ultimately achieving a harmonious coexistence of different legal and social systems.

What are the values held by the community?[edit]

The community values individual autonomy, mutual consent, and ethical decision-making. They hold the belief that unanimity is the gold standard for political systems and that decentralization is essential for protecting individual rights and preventing tyranny. The community also values intellectual exploration and is committed to finding practical solutions to implement unacracy. They believe that respecting individual choice is fundamental to achieving true freedom and equality.

What are the motivations of the community?[edit]

The primary motivation of the community is to create a political system that genuinely respects individual choice and avoids the pitfalls of majority rule, which they view as inherently tyrannical. They are driven by a desire to overcome the limitations and ethical shortcomings of traditional political systems. The community is motivated by the potential of unacracy to solve longstanding political problems, such as lobbying and voter ignorance, and to provide a more just and equitable society.

What are the pain points of the community?[edit]

The community faces challenges in convincing others of the feasibility and benefits of unacracy, as it is a radical departure from established political systems. They struggle with skepticism and resistance from those who are invested in maintaining the status quo. Additionally, the practical implementation of unacracy presents challenges, such as organizing defense and infrastructure in a decentralized system. The community also grapples with the difficulty of building consensus and overcoming the inertia of existing institutions.

What are the anticipated solutions to the pain points of the community?[edit]

To address skepticism, the community focuses on educating others about the ethical and practical advantages of unacracy through intellectual discourse and detailed proposals. They anticipate that starting small-scale experiments, such as seasteading communities, will demonstrate the viability of unacracy. They also plan to develop frameworks for organizing common goods and defense in a decentralized manner, using agreements and contracts to ensure cooperation and stability.

Who are the key villains?[edit]

  • Current Democratic and Autocratic Systems: Viewed as oppressive due to their reliance on majority rule or centralized authority, which the community believes limits individual freedom.
  • Lobbyists and Political Elites: Seen as perpetuating a system that prioritizes special interests over individual choice and ethical governance.

Who are the key heroes?[edit]

  • Anen-o-me: A prominent contributor to the community, actively engaging in discussions and promoting unacracy.
  • Anenome5: A thought leader within the community, offering detailed explanations and insights into unacratic principles.
  • Libertarian Thinkers and Theorists: Influencers who advocate for decentralization, individual autonomy, and alternative political systems that align with unacratic values.

Shared Experiences?[edit]

The community shares a collective frustration with traditional political systems and a strong desire for meaningful change. They are united by their interest in exploring and advocating for unacracy as a solution to the shortcomings of democracy and autocracy. Discussions and debates within the community serve as shared experiences that shape their identity and reinforce their commitment to unacracy.

Barriers to Entry[edit]

New members may face barriers due to the complex and unconventional nature of unacracy. Understanding the philosophical and practical aspects of the system requires a willingness to engage in deep intellectual exploration. Additionally, the community’s focus on radical change may be intimidating to those unfamiliar with alternative political theories. These barriers can affect community dynamics by creating a close-knit group of dedicated members who are deeply invested in the unacratic vision.

AIO (Activities, Interests, and Opinions)[edit]

The community is actively engaged in intellectual discussions and debates about political theory, ethics, and governance. They are interested in exploring decentralized systems and the practical implementation of unacracy. Opinions within the community are generally aligned with libertarian and anarchistic principles, emphasizing individual autonomy and the rejection of coercive authority. Members believe that current political systems are fundamentally flawed and are dedicated to finding innovative solutions through unacracy.

Community Rituals[edit]

  • Debate and Discussion: Regular engagement in intellectual discourse to explore and refine unacratic ideas.
  • Sharing Resources and Research: Members frequently share articles, books, and other materials that support or challenge their views.
  • Conceptual Development: Collaborative efforts to develop frameworks and proposals for implementing unacracy.

In-Group Jokes, Common Phrases, and Memes[edit]

  • “Tyranny of the majority” – A phrase commonly used to criticize traditional democracy.
  • “Foot-voting” – Refers to the concept of choosing laws and governance through movement and personal choice.
  • “Unanimity is the gold standard” – Emphasizes the community’s belief in unanimity as the ethical basis for decision-making.

Glossary of Community-specific Jargon[edit]

  • Unacracy: A political system based on unanimity and individual choice, as opposed to democracy or autocracy.
  • Foot-voting: The concept of choosing governance by physically moving to areas with laws and policies one agrees with.
  • Meta-rules: Foundational rules that govern the creation and implementation of laws in a decentralized system.
  • Group-splitting: The process of dividing dissenting groups into unanimous ones to achieve consensus.

Cultural Influences[edit]

The culture of the subreddit emphasizes intellectual exploration, philosophical debate, and a commitment to ethical governance. This culture influences members to be open-minded, critical thinkers who are willing to challenge conventional political norms and explore radical alternatives like unacracy.

Communication style[edit]

The preferred communication style is analytical and philosophical, with members often engaging in detailed discussions and debates. Direct quotes such as “You choose for yourself then form a group by joining up with the people who made the same choice you did” illustrate the community’s focus on individual choice and collective decision-making.

Conflict and Resolution[edit]

Conflicts within the community are typically resolved through rational discourse and debate. Members are encouraged to present evidence and arguments to support their views, fostering an environment of mutual respect and intellectual engagement.

How to communicate with them on an emotional level?[edit]

To communicate effectively with this community on an emotional level, it is important to acknowledge their desire for autonomy and respect their commitment to ethical decision-making. Emphasizing the potential for unacracy to empower individuals and promote social harmony can resonate deeply. Emotional triggers include the frustration with current political systems and the aspiration for meaningful change.

How to communicate with them on a material level?[edit]

On a material level, communication should focus on the practical benefits and feasibility of unacracy. Highlighting successful experiments or models, such as seasteading communities, can demonstrate the viability of the system. Addressing concerns about infrastructure, defense, and common goods with concrete solutions can also enhance credibility and engagement.

External Perception[edit]

Outsiders may perceive the community as radical or idealistic due to their advocacy for a novel and unconventional political system. This perception may lead to skepticism or dismissal, but it also draws interest from those seeking alternatives to traditional governance. The community’s commitment to intellectual exploration and ethical governance can attract individuals who share similar values.

Additional Notes & Insights[edit]

The r/unacracy community represents a unique blend of philosophical exploration and practical innovation. While the concept of unacracy is challenging to implement, the community’s dedication to exploring its potential and addressing its challenges is commendable. Their focus on individual choice and ethical governance has the potential to inspire broader discussions about the future of political systems and the role of decentralization in achieving social harmony.